<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting public spending the right way will be popular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: STAN FRANCIS</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18799</link>
		<dc:creator>STAN FRANCIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18799</guid>
		<description>Well now John Redwood agrees with Stan Francis-But you didn&#039;t say that Tories would go for contracts did you?..we know that all policies cannot always be carried through, but to be &#039;seen&#039; to attempt would be a &#039;bench-mark&#039; would it not?-my only purpose to get elected is to serve the people..I will therefore give &#039;firm&#039; promises that I &#039;will&#039; serve the electorate with whatever issues they need addressing, afterall that&#039;s why we are elected is it not?-or would people say I am naive?...naive or not I doubled my votes this time around and also saw Lab/Green/BNP hit the dust!-coming up four places and NOW just under the grand master of illusions is some triumph?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now John Redwood agrees with Stan Francis-But you didn&#8217;t say that Tories would go for contracts did you?..we know that all policies cannot always be carried through, but to be &#8216;seen&#8217; to attempt would be a &#8216;bench-mark&#8217; would it not?-my only purpose to get elected is to serve the people..I will therefore give &#8216;firm&#8217; promises that I &#8216;will&#8217; serve the electorate with whatever issues they need addressing, afterall that&#8217;s why we are elected is it not?-or would people say I am naive?&#8230;naive or not I doubled my votes this time around and also saw Lab/Green/BNP hit the dust!-coming up four places and NOW just under the grand master of illusions is some triumph?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOVE...LABOUR'S LOST!</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18798</link>
		<dc:creator>LOVE...LABOUR'S LOST!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18798</guid>
		<description>We agree Stan - it&#039;ll be the Independents if not the Lib-Dems who hammer the final nails in Gordon Brown&#039;s coffin next Spring just after the Tories have put a stake thru his black heart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree Stan &#8211; it&#8217;ll be the Independents if not the Lib-Dems who hammer the final nails in Gordon Brown&#8217;s coffin next Spring just after the Tories have put a stake thru his black heart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Slocombe</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18797</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty Slocombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18797</guid>
		<description>I agree with former Tory.   Look what happened to Frank Field for &quot;thinking the unthinkable&quot;   He was told to do just that, but when he did, was pushed out.

Common sense does not apply because Orwell was right, the pigs are always in control, and so it will always be until we have a benevolent dictator to grip the issue.   Conviction politics are dead; it is now a big business career option for too many, however well intentioned most are at the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with former Tory.   Look what happened to Frank Field for &#8220;thinking the unthinkable&#8221;   He was told to do just that, but when he did, was pushed out.</p>
<p>Common sense does not apply because Orwell was right, the pigs are always in control, and so it will always be until we have a benevolent dictator to grip the issue.   Conviction politics are dead; it is now a big business career option for too many, however well intentioned most are at the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Slocombe</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18796</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty Slocombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18796</guid>
		<description>All &quot;services&quot; seem to spend time and money on all sorts of similar stupid, irrelevant courses because it is governement led.  One has to pay the piper.

The private sector suppliers of goods and &quot;services&quot; are controlled by legislation.   If the &quot;services&quot; are not &quot;as described&quot;, or &quot;fit for purpose&quot;, the providers become criminally liable, and the purchaser may go elsewhere for the &quot;service&quot;.

Why can&#039;t we have similar legislation for the public &quot;services&quot; ?   I&#039;m sure this would concentrate a few minds!   In the case of the police, Sir Robert Peel&#039;s definition of police duty would not include &quot;being aware of females&quot;    He would wonder what it all meant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All &#8220;services&#8221; seem to spend time and money on all sorts of similar stupid, irrelevant courses because it is governement led.  One has to pay the piper.</p>
<p>The private sector suppliers of goods and &#8220;services&#8221; are controlled by legislation.   If the &#8220;services&#8221; are not &#8220;as described&#8221;, or &#8220;fit for purpose&#8221;, the providers become criminally liable, and the purchaser may go elsewhere for the &#8220;service&#8221;.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t we have similar legislation for the public &#8220;services&#8221; ?   I&#8217;m sure this would concentrate a few minds!   In the case of the police, Sir Robert Peel&#8217;s definition of police duty would not include &#8220;being aware of females&#8221;    He would wonder what it all meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18795</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18795</guid>
		<description>Right, thanks - and quite agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, thanks &#8211; and quite agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STAN FRANCIS</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18794</link>
		<dc:creator>STAN FRANCIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18794</guid>
		<description>I detect a new mood in the public and the media.?..do you now John?..take a look at the last elections and instead of Independents being last or termed as others, they now come second to your party that still gets elected on (spin-ed).....I would welcome policies that are termed as contracts-a new wave of people attitude is COMING-I proved it this election!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I detect a new mood in the public and the media.?..do you now John?..take a look at the last elections and instead of Independents being last or termed as others, they now come second to your party that still gets elected on (spin-ed)&#8230;..I would welcome policies that are termed as contracts-a new wave of people attitude is COMING-I proved it this election!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18793</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18793</guid>
		<description>All very interesting. Let me sum up for all you right wingers. Employing and using. If you are using them I am right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very interesting. Let me sum up for all you right wingers. Employing and using. If you are using them I am right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think This</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18792</link>
		<dc:creator>Think This</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18792</guid>
		<description>ID = International Development. The Tories have promised not to cut it - quite wrong in my opinion. Hopefully that clears things up.

As for ID cards, its quite right they should go, although the Tories haven&#039;t mentioned anything about the database which is the real problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ID = International Development. The Tories have promised not to cut it &#8211; quite wrong in my opinion. Hopefully that clears things up.</p>
<p>As for ID cards, its quite right they should go, although the Tories haven&#8217;t mentioned anything about the database which is the real problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18791</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18791</guid>
		<description>Can I suggest we have a good look at the British constitution and simply repeal all the unnecesary stuff legislated over the past decades.
The British constitution was perfectly workable, the reason why we are in this mess is because MP&#039;s have repeatedly undermined and broken these Laws over many decades.

http://britsattheirbest.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I suggest we have a good look at the British constitution and simply repeal all the unnecesary stuff legislated over the past decades.<br />
The British constitution was perfectly workable, the reason why we are in this mess is because MP&#8217;s have repeatedly undermined and broken these Laws over many decades.</p>
<p><a href="http://britsattheirbest.com/" rel="nofollow">http://britsattheirbest.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE ESSEX BOYS</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/04/cutting-public-spending-the-right-way-will-be-popular/#comment-18790</link>
		<dc:creator>THE ESSEX BOYS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3987#comment-18790</guid>
		<description>Matthew - we agreee with your opening comment.

This seems to have been one of JR&#039;s most effective blogs.
We&#039;re all brimming with frustration and ideas and we&#039;d like to know that the Tory hierarchy has genuinely connected with them - not the kind of lip service repsponses we all get from our MPs and shadow ministers&#039; &#039;listening and learning&#039; proclamations... GENUINELY  connecting please!

How about it John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew &#8211; we agreee with your opening comment.</p>
<p>This seems to have been one of JR&#8217;s most effective blogs.<br />
We&#8217;re all brimming with frustration and ideas and we&#8217;d like to know that the Tory hierarchy has genuinely connected with them &#8211; not the kind of lip service repsponses we all get from our MPs and shadow ministers&#8217; &#8216;listening and learning&#8217; proclamations&#8230; GENUINELY  connecting please!</p>
<p>How about it John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

