<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soak the rich and sack the rich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/</link>
	<description>Incisive and topical campaigns and commentary on today&#039;s issues and tomorrow&#039;s problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: trilulilu download</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23922</link>
		<dc:creator>trilulilu download</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23922</guid>
		<description>I liked what you posted here but I must say that it can be improved, although it is good but some more effort can get this blog to the top. And the theme is good. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked what you posted here but I must say that it can be improved, although it is good but some more effort can get this blog to the top. And the theme is good. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham De Roy</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23921</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham De Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23921</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Jeff Randall, Cameron needs to plead with him to be a Tory peer in the Lords and get him in the team before it is too late. Oh, and Simon Heffer too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Jeff Randall, Cameron needs to plead with him to be a Tory peer in the Lords and get him in the team before it is too late. Oh, and Simon Heffer too. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham De Roy</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23920</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham De Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23920</guid>
		<description>Spot on with regard to taxing those who earn less than the average wage.  Think of the money you would save by sacking those incompetents at the &quot;working&quot; tax credit office. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on with regard to taxing those who earn less than the average wage.  Think of the money you would save by sacking those incompetents at the &quot;working&quot; tax credit office. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham De Roy</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23919</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham De Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23919</guid>
		<description>If those who don&#039;t read this blog possessed more intelligence, the Tories would have a 20 per cent lead in the polls. If Cameron had any economic policies that were anything other than anaemic, they would have a 30 per cent lead in the polls. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If those who don&#039;t read this blog possessed more intelligence, the Tories would have a 20 per cent lead in the polls. If Cameron had any economic policies that were anything other than anaemic, they would have a 30 per cent lead in the polls. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyB</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23918</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23918</guid>
		<description>Great - look forward to seeing a full list in the Tory manifesto ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great &#8211; look forward to seeing a full list in the Tory manifesto ! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek W. Buxton</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23917</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek W. Buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23917</guid>
		<description>The &quot;green taxes&quot; proposed does just that, taxes the poor to make the rich richer.  We also have to eat and use energy.  You would think that with all their talk of &quot;social justice (no I have never believed in any such thing), this would have been taken into account. 
If you read this MR. CAMERON, yes &quot;GREEN TAXES IMPACT MORE ON THE POOR THAN ON THE RICH&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &quot;green taxes&quot; proposed does just that, taxes the poor to make the rich richer.  We also have to eat and use energy.  You would think that with all their talk of &quot;social justice (no I have never believed in any such thing), this would have been taken into account.<br />
If you read this MR. CAMERON, yes &quot;GREEN TAXES IMPACT MORE ON THE POOR THAN ON THE RICH&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek W. Buxton</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23916</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek W. Buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23916</guid>
		<description>Yes Amanda, I would second that.  This pair are going nowhere,   fast.  As for Georgie&#039;s green jobs, they sound to me like huge costs not benefits.  It quite puts you off Eton Scholars! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Amanda, I would second that.  This pair are going nowhere,   fast.  As for Georgie&#039;s green jobs, they sound to me like huge costs not benefits.  It quite puts you off Eton Scholars! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Voice of Truth</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23915</link>
		<dc:creator>The Voice of Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23915</guid>
		<description>This next statement does not even take into account the latest theft by our unelected PM - a little balance to your totally incorrect comments.                                                                                  According to HMRC&#8217;s estimates, the richest 10% of taxpayers pay 53% of total income tax. The current average rate of tax for someone on GBP150/- is 31.6% (about GBP47/-) compare that to 14% for someone on GBP20/- (GBP2,800). So the former is paying 17x more tax than the latter whilst only earning 7.5x more. Not only that the former group are unlikely to get any government social benefits apart from child benefit (tax credits etc.) So in my mind they do 
! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This next statement does not even take into account the latest theft by our unelected PM &#8211; a little balance to your totally incorrect comments.                                                                                  According to HMRC&rsquo;s estimates, the richest 10% of taxpayers pay 53% of total income tax. The current average rate of tax for someone on GBP150/- is 31.6% (about GBP47/-) compare that to 14% for someone on GBP20/- (GBP2,800). So the former is paying 17x more tax than the latter whilst only earning 7.5x more. Not only that the former group are unlikely to get any government social benefits apart from child benefit (tax credits etc.) So in my mind they do<br />
! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23914</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23914</guid>
		<description>If only we could persuade a few quangocrats to migrate to Switzerland. Unfortunately government policy only incentivises the useful to leave. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only we could persuade a few quangocrats to migrate to Switzerland. Unfortunately government policy only incentivises the useful to leave. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyB</title>
		<link>http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2010/02/02/soak-the-rich-and-sack-the-rich/#comment-23913</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5518#comment-23913</guid>
		<description>John - please name names - much is said of wasted public money going to quangos - but which would you cut ?  Spell it out for us and we can see for ourselves whether we agree with you.  I suspect many people have no idea of the extent and cost 
 
Reply: I have done so, many times, on this site. Start with abolition of the unelected regional quangos. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; please name names &#8211; much is said of wasted public money going to quangos &#8211; but which would you cut ?  Spell it out for us and we can see for ourselves whether we agree with you.  I suspect many people have no idea of the extent and cost </p>
<p>Reply: I have done so, many times, on this site. Start with abolition of the unelected regional quangos. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

