Comments on: Can they keep the lights on?

By: Andrew Forbes

Andrew Forbes — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:21:04 +0000

Nobody who lives under Heathrow airport should be expected to live with more noise (and the claim that there will be no noise is an easily explained lie. by the way). We don't need the 3rd runway because we're about to run out of oil. Let's try building something useful instead.

By: mikestallard

mikestallard — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:53:12 +0000

Today I drove through the Fens and saw the wind turbines. They were working fitfully in the gusty winds. In no way were they reliably churning out electricity.
Also, there was an interesting programme on this very subject on Radio 4. At last the BBC has woken up to the danger.
I remember the lights going out under Ted Heath. It was not pleasant. And there were no computers or colour TVs then for ordinary people.
We have just bought a Calor gas fire with our winter fuel allowance. Even the gas central heating won't work, you see, if there is a power cut.
Meanwhile, Mr Miliband chugs on with his fears about climate change and the EU breathing down his neck.
Atomkraft? Nie danke!

By: Andrew Forbes

Andrew Forbes — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:42:18 +0000

In truth, it's been a rare Labour cabinet minister who was ever interesting in mastering his brief beyond his department's press & spin office. Energy & transport have merely been a series of empty green initiatives. The actual provision of energy and transport needs are beyond the intellectual interests and aptitudes of modern professional politicians.

By: Mark Wadsworth

Mark Wadsworth — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:53:34 +0000

Now is a good time to bring forward privately financed infrastructure projects

Exactly, I couldn't agree more. So why are Tory MPs lining up to argue against Heathrow Third Runway? Does perhaps NIMBYism trump economics and commonsense?

By: not an economist

not an economist — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:28:36 +0000

If this happens and "the lights go off", I do hope the Tory front bench is ready to fight off the inevitable accusation that this is all the fault of the Tories for privatising the energy companies in the first place which have subsequently failed to invest appropriately .

I know you would dismiss this in an instant but the reasons such an argument is blatantly false has to be spelt out otherwise Brown will score up another victory against the tories – as they have been doing in the banking fiasco.

By: Lola

Lola — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:15:20 +0000

Now then Mr Redwood I do not know why you are surprised by this further evidence of this Governments basic incompetence. It's not as if they ever had any pretence at actually running anything properly. All their policies are designed to give the appearance of action and the maximum political capital. It matters not to them whether anything they do actually works as longs as it gives them a good soundbite. When that policy fails they just have another soundbite policy ready, which usually involves spending a shed load more of our money. This is tragic because I am sure than on the New Labour benches there are MP's that really do care about this sort of stuff, but they are usually 'difficult' characters that the Whips cannot 'manage'.

By: Brian Tomkinson

Brian Tomkinson — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:00:03 +0000

Worrying, and even more so after listening to Energy Minister Mike O'Brien, on "Today", who gave me no confidence at all that he even has a grasp of the subject for which he now has ministerial responsibility.