<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How  Gordon&#8217;s laundry list just shows the dirty washing.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>Even my brother ( a lifelong military man and Conservative to his fingertips) is now complaining that the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail are &quot;Fascist&quot;. He is seriously thinking of going over to the Independent. He is getting fed up with all the negativity. 
Even my long suffering wife is noticing that petrol prices and food prices are skyrocketing. 
And, on TV, Mr Brown, without his black suit jacket when visiting that hospital, looked fat and old. 
Mr Blair looks more and more like Harold Wilson in his later years. 
It is the end of an era. 
 
BUT the huge question which the left are (rightly) asking is this: 
Can the Conservatives under David Cameron, do any better? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even my brother ( a lifelong military man and Conservative to his fingertips) is now complaining that the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail are &quot;Fascist&quot;. He is seriously thinking of going over to the Independent. He is getting fed up with all the negativity.<br />
Even my long suffering wife is noticing that petrol prices and food prices are skyrocketing.<br />
And, on TV, Mr Brown, without his black suit jacket when visiting that hospital, looked fat and old.<br />
Mr Blair looks more and more like Harold Wilson in his later years.<br />
It is the end of an era. </p>
<p>BUT the huge question which the left are (rightly) asking is this:<br />
Can the Conservatives under David Cameron, do any better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Bickle</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Bickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>Listening to Ivan Lewis on Sky just now it is very clear that they are trying to build the myth that UK was in dire economic straits in 1997, and that at some stage Brown has previously guided us through recession.   (and for the first time he brought Brown&#039;s children into it, I do hope they are not so desperate as to start playing that particular card). 
 
It&#039;s about time that Conservative spokesman rebutted this nonsense every time it comes out of their mouths, instead of sitting there and allowing the lie unchallenged. The strength of economy in 1997 (already having seen several quarters of healthy growth I believe) is shown perfectly by the fact it took so long for Labour to screw it up.  QED. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listening to Ivan Lewis on Sky just now it is very clear that they are trying to build the myth that UK was in dire economic straits in 1997, and that at some stage Brown has previously guided us through recession.   (and for the first time he brought Brown&#039;s children into it, I do hope they are not so desperate as to start playing that particular card). </p>
<p>It&#039;s about time that Conservative spokesman rebutted this nonsense every time it comes out of their mouths, instead of sitting there and allowing the lie unchallenged. The strength of economy in 1997 (already having seen several quarters of healthy growth I believe) is shown perfectly by the fact it took so long for Labour to screw it up.  QED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Baynes</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Baynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>&quot;I expect that most voters would apply Ed Balls favourite two word riposte to the majority of these points.&quot; 
 
I&#039;m finding it hard to decide which version of the Balls riposte is more devastating. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I expect that most voters would apply Ed Balls favourite two word riposte to the majority of these points.&quot; </p>
<p>I&#039;m finding it hard to decide which version of the Balls riposte is more devastating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Bickle</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Bickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>They started struggling with that list very early on, probably cobbled together over a very liquid lunch. 
 
I expect that most voters would apply Ed Balls favourite two word riposte to the majority of these points. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They started struggling with that list very early on, probably cobbled together over a very liquid lunch. </p>
<p>I expect that most voters would apply Ed Balls favourite two word riposte to the majority of these points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3491</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3491</guid>
		<description>Brown has borrowed record amounts to fund some of these &quot;achievements&quot;, but now he appears to be living on borrowed time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brown has borrowed record amounts to fund some of these &quot;achievements&quot;, but now he appears to be living on borrowed time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>The VAT windfall caused by the higher fuel price can fund a 12p a litre fuel duty cut while the potty VED hikes that will not cut CO2 emmissions need to go . As many as possible of the 1,168 QUANGO&#039;s should be culled via  a simple Act of Parliament that would impose on them all a sunsetting clause meaning that without a vote that had the majority of Peers in the House of Lords any public body would expire after three years . This would force a major reduction in public sector bureacracy as powers either went to ministers or local councils and wasteful duplication was ended .

As part of this sunsetting Act of Parliament the government would be legally obliged to use any money saved due to a QUANGO expiring to either cut taxes or pay down some public debt . No minister would dare go to the Lords asking for a public body to be preserved if it meant no tax cuts or a dangerously high PSBR . Likewise Ministers in the Lords would not have the time to persaude the majority of all Peers to vote seperately to bring back each &amp; every QUANGO in the space of three years .

This would mean greater accountability as QUANGO&#039;s would have to have very very good reasons for enduring and Parliament would be a great tool for rooting out government waste and thus paving the way for lower taxes &amp; a balanced budget . Taxpayers deserve protection from the kind of big government / high tax irresponsibility that has been going on since John Major as Chief Secretary started a massive public spending binge from about 1987 onwards . There have been some patches of public spending cuts &amp; lower taxes in the last twenty years - my plan might well mean a lot more in the next few years .

Just as Bank of England independence is really a good idea as politicians are like children in a sweet shop when it comes to monetary policy ( i.e. cannot be trusted to do the right thing - they just give into base instincts by gobbling the candy via a loose monetary policy when they should be fighting inflation ) we need a sound fiscal policy that is legally entrenched to stop cronyism costing hard pressed taxpayers too much money . New QUANGO&#039;s should get a sunsetting clause so that they expire after two years with the money saved going on national debt reduction or lower taxes . Just think we could have an Eire style economic boom with ideas like this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The VAT windfall caused by the higher fuel price can fund a 12p a litre fuel duty cut while the potty VED hikes that will not cut CO2 emmissions need to go . As many as possible of the 1,168 QUANGO&#8217;s should be culled via  a simple Act of Parliament that would impose on them all a sunsetting clause meaning that without a vote that had the majority of Peers in the House of Lords any public body would expire after three years . This would force a major reduction in public sector bureacracy as powers either went to ministers or local councils and wasteful duplication was ended .</p>
<p>As part of this sunsetting Act of Parliament the government would be legally obliged to use any money saved due to a QUANGO expiring to either cut taxes or pay down some public debt . No minister would dare go to the Lords asking for a public body to be preserved if it meant no tax cuts or a dangerously high PSBR . Likewise Ministers in the Lords would not have the time to persaude the majority of all Peers to vote seperately to bring back each &amp; every QUANGO in the space of three years .</p>
<p>This would mean greater accountability as QUANGO&#8217;s would have to have very very good reasons for enduring and Parliament would be a great tool for rooting out government waste and thus paving the way for lower taxes &amp; a balanced budget . Taxpayers deserve protection from the kind of big government / high tax irresponsibility that has been going on since John Major as Chief Secretary started a massive public spending binge from about 1987 onwards . There have been some patches of public spending cuts &amp; lower taxes in the last twenty years &#8211; my plan might well mean a lot more in the next few years .</p>
<p>Just as Bank of England independence is really a good idea as politicians are like children in a sweet shop when it comes to monetary policy ( i.e. cannot be trusted to do the right thing &#8211; they just give into base instincts by gobbling the candy via a loose monetary policy when they should be fighting inflation ) we need a sound fiscal policy that is legally entrenched to stop cronyism costing hard pressed taxpayers too much money . New QUANGO&#8217;s should get a sunsetting clause so that they expire after two years with the money saved going on national debt reduction or lower taxes . Just think we could have an Eire style economic boom with ideas like this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Makara</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3490</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Makara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3490</guid>
		<description>Gordon Brown&#039;s &#039;Radio Tirana&#039; style list of so-called achievements every week at PMQs is becoming something of a music hall joke, especially his comments about full employment and low inflation. I wonder why the speaker doesn&#039;t intervene to stop this nonsense. Most comical of all is Brown&#039;s continual reference to unemployment figures of 25 years ago. Yes, those figures were high but what relevance are they to PMQs and the politicial business in 2008? If the opposition parties are smart they will mock Brown on this weekly bout of statistical alchemy which is a non too subtle blend of Ceausescu and Comical Ali. As we all know statistics are never what they seem, take for example the New Deal which I heard a Labour MP proudly claim had a staggering 30% success rate in his area, or more realistically put has a 70% failure rate! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon Brown&#039;s &#039;Radio Tirana&#039; style list of so-called achievements every week at PMQs is becoming something of a music hall joke, especially his comments about full employment and low inflation. I wonder why the speaker doesn&#039;t intervene to stop this nonsense. Most comical of all is Brown&#039;s continual reference to unemployment figures of 25 years ago. Yes, those figures were high but what relevance are they to PMQs and the politicial business in 2008? If the opposition parties are smart they will mock Brown on this weekly bout of statistical alchemy which is a non too subtle blend of Ceausescu and Comical Ali. As we all know statistics are never what they seem, take for example the New Deal which I heard a Labour MP proudly claim had a staggering 30% success rate in his area, or more realistically put has a 70% failure rate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBC Reed</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/05/24/how-gordons-laundry-list-just-shows-the-dirty-washing/#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>DBC Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 08:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1095#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>The comments at #2 about people paying too much of their incomes out on mortgages re-payments or, because of unofficial Credit Controls (did n&#039;t the Conservatives abolish these at the beginning of the 70&#039;s?), find they can&#039;t access a mortgage at all ,are very much to the point. 
But there is nothing in Conservative policy which would help in either case or present an alternative.They have created a brand identity which appears to exploit a deep streak of snobbery in particularly English society which centres around the disdain owner-occupiers have been encouraged to feel for renters , though renting provided the social mobility that enabled the modern set-up.The working class institions like building societies may have encouraged this,what might be called, petit bourgeois sentiment, for want of another term, by helping the better class of workers to buy their own houses so they could get the vote , then restricted to property owners.( Abbey National started off with these explicitly political aims). 
It is also hard to see the Conservatives doing anything about the banks which are ignoring the wishes of the Government that the supply of cheap credit resume.There is a Who runs Britain? issue here.As Heath found with the miners, it is certainly not the P.M. I&#039;d nationalise all the High Street banks.We&#039;re close to it already by replacing their worthless private sector reserves  with rock-solid public sector funds. 
 If you want to see what makes the continuance of the status quo uncertain, and one cause of the present discontent ,take a look at the House Price Crash blog for today(Saturday).There is a geezer there whose friend has bought a house in Wokingham (1950&#039;s big plot: 39ft x100ft)  . Paid half a million for what amounts to the site value alone.And the irony is that these sites were  originally dished out free to employees of Heathrow Airport to self-build their own houses. 
Looks like a case for LVT-man! 
It is not as if the market will clear itself by the Invisible Hand or what have you.Or by blaming everything on Gordon Brown whose main fault has been in shadowing the Tory policy of not interfering in the land market and hoping things will sort themselves out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments at #2 about people paying too much of their incomes out on mortgages re-payments or, because of unofficial Credit Controls (did n&#039;t the Conservatives abolish these at the beginning of the 70&#039;s?), find they can&#039;t access a mortgage at all ,are very much to the point.<br />
But there is nothing in Conservative policy which would help in either case or present an alternative.They have created a brand identity which appears to exploit a deep streak of snobbery in particularly English society which centres around the disdain owner-occupiers have been encouraged to feel for renters , though renting provided the social mobility that enabled the modern set-up.The working class institions like building societies may have encouraged this,what might be called, petit bourgeois sentiment, for want of another term, by helping the better class of workers to buy their own houses so they could get the vote , then restricted to property owners.( Abbey National started off with these explicitly political aims).<br />
It is also hard to see the Conservatives doing anything about the banks which are ignoring the wishes of the Government that the supply of cheap credit resume.There is a Who runs Britain? issue here.As Heath found with the miners, it is certainly not the P.M. I&#039;d nationalise all the High Street banks.We&#039;re close to it already by replacing their worthless private sector reserves  with rock-solid public sector funds.<br />
 If you want to see what makes the continuance of the status quo uncertain, and one cause of the present discontent ,take a look at the House Price Crash blog for today(Saturday).There is a geezer there whose friend has bought a house in Wokingham (1950&#039;s big plot: 39ft x100ft)  . Paid half a million for what amounts to the site value alone.And the irony is that these sites were  originally dished out free to employees of Heathrow Airport to self-build their own houses.<br />
Looks like a case for LVT-man!<br />
It is not as if the market will clear itself by the Invisible Hand or what have you.Or by blaming everything on Gordon Brown whose main fault has been in shadowing the Tory policy of not interfering in the land market and hoping things will sort themselves out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

