<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s big tent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/01/28/obamas-big-tent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/01/28/obamas-big-tent/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Idle Pen Pusher</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/01/28/obamas-big-tent/#comment-10595</link>
		<dc:creator>Idle Pen Pusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=2759#comment-10595</guid>
		<description>Take a look at this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/special/stimulus09/cato_stimulus.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;full page ad&lt;/a&gt; taken out by the Cato Institute, if you&#039;ve not already seen it.

Plenty of economists are not in favour of &lt;a href=&quot;http://idlepenpusher.blogspot.com/2009/01/brands-politics-and-mcbama.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; spending splurge, despite what he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this <a href="http://www.cato.org/special/stimulus09/cato_stimulus.pdf" rel="nofollow">full page ad</a> taken out by the Cato Institute, if you&#8217;ve not already seen it.</p>
<p>Plenty of economists are not in favour of <a href="http://idlepenpusher.blogspot.com/2009/01/brands-politics-and-mcbama.html" rel="nofollow">Obama&#8217;s</a> spending splurge, despite what he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTom</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/01/28/obamas-big-tent/#comment-10594</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=2759#comment-10594</guid>
		<description>The US could have a tax cut in the guise of making FICA contributions tax-deductible. The fact that social security charges come off net pay and the US system does not deduct spread over 12 months could improve cashflow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US could have a tax cut in the guise of making FICA contributions tax-deductible. The fact that social security charges come off net pay and the US system does not deduct spread over 12 months could improve cashflow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will S</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/01/28/obamas-big-tent/#comment-10593</link>
		<dc:creator>Will S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=2759#comment-10593</guid>
		<description>My God you get up early to write these! Much appreciated that you give your time to do this. However might I suggest that you put words through a spell check so you don&#039;t end up writing about &quot;Copnservatiove&quot; governments. ;)

On the subject of your point I agree entirely. As you said in your response to the Queen&#039;s speech, it is of great advantage to ministers if they can be criticised by supporters and opponents on their proposed suggestions. And it is an intelligent government that not only allows it to happen, but seeks it to happen. May that kind of government come into being someday soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My God you get up early to write these! Much appreciated that you give your time to do this. However might I suggest that you put words through a spell check so you don&#8217;t end up writing about &#8220;Copnservatiove&#8221; governments. <img src='http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the subject of your point I agree entirely. As you said in your response to the Queen&#8217;s speech, it is of great advantage to ministers if they can be criticised by supporters and opponents on their proposed suggestions. And it is an intelligent government that not only allows it to happen, but seeks it to happen. May that kind of government come into being someday soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

