<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dodgy funding crisis &#8211; what crisis?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-612</guid>
		<description>If Bazman won the European Lottery then gave it all to Labour. Would anything happen to me? In a free country..... This is a serious question. I think something would. 
Take it down John. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bazman won the European Lottery then gave it all to Labour. Would anything happen to me? In a free country&#8230;.. This is a serious question. I think something would.<br />
Take it down John. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Patriot</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>British Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-611</guid>
		<description>The EU Constitution has been renamed the EU ConstiTraityTution. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EU Constitution has been renamed the EU ConstiTraityTution. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennisA</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>The only good news for Gordon Brown is that no-one is currently asking him about a referendum on the EU Constitution, (oops, EU Treaty). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only good news for Gordon Brown is that no-one is currently asking him about a referendum on the EU Constitution, (oops, EU Treaty). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven_L</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven_L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-609</guid>
		<description>This is why seasoned Labour party members are so intent on painting the Tories and nasty (or worse) and denegrating them rather than taking them on in honest debate if you ask me - they have to justify all their little undemocratic scams to their activists with the usual cry of &#039;It&#039;s better than having the Tories back in power.&#039; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why seasoned Labour party members are so intent on painting the Tories and nasty (or worse) and denegrating them rather than taking them on in honest debate if you ask me &#8211; they have to justify all their little undemocratic scams to their activists with the usual cry of &#039;It&#039;s better than having the Tories back in power.&#039; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Makara</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Makara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>It seems that the Labour government has ever more scandal to be unearthed. Where will it all end? Remember we are only finding out what has been discovered, there is probably a lot more corruption that we will never hear about. This government is completely unfit for office. They have stained the good name of parliament. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the Labour government has ever more scandal to be unearthed. Where will it all end? Remember we are only finding out what has been discovered, there is probably a lot more corruption that we will never hear about. This government is completely unfit for office. They have stained the good name of parliament. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/11/29/the-dodgy-funding-scandal/#comment-607</guid>
		<description>(Sentence left out - ed)

Today didn&#039;t discuss the story this morning because there just wasn&#039;t much new to discuss. All your points are covered in the statements this week.

As for the Telegraph questions - sorry - since when do reputable broadcasting organisations have to respond to speculative pieces in newspapers with an agenda - should they have a daily Diana/Maddie story to appease ther Express?

Reply: What a pity you conceal your identity behind anon. I will post the full post if you send your name. There were plenty of new news items and questions from the day before, as the paper showed. This is a big political story which is current- Diana and Maddie are not.   Where is the Today programme&#039;s spirit of enquiry?
PS Tonight the news has broken that the police have been called in to investigate allegations about this story - doesn&#039;t that demonstrate it is an important story which any programme interested in government and politics should be following?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sentence left out &#8211; ed)</p>
<p>Today didn&#8217;t discuss the story this morning because there just wasn&#8217;t much new to discuss. All your points are covered in the statements this week.</p>
<p>As for the Telegraph questions &#8211; sorry &#8211; since when do reputable broadcasting organisations have to respond to speculative pieces in newspapers with an agenda &#8211; should they have a daily Diana/Maddie story to appease ther Express?</p>
<p>Reply: What a pity you conceal your identity behind anon. I will post the full post if you send your name. There were plenty of new news items and questions from the day before, as the paper showed. This is a big political story which is current- Diana and Maddie are not.   Where is the Today programme&#8217;s spirit of enquiry?<br />
PS Tonight the news has broken that the police have been called in to investigate allegations about this story &#8211; doesn&#8217;t that demonstrate it is an important story which any programme interested in government and politics should be following?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

