NHS is not about to be privatised


I have taken up the issue of NHS privatisation and today’s private members bill with Ministers, as some constituents have sent me copies of an  email expressing worries on the topic. The Minister tells me:


“This Bill seeks to prevent ‘privatisation’ that simply isn’t happening.


  • There are no new competition provisions in the Health and Social Care Act – it simply codified practices the old PCTs were obliged to follow under European law.
  • Private sector provision grew at twice the rate under Labour than under this Government. Only 6 pence in every pound spent by the NHS is spent with private sector providers.
  • Labour signed contracts with the private sector that guaranteed levels of income to Independent Sector Treatment Centres regardless of the amount of work they actually carried out – which we have stopped.
  • We have made it a matter of law that commissioners cannot pursue competition in the NHS if it is not in the interests of patients.


The NHS Confederation, the independent membership body that represents the service, has already expressed serious concerns about the Bill, citing the ‘potential for disruption caused by further changes’.


The Bill stops local doctors making decisions about the best services for their patients. Clinical leadership is highly valued in the NHS – but this Bill seriously undermines it.


What the reforms actually did was remove layers of bureaucracy in the old SHA and PCT organisations so we have been able to recruit additional frontline staff:


  • They removed 19,000 managers;
  • They save the NHS £5.5 billion in this Parliament alone and then £1.5 billion every year after that;
  • They mean we can afford to employ 8,000 more doctors and 5,600 more nurses on our wards compared to 2010;
  • They help us to carry out nearly a million more operations a year, perform millions more diagnostic tests, and refer 51% more patients for cancer treatment, ensuring people get the care they need.


The Bill also claims that it will stop the NHS being affected by TTIP. Labour ignore the facts here too – because if there was any risk to the NHS, I would be the first to oppose the deal. The EU’s chief negotiator on the deal has said that ‘provisions in TTIP could have no impact on the UK’s sovereign right to make changes to the NHS’.


  • The EU have acknowledged that the deal ‘excludes any commitment on public services, and the governments remain at any time free to decide that certain services should be provided by the public sector’.
  • Labour MP John Healey, a former Minister, has said the deal protects the NHS and ‘progressives should keep campaigning’ for a TTIP deal ‘that will be good for British consumers and workers’  “







  1. Antisthenes
    November 21, 2014

    Only a very basic understanding of economics tells us that if you truly want a healthcare service that is the envy of the world then the bulk of the provision needs to involve competition. That of course means a considerable amount of privatisation not only in provision but in funding it as well.

    The NHS is dysfunctional, not fit for purpose and overly costly precisely because it is monopolistic, not profit driven and it is virtually completely free to use. This ensures that it is wasteful, open to abuse, inefficient and is not patient focused.

  2. Terry
    November 21, 2014

    Isn’t the NHS already Privatised? The French owned company Steria, with various subsidiaries in the guise of a range of acronyms, already control £100 Billions of NHS spending, including the movement of medical records, patient registration, screening programmes such as cervical and breast screening, payments and primary care contracts. It’s a fact – huge swathes of the NHS already have been privatised.

  3. adams
    November 21, 2014

    When are the Tory Party being admitted into intensive care ? The sooner the better .

Comments are closed.