<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the budget discussion should really be about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>You returned again to Northern Rock in your post script. Vince Cable, who apparently can do no wrong at the moment, was gung-ho for nationalisation, as you rightly observe. He took up this position almost from the start of the crisis, even though at that time the quality of the NR loan book was unknown. Why are the media still treating him as a sage for now querying the security of some of those loans and letting him opine sanctimoniously on a situation he helped to create?  Itâ€™s a bit late in the day for him to have second thoughts. You seem to be the only politician to have consistently criticised his approach. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You returned again to Northern Rock in your post script. Vince Cable, who apparently can do no wrong at the moment, was gung-ho for nationalisation, as you rightly observe. He took up this position almost from the start of the crisis, even though at that time the quality of the NR loan book was unknown. Why are the media still treating him as a sage for now querying the security of some of those loans and letting him opine sanctimoniously on a situation he helped to create?  Itâ€™s a bit late in the day for him to have second thoughts. You seem to be the only politician to have consistently criticised his approach. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Thornhill</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Thornhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>David, Atlas, Matt and Jane might find a better home in the Libertarian Party! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, Atlas, Matt and Jane might find a better home in the Libertarian Party! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hannah</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s hardly surprising that the middle classes are in the crosshairs of the latest budget. After all, we&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re not yet dependent on Gordon Brown&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s client state for our income. Thus, a further tax on our simple pleasures is inevitable. 
 
We&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re all used to this authoritarian BS from our esteemed NuLabour government. However, what I find astonishing is that the Conservative party have joined the &#226;&#8364;&#339;binge-drinking&#226;&#8364; bandwagon of taxing alcohol even more. Shame on you! This behaviour is cultural; it cannot be modified through the tax system. 
 
Please do not allow the Tories to become a wholly owned subsidiary of the &#226;&#8364;&#339;something must be done&#226;&#8364; brigade. Besides, once again, our real government in Brussels calls the shots, and would prevent the imposition of discriminatory taxes on specific brands of alcoholic beverages (specifically, if those higher strength products come from abroad, as they often tend to), rendering your proposals illegal. 
 
When are we going to hear some sensible policies on tax from the Conservatives? With 1 in 10 skilled professionals leaving the country, you&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re fiddling while Rome burns. 
 
What we need is a vast reduction in public spending, not more taxes. If we were to return to 2001 spending figures, we could abolish Income Tax altogether. If we left the sclerotic EU, we could also abolish the Death Tax and Capital Gains Tax. Then let us have a bonfire of the &#226;&#8364;&#732;quangos&#226;&#8364;&#8482; (a real one, not one that exists only at a party conference). If we were to transform the Welfare State (making it a safety net rather than a hammock) we could abolish Corporation Tax too. Then, instead of witnessing the exodus of companies and individuals to Switzerland, we could see them coming the other way. 
 
If we must spend &#194;&#163;50 billion of taxpayers&#226;&#8364;&#8482; money, I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;d rather see it going towards something that will have tangible benefits. Rather than purchasing a bank with bad debts, we could instead have a Maglev link from London to the North-East, and to Scotland. By bringing the North of the country into the London commuter belt (remember the North; the bit that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s in the opposite direction from Brussels and Paris), it would do more to address the North-South divide than any amount of Government handouts. 
 
Now, where&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s that Australian immigration website? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&acirc;&euro;&trade;s hardly surprising that the middle classes are in the crosshairs of the latest budget. After all, we&acirc;&euro;&trade;re not yet dependent on Gordon Brown&acirc;&euro;&trade;s client state for our income. Thus, a further tax on our simple pleasures is inevitable. </p>
<p>We&acirc;&euro;&trade;re all used to this authoritarian BS from our esteemed NuLabour government. However, what I find astonishing is that the Conservative party have joined the &acirc;&euro;&oelig;binge-drinking&acirc;&euro; bandwagon of taxing alcohol even more. Shame on you! This behaviour is cultural; it cannot be modified through the tax system. </p>
<p>Please do not allow the Tories to become a wholly owned subsidiary of the &acirc;&euro;&oelig;something must be done&acirc;&euro; brigade. Besides, once again, our real government in Brussels calls the shots, and would prevent the imposition of discriminatory taxes on specific brands of alcoholic beverages (specifically, if those higher strength products come from abroad, as they often tend to), rendering your proposals illegal. </p>
<p>When are we going to hear some sensible policies on tax from the Conservatives? With 1 in 10 skilled professionals leaving the country, you&acirc;&euro;&trade;re fiddling while Rome burns. </p>
<p>What we need is a vast reduction in public spending, not more taxes. If we were to return to 2001 spending figures, we could abolish Income Tax altogether. If we left the sclerotic EU, we could also abolish the Death Tax and Capital Gains Tax. Then let us have a bonfire of the &acirc;&euro;&tilde;quangos&acirc;&euro;&trade; (a real one, not one that exists only at a party conference). If we were to transform the Welfare State (making it a safety net rather than a hammock) we could abolish Corporation Tax too. Then, instead of witnessing the exodus of companies and individuals to Switzerland, we could see them coming the other way. </p>
<p>If we must spend &Acirc;&pound;50 billion of taxpayers&acirc;&euro;&trade; money, I&acirc;&euro;&trade;d rather see it going towards something that will have tangible benefits. Rather than purchasing a bank with bad debts, we could instead have a Maglev link from London to the North-East, and to Scotland. By bringing the North of the country into the London commuter belt (remember the North; the bit that&acirc;&euro;&trade;s in the opposite direction from Brussels and Paris), it would do more to address the North-South divide than any amount of Government handouts. </p>
<p>Now, where&acirc;&euro;&trade;s that Australian immigration website? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [[NAME EDITED]]</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>[[NAME EDITED]]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Matthew Reynolds and Atlas Shrugged. Monday morning, and I have just read your comments, &amp; shall go on my way with a song in my heart. Surely everybody with any sense at all is going to come round to that way of thinking? Am I living in a private fantasy world? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Reynolds and Atlas Shrugged. Monday morning, and I have just read your comments, &amp; shall go on my way with a song in my heart. Surely everybody with any sense at all is going to come round to that way of thinking? Am I living in a private fantasy world? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Chancellor should do in the budget &#171; Curly&#8217;s Corner Shop, the blog!</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator>What the Chancellor should do in the budget &#171; Curly&#8217;s Corner Shop, the blog!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1950</guid>
		<description>[...] John Redwood thinks that Darling could could start by cancelling the nationalisation of Northern Rock and putting in place a proper banking package, to manage the taxpayer debt down over a sensible time period with clear controls and a repayment schedule. This would prevent the large increase in public indebtedness that will result from the inclusion of all Northernâ€™s obligations on the public balance sheet. Personally, I think it&#8217;s too late for that, and that action needs to be taken in other areas of the public balance sheet to helpÂ  close the yawning gap between government expenditure and taxation revenue. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Redwood thinks that Darling could could start by cancelling the nationalisation of Northern Rock and putting in place a proper banking package, to manage the taxpayer debt down over a sensible time period with clear controls and a repayment schedule. This would prevent the large increase in public indebtedness that will result from the inclusion of all Northernâ€™s obligations on the public balance sheet. Personally, I think it&#8217;s too late for that, and that action needs to be taken in other areas of the public balance sheet to helpÂ  close the yawning gap between government expenditure and taxation revenue. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>The Tories should target 100 quangos, tabulate their budgets &amp; promise to get rid of them &amp; put the money into cutting corporation tax. If they chose some which have the power to prevent building or increase its costs they would do the economy even more good by cutting construction costs &amp; times than by saving the money. 
 
I don&#039;t think quangos are popular. While the concept of massive unspecified cuts is, rightly, a bit scary &amp; would be seen as giving a blank cheque to an incoming government, the idea of a massive barbecue of specific sacred cows would be popular &amp; put Labour on the defencive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tories should target 100 quangos, tabulate their budgets &amp; promise to get rid of them &amp; put the money into cutting corporation tax. If they chose some which have the power to prevent building or increase its costs they would do the economy even more good by cutting construction costs &amp; times than by saving the money. </p>
<p>I don&#039;t think quangos are popular. While the concept of massive unspecified cuts is, rightly, a bit scary &amp; would be seen as giving a blank cheque to an incoming government, the idea of a massive barbecue of specific sacred cows would be popular &amp; put Labour on the defencive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s get the idea of any change of taxation for any kind of alcohol out of the way first. It is laid down by the EU:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?where=&amp;lang=en&amp;num=79929580C19060063&amp;doc=T&amp;ouvert=T&amp;seance=ARRET)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?where=&amp;lang=en&amp;num=79929580C19060063&amp;doc=T&amp;ouvert=T&amp;seance=ARRET)&lt;/a&gt; So he cannot do anything about that, and neither can anyone else. 
The big question is why it is even being discussed. As things get more and more secret, of course, rumours start to fly. Is it a plot by the (leftie) BBC? Or the Murdoch Press? Either way, the whole political system comes under suspicion, however unjustly. 
 
About the reduction of bureaucracy etc etc: these are the people who brought it in. It is often called &quot;the client state.&quot; So no hope there either, I am afraid. 
Do you remember when Argentina crashed a few years ago? Exactly the same causes...... 
Me? I expect a lot of stealth taxes to pay for the broken machine and then a final brilliant fling - like 2p on every pensioner&#039;s Easter bonus. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s get the idea of any change of taxation for any kind of alcohol out of the way first. It is laid down by the EU:  <a href="http://(http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?where=&amp;lang=en&amp;num=79929580C19060063&amp;doc=T&amp;ouvert=T&amp;seance=ARRET)" rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?where=&#038;lang=en&#038;num=79929580C19060063&#038;doc=T&#038;ouvert=T&#038;seance=ARRET" rel="nofollow">http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?where=&#038;lang=en&#038;num=79929580C19060063&#038;doc=T&#038;ouvert=T&#038;seance=ARRET</a>) So he cannot do anything about that, and neither can anyone else.<br />
The big question is why it is even being discussed. As things get more and more secret, of course, rumours start to fly. Is it a plot by the (leftie) BBC? Or the Murdoch Press? Either way, the whole political system comes under suspicion, however unjustly. </p>
<p>About the reduction of bureaucracy etc etc: these are the people who brought it in. It is often called &quot;the client state.&quot; So no hope there either, I am afraid.<br />
Do you remember when Argentina crashed a few years ago? Exactly the same causes&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Me? I expect a lot of stealth taxes to pay for the broken machine and then a final brilliant fling &#8211; like 2p on every pensioner&#039;s Easter bonus. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlas shrugged</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlas shrugged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>John 
 
When you get into office you must take on the public services industry ASAP. It is clearly out of control in all respects. The only problem is that this will cause an even greater short to medium term ressesion then we are already going to have, but what the hell. Start looking just like a mean Labour government in blue and the party and the country are finished. 
 
As churchill once indicated . If you tell the people the bad news, they will put up with almost anything. I fully understand why its best not to talk down the economy when in opositon. Because there really is no point, the BBC will only blame the Tory party for the ressesion. But as soon as you or that boy Osbourn get to see the figures, honesty is the best policy. 
 
However when the election is won all bets are off.  As we can now plainly see they were in 97. 
 
As for the BBC. My advice is to strike while the iron is hot, and close the utter diabolical shower down on your first day. Conservative voters will not miss it,  and everything will become almost instantly easier in all respects. YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE. If there is rioting in the streets, which is unlikely, you can always give the BBC a reprise, a half Billion cental government budget and put your own people in place. Play the socialists at there own game, or you will not last a full term. 
 
BTW 
 
There is little point ,pointing out how authoritarian this current government is. When you as a party say so little about which laws you intend to get shot of.  If you consider its best to say not too much now, then thats  just as well. But say so you must one day, my advice would be not untill the election campaign starts. 
 
Remember LIBERTY is popular. Its what we British used to pride ourselves on.  Please don&#039;t  bother trying to keep this countries assorted fascists happy, if they are not happy now they never will be. They are mostly all voting Labour or BNP these days anyway. This country needs a Libertarian counter revolution every bit as much as it needed one in 79. It will either get one of sorts, or deserve to sink without trace. 
 
Reply: THE ECNOMIC POLICY REVIEW LISTS MANY MEASURES WE WOULD LIKE REPEALED IN THE DEREGULATION SECTION. REMEMBER IT IS ADOPTED POLICY TO SCRAP ID CARDS AND MUCH OF THE FORM FILLING. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John </p>
<p>When you get into office you must take on the public services industry ASAP. It is clearly out of control in all respects. The only problem is that this will cause an even greater short to medium term ressesion then we are already going to have, but what the hell. Start looking just like a mean Labour government in blue and the party and the country are finished. </p>
<p>As churchill once indicated . If you tell the people the bad news, they will put up with almost anything. I fully understand why its best not to talk down the economy when in opositon. Because there really is no point, the BBC will only blame the Tory party for the ressesion. But as soon as you or that boy Osbourn get to see the figures, honesty is the best policy. </p>
<p>However when the election is won all bets are off.  As we can now plainly see they were in 97. </p>
<p>As for the BBC. My advice is to strike while the iron is hot, and close the utter diabolical shower down on your first day. Conservative voters will not miss it,  and everything will become almost instantly easier in all respects. YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE. If there is rioting in the streets, which is unlikely, you can always give the BBC a reprise, a half Billion cental government budget and put your own people in place. Play the socialists at there own game, or you will not last a full term. </p>
<p>BTW </p>
<p>There is little point ,pointing out how authoritarian this current government is. When you as a party say so little about which laws you intend to get shot of.  If you consider its best to say not too much now, then thats  just as well. But say so you must one day, my advice would be not untill the election campaign starts. </p>
<p>Remember LIBERTY is popular. Its what we British used to pride ourselves on.  Please don&#039;t  bother trying to keep this countries assorted fascists happy, if they are not happy now they never will be. They are mostly all voting Labour or BNP these days anyway. This country needs a Libertarian counter revolution every bit as much as it needed one in 79. It will either get one of sorts, or deserve to sink without trace. </p>
<p>Reply: THE ECNOMIC POLICY REVIEW LISTS MANY MEASURES WE WOULD LIKE REPEALED IN THE DEREGULATION SECTION. REMEMBER IT IS ADOPTED POLICY TO SCRAP ID CARDS AND MUCH OF THE FORM FILLING. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gen public</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>gen public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>See the Govt and Ken in London seem particularly keen on hammering drivers of automatic cars, normal family cars with an auto transmission are apparently so dangerous they need a 400 GDP tax and more to come in the budget - don&#039;t get a dodgy left knee in Gordon&#039;s Britain, tens of thousands of people who don&#039;t qualify as a disabled driver yet need an auto to prevent medical problems getting worse, is it really good economics to hammer such drivers? 
 
Meanwhile the Toyota prius et all do rather well, shame the pollution during the production and disposal of the battery is not taken into account in these &quot;tax to manipulate the market&quot; measures 
 
Decent drivers get hammered for minor offences, meanwhile we have &quot;travellers&quot; with gaffer tape over their number plates who the police are literally too scared to stop, and if they do they will routinely get let off cos they cannot be traced 
 
And so many middle classes now driving on foreign licences from their pad in Spain/Belgium etc as its just too hard to drive on a UK licence in this country, and foreign licences are let off with just about everything 
 
So fair isn&#039;t it 
 
Normal hardworking folk cannot afford anything more than a one bed flat, yet folk who have never worked are given large desirable homes because they have had multiple kids paid for by the state aka the hardworking folk 
 
We have rubbish hospitals when even when there is a dead rat in the operating theatre the customer cannot take his business quickly and simply to another provider, and the idiots running the rubbish providers are allowed to get ever more public money 
 
I cannot have kids, I wouldn&#039;t be able to get them into a decent school like the one I had, and they wouldn&#039;t be able to see a decent GP like the ones of my childhood, fear to have kids the worst fear of all 
 
Forcing the builder to build too many flats and too few houses? And houses without car parking spaces cos &quot;cars are bad for the environment&quot; such a simplistic view 
 
And folk living in flats above or near bars now open 24/7 unable to sell the flats and move 
 
NHS which does not cope with a mobile workforce which moves address often, wait wait move and go to the beginning of another wait to see a nurse not a consultant to wait again to be sent back to the GP cos &quot;the referral was for the wrong finger&quot; or whatever, complete nonsense 
 
How did Gordon get away with selling our gold while the price was low? 
 
Why are we giving so much away to public sector workers in unsustainable pension rights? Why should anyone work their heart and soul off in the real economy to pay for these burdens? 
 
(Sentence left out) 
Politics is letting the people down in this country big time </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the Govt and Ken in London seem particularly keen on hammering drivers of automatic cars, normal family cars with an auto transmission are apparently so dangerous they need a 400 GDP tax and more to come in the budget &#8211; don&#039;t get a dodgy left knee in Gordon&#039;s Britain, tens of thousands of people who don&#039;t qualify as a disabled driver yet need an auto to prevent medical problems getting worse, is it really good economics to hammer such drivers? </p>
<p>Meanwhile the Toyota prius et all do rather well, shame the pollution during the production and disposal of the battery is not taken into account in these &quot;tax to manipulate the market&quot; measures </p>
<p>Decent drivers get hammered for minor offences, meanwhile we have &quot;travellers&quot; with gaffer tape over their number plates who the police are literally too scared to stop, and if they do they will routinely get let off cos they cannot be traced </p>
<p>And so many middle classes now driving on foreign licences from their pad in Spain/Belgium etc as its just too hard to drive on a UK licence in this country, and foreign licences are let off with just about everything </p>
<p>So fair isn&#039;t it </p>
<p>Normal hardworking folk cannot afford anything more than a one bed flat, yet folk who have never worked are given large desirable homes because they have had multiple kids paid for by the state aka the hardworking folk </p>
<p>We have rubbish hospitals when even when there is a dead rat in the operating theatre the customer cannot take his business quickly and simply to another provider, and the idiots running the rubbish providers are allowed to get ever more public money </p>
<p>I cannot have kids, I wouldn&#039;t be able to get them into a decent school like the one I had, and they wouldn&#039;t be able to see a decent GP like the ones of my childhood, fear to have kids the worst fear of all </p>
<p>Forcing the builder to build too many flats and too few houses? And houses without car parking spaces cos &quot;cars are bad for the environment&quot; such a simplistic view </p>
<p>And folk living in flats above or near bars now open 24/7 unable to sell the flats and move </p>
<p>NHS which does not cope with a mobile workforce which moves address often, wait wait move and go to the beginning of another wait to see a nurse not a consultant to wait again to be sent back to the GP cos &quot;the referral was for the wrong finger&quot; or whatever, complete nonsense </p>
<p>How did Gordon get away with selling our gold while the price was low? </p>
<p>Why are we giving so much away to public sector workers in unsustainable pension rights? Why should anyone work their heart and soul off in the real economy to pay for these burdens? </p>
<p>(Sentence left out)<br />
Politics is letting the people down in this country big time </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/03/09/what-the-budget-discussion-should-really-be-about/#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Why tax people, then give the money back? Simple reform of the tax code is the answer. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why tax people, then give the money back? Simple reform of the tax code is the answer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

