<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: May the markets provide more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7017</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7017</guid>
		<description>John Redwood, whose blog this is, made an excellent, clear, speech, which, of course, was not reported. There are lots and lots of us on this blog who know that the government needs to cut back fast and seriously. So does the Daily Telegraph Leader. Read this thread alone and see how we have clearly seen how Mr Brown has put the taxpayer in debt for the next decade (&#163;2 trillion yet? Who is actually lending him all this money?) 
None of this is ever discussed on Newsnight, on the News or on Radio 4, unless I missed it. 
The Conservatives are not much reported, but they are all we have got. I do hope the Labour propaganda machine does not manage to spin itself in for another disastrous five years. I really do. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Redwood, whose blog this is, made an excellent, clear, speech, which, of course, was not reported. There are lots and lots of us on this blog who know that the government needs to cut back fast and seriously. So does the Daily Telegraph Leader. Read this thread alone and see how we have clearly seen how Mr Brown has put the taxpayer in debt for the next decade (&pound;2 trillion yet? Who is actually lending him all this money?)<br />
None of this is ever discussed on Newsnight, on the News or on Radio 4, unless I missed it.<br />
The Conservatives are not much reported, but they are all we have got. I do hope the Labour propaganda machine does not manage to spin itself in for another disastrous five years. I really do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rowsby</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7016</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rowsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7016</guid>
		<description>Re David Lewis. What makes you think that the Conservatives 
 
will be taking over in 2010? Why should people vote for more of 
 
the same socialism that we have at the moment? I have written 
 
before,&#039;what is the oppositions policy&#039;?Surely with the massive 
 
debts that exist we need to be clear about cutting public 
 
spending.This means quangoes,civil service posts etc must be 
 
chopped.What about public service pensions? Do politicians 
 
really expect private sector tax payers to work[ if they can 
 
find it] until they are 70 or more to finance gold plated 
 
public sector perks starting at the age of 60?Its long past 
 
time for David Camerons team to speak out.That is if they 
 
have anything to say. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re David Lewis. What makes you think that the Conservatives </p>
<p>will be taking over in 2010? Why should people vote for more of </p>
<p>the same socialism that we have at the moment? I have written </p>
<p>before,&#039;what is the oppositions policy&#039;?Surely with the massive </p>
<p>debts that exist we need to be clear about cutting public </p>
<p>spending.This means quangoes,civil service posts etc must be </p>
<p>chopped.What about public service pensions? Do politicians </p>
<p>really expect private sector tax payers to work[ if they can </p>
<p>find it] until they are 70 or more to finance gold plated </p>
<p>public sector perks starting at the age of 60?Its long past </p>
<p>time for David Camerons team to speak out.That is if they </p>
<p>have anything to say. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figurewizard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7015</link>
		<dc:creator>figurewizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7015</guid>
		<description>In the cold light of morning the signs for the taxpayer are even worse today. Not only do we now know that the government paid more for RBS on our behalf than it was actually worth but in the middle of one of the biggest one day rises in the FTSE in history our shiny new investment was almost alone in losing yet more value. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cold light of morning the signs for the taxpayer are even worse today. Not only do we now know that the government paid more for RBS on our behalf than it was actually worth but in the middle of one of the biggest one day rises in the FTSE in history our shiny new investment was almost alone in losing yet more value. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H Lewis</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7014</link>
		<dc:creator>David H Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7014</guid>
		<description>When the Conservatives take over in 2010 the debt levels will be so high it is hard to imagine what can be achieved over a first term. 
 
I suggest the first step is to identify the FULL level of national debt owed and put up on a &quot;debt clock&quot; in Leicester Square. Nothing hidden - the horrible truth for all to see! 
 
Then concentrate on some social changes plus navigating the way out of recession, privatising the banks and reducing the debt levels. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Conservatives take over in 2010 the debt levels will be so high it is hard to imagine what can be achieved over a first term. </p>
<p>I suggest the first step is to identify the FULL level of national debt owed and put up on a &quot;debt clock&quot; in Leicester Square. Nothing hidden &#8211; the horrible truth for all to see! </p>
<p>Then concentrate on some social changes plus navigating the way out of recession, privatising the banks and reducing the debt levels. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Skinner</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7013</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7013</guid>
		<description>Michael Shedlock describes the banking rescue quite nicely on his blog (he is writing about the US, but it applies to the UK): 
 
&quot;The method of recapitalization is best described as robbing Taxpayer Pete to pay Wall Street Paul. In essence, money is taken from the poor (via taxes, printing, and weakening of the dollar) and given to the wealthy so the wealthy supposedly will have enough money to lend back (at interest) to those who have just been robbed.&quot; 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/10/essence-of-rescue-plan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/1...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Shedlock describes the banking rescue quite nicely on his blog (he is writing about the US, but it applies to the UK): </p>
<p>&quot;The method of recapitalization is best described as robbing Taxpayer Pete to pay Wall Street Paul. In essence, money is taken from the poor (via taxes, printing, and weakening of the dollar) and given to the wealthy so the wealthy supposedly will have enough money to lend back (at interest) to those who have just been robbed.&quot;<br />
  <a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/10/essence-of-rescue-plan.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/1" rel="nofollow">http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/1</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7012</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7012</guid>
		<description>I have just had the pleasure of your 3 u tube speeches. Passionate, correct and sensible. 
Now then. 
Where have these been reported? 
Who has heard them except here on the internet? 
Thanks to the BBC none of this has been thrashed out. Instead, we are left with a rather vague couple of announcers and anchor men and women who, obviously, know as little about all this as I do. 
President Clinton, the FSA, the Bush Administration and Gordon Brown are all people who have a lot to answer for. 
The general impression being given is that the Conservatives are saying nothing because they are just effete toffs from Eton who know nothing much except for PR. Brown, of course, is having a &quot;bounce&quot;. 
Crisis makes excellent news, I am sure. But where is the sensible discussion? 
Muzzling people who know what they are talking about makes absolutely no sense and is, as you hint, very dangerous when things are moving so very fast. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just had the pleasure of your 3 u tube speeches. Passionate, correct and sensible.<br />
Now then.<br />
Where have these been reported?<br />
Who has heard them except here on the internet?<br />
Thanks to the BBC none of this has been thrashed out. Instead, we are left with a rather vague couple of announcers and anchor men and women who, obviously, know as little about all this as I do.<br />
President Clinton, the FSA, the Bush Administration and Gordon Brown are all people who have a lot to answer for.<br />
The general impression being given is that the Conservatives are saying nothing because they are just effete toffs from Eton who know nothing much except for PR. Brown, of course, is having a &quot;bounce&quot;.<br />
Crisis makes excellent news, I am sure. But where is the sensible discussion?<br />
Muzzling people who know what they are talking about makes absolutely no sense and is, as you hint, very dangerous when things are moving so very fast. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Lawson</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7011</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7011</guid>
		<description>John, stop worrying about the markets! There is no man-made financial crisis.  The markets just go through natural cycles, related to sunspot activity, and there is nothing we can do about it. Brown is wasting squillons of taxpayers&#039; money in an evil Socialist conspiracy to nationalise our banks. Don&#039;t be taken in by this market meltdown nonsense, it&#039;s all made up by eco-terrorists who want to take over with a Green New Deal.  Don&#039;t listen to the international financial experts, they have got it all wrong, just like the IPCC have with global warming... I found out about it on this website and now everything is all right.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20081001-Keane-There-is-no-evidence-for-a-human-induced-credit-crisis.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20081001-Keane-...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, stop worrying about the markets! There is no man-made financial crisis.  The markets just go through natural cycles, related to sunspot activity, and there is nothing we can do about it. Brown is wasting squillons of taxpayers&#039; money in an evil Socialist conspiracy to nationalise our banks. Don&#039;t be taken in by this market meltdown nonsense, it&#039;s all made up by eco-terrorists who want to take over with a Green New Deal.  Don&#039;t listen to the international financial experts, they have got it all wrong, just like the IPCC have with global warming&#8230; I found out about it on this website and now everything is all right.  <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20081001-Keane-There-is-no-evidence-for-a-human-induced-credit-crisis.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20081001-Keane-" rel="nofollow">http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20081001-Keane-</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Skinner</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7010</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7010</guid>
		<description>Well said Stuart. 
 
Why indeed should a working family have to take on an extra &#163;50,000 of debt (its share of the &#163;500bn bank support scheme)? It is tax enslavement. 
 
Why should the whole country&#039;s economy be put at risk for the sake of an over-extended banking system? 
 
Who are the politicians to decide they know better than the market where this &#163;500bn of capital is best invested? And of all the places to put it, a set of failed banks. It promises to prolong the downturn no end. 
 
Why do our politicians have so little faith in the markets that they must all become socialists? 
 
What chance is there this scheme will work even on its own terms? And is there a point - before our total ruin - at which the politicians would admit to themselves they should stop playing Canute? 
 
Let us move get through the difficult times ahead as swiftly as possible, and harness the full power of the market to make the best of what we have. Do not, for goodness sake, work against it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Stuart. </p>
<p>Why indeed should a working family have to take on an extra &pound;50,000 of debt (its share of the &pound;500bn bank support scheme)? It is tax enslavement. </p>
<p>Why should the whole country&#039;s economy be put at risk for the sake of an over-extended banking system? </p>
<p>Who are the politicians to decide they know better than the market where this &pound;500bn of capital is best invested? And of all the places to put it, a set of failed banks. It promises to prolong the downturn no end. </p>
<p>Why do our politicians have so little faith in the markets that they must all become socialists? </p>
<p>What chance is there this scheme will work even on its own terms? And is there a point &#8211; before our total ruin &#8211; at which the politicians would admit to themselves they should stop playing Canute? </p>
<p>Let us move get through the difficult times ahead as swiftly as possible, and harness the full power of the market to make the best of what we have. Do not, for goodness sake, work against it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevenL</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7009</guid>
		<description>Look on the bright side, casinos are a lot of fun!  On the other hand the government have banned small shareholders from hedging their rights-issue shares this time.  What&#039;s the bet that the short-selling ban remains in place whilst the taxpayer owns share capital?  I can&#039;t even hedge out the risk GB is taking on my behalf! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look on the bright side, casinos are a lot of fun!  On the other hand the government have banned small shareholders from hedging their rights-issue shares this time.  What&#039;s the bet that the short-selling ban remains in place whilst the taxpayer owns share capital?  I can&#039;t even hedge out the risk GB is taking on my behalf! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/10/13/may-the-markets-provide-more/#comment-7008</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1783#comment-7008</guid>
		<description>A very naive thought.  Why should shareholders stump up?  Anybody investing in bank shares has already lost their shirt, received no sympathy from politicians, while the rest of the market increasingly resembles a casino. 
 
Throwing more money at the banking problem without some reassurance that the people running the system will start behaving more like solid custodians of other people&#039;s money is wildly optimistic.  The taxpayer is in this situation because all in Westminster took their eye off the ball. 
 
Reply: Shareholders might put more up to rescue their institutions or to strengthen them, so they enjoy the recovery when it comes </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very naive thought.  Why should shareholders stump up?  Anybody investing in bank shares has already lost their shirt, received no sympathy from politicians, while the rest of the market increasingly resembles a casino. </p>
<p>Throwing more money at the banking problem without some reassurance that the people running the system will start behaving more like solid custodians of other people&#039;s money is wildly optimistic.  The taxpayer is in this situation because all in Westminster took their eye off the ball. </p>
<p>Reply: Shareholders might put more up to rescue their institutions or to strengthen them, so they enjoy the recovery when it comes </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

