<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oliver Cromwell describes a very different world!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: David E Thorold</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15018</link>
		<dc:creator>David E Thorold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15018</guid>
		<description>Dear Sirs,

We, the voting populace have been duped. I am sure this is not new, but it is politicians being elected on the basis of false promises, and making a mockery of a fair and reasonable expectation of basic honesty and integrity. They should all stand down. They do not represent us, the electorate, they represent themselves. They should ALL fall upon their swords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sirs,</p>
<p>We, the voting populace have been duped. I am sure this is not new, but it is politicians being elected on the basis of false promises, and making a mockery of a fair and reasonable expectation of basic honesty and integrity. They should all stand down. They do not represent us, the electorate, they represent themselves. They should ALL fall upon their swords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15017</link>
		<dc:creator>B Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15017</guid>
		<description>Really, I wouldn&#039;t have known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, I wouldn&#8217;t have known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalvis Jansons</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15016</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalvis Jansons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15016</guid>
		<description>I have had quite a few reports of strange, and unexplained, &quot;features&quot; of the Number 10 petition system, particularly regarding my &quot;resign&quot; petition.  I have now emailed the Number 10 petition team 3 times over 7 days, with my fears.  So far they have not replied to any of them.

Also, the very sudden slowing from 10,000/day to 1000/day at a time of increased coverage, and after appearing on &quot;Have I got news for you&quot;, is very strange.

One person had to sign up 15 times to get 1 confirmation email, and did finally appear on the list, but many would give up much sooner.

Also, note SPAM names are removed from my list (as they should be) quite quickly, but are not being removed from the lists for Mr Brown.  I guess this is to make those lists look longer than they really are.  However, the SPAM comments on those surely make things even worse for Mr Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had quite a few reports of strange, and unexplained, &#8220;features&#8221; of the Number 10 petition system, particularly regarding my &#8220;resign&#8221; petition.  I have now emailed the Number 10 petition team 3 times over 7 days, with my fears.  So far they have not replied to any of them.</p>
<p>Also, the very sudden slowing from 10,000/day to 1000/day at a time of increased coverage, and after appearing on &#8220;Have I got news for you&#8221;, is very strange.</p>
<p>One person had to sign up 15 times to get 1 confirmation email, and did finally appear on the list, but many would give up much sooner.</p>
<p>Also, note SPAM names are removed from my list (as they should be) quite quickly, but are not being removed from the lists for Mr Brown.  I guess this is to make those lists look longer than they really are.  However, the SPAM comments on those surely make things even worse for Mr Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian kelly</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15015</link>
		<dc:creator>brian kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15015</guid>
		<description>As an aside, I think it was he who said something akin to &#039;if you sacrifice your liberty for security then you will ultimately lose both&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, I think it was he who said something akin to &#8216;if you sacrifice your liberty for security then you will ultimately lose both&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15014</guid>
		<description>Ah Cromwell, those were the days!

Or were they? People tend to forget that although the Lord Protector ruled wisely, and generously, he was also just another dictator.

We have no need of Oliver&#039;s option, because we have still the ultimate in weaponry, the Ballot Box.

Mind you, the range of legal artillery available to ZaNULabour these days is a great deal heavier that the cannon of the Roundhead&#039;s days.

Will the Tories be repealing, amongst other anti-democratic legislation, the Civil Contingencies Act, which gives a modern Prime Minister, Labour or &lt;b&gt;Tory&lt;/b&gt;, draconian powers far greater than those available to old &#039;Nollie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Cromwell, those were the days!</p>
<p>Or were they? People tend to forget that although the Lord Protector ruled wisely, and generously, he was also just another dictator.</p>
<p>We have no need of Oliver&#8217;s option, because we have still the ultimate in weaponry, the Ballot Box.</p>
<p>Mind you, the range of legal artillery available to ZaNULabour these days is a great deal heavier that the cannon of the Roundhead&#8217;s days.</p>
<p>Will the Tories be repealing, amongst other anti-democratic legislation, the Civil Contingencies Act, which gives a modern Prime Minister, Labour or <b>Tory</b>, draconian powers far greater than those available to old &#8216;Nollie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15013</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15013</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t have put it better myself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t have put it better myself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Cooper</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15012</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15012</guid>
		<description>According to Antonia Fraser, Cromwell finally resorted to force out of sheer exasperation, and as a hasty, almost impulsive, reaction - not even bothering to change into more formal dress before ordering up a party of troops and rushing off to Parliament.

Because, apparently, the members of the Rump were refusing to consider a dissolution and a fresh election, and instead that morning they were debating whether to prolong their existence indefinitely, and, allegedly, they were even discussing whether to choose new members themselves.

It wasn&#039;t what he wanted to have to do; in fact four years earlier, in the aftermath of Pride&#039;s Purge, he argued against setting a term for Parliament, saying that it would be &quot;honourable and convenient&quot; for the Commons to decide it for themselves.

And only the day before, leading members of the Rump had left him with the impression that they would agree to a dissolution.

Luckily, we won&#039;t have to send troops to the Commons to bring about a dissolution of the present Parliament; but, unluckily, there&#039;s no way that we can force Brown to exercise the Royal Prerogative and call a fresh election before June 3rd 2010.

We could do, if there was a legal mechanism empowering constituents to recall their MP, in which case a succession of by-elections could quickly destroy his majority in the Commons.

But none of the main parties would ever contemplate introducing a system which would leave &quot;their&quot; MPs vulnerable to dismissal by constituents at any time the latter chose, within certain limits.

That would be returning power to the people; and power which the people can exercise is necessarily power taken back from the anti-democratic oligarchs who control the main political parties; and they will never, ever, allow that, unless they seriously fear an imminent violent revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Antonia Fraser, Cromwell finally resorted to force out of sheer exasperation, and as a hasty, almost impulsive, reaction &#8211; not even bothering to change into more formal dress before ordering up a party of troops and rushing off to Parliament.</p>
<p>Because, apparently, the members of the Rump were refusing to consider a dissolution and a fresh election, and instead that morning they were debating whether to prolong their existence indefinitely, and, allegedly, they were even discussing whether to choose new members themselves.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t what he wanted to have to do; in fact four years earlier, in the aftermath of Pride&#8217;s Purge, he argued against setting a term for Parliament, saying that it would be &#8220;honourable and convenient&#8221; for the Commons to decide it for themselves.</p>
<p>And only the day before, leading members of the Rump had left him with the impression that they would agree to a dissolution.</p>
<p>Luckily, we won&#8217;t have to send troops to the Commons to bring about a dissolution of the present Parliament; but, unluckily, there&#8217;s no way that we can force Brown to exercise the Royal Prerogative and call a fresh election before June 3rd 2010.</p>
<p>We could do, if there was a legal mechanism empowering constituents to recall their MP, in which case a succession of by-elections could quickly destroy his majority in the Commons.</p>
<p>But none of the main parties would ever contemplate introducing a system which would leave &#8220;their&#8221; MPs vulnerable to dismissal by constituents at any time the latter chose, within certain limits.</p>
<p>That would be returning power to the people; and power which the people can exercise is necessarily power taken back from the anti-democratic oligarchs who control the main political parties; and they will never, ever, allow that, unless they seriously fear an imminent violent revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Jones</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15011</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15011</guid>
		<description>You mean we need a (person-ed) to sell everything we own at a knock down price to the Americans so we can save the Europeans from themselves?

The last thing we need is another Winston Churchill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean we need a (person-ed) to sell everything we own at a knock down price to the Americans so we can save the Europeans from themselves?</p>
<p>The last thing we need is another Winston Churchill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figurewizard</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15010</link>
		<dc:creator>figurewizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15010</guid>
		<description>Sadly the petition is redundant given the wording. Within his own party Gordon Brown is already toast and June appears to be the date that they will be showing him the door.

It is not just him who should be going, it&#039;s the whole bunch of this &#039;factious crew, and enemies to all good government&#039;. If not we are going to be saddled with a second unelected Labour Prime Minister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly the petition is redundant given the wording. Within his own party Gordon Brown is already toast and June appears to be the date that they will be showing him the door.</p>
<p>It is not just him who should be going, it&#8217;s the whole bunch of this &#8216;factious crew, and enemies to all good government&#8217;. If not we are going to be saddled with a second unelected Labour Prime Minister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan jutson</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/25/oliver-cromwell-describes-a-very-different-world/#comment-15009</link>
		<dc:creator>alan jutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3507#comment-15009</guid>
		<description>Will
Now over 8,000 as the total, and rising fast.
Perhaps we can keep an eye on the total.
Then your concerns may be unfounded.
It really would be silly to mess with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will<br />
Now over 8,000 as the total, and rising fast.<br />
Perhaps we can keep an eye on the total.<br />
Then your concerns may be unfounded.<br />
It really would be silly to mess with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

