<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clegg and Cable &#8211; the two gaffers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: This is politics calling Nick Clegg, is there anyone there? &#171; Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>This is politics calling Nick Clegg, is there anyone there? &#171; Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>[...] that you have been forced to shop at Sainsburys instead of Ocado.  On the same page, I also found John Redwood savaging you for thinking that the basic pension was £30 a week, which caused you great embarrassment in the Commons if memory serves me correctly.  Having failed [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that you have been forced to shop at Sainsburys instead of Ocado.  On the same page, I also found John Redwood savaging you for thinking that the basic pension was £30 a week, which caused you great embarrassment in the Commons if memory serves me correctly.  Having failed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Strang</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6245</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Strang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6245</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Hedgies weren&#039;t shorting the banks to any significant extent though..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Hedgies weren&#8217;t shorting the banks to any significant extent though..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autoversicherung</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6244</link>
		<dc:creator>Autoversicherung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6244</guid>
		<description>Excelent comment. My favorit Blog. Thanks and best regards from Autoversicherung</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelent comment. My favorit Blog. Thanks and best regards from Autoversicherung</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Euro</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6243</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Euro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6243</guid>
		<description>No because then the share traders have made money from buying shares and then sell them for a profit if the government supports them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No because then the share traders have made money from buying shares and then sell them for a profit if the government supports them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APL</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6242</link>
		<dc:creator>APL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6242</guid>
		<description>Having thought about it a little more, I realise, Mr Cable and I are both wrong. Hmmm, cold Crow, delicious. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having thought about it a little more, I realise, Mr Cable and I are both wrong. Hmmm, cold Crow, delicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bursting the Vince Cable bubble &#171; Lightwater</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bursting the Vince Cable bubble &#171; Lightwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6241</guid>
		<description>[...] John Redwood also questions Vince Cable&#8217;s knowledge of the financial markets. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Redwood also questions Vince Cable&#8217;s knowledge of the financial markets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Allen</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6240</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6240</guid>
		<description>They would at least provide a more honest opposition without so much spin, which is a thing to feel comfortable about if progressing politics in the way we need it to progress. 
 
I believe they have their hearts in the right place even though they&#039;re lacking on the old European front, but a believable opposition which looks for things which are good for the country and can agree with decent policies yet argue their case openly without so many soundbites ( ? ) is what&#039;s needed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would at least provide a more honest opposition without so much spin, which is a thing to feel comfortable about if progressing politics in the way we need it to progress. </p>
<p>I believe they have their hearts in the right place even though they&#039;re lacking on the old European front, but a believable opposition which looks for things which are good for the country and can agree with decent policies yet argue their case openly without so many soundbites ( ? ) is what&#039;s needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6239</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6239</guid>
		<description>Blimey - we really are moving up a class of blogg Artist here aren&#039;t we! Wow! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey &#8211; we really are moving up a class of blogg Artist here aren&#039;t we! Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>I very much want the Lib Dems to take over from the ghastly Labour as the party of opposition. Now that they have their Tony Blair (Clegg) in charge - a man of Conservative Principles (well, almost!), I think this makes it more likely and I welcome that.
Vince Cable is so telegenic and he gives a patina of leftie Wit to the dear old Green BBC. Remember the Mr Benn gag? I think he is an asset not an ass - well, perhaps, thinking about it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much want the Lib Dems to take over from the ghastly Labour as the party of opposition. Now that they have their Tony Blair (Clegg) in charge &#8211; a man of Conservative Principles (well, almost!), I think this makes it more likely and I welcome that.<br />
Vince Cable is so telegenic and he gives a patina of leftie Wit to the dear old Green BBC. Remember the Mr Benn gag? I think he is an asset not an ass &#8211; well, perhaps, thinking about it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr David Burbage</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/18/clegg-and-cable-the-two-gaffers/#comment-6237</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr David Burbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1584#comment-6237</guid>
		<description>Vince calls which way the Fed will go on Lehman Bros
Posted by davidburbage on September 17, 2008

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7616000/7616089.stm

Stourton : They’re not going to be allowed to go bust, you say, but they have gone bust!

Vince : Well indeed but [ .. ] probably along the lines of Bear Stearns, the US Treasury will step in here.

I’m not sure this has happened … and Hank Paulson, who should know whether the US Treasury should/would/could act, rather has a different view to Vince

Paulson said the situation with Lehman was ‘very, very different’ from the one facing regulators earlier this year, when the Federal Reserve helped JP Morgan Chase (nyse: JPM - news - people ) buy Bear Stearns.

and

Paulson said he ‘never once considered that it was appropriate to put taxpayer money on the line’ for Lehman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince calls which way the Fed will go on Lehman Bros<br />
Posted by davidburbage on September 17, 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7616000/7616089.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7616000/7616089.stm</a></p>
<p>Stourton : They’re not going to be allowed to go bust, you say, but they have gone bust!</p>
<p>Vince : Well indeed but [ .. ] probably along the lines of Bear Stearns, the US Treasury will step in here.</p>
<p>I’m not sure this has happened … and Hank Paulson, who should know whether the US Treasury should/would/could act, rather has a different view to Vince</p>
<p>Paulson said the situation with Lehman was ‘very, very different’ from the one facing regulators earlier this year, when the Federal Reserve helped JP Morgan Chase (nyse: JPM &#8211; news &#8211; people ) buy Bear Stearns.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Paulson said he ‘never once considered that it was appropriate to put taxpayer money on the line’ for Lehman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

