What is the cost of hotel accommodation for illegal migrants?

Question:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the 2020-21 budget is for housing illegal migrants. (77354)

Tabled on: 18 November 2021

Answer:
Tom Pursglove:

Accommodation costs are commercially confidential; therefore, the Home Office does not publish this information.

The answer was submitted on 24 Nov 2021 at 15:42.

75 Comments

  1. Ian Wragg
    December 1, 2021

    How can it be commercially confidential when it is taxpayers money.
    More mealy mouthed rubbish from the Home Office which is encouraging the boat people.
    I hope you get a resounding thrashing on Thursday.

  2. Micky Taking
    December 1, 2021

    So a leading MP from the ruling Party in Government is told ‘mind your own business’.

  3. MickN
    December 1, 2021

    Nothing to hide there then – move along.
    Just imagine what you think it might be and treble it and you won’t be far off.

    1. glen cullen
      December 1, 2021

      Then treble that number again for the added cost of Home Office management, staff and resource

      1. lifelogic
        December 2, 2021

        +1

  4. beresford
    December 1, 2021

    You’ve been fobbed off, mate. Individual hotel costs may be confidential, but clearly the Government budget isn’t. They are concerned that taxpayers may be angry if they see the cost of this process to which no consent has been asked or given.

    1. Timaction
      December 1, 2021

      Indeed. Biggest scandal going. Why aren’t they being deported?

      1. BW
        December 2, 2021

        Human Rights Act and the lawyers. We will never solve this problem whilst we remain with the Human Rights Act and the ECHR. Never.

        1. Nottingham Lad Himself
          December 2, 2021

          Germany, like several other countries, deports many times the number than does the UK for failed applications.

          It is in ECHR like 45 other countries including Russia and Turkey, and HRA only mirrors that.

          What is the difference?

          Could it just be, that using desperate people in a cynical political game – aided by their privately-owned media – is actually beneath the main parties there, unlike here?

          1. Peter2
            December 2, 2021

            I don’t follow your logic NHL
            You say Germany deports many more people than the UK
            Then you have a go at the UK for being desperate to deport people.

          2. Peter2
            December 2, 2021

            We created and held these rights in the UK centuries before, NHL
            It just depends if you feel a foreign court should have the final say over us.
            I don’t

        2. Sid
          December 2, 2021

          If only a government with an 80 seat majority could alter legislation?

          1. lifelogic
            December 2, 2021

            +1

          2. Nottingham Lad Himself
            December 2, 2021

            How would you like it altered?

            Read up on what your fourteen rights are under ECHR, and tell us which you want to lose?

            That might give us some insight.

          3. Peter2
            December 3, 2021

            Who said give up rights NHL?
            It would be nice to have our own Parliament and Courts be supreme.

      2. DavidJ
        December 2, 2021

        +1

    2. Mike Wilson
      December 1, 2021

      Individual hotel costs may be confidential,

      Why so? Anyone can call a hotel and ask for their rates. If the government have negotiated a discount, fair enough. If they are paying over the odds, who cares? It’s only taxpayers’ money.

    3. Cheshire Girl
      December 2, 2021

      Beresford:

      I agree. The truth is, they know the Public would be outraged, if they knew the true cost. This is my money, and the money of every taxpayer. Even though Iā€™m a pensioner, the HMRC wants to know about every penny of my income.

      Hundreds are coming into this Country daily, and the people who pay for it have no say. If we murmur, we are accused of ā€˜racismā€™ and lack of sympathy. I suppose we are expected to ā€˜know our placeā€™!
      Iā€™m fed up to the teeth with it myself, and I know I am far from alone.

      1. DavidJ
        December 2, 2021

        Indeed you are not alone CG.

    4. Dennis
      December 2, 2021

      beresford – you are right. No comment from JR, as usual.

  5. Sir Joe Soap
    December 1, 2021

    So taxpayers aren’t allowed to know how much of their money is being spent on what. Perhaps our income should be Commercially Confidential from the taxman!
    This *we’ll take your cash and won’t tell you where we spend it* won’t end well. It really does become theft at that stage by any moral yardstick.

    1. glen cullen
      December 1, 2021

      This government makes Prince John Sheriff of Nottingham look like a teddy bear

    2. Dennis
      December 2, 2021

      I heard that the US lawyers on the Assange case are paid by UK taxpayers – is this correct JR?

      1. glen cullen
        December 2, 2021

        It just doesn’t stop – millions here millions there

  6. The Prangwizard
    December 1, 2021

    Government deviousness. Sir John asked what the budget figure was, not the actual cost. Pursglove should not be allowed to get away with not answering the question. But they get away with such as this all the time and it seems nothing can be or is done. In any case the whole answer stinks and is full of fakery. The fact that Pursglove thinks we the people should not know is disgusting and typical of government arrogance.

    1. Nottingham Lad Himself
      December 1, 2021

      *Typical of Tory arrogance.

    2. Original Richard
      December 1, 2021

      The Prangwizard :

      Agreed.

      I have asked this question to my MP, but of course I received no answer – not even “we’re not telling you!”

  7. Everhopeful
    December 1, 2021

    Ha!
    Shy about owning up to the truth!
    Ā£200 per room per night.

  8. alan jutson
    December 1, 2021

    Oh dear what a stupid answer, just imagine the worst, and then treble it !

    Lets say Ā£300 per day per person, plus all of the overheads of government departments involved !

    Probably Ā£1,000 per day per person.

  9. Nottingham Lad Himself
    December 1, 2021

    So much for Freedom Of Information.

    Stand by to see it basically scrapped in all areas by these secretive authoritarians.

  10. Iain Gill
    December 1, 2021

    another non answer from the government

    so much for parliamentary scrutiny

  11. Mark J
    December 1, 2021

    ‘Commercially confidential’.

    An utter cop out of an answer to hide the true costs from the Taxpayer.

    Is it any wonder we don’t trust the Government on dealing with this issue?

    It has been reported in the media that the costs of dealing with illegal migration exceed Ā£1 BILLION per year.

    I also question why it is right that largely economic migrants (if you are paying a people smuggler Ā£1000’s to come here, then sorry you are not genuine in my book) to these shores are given four star hotel accommodation, whilst there are many British born homeless on the streets whom do not get this same treatment. Talk about double standards.

    Look after others before your own, seems to be the Government’s mentality.

  12. matthu
    December 1, 2021

    The MP for Corby needs to reconsider his reply as it was clearly and deliberately evasive and answered a question that had not been asked.

    But then again, that probably puts him in good stead for promotion in this coercive and deceitful government.

  13. XY
    December 1, 2021

    But… the Home Office is not a commercial organisation.

    Ask them to try again. Raise their failures with the minister responsible.

  14. anon
    December 1, 2021

    The answer in unreasonable and not acceptable. Fire him.
    Public money demands public oversight and full transparency.

  15. glen cullen
    December 1, 2021

    To the penny we can find out how much the taxpayer has spent on nuclear submarines & nuclear weaponsā€¦.but we canā€™t be told the cost of a hotel room
    This isnā€™t a point of order issue; itā€™s a resignation (canā€™t be associated with this government) issue

    1. hefner
      December 2, 2021

      Indeed, Ā£8,647 every minute of 2020, Ā£4.46bn just to maintain the stock of nuclear weapons and its delivery system in good shape.

  16. X-Tory
    December 1, 2021

    This is a quite outrageous and offensive response as it is deceitful and disrespectful in the extreme. You were not asking for individual budgets but merely a global total. To provide that information would give NO indication whatsoever as to the amount paid to individual accommodation providers.

    So the minister LIED to you by claiming that his refusal to reply was due to commercial confidentiality. This seems to have been a written, and not an oral, reply, but is there no action you can take to get this liar sacked, or at least disciplined? Lying to am MP must surely be punished.

  17. JoolsB
    December 1, 2021

    Who the hell do they think they are? How dare they keep this information from the taxpayer, what are they hiding?

    1. Fedupsoutherner
      December 2, 2021

      They are hiding a bloody big number and one that’s getting bigger all the time. Just by being secretive tells us it’s unacceptable.

  18. glen cullen
    December 1, 2021

    The Home Office confirmed the number in hotels as 15,000

    All found a discounted average cost of a room would be Ā£100

    Thatā€™s 1.5 million per day x 365 days in a year = Ā£547,500,000

    A cool half a billion pounds of taxpayers money ā€¦and thatā€™s just the accommodation costs

    1. formula57
      December 1, 2021

      It is the not-fit-for-purpose Home Office so prudence suggests your half billion Ā£ figure should be at least doubled.

      How many patrol boats and other resources would a billion Ā£ a year buy to prevent the arrival of illegals?

    2. Original Richard
      December 2, 2021

      glen cullen :

      ā€œThe Home Office confirmed the number in hotels as 15,000ā€

      This may be correct, I do not know, but it must be a far bigger figure currently being HOUSED by the countryā€™s taxpayers as nearly 24,000 have already arrived this year alone.

      The total cost will be even bigger still as it will include food, Ā£40/week spending money and free healthcare.

      1. glen cullen
        December 2, 2021

        Following a question at committee a couple of weeks ago they reported 15,000 immigrants staying in hotels….I am sure you’re correct in that there are a greater many in ‘other’ accomodation

  19. Nota#
    December 1, 2021

    Accommodation costs are commercially confidential

    That is a silly and insulting response, its not his money but our (the taxpayers) money. Thinking they can spend it and not allow it to be scrutinised illustrates everything that is wrong with this Government

    1. Dennis
      December 2, 2021

      This govt. is catching up fast if not exceeding the corruption of the US govt. I suppose the UK govt. is obliged to be corrupt as it is scared of the US applying pressure on it. Even Switzerland runs scared of the US as exemplified by them cow towing to the US pressure in not sending crowdfunded ventilation units to Cuba. The US just loves people. Italy also has bowed to US pressure.

      The US Blinken and most other US spokespeople seem to be Russian assets as their stupid statements make the US a laughing stock which Putin must love.

      JR – why has the US/UK extradition treaty not been scrapped? Are you not pressing for it or you don’t care?

  20. Mike Wilson
    December 1, 2021

    The Question and Answer should be on the front page of every Tory supporting paper tomorrow. These people need shaming into answering.

  21. Mike Wilson
    December 1, 2021

    Is this another one of those inane situations, like in Parliament, where you ask a question – get a half answer – and are then unable to respond. If you can respond presumably it will be along the lines of: “I asked what the budget is – not what the accommodation costs being paid are.”

    1. Dennis
      December 2, 2021

      Can JR offer any proof that he has followed up on inadequate answers at any time and what the results were? If so, JR, give us some links.

      Reply Of course I follow up in conversations which are not available as links!

  22. Zorro
    December 1, 2021

    You should complain about that non-answer, absolutely outrageous. This cowardly, useless government canā€™t handle anything. We will never escape COVID 19 as they are too slavish to lefty public opinion.

    Zorro

  23. Narrow Shoulders
    December 1, 2021

    Must be at least Ā£100 per room per night which would be the accommodation cost for a care home.

    I know which one I would rather my taxes were used for.

    Thank you for enquiring Sir John

    1. glen cullen
      December 1, 2021

      Concur…well done SirJ

  24. Dave Andrews
    December 1, 2021

    This is a contemptuous response to who should be a parliamentary colleague. He should say “owing to my obligation not to embarrass the government, I decline to give an answer”.

  25. Jasper
    December 1, 2021

    Well the amount of money it is costing should be published, together with details of how long it takes to process their claim. I would like to see a plan to ensure all claims are dealt with within 3 months and individuals not eligible to be here swiftly deported straight away. Home office needs to employ more foot soldiers to do the work instead of just contemplating how to deal with it. Happy to offer my services to organise the Government if required – you certainly need it!

  26. Rhoddas
    December 1, 2021

    The Blob are colluding with the Minister, really defensive, must be huge dinero’s and hence huge embarrassment to HMG. Border control, er no… this is one of the many manifesto pledges which have been trashed. I imagine the soon to occur 2 by-elections will either show very angry and disappointed tories or they will just decline to turn out….
    The men in suits yet?

    1. BOF
      December 2, 2021

      Rhoddas, I think we need other men in suits, for the absent men in suits.

  27. ukretired123
    December 1, 2021

    You can be assured even the true costs of everything from Channel taxi service, concierge services, interpreters, full time support services, full board and lodging will be unknown nationwide by anyone being political dynamite. Even if known Labour would say it’s not enough. Those in the red wall areas would be livid. Boris still sits right hoping no one asks this. Would Andrew Marr ever ask or any MSM?

    1. ukretired123
      December 1, 2021

      Boris sits tight, praying …

    2. glen cullen
      December 2, 2021

      …and what of the social costs to our customs, traditions and community

      1. Dennis
        December 2, 2021

        glen cullen – it is said that the migrants are coming for a better life but does that include those already living here?

  28. No Longer Anonymous
    December 2, 2021

    The Government’s official advice to immigrants is that they will be housed in hotels with Ā£35 a week until their asylum applications are processed and – wait furrit – that if their asylum application fails their Ā£35 a week will be withdrawn only if they refuse the accommodation that is offered to them.

    Madness.

    F***ing madness.

    1. BOF
      December 2, 2021

      I concurr with your anger NLA.

    2. glen cullen
      December 2, 2021

      Agree – utter madness

    3. Nottingham Lad Himself
      December 2, 2021

      If their application fails conclusively, then they should be deported, and there would be no reason under ECHR for them not to be.

      Their application would have succeeded otherwise.

      If there were some covid19 travel restriction, or granted right to appeal preventing this, then that would be a separate matter entirely.

      1. Peter2
        December 2, 2021

        Then they move onto a long appeals process which can take years.
        That isnt “granted”, it is their legal right.
        Then after these years have passed they now have partners or anchor babies and thus the right to family life.
        Surely you know all this NHL?

        1. Nottingham Lad Himself
          December 2, 2021

          The appeals processes and criterions could be changed at any time by Act Of Parliament even if your claim were true – which it generally is not.

          People are granted leave to appeal where appropriate.

          1. Peter2
            December 2, 2021

            Wrong
            As you say yourself the ECHR has supremacy and our Courts interpret their judgements as being right.
            Hence right to family life as loosely interpretated by our Courts.

          2. Nottingham Lad Himself
            December 3, 2021

            ECHR are quite clear that a right to family life is NOT absolute, and that countries may deport criminals.

            They made this clear for Russia, some years ago now.

            UK judges have been criticised for not following precedent, and hence bringing ECHR into disrepute.

            But hey, denying that makes an excuse to rob 67 million of all of their human rights, so let’s carry on doing that eh?

            As I say, how come Germany etc. don’t have these problems?

          3. Peter2
            December 3, 2021

            Nonsense again NHL
            There are many cases of deportation being overturned because of the ruling of the European courts on the right to family life.
            Don’t be a denier.
            PS
            Love your claim to rights based on the interpretation of Russian courts
            Hilarious

  29. Lindsay McDougall
    December 2, 2021

    The answer is that there is no budget and that these costs will be allowed to crowd out other budget items or (worse) will be added to Government ‘borrowing’ (money printing).

    I see that the Chancellor is insisting he is a low tax Tory. Some evidence would be nice.

  30. BOF
    December 2, 2021

    Appalling, and imo misleading Parliament as this is tax payers money. A bit like refusing to disclose how much money is spent on HS2!

  31. Gary Megson
    December 2, 2021

    Your question is profoundly ignorant. There is nothing illegal about being migrant.

    Reply There are people who come here with no permission to live and work here.

    1. Original Richard
      December 2, 2021

      Gary Megson :

      ā€œYour question is profoundly ignorant. There is nothing illegal about being migrant.ā€

      You are correct, there is nothing illegal about being a migrant.

      However, as Sir John correctly says the illegality arises from arriving without documentation and without permission.

      Only a fool or a fifth columnist would believe that anyone of the 8 billion people in the world can live in any country they fancy.

      It also needs to be understood that just because people may be wishing to leave their own country and come to ours for economic reasons or because they are suffering from intolerance in their own country does NOT mean they are then willing to accept our laws, culture and customs or happy to integrate into our society and make a contribution.

  32. Aden
    December 2, 2021

    The home office FOI department refuses to release a telephone number for their FOI department.

  33. Yossarion
    December 3, 2021

    As the populations of Scotland Wales and Ulster have barely moved up in the last fiffty years whilst Englands has gone Norgth of fifteen Million in that time, is it not time that immigration quotas should be linked to the Barnett Formula?

Comments are closed.