But what is the Conservative party going to DO, assuming it is elected when Brown finally condescends to allow the British public a say in who is PM.

Will you scrap ID cards?

Will you make it illegal for Local Authorities to carry out covert surveillance on people?

Will you prevent convicted criminals from the far flung corners of the EU entering the UK to take the opportunity to commit crimes here? – perhaps using the same process as used against a certain Dutchman recently?

Will you reduce the number of CCTV cameras in use?

Will you repeal the law which allows a policeman to arrest you for taking a photograph?

Will you make it illegal for police to retain DNA and fingerprints of people who are not convicted of any offence without their expressed agreement?

Will you make it illegal for local authorities to use anti-terrorism legislation against their constituents for ANY purpose other than anti-terrorism ?

I feel from experience and instinct that the Conservative ethos is against all these abuses (and the many others) but I do not see this clear and unequivical opposition coming from the front bench.

Please, if you do oppose these things, make it crystal clear. I want to see David Cameron shredding the government front bench using these clear infringements of our liberty as the weapon.

If it is your policy to allow all these abuses to continue when (if) you are elected then please be clear and open about it.

Reply: I agree with your wishes. The Opposition has said iot will abolish ID cards and strengthen our borders. I also want it to cut surveillance by all levels of government.

Agreed. We do need to leave the EU as soon as possible as the longer we stay in the more these problems will develop. Only problem is, none of the three major parties are commited to even discussing this issue.

http://www.eutruth.org.uk

Another fine mess the EU has got us all in, I could go on about other Policies of the EU but there seems little point unless there is an open discussion about our continued Membership and its benefits or otherwise.

The problem today is the rush to create new laws and orders to address a problem when there is adequate law already in place. No one bothers to enforce them.

Then there is always the Ways and Means Act, used by the inventive Police mind to fit criminal circumstances for which there may be no actual law!

I’m not entirely sure how a middle-aged Welsh aetheist could be a terror threat…… so I’d best check.

(If this is correct), it’s worrying because it’s not what you do, it’s the intent you are deemed to have by the people enforcing the law ~ who could vote for such a law?