This is an amended version of an article commissioned by the Telegraph in 2022. I was asked when speaking at a lunch on Friday to reissue a statement about what Conservatism is.
Many of us believe people should keep more of their own money to spend on themselves and their families. We want to help people on their individual journeys to success and greater prosperity. We want government to make life easier for all those who can make their own way in the world, with lower tax rates and sensible rules. We want to live in a successful economy where low tax rates generate more tax revenue from the extra incomes and business they bring. Then we can be generous to those who need help and cannot earn their own living and we can afford great quality public services. We want everyone to have the opportunity to own their own home. We would like many to own a share in the business they work for or be able to set up a business of their own. Government should not tell people how to live their lives, but should help people with great education and with public order. Government interfering and investing in business usually wastes money, racks up losses and makes things worse. Ask the postmasters a nationalised company sent to prison, or rail travellers in the north waiting for an HS 2 train.
     We are against those who glue themselves to the roads to stop people getting to work or to prevent ambulances getting to patients, to be on the side of those who leave home early in the dark to ensure the rest of us have milk, bread and emergency services that morning. We oppose the politicians who want to prevent us getting out more of our own gas and think of the needs of the rest of us who have gas boilers and want to keep our families warm over the winter.
     There is indeed an anti growth coalition. It is a coalition which despises all those who go out to work in the private sector to make and deliver life’s necessities and to keep our utilities running. It sees the businesses that supply us with clean water, heating fuels and broadband as the enemies that should be taxed more then nationalised. When they were nationalised they were starved of investment as it all had to compete with the cash demands of the NHS. The anti growth protesters seek to impede or prevent new homes, new factories and above all new energy supplies , whilst backing ever more illegal economic migrants who of course will need new homes, and more utility supply to have a decent life here.
      The protesters who try to disrupt the lives of those who work hard to keep our society functioning are backed by an army of left wing party politicians. They include the nationalists that want to bust our country apart. They use devolved government not to help their electors but to grandstand against the national government. They include the Lib Dems who do not ever want us to get out more of our own oil, gas or coal. They blocked more nuclear power as well when in government . They would leave us without heating or hot water on days when the wind does not blow. They of course include the Labour party, bound to the Trade Unions who think now is a good time to engineer as many strikes as possible. These strikes on the railways threaten their own members jobs. The railway needs more passengers, not less, to generate the extra fare revenue to be able to pay their wages. Striking means more people do without the trains so more trains run empty yet the Unions expect yet more subsidy for a service people do not want to use or are prevented from using
     We favour freedom and fairness. We need a new balance in policy between those who do and those who complain. We need to let all those who turn up for work, undertake the training and look for promotion to keep more of what they earn. We need to say No, not give in, to all those who want to block every new private sector idea, impede the new investments, the new mines and gas wells, the new fields of food and new factories to make products for the NHS and other customers. The world does not owe the UK a living. We are too dependent on imports and therefore on the goodwill and loans of foreigners. The new UK can be a shining example of enterprise and freedom, where people will want to invest more and create more jobs, because we could have a government that believes in the power of enterprise to help people to more prosperous lives.
F
October 7, 2022
Good morning.
Anyone who believes that work should always be made to pay gets my vote. But words are just words. What we need now are deeds. Apart from the non-story over the %45 tax rate and the governments embarrassing climb down due to non-conservatives in the your party Sir John, it seems to be trying.
And neither does the UK own it anything. Hence why I believe we need to end, or massively revise, Overseas Development.
Your fighting the good fight, Sir John. It is just such a shame that it has taken 12 years and 4 PMâs for it to finally permeate most, but alas not all (see above) of those in your party.
Let us hope it is not too late.
October 7, 2022
Work does indeed need to pay and by a decent margin over benefits. Why work 40 hours a week only to be 50p per hour better off after tax, NI, commuting, work clothes, lunches, student loans, pension contributions and child care costsâŠmany might as well not bother and spend more quality time with your children perhaps have another couple too. Many are behaving quite rationally given the idiotic system government has put in place.
October 7, 2022
Well said
Need to pay people decent wage. But at same time, we’ve lost our work ethic to a degree which is about working cause working is good for one! (And part of work ethic is trying to find a job you love but that requires a lot of effort and risk etc).
September 1, 2024
It is not âWEâ have lost our work ethic, it the trash coming into our country, we need to return to the stamp ethic for controlling how much one can get from the social services. AND when the stamps you payed for run out – then the social security stops .
Force the incomers to work hard for their so called benifit
September 1, 2024
I agrée MFD. I work with a lot of people with a great work ethic from all ages from 18 to 70+.
I also want to know what people consider âdecent wagesâ? Is it more than ÂŁ12 ph or ÂŁ15 per hour for all jobs? ÂŁ20? ÂŁ30? What of those people who only choose to work 21 hours but plead poverty should we continue to give them full time equivalence with Universal credit at everyone elseâs expense just so theyâre on âdecent wagesâ for the hours theyâre willing to work.
Passing on some middle class peopleâs expectations i.e. compulsory maths to 18 is the reason we have an ever increasing number of neets, if you check you would probably find they refuse to do more maths and english than theyâve already been forced to do, we are writing them off and their other skills in none academic disciplines. I know people that are millionaires now that didnât get their gcse maths and english.
We need to stop insisting everyone fits in narrow round holes of certain peopleâs expectations of who are clever and not.
October 7, 2022
LL Actually those young people in my family who have gone to University and got medical degrees are much MUCH worse of than cousins who bred like rats on benefits.
Wages ARE chasing index linked benefits.
Reverse Darwinism.
October 7, 2022
+1
September 1, 2024
Indeed often because they build up large student debts circa ÂŁ100k plus interest for 5-6 years to become a doctor. This sum and interest is not deducted for tax nor indeed for benefit entitlement. So someone who would normally get help with council tax or rent but for this does not. Also non income for 5-6 years.
Leave school at 16 get a job even just packing shelves at a supermarket then, up to the age of about 40 when the Doctor may perhaps have finally paid of his student debt and interest, you will be better off.
24 years of pay rather than 16, no ÂŁ100k of student debt, no interest on this circa ÂŁ60k les tax and NI too. Plus you do not have to pay for your own exams and medical fees. This is true even if the doctor by age 40 is earning say ÂŁ100k gross.
September 1, 2024
Thats the reason for earning stamps as I said above!
October 7, 2022
@Lifelogic
Maybe an answer is for the benefit claimants to receive their inflationary increase but to make all benefits taxable ?
https://www.gov.uk/income-tax/taxfree-and-taxable-state-benefits
October 7, 2022
A Truss Tweet an hour ago ~ âWe have taken decisive action to support households and businesses with their energy costs â and weâre working to make sure the United Kingdom is never in this position again by tackling the root cause of the energy crisis. That means producing more energy here at home.â
âThe root cause of the energy crisisâ is net zero dear, great to hear you are going to ditch it. Ditch the CO27 attendance too & save the money and the wasted energy and hot air.
September 1, 2024
The root cause of our energy crisis is Russophobia and Truss is one of the main war-mongering women-in-power-who-are-supposed-to-bring-peace determined to fight not only Russia but China too.
This woman is out of Parliament. Her constituents required her to leave the stage. Even the British MSM are now reporting the disaster in Kursk and that the Russians are dancing across the front line without having to damage the towns and cities they liberate.
That is attrition. The fortified towns, built since 2007 and paid for by the Collective west, have fallen. F16 shot out of the sky. Itâs over.
October 7, 2022
Lifelogic, the system is bonkers, but how would you do things better?
There is a basic amount people need to live on. Then there will always be a taper between this and the amount people can earn from employment. If you reduce the taper rate as you suggest, you trap many more people in the system and increase welfare costs. If you cut the basic amount, you put people into real poverty.
September 1, 2024
Thats where your thinking is wrong James.
we as country are only morally responsible for the disabled and seriously ill.
It is not the working publics responsibility to pay anything to those lazy beings – not even those you talk about trapped in welfare.
The rule should be â not ill or disabledâ get out and work or starve, we have no responsibility to the vast amount of layabouts!
September 1, 2024
We shouldnât write all disabled people off either. I know disabled people who are fully enterprising and earn a good wage. Too often though they are not hired because people have bias thoughts about what they might not be able to do or a feeling they will need a lot of time off work at short notice.
Working from home has freed up a lot of employment for disabled people, more should be trained in those functions.
September 1, 2024
And, if you donât work, youâll still get a state pension. If you do work, sounds as if they will take your pension away.
October 7, 2022
You can’t implement traditional Conservative policies when the formula for fighting elections is above all to appeal to the nastiest third of the electorate, because even those policies simply aren’t nasty enough for many of them.
You’re falling into The Despot’s Trap, that is, of being led by the mob, rather than having them follow you.
Just listen to Suella Braverman, for instance.
October 7, 2022
Your Labour needs more than this third you hate to vote for them in order to win.
So please keep on saying and doing what you do do NLH
The voters are watching.
September 1, 2024
NLH.
SJR is not talking about politicians. He speaks of the aspirations of many of the people, and not of the rabid right wing bogeymen who you of the left produce out of a hat when anything possitive is discussed.
September 1, 2024
NLH please keep defining what this ânastiest third of the nationâ believe and want to do.
Tell us what are their top 5 nasty policies.
October 7, 2022
MB,
Agreed ‘words are just words’.
Of equal concern is the lack of unity in the Conservative party. There is no guarantee that the party will always support this government and time is running out.
September 1, 2024
My words are as true today (01.09.2024) as they were nearly two years ago. More so in fact.
But today we have a real socialist party in charge and, at least we cannot complain about what is to come as expectation are already set. ie We know what is inside the tin this time as it is properly and clearly labled. No more false selling đ
And when I read and here much about what this government is doing, my heart gladens as I am witnessing the slow detruction of the LibLabCON. The biggest block to true democracy we have.
September 1, 2024
The halcyon days of 2022 by comparison. Who’d have thought the tories could have made such a mess.
September 1, 2024
I do not believe they we true tories Ian, most of them were getting their pockets filled by our enemy the WEF . They were and still are globalist puppets
October 7, 2022
I do believe you are a true conservative, Sir John. Unfortunately, I also believe that the majority of your MP’s are not! Experience of your government, and the actions of the last 12 years prove me right. The majority of your party is anti-UK, anti-white, anti-conservative, pro-EU, pro-green, pro-socialist and too eager to appease every other country and every minority in existence, and please everyone but the Brits. We are just the cash cows to fund the largesse spent on everyone else. If we do finally have a genuine conservative for PM, will she be held back by the undemocratic non-conservative betrayers of the UK in your party. Will the benefit recipients gain more money from the government than the taxpayers who fund those benefits? Those in the private sector won’t be getting rises in line with inflation but will be expected to fund it for everyone else.
I also suspect there are some in your party/NHS management that are willing to sacrifice the elderly in our society to save money for and make room for the immigrants. Was it really an accident that covid sufferers were sent to care homes. Was it really necessary to impoverish pensioners while hurling vast amounts of money at dinghy ‘passengers’? I have direct experience of the NHS in our area ‘encouraging’ the elderly to refuse life saving and life extending treatment.
I wish I didn’t have to be so scathing and pessimistic about your party and your government, but you know to fix that, don’t you! Unfortunately, I doubt your party will even try!
October 7, 2022
Do they even have time to turn the tanker round before 2024? This even if they tried. Do we really have to the appalling policies of a Starmer/Sturgeon/Ed Davey Gov.?
Ed Davey, Cameronâs appalling energy minister whose policies are very much responsible for the current huge energy problems – far more so than Putin.
October 7, 2022
We are expecting power cuts this winter. I’ve worked in the industry for 40 years.
I’ve watched the conservatives over the past 12 years dismantle our power stations and fuel supply
All done at the already of the UN climate change lobby.
We are governed by a bunch of shysters who put ever other cause before protecting their own people.
You deserve to lose just on power cuts alone.
Predicted foe at least 5 years but just laughed off.
Answer build more useless windmills.
September 1, 2024
The day the lights go out Ian, a lot of pennies will drop. Spreed the day and buy a blanket.
September 1, 2024
I have bought a generator.
October 7, 2022
From a Q&A session with the Minister of State for Energy Affairs of Qatar (currently the world’s largest producer of LNG):
Q:Do you think Europe will be able to wean itself off Russian gas?
A:No.They are going to have to come back.
Front cover of October’s Business New Europe Intelligence report:
“Energy Crisis:Europe’s Industry Shutting Down.”
September 1, 2024
Self-harm. These people should be treated as psychotic cases. We need a â5th amendmentâ.
October 7, 2022
Well said.
The last people on earth they care about are the “hard-working British families” they so like to patronise on the run-up to every General Election.
October 7, 2022
To signal the true change that will save the Tories in 2024 there needs to be hard action in the Channel migrants.
The Sun complains today that Liz Truss is silent on the issue.
September 1, 2024
Liz Truss?
October 7, 2022
Will the benefit recipients gain more money from the government than the taxpayers who fund those benefits? Those in the private sector wonât be getting rises in line with inflation but will be expected to fund it for everyone else.
This, Sir John is the messaging your party must adopt on benefits. Why should benefits recipients become relatively better than the non-benefit population? (the extra ÂŁ1,200 should be deducted from any percentage).
October 7, 2022
I believe benefit recipients should pay tax on their benefits, even if the total benefits have to be increased. It would ‘educate’ the benefit recipients as to how much tax is taken from the working population. Some families get an enormous amounts of benefits, far more than most people can possibly earn, and the tax liability would be enormous too. It would be a double edged sword, in that it may put them off work forever, but this could be overcome by removing unemployment benefits after say, 12 months, but retain the benefits that are available to workers. I know of many people who refused job after job because it was lower pay than their previous employment, even though they had received generous redundancy payments. They were not prepared to prove their worth to a new employer and gain merit rises. Meanwhile the government was paying them benefits, and even paying their mortgages so they gained a valuable asset at the expense of the taxpayer! I don’t know whether this still happens, but as many MP’s are talking about paying mortgages for benefit recipients than it probably is.
October 8, 2022
All benefits & benefits in kind including special tax reductions, social rent & subsidised rents should be added to a P11D even non-taxable benefits.
This data should be made available to those that are advised that of the need for increased benefits. This should be compared to wages available in the area. Then perhaps more rounded policy judgements can be made.
If mortgages are paid for benefit recipients then a first charge should be placed on the property for the assistance and be repaid before other capital payments are allowed.
We should close all tax exemptions for the uber wealthy not available to the proles. All should pay inheritance tax including the royals. Non dom exemptions and rules need to be abolished.
Suspend net zero and try leveling playing field between the plebs & plebs & elites.
September 1, 2024
Yes anon
October 7, 2022
Have you noticed how you can’t see what the benefit payments are per week now? The government hides them, you have to put in all your details first. ÂŁ24,180 for a single woman with a child (and that’s without all the extra free school meals, free school uniform, furniture for the house, extra UC for all sorts this year, extras for ADHD etc. more in London).
The NLW = ÂŁ18,500 for a 37.5-hour week.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation loves to give a minimum wage based on the whole of the UK regardless of the cost of rentals and housing around the UK. They say a single person needs to earn ÂŁ25,500 pa and a couple with two children ÂŁ43,400. So you can bet that’s what the benefits are paying.
October 7, 2022
I have to agree, and I believe the majority of people do to! Somehow the vast range of destroyers get their view extolled by media and allowed centre stage. ‘The majority of your party is anti-UK, anti-white, anti-conservative, pro-EU, pro-green, pro-socialist and too eager to appease every other country and every minority in existence, and please everyone but the Brits.’
How has this statement come to reflect your party so accurately Sir John?
There are terrible mistakes being made in Central Office, and within constituency member organisations when these fifth columnists are allowed to work their damage.
October 7, 2022
Shirley M
I can confirm your final point about encouraging elderly people to.refuse life extending treatment etc. Out of the blue, just after the start of the covid era, I had a phone call from my gp practice who asked me about my wishes if I should catch covid. Bearing in mind that I had no prior warning of this call, I was asked to decide if I want to be put on a ventilator if I needed one or if I wanted to be resuscitated if my heart stopped. I definitely got the impression I should say no to both as I am older and have a medical condition which means I am immunosuppressed. In my view, this kind of decision should not be an instant snap decision.
Sir John
Sadly, this morning the climate minister on Sky News stated that the government are strongly committed to net zero and are looking to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels. He also said that The UK has a strong and diverse supply of energy. This rather destroys the notion of sensible government.
October 7, 2022
Cliff, I had an even worse experience with a new doctor at our practice. He asked me to attend an appointment to discuss my medication but in reality it was to ‘discuss’ a DNR. Very little discussion and no change to my medication (told me to take whatever I wanted!) but he was very aggressive about the DNR and made it sound like resuscitation would kill me anyway (no need for that as I would have agreed if he had been more pleasant about it) but he upset me so much and I felt I was being pressured, so I said I wanted to think about it. He then said he could sign it without my permission and he would if I refused! He set my health and mental state backward by a very good margin. I did get over it, but he put me under a lot of stress and made me very angry, which is counterproductive unless he actually WANTED my condition to deteriorate.
October 7, 2022
PS. I also received a letter from the NHS, saying that if I caught covid I ‘might’ be suitable for treatment (treatment not specified).
October 8, 2022
Shirley M
What a truly horrific story.
Is there any wonder so many of us are scared stiff of going into hospital?
October 8, 2022
Thanks Cliff. Fortunately, I have never ever been hospitalised, and would now do anything to avoid it.
September 1, 2024
I am honestly shocked at these two experiences and they will have been duplicated across the nation. This is a very very nasty and dangerous country now. I do not recognize it at all.
September 1, 2024
This is a disgraceful story.
If you can always take someone with you in future to any public sector service.
October 7, 2022
“This rather destroys the notion of sensible government” Sensible Government? That would be nice for a change.
UK’s King Charles and Truss should attend Cop27, says the daft as a brush Alok Sharma So why on earth did Truss retain this deluded dope?
King Charles should keep out of politics especially on this highly political issue as:-
1. He is clearly completely wrong & deluded on Climate Alarmism as he is on Organic Farming, talking to plants, Quack Medicine and most other things.
2. He is a complete hypocrite on Climate Alarmisms spending over ÂŁ1million a year on personal private jets, helicopters, Aston Martins and vast sums heating huge palaces… this while lecturing others about their small old car they need to get to work or their weeks break in Spain
3. He should be completely above politics on all issues so as not to alienate people & especially this one.
4. His past warning “X months to save the world” etc. were proved to be totally wrong & complete B/S
5. The man has just two duff A levels (B & C History and French) and this from a very good & expensive school. Plus he read Arch. and Anth. So he really has not got a clue about energy, climate, engineering or physics.
We alas know what the dope “thinks” already – but surely he should at least shut up now. “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt” Abraham Lincoln.
October 7, 2022
@Cliff.Wokingham
The “Climate Minister” is going show his support for net zero.
The Government has given us clue is in his title.
However, his reference to the UK’s “strong and diverse supply of energy” suggests the transition away from fossil fuels may be a matter of (sensible ?) timing.
We shall see.
October 7, 2022
Cliff W
According to Dr Mike Yeadon, an expert on respiratory diseases, being placed on a ventilator is the worst thing you can do if you have covid
October 7, 2022
Cliff
Agree with both of your Points,
An elderly family member was also asked similar questions about resuscitation, and they were very active at the time.
Clearly this Climate Minister is completely and utterly out of touch with reality, see my later post about useless Conservative Party Communication on policies over the past decades.
October 7, 2022
What good does a ‘Climate Minister’ do? We might just as well have a ‘Tides Minister’ to stand at the seashore like King Canute and tell the sea to go back.
October 7, 2022
A climate minster who was a Remainer. Having studied Philosophy and Law he no doubt has the technical and scientific/engineering knowledge to look after :
Net Zero Strategy, net zero (science and innovation), carbon budgets, low carbon generation, international energy, EU energy and climate, international climate change, hydrogen, carbon capture utilisation and storage (CCUS), nuclear, nuclear supply chains, smart systems.
No wonder our energy policy is in such a mess and we continue along the technically impossible and hence economy destroying Net Zero Strategy until its inevitable collapse.
September 1, 2024
We continue to have the lunatics running the asylum :
Ed Miliband (PPE), Secretary of State for Energy Security & Net Zero and Chris Stark (Law and Financial Studies), Head of Mission Control Centre for Clean Energy, have written an âSOSâ letter to Fintan Slye (Legal Sudies & Business Administration), Executive Director of the National Grid ESO, to ask how net zero CO2 emissions for electricity by 2030 can be achieved, as this was a manifesto promise :
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66cda5c1e39a8536eac0532e/sos-chris-stark-letter-clean-power-2030.pdf
Mr. Slyeâs reply will be interesting as it is unachievable if we are to have affordable, abundant and reliable electricity. Perhaps he will suggest :
1) The Government adopts the EU position that gas (methane) is green energy? Perhaps as part of the EU reset?
2) The BBC and Sky et al is tasked to just say that 97% of scientists agree that our electricity is green? They know that if you tell a big enough lie often enough, such as that anthropogenic emissions of CO2 have caused a climate crisis/emergency/breakdown even though the science is clear that only a negligible amount of further greenhouse gas warming is possible because there is already sufficient CO2 in the atmosphere to absorb all the IR radiation emitted by the planet, a phenomenon known as IR saturation, expecting the public to swallow it?
3) Ed Miliband just blows up the gas generated electricity plants as the Conservative faction of the Uniparty did for a coal plant in preparation for COP26, and the country is simply made to run on expensive, chaotically intermittent renewables? Not a problem for the Far Left to pursue such a policy as history shows us with Stalinâs collectivisation (viz GB Energy) and Lysenkoism (viz Net Zero) and ignoring the inevitable disastrous consequences.
October 7, 2022
Cliff. My elderly neighbour was also asked to sign a DNR order by her GP.
September 1, 2024
She should be grateful she saw her GP. My impression is that GPs have a DNT (do not treat) policy for everyone.
September 1, 2024
it sure does- my father and mother fought for this country in WW2, and considering the lives of my grand children and great grand children , I will be fighting these low life commies.
I have now had a good life and I intend to ensure my family will also, the labour commies need to beware !
September 1, 2024
Shirley, I back that statement of truth 100%, it is my belief as well!
October 7, 2022
This should indeed be the message of Conservatism but in their actions the Conservatives (under Major, Cameron, May and Boris with their appalling Chancellors) have endlessly increased taxes, borrowed and wasted money hand of fist, debased the currency, wasted billions, vastly increased misguided red tape & regulations, hugely increased the size of the largely unproductive (counter productive often) state sector, had daft employment laws and run an expensive, intermittent energy policy driven by a misguided unscientific religion.
There is indeed an anti-growth coalition but the Conservative party is one of the main drivers of this. Truss and Kwasi do say a few sensible things occasionally but no real action as yet to cut out any of this waste, deregulate or ditch the insanely damaging net zero agenda. We could easily have on demand electricity from coal at less than 10p a KWH even at current coal prices but Truss/Kwasi prefers to ban, tax, blow up power stations and rig the energy markets to kill this possibility and have unreliable energy at circa five times this figure. This exporting whole industries, jobs and increasing worldwide CO2 in the process (should that quite wrongly concern you)
I mentioned mortgage rates doubling yesterday. A couple of month back 10 year fixed mortgages were slightly under 2% now they are over 6% so actually over three times the rate not just double! So well done Sunak and Andrew Bailey with your vast currency debasing and gross economic incompetence. A ÂŁ500k mortgage now costs you ÂŁ200k more over five years ÂŁ20,000 extra per year (or ÂŁ55 every day). This will further push up rents too. Average take home pay for a dayâs work is only double this ÂŁ110.
Expensive money is hugely anti-growth and deters investment as does expensive energy.
October 7, 2022
+ 100
October 7, 2022
There is no anti-growth coalition, there are just self interested parties permitted to promote their own agenda.
With an 80 seat majority and after 12 years in government this should not be so. If our new PM wishes to change the status quo she should just get on with it over the next two years instead of making vacuous statements about enemies within. We can say that, she should just do something about it.
October 7, 2022
Have you observed the 80 seat majority, which is now just over 70? It never was prepared to let everything through that was conservative and in the antional interest. The majority is an unruly, disorderly rabble. Maybe Parliament being shut down did the damage as a huge number came in for the first time in 2019 and never learned the conventions of party behaviour.
October 7, 2022
The ÂŁ55 is also charged at weekends and the ÂŁ110 take home is only earned on weekday days! So even worse!
October 7, 2022
Where could you get ten years fixed for 2%? All three of my children could only get five years fixed.
October 7, 2022
HSBC, Virgin both had them until recently at 1.99% and 1.89% I think they were. Prob. restricted to low LTV of perhaps 60% or lower or similar.
October 8, 2022
agreed and many of the families now facing the horror might have good equity in their home.
October 7, 2022
Whilst I sympathise with these people whose mortgages are rising, it should be remembered that in the past they have been considerably higher and people should just bear in mind when taking them out that they can both increase and decrease. And what about the savers who provide most of the money for these cheap mortgages. They always seem to suffer rates well below the rate of inflation, both in good and bad times.
September 1, 2024
We need fixed rate bonds on house purchases over 25 years. The fluctuations of the base rate are immaterial then to the repayment. They even out over 25 years. All sensible countries have these – even South Africa.
October 7, 2022
“We want government to make life easier for all those who can make their own way in the world, with lower tax rates and sensible rules”.
Sir John , can’t see how increasing the state pension age makes my life or many other peoples lives any easier.
I’m guessing you had the opportunity to retire and draw your pension at 65 should you wanted.Something you had, but deny others from doing.
Reply An MP cannot retire and cause a by election just because they have reached 65
October 7, 2022
Wasn’t my point, it was you had the opportunity to retire at 65 and take your pension, something you deny others.
Reply I made a promise to serve a 5 year Term so I could not retire at 65
October 7, 2022
reply to reply ….but the men in our age group did indeed have the option to retire at 65, although surviving on the state pension is a dire choice and always has been.
October 7, 2022
Will the state pension even cover your council tax & heating and lighting costs?
October 8, 2022
and running an old car, shopping in a supermarket etc.
A retirement to dream of…
October 7, 2022
Sir John a Link to your new pension rules showing you the changes from old to new.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.mypcpfpension.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/change-guide.pdf
October 7, 2022
The previous retirement age and pension was based on average life expectancy in the 1940s, and was anyway faulty, in that women tend to live longer than men.
In the C21st, we can all expect to live far longer, but frequently at a very high cost to the State/taxpayer, not just in terms of pensions, but also medical and social care.
Society needs to look again not just at the finances but also at the ethics of keeping alive, at huge expense, the growing number of us who are unproductive but voracious consumers.
October 7, 2022
‘ . . . the growing number of us who are unproductive but voracious consumers.’
Goodness, SM. That’s straight out of the WEF playbook (‘useless eaters’). Next thing you’ll be advising will be ‘Build Back Better’.
Great article, by the way, Sir John. And Ben Habib in an interview with Lawrence Fox on GB News last night described so accurately what the anti-growth coalition within the Government was all about. Ben Habib is very supportive of what Liz Truss is trying to do.
October 7, 2022
So you would abandon the elderly who have (most of them) paid into the system for 53 years, as I have, but do you have qualms about keeping disadvantaged babies/young people alive for maybe 50-60 years who have zero potential for working and/or living a self sufficient life, and will rely on care and medicines for the WHOLE of their lives, and their parents won’t be around long enough to care for them (if you had your way).
October 7, 2022
I too am a pensioner, Shirley, and I have the gravest of qualms about keeping the extremely sick babies and young people alive at all costs – to the taxpayer, that is.
And yes, I am also mother and a grandmother, with all too much experience of caring for close and dearly-loved relatives with severe genetic deformities/extreme old age/incurable disease.
October 7, 2022
As I believe you only get one go on this planet and then there is nothing I will be hanging on to every minute as a voracious but unproductive consumer. My family have been told that if my bottom needs wiping and my drool needs moping then that is what they shall do.
But then I have no assets so there is no benefit to them in me dying.
The ethics of keeping people alive are a different discussion if you believe there is a better place afterwards or you think you will come back as an oligarch.
October 7, 2022
I am not keen on outdoor ‘murdering cats’ , but the life of house cats must take some beating?
Oligarchs seem to die in rather odd circumstances.
October 7, 2022
Quite so. The state pension age was a con. It was never meant to cost anything, it was set at 65 because, actuarialy, men died at 65.
October 7, 2022
SM. Alas too many people are being kept alive when they themselves don’t want to live. It would certainly free up care home places and much needed NHS beds if people were allowed to end their lives when they felt they were ready. It’s just another area of our lives where government dictates. My cat had a clot which split a vessel in his aorta. He was in pain and one of his legs was affected. We had him euthenised as the vet said his prognosis wasn’t good . We don’t get that choice.
October 8, 2022
I suggest more and more people, even youngsters, find little to enjoy being alive. They look at the world around them and find small comfort.
September 1, 2024
If you have a pension fund bring in a return on which you pay the pensions, it does not matter how long people live!
You are only in trouble if you have stolen the fund and then pay pensions hand to mouth in a ponsi scheme. But the pensioners paid into and created the fund. Donât forget that they were paying in âgoodâ pounds and are now getting confetti – so donât tell me that they did not pay in enough.
October 7, 2022
@ Stephen Reay – the state pension age changes were prompted by the desire for gender equality and then took recognition of changes in life expectancy, all against a background of what was affordable.
Opting to acknowledge changes in facts and circumstances but to allow consequences only if they give rise to more largesse from the State does not seem sensible and will eventually see the perpetrators run out of other people’s money.
October 7, 2022
Gender equality was the ruse they just wanted to save money in effect another tax increase. You paid your NI and Tax in good faith but we now give you up to seven years less state pension back.
October 7, 2022
formula, my understanding was that it was an EU aim and target, some Countries like Denmark adopted early, but France kept it to 62 for both sexes.
In a couple of other Countries like Italy and Hungary, if you have contributed for 40-42 years so can retire. Surely that should have a bearing in the UK too even if they set it to 45 working years of contributions (not infill years or claimant top-up years).
October 15, 2022
Your own examples of Denmark, France, Italy and Hungary show that it was not so much an EU aim and target but clearly something made in the UK.
Macron right now would want to move the French retirement age from 62 to 64 or 65 with an awful lot of reactions from trade unions.
But as so often on this blog the EU is the big bad wolf used by hypocritical politicians to justify their decisions, and the good little piggies gobble up all their serving of Brexshit.
September 1, 2024
Hefner the EU and itâs U.K. acolytes bankrupted Britain. Stole our assets and left us with insufficient funds for our own needs. It destroyed the nation, foisting millions of people who have contributed NOTHING to this country. They still do.
You remarks are OFFENSIVE. As usual!
September 1, 2024
The eushit came either from the EU and/or the hypocritical politicians so it was necessary to separate them from the source of punishment or their fig leaf.
The real failures though were the euphilics who prospered mightily and enjoyed the gites without caring what it cost everyone else.
October 7, 2022
Nor can the country afford for one of the very few sensible and rational MPs, such as yourself, to retire before about 90.
October 7, 2022
however, I’d like to forcibly retire large numbers of existing Tory MPs.
October 7, 2022
Micky Taking
It is not only only the tories it should be applied across the whole of Parliament.
Too many not fit for purpose.
October 8, 2022
Agreed, there was a time when an Opposition carried out the function of pointing out the downsides to policy from the ruling party. It tried and often succeeded in reigning in the more extreme views and policies. More recently the ruling party has been trying to accommodate the extreme views of the Opposition.
On a path to madness.
October 7, 2022
If you can find any.
October 7, 2022
We cannot afford to support the number of people in this country retiring at 65.
I want to be supported by the state as early as possible by retiring (I will be claiming pension credits too) but I also appreciate that the country can afford what it can afford and people are living much longer (surely something to celebrate unless you need social care of some sort).
October 7, 2022
I reckon they screwed up on all their calculations going way back.
OA pension was only dreamed up because they wanted to pension off âunproductiveâ ageing farm workers. Having done that they proceeded to squander the receipts and now the coffers are empty.
Donât think people are living longer. The figures are distorted by infant birth/ mortality figures and the fact that people were driven off the countryside and into insanitary and unfamiliar industrial towns.
That was the FIRST industrial scam!
September 1, 2024
It was a mistake to have a state pension replace the individual savings that people made for their retirement. There was a lot of discussion at the time. It is ALWAYS a mistake to surrender any control to the State.
September 1, 2024
Before the state got involved in education, health and social services, the majority of the population lived in slum housing with disease and absolute poverty. Life was shit for most people.
October 7, 2022
The pension was set up as a financial cushion to help when people were no longer able to work. Life expectancy has now increased dramatically as has a persons working life so why should the State pay you for a state assisted âholidayâ?
In any event you could structure a private pension to pay out at the age of 65 or earlier.
October 7, 2022
Rather nullified by the fact that school leaving age has increased and 50% ‘encouraged’ to go to university so many don’t start work until in their twenties. Many of the elderly today started work at 15, trained on the job, and paid into the system for many more years than the current generation. Those who received very generous public sector pension can retire at 50 on an extremely good pension and work part time for extra money, if they wish. Where is the equality? Why does the private sector keep being mugged?
October 7, 2022
Agree with all of this but I am just a bit concerned to read that she will :
1: Block an information campaign on saving energy ( which sames the country money?)
2: Cancels the obesity reducing measures which help the health of the nation and the NHS
3: Cancel the freeze on Civil Service recruitment ( it is overmanned already )
October 7, 2022
David Peddy
Only a bit concerned?
Not sending the right signals at all, bordering on frightening to where we might be really heading.
October 7, 2022
Just being polite !
October 7, 2022
David Peddy
Roger that.
What control you exercise so early in the morning.
October 7, 2022
you won’t get support on here like that!
October 7, 2022
If people want to save energy there are lots of sources of information. Get led lighting, switch things off, heat only one room, wear more clothes⊠It you want to lose weight just eat half as much as you do now until you have done. Yes the civil service is hugely overmanned (mainly overwomanned) and hugely over paid, misdirected and over pensioned too.
October 7, 2022
Intelligent people like you know about LED, heat one room etc . about reducing portion size ( worked for me !) but not all the public are *(self evidently ) as intelligent as you ( or we would not have these problems and be talking about it here ! )
At least we are on the same page with the Civil Service !
October 7, 2022
Half portion sizes works for anyone & everyone but only if they actually stick to it!
Also no point in insulating a whole house if you can only afford to heat part of it!
September 1, 2024
No point owning a house if you can only afford to heat one room. The crunch comes, of course, when you canât afford to heat even one room.
October 7, 2022
LL,
” If you want to lose weight just eat half as much as you do now until you have done.”
How did you come up with this one. Viz Top Tips?
October 7, 2022
D P
Indeed not only do we not have enough real conservatives in the Party, as many others have outlined, they also have a huge problem with communication and the promotion of their polices.
For more than a decade the Conservatives have lacked a real and sensible communicator of their polices for the future.
We do not want modern spin doctors and policies made up in panic on the back of a fag packet, we need properly thought out policies, which are simple to understand, which show direction, political savvy in its presentation, and encourages work and it’s rewards.
October 7, 2022
David, wouldn’t ‘an information campaign on saving energy’ be free on the BBC/C4 anyway? I thought both had a social remit to fulfil.
September 1, 2024
Oâ Dear A-Tracy do you still watch and listen to those Far Left Globalists in the BBC.
They never talked the truth when I used to listen. A total waste of money!9
September 3, 2024
No, MFD. I don’t, sadly they frustrate me. My original post was from October 2022, nearly two years ago, and I no longer watch BBC News or C4 News on a regular basis.
October 7, 2022
What we want is not always what we get. The vast majority of the present term of politicians leave a lot to desire.
For a lot of us the old school, statesman type politician you can count on one hand. Far too many sucked into the big picture of STW religious sect and totally adrift from what is really needed and essential for this country to be really successful again.
The fault has to lie with central office as they I assume dictate the criteria for the selection process. Too much useless talk, not enough action and commitment to the peoples real problems just endless sticking plaster solutions.
It’s not your beliefs or policies that really count. It’s having the people dedicated to living by and implementing them, with no quarter given.
October 7, 2022
All well meaning but in the real world the party in government died in 1990 and now longer exists. The party today is a woke movement that works with Labour and its unionised and ideological public sector to impose totalitarian progressive ideology to reshape this nation and its people. In effect Neo-Marxism whose purpose is to remodel our world, our minds and destroy our freedoms
Voting Tory is an act of self-harm and merely endorses the cancer of Labour’s identity politics ideology. Both parties are deliberately and perniciously strangling our freedoms to preserve their political fortunes. They’re working together. It’s a game to them that is having terrible consequences in the real world across all areas of life
The Tories aren’t even competent on the economy and the promotion of the private sphere which was always their trump card
So John can argue all he likes but he knows in his heart that he represents a party that has through appeasing the powerful Left totally undermined our freedoms, our morality and our future and condemned us all to collectivist, Maoist infused environment
October 7, 2022
Yes DOM, I too, see it that way.
October 7, 2022
I found this on the conservative foundation website â
ââ We believe it is our duty to uphold Conservative values:
Our individual freedoms and right to social justice are respected and upheld
Our right to free enterprise and industry is protected and encouraged
Our dignified institutions and traditions are safeguarded and carefully maintained
October 7, 2022
DOM, I thought you were exaggerating until I just saw the headline news article in the Guardian saying IDS and other Tory MPs are warning Truss she must put out a ÂŁ15m leaflet telling people to cut down on their energy use.
Truss wants to Trust people to help themselves, and rather than a new public information campaign, the government is looking at âsignpostingâ existing guidance. Seriously do people want written instructions on how to wipe their bums clean? Oh, and wash your hands after you go to the toilet. This is where years of extra education have got us, is it?
1) Why isn’t the public broadcaster the BBC putting regular reminders about the people in their Eastenders shows and other programming? Isn’t that what usually happens, Coronation Street too?
2) Energy companies must always correspond with customers; their bills could remind people that using energy wastefully could result in power cuts this winter. Although I guess with them being private enterprises, they quite like the idea of people wracking up extremely high bills.
October 8, 2022
Why put out a leaflet – the next bill will be much more effective.
October 9, 2022
MT, well it might save them money in the long run if the energy companies do this because of all the people theyâll have to pursue in the small claims court and cut off otherwise with all the resultant negative headlines about them.
Have you noticed this big push on air fryers theyâre being advertised everywhere but their energy use is never mentioned. Some of them cost from ÂŁ100 to ÂŁ300 so how much per year do they actually save over a microwave for example.
October 7, 2022
The Anti-Growth Coalition is bigger than you think
Green NGOs, academia, ESG corporations and the IFS â Liz Truss left critical parts of it out of her speech
Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph today.
The Tories have been in power for twelve years. They have surely been the biggest and most damaging driver of the Anti-Growth Coalition. It is actions the count Ms Truss & not hollow words. You still cling to the insanity net zero, taxes are still increasing, interest rates and gilt yields have tripled, government waste is huge and appalling. The Covid lockdowns were idiotic and counter productive. Yet despite all this taxation these public âservicesâ are generally dreadful and incompetent – the NHS kill tens of thousands, transport, education, the criminal justice system, our joke police forceâŠall are, in general, dire and misdirected.
October 7, 2022
The pension was set up as a financial cushion to help when people were no longer able to work. Life expectancy has now increased dramatically as has a persons working life so why should the State pay you for a state assisted âholidayâ?
In any event you could structure a private pension to pay out at the age of 65 or earlier.
October 7, 2022
Of late life expectancy has declined rather.
October 7, 2022
Maybe a minimum contribution period would be fairer? Lots of this generation don’t start work or contribute till their early twenties. If they did 53 years work (as I did) they would need to work well into their seventies to make things equal.
October 7, 2022
If that was the case then why do we have to pay national insurance towards our pensions @ NigL
It is earned money. Agree that potentially the age could be raised so you get out what you put in
September 1, 2024
An income producing investment produces income no matter how long you live. Have you no economic comprehension at all?
October 7, 2022
So youâre saying we havenât had a Conservative Government for the past decade.
October 7, 2022
Not since Thatcher and even she made huge errors.
A workforce of over 27,000 are now supporting HS2’s construction, spread across 350 sites between London, the Midlands and the North West.
So that is 27,000 builders, engineers, project managers, lawyers etc. who could be doing something productive instead of building this pointless white elephant and doing economic and environmental net harm. Well done Cameron, May, Boris, Truss(?)âŠ
October 7, 2022
Not since John Major and the party ditched Mrs Thatcher in 1990 and even she made huge errors. Appointing the dope Major as Chancellor and letting him join the ERM, closing many Grammar schools, the EU treaties without even any referendumsâŠ
October 7, 2022
but apart from all that, how was it for you?
October 7, 2022
I see that Macron is back in the friend category according to the media.
The jury is out on that one. Let’s wait and see if he can have an impact on the dingy invasion. That’s what friends do they support one another.
His past performance is nothing to go by
October 7, 2022
@ turboterrier – Macron’s redesignation, inappropriate and dangerous, was made by L. Truss herself.
What outrageous concessions has Macron been given for him to agree to act on the dinghy invasion? Fishing licences in perpetuity, massive subsidy for French-built nuclear power stations, compliance with his European Political Community aims, capitulation to the Evil Empire over Northern Ireland? Perhaps not, as he may have been getting all those anyway.
October 7, 2022
formula57
You are correct in what you have highlighted and yes the concern is those areas you mentioned have I suspect been discussed to the French advantage or promised to be handed over. What the hell she went there for in the first place is questionable?
October 7, 2022
From the Irish News editorial today:
https://www.irishnews.com/opinion/leadingarticle/2022/10/07/news/editorial_scene_set_for_protocol_progress-2852590/
“Mr Bakerâs remarkable public apology for past behaviour towards Ireland and the EU has also helped change the mood, as will Mr Varadkarâs admission yesterday that the protocol is a âlittle too strictâ.
The scene has certainly been set for constructive negotiations, with the landing zone widely expected to be a relaxation of checks on goods from Britain that remain in Northern Ireland.”
Compare that with the much wider demands of the UK government as stated here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/northern-ireland-protocol-the-uks-solution/northern-ireland-protocol-the-uks-solution
Even on that one point:
“Why we need to change the Protocol”
“The Protocol treats goods going from Great Britain to Northern Ireland as if they were going to another country.”
And it will still do that even if some of the EU checks are relaxed.
Another Tory cheat is on the way.
October 7, 2022
Geopolitically, Macron is in trouble-he is losing Francophone Africa to Russia;first Central African Republic,then Mali,now Burkina Faso.
There is speculation that Niger will be next.Amongst other things,Niger’s uranium mines supply more than half of the needs of France’s nuclear power plants.
September 1, 2024
Macron is in trouble at home too. More people die of cold than of heat. The French have lost their sense of humour but have not yet worked out how to counter the State. Macron will go but where to – the world is not big enough for these globalist collectivists to hide. And there is Kier Starmer rushing to board the Titanic.
October 7, 2022
He could stop it overnight if he accepted the migrants immediate return but he chooses to use it as a political bargaining chip. France is no friend to the UK and never will be.
October 7, 2022
+1 Christine, and the name of the new ‘cooperation ‘European Political Community’ is enough to scare me away.
October 7, 2022
@turboterrier, without the French States semi-nationalised power company controling the UK infrastructure we would be without electricity. Prices are kept high in the UK so as to be able to keep Macron in power by subsidising the French electorate at the expence of the UK consumer. Wierd. Upset Macron and he will pull the plug so to speak, the UK Government sold him everything to do with our security and sustainability. The UK has no alterantive but suck it up and take the punishment so to speak, which could also be reasoned as to what Sir John is infering when he suggests security and sustainability needs to be returned to the UK not kept at bay as the left leaning growth deniers that are fighting everyones future.
October 8, 2022
Then the solution is nationalization and rapid build out of alternatives including coal & gas in the short run.
October 7, 2022
You say âwe have a government that believes in the power of enterprise to help people to more prosperous livesâ. Do they actually believe in this? â Well perhaps, but a belief of itself does nothing. Sensible actions are what is needed. Half the size of the state, ditch net zero, cut taxes, make work pay, a bonfire of red tape, cut out the vast government waste, get real and fair competition in energy, healthcare, transport, broadcasting, banking, housing, education⊠relax planning, cull the pointless degrees and soft loans for them, stop the duff and dangerous vaccinationsâŠ
October 7, 2022
All good ideas LL, falling on deaf ears, unfortunately.
October 7, 2022
Hundreds and hundreds of repetitive posts zero solutions and no political antennae plus as we see today, misogyny.
For all your ranting about PPE degrees etc, maybe you should have learned âthe art of the achievableâ
October 7, 2022
Misogyny? So is stating the fact that the state sector has far more women employees than men Misogyny?
“More women work in the public sector compared with men; 35% of workers are men and 65% are women, whereas the private sector is made up of 58% men and 42% women”. Figs from the ONS.
September 1, 2024
Women are part-time workers – because their main job is in the home.
Before you get you WOKE manual out – Iâm a woman. I know.
October 7, 2022
@Lifelogic, all sensible but BJ signed us up to race to the bottom than no other sane nation despite meely words is intending to compete in.
Remember bonfire of the QUANGO’s a small state, sorting the NHS, all requiring tough action by Government – lets punish the People on trivia then they will think we are doing something. A 70 year high for taxes is not hurting those that introduced them.
September 1, 2024
All good Ideas, take them to Reform UK as they are going to be the next government and I believe they are open minded !
October 7, 2022
I wonder how many of your fellow Conservative politicians would agree with this? Sadly, I don’t think it’s enough to carry much of this through under this Parliament.
October 7, 2022
They donât agree because Conservatism, if it ever existed in the form often quoted in this blog, was seen as ânastyâ so has moved to the left, indeed May and Johnson could be classed as Social Democrats.
The Left has weaponised the word ârichâ as they have with the âNHSâ and Truss is the first leader of the Torys with the courage to champion wealth creation and retention and as we see even from some of her own MPS she is accused of moving Right. She did of course sit on her hands during Borisâ reign so even her âconversionâ could be seen as coming from a âchancerâ
Add the last 12 years of Tory rule as a metaphor for visionless incompetency, havenât got the miners this time to blame for blackouts and you have a recipe for political annihilation.
September 1, 2024
It was only seen as ânastyâ by Theresa May who, it transpires is a very nasty person indeed. The nation LOVED Consetvatism as described on this blog which is why Mrs Thatcher NEVER LOST AN ELECTION. Suck it up.
October 7, 2022
Good article. Meanwhile Ms Truss has been talking to Macron.
More talk of reducing the illegals crossing the channel! How many times have we heard that! How much have we already paid the French? The result? More boats with more illegals.
Still talk of limiting temperature to 1.5 degrees, in other words, more NZ fantasy. More wind turbines in the N Sea, so compounding the already failed policy.
When the last Brit leaves, there will be no lights to turn off!
October 7, 2022
+1
Blow out the candle?
Looking at your NZ (Net Zero) made me think illegal thoughts.
A couple of letters missing?
October 7, 2022
Sir John, your Party abandoned the message of Conservatism decades ago. A minority of so-called Conservative MPs believe in the principles you set out; the majority are LibCONs and GreenCONs who support the lefty policies and green lunacy we’ve had thrust down our throats for the past 12 years of supposedly Conservative Governments.
The last people on earth whose lives you seek to improve are the native peoples of these islands. You’d rather shovel our money at foreign nations run by corrupt people who refuse to use their own money for the betterment of their own people. Or at corrupt foreign and/or Globalist Institutions who then use that money to make our lives worse. Or at immigrants, especially if they are criminal migrants who break the law just entering our country…. before they go on to break many more laws.
The country has voted Conservative for 12 years. And now, after 11 years of BluLabour we’re finally told we will have a Prime Minister who will govern as a Conservative, and the legions of LibCONs and GreenCONs on the Conservative benches are doing their level best to stop and get rid of her.
October 7, 2022
@Donna +1
October 7, 2022
This morning I’m struggling to understand Liz Truss’s objection to a public information campaign encouraging energy efficiency this winter. And I’m also struggling to understand why the BBC can’t run the campaign at ZERO cost, across its fifty channels!
P.S. But pleasing to see JRM plagiarising your argument that home-grown oil & gas makes more C02-footprint sense than imports.
October 7, 2022
@Sea_Warrior, It would be a BIG waste of taxpayer money. Those that ‘think’ already comply with everyones asperations. The others just dont care and wouldn’t engage, pouring money down the drain for the sake of proper-gander and virtual signalling – not good. To get taxes down and get the economy moving sustainable, we therefore need to stamp out unadulterated waste
There is no such thing as zero cost at the BBC, you compolsarily have to pay for their political views but have no say in how they are formed.
October 7, 2022
Plagiarism or just commonsense?
October 7, 2022
The cost to the taxpayer? Why tell people to use less gas and electricity when they already are? Anyway, the publicity from the media kicking up about her not spending millions on a leaflet, should do the trick for anyone who hasn’t twigged yet.
October 7, 2022
May I remind your party that it has an 80 seat majority!
Conservatism is about freedom to make your own choices because less has been legislated for or against. That should cover, gas and energy production, taxes, education, further education and identity.
Where Conservatism should be interventionist is in defence of the realm and law and order, Property and physical self should be sacrosanct, writing and spoken words should be policed by the civil courts.
Keep it simple stupid.
Lose much of the statute book.
October 7, 2022
A bonfire of vellum!
October 7, 2022
+1
October 7, 2022
The life mapped out above would be ideal.
And when things were more like that they were FAR better by any objective standard.
Who in their right mind wants to be wholly owned by debt? Who really wants to be economically inactive?
The question isâŠ.who allowed, nay pushed things to this near commie existence and WHY?
October 7, 2022
This is more accurate from the Torygraph:
Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng have driven our economy off a cliff
PM and Chancellor are wedded to a disastrous ideology, with the damage likely to be felt by working people for years to come
October 7, 2022
Complete nonsense but I’m afraid the truth is worse.
T&K may have have been completely tone deaf in what they announced recently but they are certainly not responsible for what’s happening currently. We (and the rest of the West) have been busy digging holes for ourselves for decades but have speeded up the hole enlargement progrmme over the last fifteen years. Everytime there was any sort of economic glitch, governments printed money (QE) and have acted to keep interest rates on the floor. There has been no strategic energy policy, here or in Europe
We are now nearing the Great Unwinding – where the Central Banks ability to ‘print’ no longer exists and the asset bubbles are going to pop! We are going to have a very hard time going forward and Truss & Kwarteng will no doubt get blamed for it all (as you have just done).
Whatever you think of L&K I’d suggest that anyone who owns anything (a pension and property for instance) supports them, because however much you might dislike them now, you would certainly hate Starmer and Reeves a great deal more. The printing presses (QE) are now permanently broken and higher taxes and wealth confiscation will be the only route open to Labour to fund it’s Socialist policies.
October 7, 2022
Why is common sense called ideology?
Did you react like this to the shutting down of the country for two years, to Net Zero, to the splurge on the gas bills, to the sanctions and weapons for the Russian war? Have you reacted at all to what the Bank of England has been getting up to ever since 2008? And in particular 2020-21?
October 7, 2022
Sir John,
In two years there will be a new government. Unless there are major changes in effectiveness, not just more words, assertions and hot air then it will not be Conservative. If, as seems likely, people forget the past and decide to ‘give the other lot a chance’ there will then be five years of asset destruction, productivity collapse and a further descent towards poverty. This likely but not inevitable, not if your party faces reality.
We do not need HS2. We do not need the new generation of EPRs and cannot afford to continue paying for the renaissance of French nuclear capability. We do not need, cannot afford and will rebel against onshore wind turbines and huge solar farms.
We need cheap reliable energy, not in ten years when the first SMR comes on stream but as soon as possible. Thanks to breath-taking incompetence over decades our needs cannot be met.
When in doubt tell the truth and face the music while trying to reduce the damage. That can start now or in seven years when the next government’s dreams and illusions meet the Gods of the Copybook Headings.
JF
October 7, 2022
so what do you propose? Turn off all heating, eat only cold food, walk/cycle everywhere?
October 7, 2022
‘livin the dream’
October 7, 2022
You cannot blame others. Itâs your party that has brought forward the unobtainable net zero targets, introduced the stupid re-wilding initiatives, failed to stop the illegal immigration, issued over a million visas in the last year, enforced the unnecessary costly lockdowns during covid, allowed political correctness that enabled child abuse to flourish, introduced the modern slavery act that allows illegals to remain in the country, signed the atrocious withdrawal agreement, threatens freedom of speech with your on-line safety bill, increased taxes to their highest level in 70 years. The list is endless and others may wish to add to it in the comments so others understand the level of self-inflicted harm politicians have caused us.
You should all hang your heads in shame for the damage you have inflicted, and continue to inflict on the British people.
October 7, 2022
One more thing: the abject failure to reform Brown’s tax system. A start has just been attempted, 12 years late, at which the onslaught of opposition from the media and others should have been met by cohorts of Conservative MPs going out to explain why a simpler tax system is better for the whole country. But it wasn’t. Just as they were too weak and feeble to go out and counter the lies against Boris. Only JRM did that. Mrs T could not have done it by herself. Her MPs robustly advanced and defended the policies – though there were a fair few backstabbers as well.
October 7, 2022
Christine :
Agreed
I am beginning to wonder if the change of Conservative Party leadership is not a carefully crafted long-term plan to delay the implementation of manifesto promises combined with the implementation of anti-British, economy destroying policies.
Just before leaving :
Mrs May signed us up to the UN Global Compact on Migration, the Modern Slavery Act and Net Zero by 2050.
Mr. Johnson gave us the communist (SAGE/Susan Michie) driven unnecessary lockdowns, ramped up Net Zero, encouraged illegal immigration of young men of fighting age with no ID with free accommodation, ÂŁ40/week pocket money and the freedom to roam our streets, and issued 1 million visas.
The new PM is still committed to the unilateral economy destroying Net Zero wild goose chase masquerading as âsaving the planetâ.
âMeet the new boss, same as the old bossâ
October 8, 2022
I was thinking just the same. It’s like a relay race to get us to their goal of destroying the Britain we love. The baton is passed on to a new Prime Minister, giving us hope that policy will change, only for us to not only get more of the same but destructive policies on steroids.
October 7, 2022
Sir John is100% loyal to the Tory party whatever it does or allows, thinking he can change things. If he tried on all this he failed – how much did he support? How are we, the long standing livers here, and how is our freedom protected?
October 7, 2022
Very true. What an appalling list! The trouble is there are so few sane MPs, and they have – apparently – little influence. Added to which the FPP electoral system locks out any contender political parties.
October 7, 2022
Christine. In other words exactly what Labour would have done. Oh boy. Can you imagine how much money they will be throwing at the actively unemployed? It will break the country.
October 8, 2022
years of Tory misrule is now feeling like ‘ breaking a butterfly on a wheel’.
October 7, 2022
the real success of the west over the soviet bloc was the virtuous cycle of consumers with individual freedom constantly optimising their buying choices, changing supplier as better competitors emerge, forcing suppliers to constantly up their game. this dynamic forces continual closure of the weakest suppliers, provides incentives and rewards to those taking the risk to innovate and provide different & better services.
it is not the quality of the senior execs in the private sector which makes it better than the public sector, rather it is the persistent ever changing competitive pressure from others to provide better service to your customers, and the fact that the customers can move supplier easily (with no need for complaints process to work, or to need to complain to politicians).
what the public sector gets wrong is the “take it or leave it” approach to the customers and their staff, the monopoly behaviour, the lack of individual choice, the lack of reward or incentives to improve or innovate.
this is why the bigger the proportion of the national income spent in the private sector the more efficient, and higher quality, goods and services will be, and thats why we need to shrink the public sector and hand more money to individuals to spend as their freewill determines.
this is the heart of the argument that should be used to demolish the left wing.
October 7, 2022
Focusing on just money is a modern heresy of true Conservatism (it’s more a kind of an overly individualistic kind of Liberalism).
Conservatively-speaking, True Conservatism, of course, involves money (and as explained by the Telegraph) but is also about love of Family Values / Patriotism / Love of Culture and Civilisation and so where Conservatism isn’t just about Politics but also about Education and the Arts and the Media and so on / and Values in general of Work Ethic and Sense of Personal Responsibility of Men being Men and Women, Women – rooted in our Judaeo-Christian values and the best of our Greco-Roman heritage. The kind of thing Edmund Burke would advocate.
That is true Conservatism at least from a Conservatively Conservative position!
October 7, 2022
This Conservatism isn’t just the Conservatism of people such as Edmund Burke, but also of Jane Austen (whose family-background was from the following social background: Merchants / Gentry / Army / The Church / Land Owners / The Arts).
Jane Austen and her world and values is a perfect example of British Conservatism – what it means to be a true, Traditional Conservative!
(Where as modern Conservatism is moving more and more into the world of Ebenezer Scrooge at the beginning of the story: money, money, money – and how this obsession with money as opposed to work ethic and how money should be our servant not the other way around – destroys him – until he is given a second chance).
October 7, 2022
+many
I love that!
Brilliant!
October 7, 2022
Liz Truss has reportedly called for European ‘solidarity’ on migration. This is the very last thing we want, it is the EU who welcomed them in and threaten any member that won’t go along with the agenda. Angela Merkel has just been given an award for opening the gates. Now Truss and Merkel have promised to tackle the ‘criminal gangs’, this is pointless without confronting the criminality of the migrants themselves. If every migrant was immediately returned to France without involvement of lawyers the gangs would not be able to make money and the crossings would cease.
October 7, 2022
It is particularly pointless going after the cirminal gangs, because the criminal demand is so great that others always spring up to supply it. Until politicians stop calling the cirminal demand “vulnerable” and “desperate” it will never be stemmed.
October 7, 2022
Much to like in your post but I’d suggest that returning as many dinghyists as possible directly to their country of origin would be more effective. Albania: so dangerous that Saga offers our seniors holidays there.
October 7, 2022
Paying your own way.
I have always thought that by allowing those who can and want to pay for First Class tickets, private schools, health care and whatever else, FREES up and improves any govt provided services.
This ghastly obsession with dumbing down to achieve some quasi equality has helped no one!
October 7, 2022
Don’t forget this Tory governments obsession with social-engineering
October 7, 2022
Excellent article yesterday Sir John and as always like a breath of fresh air to cut through after recent conservatives wading through treacle and fog.
IMHO the ultimate holy grail for Britain is this:-
“It is impossible for anyone to work and save money here”.
That’s the answer I got back in 1970 from someone joining the so called “brain drain” exodus abroad. Margaret Thatcher and your own efforts helped to reverse this but recent it is still impossible to save money here for your future it seems.
The government spends eye watering mega amounts on mega projects that need funding by taxpayers on top of the moneypit NHS, Benefits etc.
October 7, 2022
What a wonderful post today, beautifully worded just like a Conservative manifesto from the 1970s or 1980s. A real nostalgia moment. What a shame it doesn’t express the government’s actual agenda on so many things that matter. The hope is, I’m sure, that Tories will rally round a message like this post and stop their infighting. I can see the political sense in this, but the situation isn’t really going to improve unless government supporters offer more confidence that measures being taken by Truss and her cabinet are going to make a difference. Rees-Mogg approving a power station that will come onstream in 18 years time is OK for the longer timescale, but that step should’ve been taken a long time ago. The question for right now is what this government can do to ease tensions and speculation on energy markets. Unless that challenge is accepted, I see no end to the crisis for the foreseeable future.
October 7, 2022
âGovernment should not tell people how to live their livesâ
Law instructs not what to do, but what NOT to do. It is essentially a list headed: DONâT!
Instinctively children know what is right. Good parents guide their growing into fine quality citizens.
Individuals are free to make their own choices but Govt does have to prevent them from harming others. Often that does involve telling them how to live their lives. Telling them in advance is better than punishing them after irreversible physical harm is done and imprisoning them for life.
However, if someone merely âinsultsâ someone they usually harm themselves with their loss of self-respect.
October 7, 2022
The rail unions have been provoked after three years of pay freezes, which they accepted responsibly but for which has gone unacknowledged. They see rail directors raking in literally millions in bonuses and their companies billions in profits during the pandemic whilst tickets rise in line with RPI which means that staff wages aren’t the inflationary component.
Rail workers (already on the most erratic and arduous shift patterns in the country – booking on or off at literally any time day or night, with three hours’ short notice movement, up to ten hours a day and up to thirteen days without a break) are expected to accept worsening and already tough flexibility and job losses in return for what amounts to a below inflation pay increases.
When – in our rail history – has an intercity driver been expected to operate Driver Only (guard-less) ? Expect trains to be stopped mid section whilst the driver goes back to release someone locked in a toilet.
This is called ‘modernisation’ in Tory speak.
Tories like Uber conditions, no pensions, no annual leave.
Tories like mass immigration and the inevitable ‘modern’ slavery it brings (growth, you see.)
There is nothing modern about what the Tories want. They want the dark ages – many of them even want us to go back to windmills and man powered transport.
October 8, 2022
If working conditions and pay are so wretched, please resign – my son would rather like to take the job!
October 8, 2022
Who can afford the train? or wants the to and fro the stations, anti-social passengers and delays, cancellations ( no automatic refunds). Never mind strikes. Robot cars cant come soon enough.
October 7, 2022
” … to the Trade Unions who think now is a good time to engineer as many strikes as possible.”
Sir
On behalf of the taxpayer, this is a battle which the Government cannot afford to lose.
Please do not lose.
October 7, 2022
Good morning Sir John
A good item as usual. Michael Jackson many years ago many years ago also summed life’s situation up so well (para)âIf you wanna make the world a better place, start with the man in the mirrorâ
The danger to the world are those that think they are âowedâ, suffer with delusions of âentitlementâ, then when they donât like an opposing view seek to have it âcancelledâ. – The removal of understanding and tolerance.
It all start to go wrong with the well meaning request and wish to reduce the impact from one thing or another when it reaches Parliament. The âLeftâ coalition jumps in for no other reason than the next election and ego, with no consideration on how to pay for this new aspiration. We the people can have everything but first the money needs to be in the bank, extra taxes is simply regression, decline and removal of ability to respond to future needs. While earnings from endeavours continues to open and refresh the future.
October 8, 2022
Perhaps every time a spend decision is made. The law should require the HMG to specify which tax group that are likely to pay it. If not they should be legally obliged to state this will be paid by the inflation tax.
October 7, 2022
Yes to the Conservatism you advocate. It agrees with what I have always understood it to be. We have theorised and agreed on what it is, it only remains to implement it.
Those who know what it is are largely outside the parliamentary party where I judge one third agree, one third are waiting for the tide, and the last third are positively anti, the lib dem trojan horse. As far as we can it is down to voting conservatives to make it clear that this last third have no future. The Brutus Gove should be consigned to wherever the Heseltines and Majors politically reside.
From now on the driving force should be implementation with little concession. There is no halfway house for the NIP, illegal immigration or failed assylum, the drive for our own independent power from our own resources, and a taxation book that drives, encourages and imports enterprise. It is only by creating wealth that you generate sufficient national income to support those who from no fault of their own are incapable temporaly or permanently of looking after themselves. For sure you do not solve social problems by over taxing enterprise and handing it as of right to the impoverished. The impoverished only need the ladder out of the hole they find themselves in.
The future of Conservatism, as espoused in conference, is now down to implementation. Get it done.
October 7, 2022
The âanti-growth coalitionâ is of course a euphemism for the communist fifth column who are determined to destroy the UKâs economy.
They infest our Parliament, Civil Service, quangos and all our institutions and Iâm sorry to say also our Government and the Conservative Party.
Their biggest weapon to impoverish the UK is the unilateral CCA/Net Zero Strategy where the plan is to replace affordable and reliable fossil fuel power with expensive and intermittent renewables.
They continue to force through the introduction of impractical evs and heat pumps despite knowing there will be chronic shortages of electrical power, both in supply and distribution.
There is no climate emergency/crisis/breakdown whether anthropogenic or natural or both, and only the climate change deniers, such as the BBC, believe there has been no change to earthâs climate until the Industrial Revolution.
Since climate change is inevitable, it will be better for us for there to be warming rather than heading for another ice age. BTW, previous changes in average temperature show that most of the change occurs towards the poles with much smaller changes at the equator.
October 7, 2022
I share and applaud what you say, but from what became apparent over last weekend, it appears you are in a minority in the Parliamentary Conservative Party: who needs enemies with ‘friends’ like Mr Gove?
The Anti-Growth Coalition loves to tell us we are in a mess, but all it can find to offer as a solution, is to pour on the flames more and more of the mixture that got us there. At last we have someone who is offering something different and it looks as if the Conservative MPS are queueing up to prevent her succeeding.
October 7, 2022
I agree with the premise of the article, it failed to mention sovereignty
October 8, 2022
The article doesn’t mention sovereignty because it’s gone. The Tories will not bring it back. For example, you can see that countries like India, Turkey, Hungary and Serbia are able to follow their own energy policy, but we aren’t.
October 8, 2022
what a quaint, old fashioned idea.
October 7, 2022
I see the BBC has quoted Nadine Dorries as saying the Government has “lurched” to the right. It has not repositioned itself to the right nor moved to the right…it has “lurched”.
I suppose it would not be necessary for the Government to lurch to the right if it had not previously lurched to the left.
The difficulty for the Government is that, if it does not lurch to the right, then someone else might move in to occupy that space. The Conservative vote might then be split. A conundrum.
October 7, 2022
The Labour Party Conference has just passed a motion in support of PR being introduced in the UK for parliamentary elections although it has not yet been endorsed by Starmer. The FPTP system which was installed in countries belonging to the British Empire but only retained by the United States and India disenfranchises two thirds of the people in this country as their votes have no impact on the outcomes of elections.
The Tory Party pretended to offer a referendum on PR but actually only offered a version of AV which was designed to get the Liberal Party elected as a compromise between Tory and Labour when in fact the people would prefer a system that would allow them to vote in new parties with different policies instead of the same parties as before whose policies gyrate from left to right and back again.
October 8, 2022
Roy Jenkins recommended what he thought was the best system for PR which was a complicated mess failing to win votes itself.
The two thirds of the population you describe as disenfranchised do have an effect on the election. They vote for losers or donât vote at all.
October 8, 2022
Are you good at maths?
October 9, 2022
Computers solve calculations easily. Reasoning is more important. Opinions may vary.
October 10, 2022
To win a FPTP election, the winning party needs one more vote than the next highest; thus all the winning party’s votes greater than one more than the next highest vote do not count. All the votes of the losing parties do not count. As you may be aware, elections are won in a minority of seats described as marginal because in all the other seats an incumbent party will win by a margin which in many cases will be substantial, for example home counties versus old industrial areas. On this basis someone with a mathematical mind without doing computations by any means would be able to see that a figure of two thirds of votes having no effect on a election result would be reasonable.
reply All votes matter. seats that deliver gooD majorities need all those voters to vote
October 7, 2022
I support all written and wish Liz Truss our PM is strong and will stand against subversion and the plans of opposition, much too much of which is embedded in the present Tory party.
I was dismayed though when she gave in to the demand to reverse the 45% tax rate removal. I am also dismayed to read that her relevant minister emphasises his determination to move faster away from fossil fuels – which to means he will oppose fracking plans, which in any event are weak, allowing local opposition to prevent it.
We all know how grand plans are slow. What we need from her are many smaller individual changes in all manner of our lives, business and trade which have been controlling and impoverishing us, and urgently which can be implimented immediately.
October 7, 2022
And all of this HAS to be dubbed a âpipe dreamâ, a âlieâ because if people push for it and get Conservatism, they LOVE it as we all found out when Margaret Thatcher was so successful in delivering that âdreamâ. Residents of the Welsh Valleys turned Labour canvassers away saying âIâm just off on holiday to my apartment in Malagaâ – THAT IS WHAT KINNOCK SAID! It was an insurmountable problem for the socialists of all colours.
So a desperate effort to nip this Conservative Spring is underway. âToryâ MPs wading in – I hope their Constituency Committees are taking note!
I donât agree with everything the Truss Government is proposing, I am distraught that she wants to fund a war against a country with whom we have no quarrel. But Truss is our only hope. Farage says âitâs too lateâ – what does he want? NEVER rather than NOW? Because that is the option.
We absolutely must stop nit-picking and stand with Truss or we will all be BURIED TOGETHER!
October 7, 2022
Funny, someone who left a comment after mine has had their comment moderated đ€đ€đ€
October 7, 2022
and now for the world shattering news:
Scotland’s first minister has said she has still not had a phone call with Liz Truss more than a month after she became prime minister. Nicola Sturgeon (in case you couldn’t remember who is first minister) told the BBC it was “absurd” and “unprecedented” that she had yet to hear from the new PM. Ms Sturgeon had talks with Theresa May and Boris Johnson within days of them being appointed. Ms Truss branded Ms Sturgeon as an “attention seeker” who was best ignored during the Tory leadership contest.
Speaking to BBC political editor Chris Mason ahead of the SNP conference in Aberdeen, Ms Sturgeon said that other than “an exchange or two” between the two leaders at events following the death of the Queen, there had been no formal contact. She added: “I don’t know whether that is arrogance, lack of respect or insecurity or whatever it is. It’s not the right way to do government in a grown up way.
“So I hope we will see a change. I’ll do my best to work with Liz Truss as constructively (like I did with other PMs) as possible or whoever comes after because we can’t take anything for granted in UK politics these days.”
October 7, 2022
Clip the wings of the socialist BBC. Making it pay per view would be a help.
October 7, 2022
Iâm getting very tired of this line that the current Government needs to do more, spend more, say more coming from the left commentator on GB News. Remember on 1 Sept 2022 â Boris Johnson is facing a backlash after making a bizarre analogy about buying a new kettle in a speech on nuclear power.
Then this – « Times clueless Tories offered up awful budgeting tipshttps://www.thenational.scot âș politics âș 20142408.five-…16 May 2022 â With that in mind, here’s a round-up of all the best and worst Tory budget tips. Learn How to Cook. Just last week, Tory MP Lee Anderson »
The Tories are leaving working people without support the left are getting away with repeating by the media – what a blimin joke, ÂŁ20bn support on energy alone and counting, high % of people not paying any tax or national insurance at all so theyâre not even contributing to their precious healthcare.
So the Tories are clueless, arrogant, rich people being condescending when they offer tips on saving money. But if they donât theyâre not giving enough information. Iâve had ENOUGH of it, so other people must be too, I canât be the only one, thinking you lefties are taking the pi** now.
What did people expect when the world stood still for nearly two years dealing with covid, there were plenty of people wanting to stay in furlough forever, lock down restaurants and businesses for months on end, not re-open school after Christmas, thatâs what you end up with if you have a left wing leadership theyâre only interested in the public sector, more money, more holidays, less working days per week, more working from home, full sick pay for months on end, free rail travel for Londoners paid for by the subsidies from the rest of us plebs, we donât know all the benefits they donât seem to have to declare them or pay tax on them, we have to declare if we provide ÂŁ5.50 for a meal when staying away from home. Allowances for overnights havenât gone up in line with real inflation but who cares as long as the public sector are alright. Greedy private sector they say; giving, caring public sector – selfless people who actually get paid wages to volunteer đ !
October 7, 2022
SirJohn- See this word “freedom” and how it is sprinkled about? and just what type of freedom are we supposed to be looking for – freedom from what? am afraid you’ll have to be more specific because I feel free alway’s – but then on the other hand when it comes to “fairness” I see it differently – the two words fairness and conservatism hardly sit right together – so am afraid you’re wasting your sweetness again – what I think instead is another blogger up all night with this mad stuff going round and round in his head.
October 7, 2022
I just think twelve years of tory misrule – I think about ‘taking back control’ and what have we really achieved? When I look up the road I can see the food bank store closed at this time and then when I look the other way I see that forever small hotel now has also closed – closed down because of being unable to pay staff and now gone out of business and when I take a cycle through the countryside I can see the unpicked crops and veg in the field – the seasonal workers long since departed unwilling to come to where they might not feel welcome – and all by our own hand. Sad really
October 9, 2022
Piecemeal Gov.uk Of all ‘Temporary Worker’ visas, ‘Seasonal Workers’ have seen the greatest increase, from 2,493 in 2019 to 39,919 in the year ending June 2022 and currently represent 55% of all ‘Temporary Worker’ visas. 23/09/22
So nearly 40,000 seasonal workers on temporary visa came?
October 7, 2022
I am so sick of this treacherous and moronic government and you, Sir John, demean yourself by trying to be an apologist for it. Every single policy they are adopting is WRONG. Yes, we need tax cuts, but I have said time and again that what is needed is for the personal allowance to be raised to ÂŁ20,000. For Christ’s sake why won’t the government just do this? Cutting the basic rate is pathetic and as the IFS have said the real effect of the budget is to RAISE income taxes! Raising the personal allowance would genuinely CUT taxes and would benefit EVERYONE.
Or take business taxes. We need to encourage new investment, and the ONLY way to do that is to have FOCUSED tax cuts. We need to have a tax relief ‘super-deduction’ on ALL investment in new buildings, machinery and R&D. THAT is the ONLY policy that will boost business investment. So why is the government too STUPID to understand this?
Or take Northern Ireland, we now have a new betrayal in preparation, as we have on illegal immigration and on everything else. This government is doomed and deservedly so. It does not have an intelligent or patriotic bone in its body.
October 7, 2022
Recent matters likely affecting the populous during the end of 12 years of Conservative government:
If we end up with blackouts this winter, prepare for Lolabour government next time.
If mortgage rates do hit 6+%, prepare for Ditto.
If Lolabour get in, then really do prepare for an IMF bailout.
For those investing, pensions etc, I humby suggest you begin to move your investments much more internationallyâŠ.
October 11, 2022
Some would argue that the right want to cut public services and also cut taxes for the rich.
While the left want to redistribute wealth from the rich to the working and middle class.
Some conservatives look down on the poor.
Some on the left are angry at the rich.
September 1, 2024
Granted it was 2022 and all very admirable however if it is all as far from reality right now as is possible – and the Conservatives failed spectacularly with it as well. Current Labour may as well take that piece and officially oppose every element. Analogies of a defective aircraft on finals with the PA shouting Brace come to mind..
September 1, 2024
05.26 on 1st September 2024.
Something is amiss. Your contribution SJR is dated
01/09/2024. The 182 comments are dated from 07/10/2022 – 11/10/2022 . Are you suggesting nothing is new in UK politics.
I ,give or take yesterday, commented on your current contribution a day early.
Set the super computer to calculate the tax income from a 25% rate of tax with NI abolished, a 10% rate of VAT, and a 10% rate of corporation tax. No special taxes on energy, and no subsidies to what are effectively nationalised industries like rail. You end with a sum of total tax take. Then decide what government can do or not do with such a sum, putting defence of the realm at the top of the list.
Then if AI is all it is cracked up to be ask it what effect this would have on the motivation and entrepreneurial instincts of the British People, and in five years hence the gross tax sum it would generate from their presumed extra activity. Then you could consider what humanitarian good you could pay for within the UK.
You may think it revolutionary, but it is only, as I suggested yesterday, what Singapore does today on a 24% top tax rate. They achieve 4th place in the World league tables of personal GDP while we in the UK achieve a mere 21st place. They have no natural energy assets, while we have coal, oil, and gas. Do the sum.
06.04 on 01/09/2024.
September 1, 2024
Are we comparing like for like?
What is the role of Singaporeâs Sovereign wealth fund in the situation. It was created in 1981 and called Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC). As of September 2023 it is estimated at $770 bn.
Singapore also has other wealth funds Temasek Holdings ($630bn of assets), Central Provident Fund ($397bn of assets), Monetary Authority of Singapore ($478bn). And that for a population of
5.92m (06/2023).
Norway has its Sovereign Wealth Fund valued at $1.7tn and a population of 5.5m.
Did the UK miss the boat in the 70-80s not creating such a wealth fund from the North Sea oil and gas and preferring in the â80s giving tax cuts?
September 1, 2024
You seem to have the same problem in Outlook as in your diary.
September 1, 2024
I wish we COULD just turn the clock back.
Would the tories have done anything differently with foreknowledge?
One small act of solidarity and theyâd have won I reckon.
September 1, 2024
E,
I will let you in to a small secret. The majority of the last government and the party were neither Tory nor Conservative. They were a bunch of infiltrators organised by central office to change the face of the party to consocialism. What is left is much the same so whoever pretends to lead the rump 121 will be beset with problems should he/she be an actual Conservative. All true Conservatives should look to Reform to rediscover Conservatism.
September 1, 2024
I do know that thanks.
And I was delighted to find out that a prominent member of our council here has defected from the Tories to Reform.
September 1, 2024
and the shameful reinforcing of the Establishment carries on?
No thanks.
September 1, 2024
Have you ANY idea what has happened?
September 1, 2024
I think that’s a pretty fair summation of what Reform voters believe and want, although there is no mention of Sovereignty or the associated control of our borders or immigration and asylum policies.
However, there is precious little evidence that “Conservatives” want these things: or certainly not most of the “Conservatives” in the so-called Conservative Party. And if they do want them, then why didn’t they even attempt to deliver them during the last 14 years?
I’m not listening to any more “promises” from the Treacherous Tories who betrayed the nation so comprehensively over the last 14 years. Not now; not next year and not at the next General Election.
September 1, 2024
The lack of action to deliver those fine beliefs caused the few to become Reform, and the people who do not forget recognise the birth of hope.
Time for the old political ways to wither on the vine, it is being cut down, re-growth begins.
September 1, 2024
I agree, this is exactly what Conservative and Reform voters want. I believe the Conservative Party could have been more determined though with its policy-delivery and seen a lot more of this through since 2010.
I know there is the ‘anti growth coalition’ who were determined to frustrate and obstruct government policy but I believe the Conservative government could have been even more determined than them and seen the Government’s policies through. The public would have seen this and respected the Government for doing so.
The question is why was the Conservative government was not being tough enough? I believe its because the softer-minded Prime Ministers and members of their cabinets do not understand the successful effects of being tough. I think they were afraid of adverse consequences so they compromised far too much (with the civil service, public sector management, regulators, pressure groups, trade unions etc). That compromise invigorated Socialism and look at the country and the Conservative Party now.
There is the long-standing division in the Conservative Party between Wets and Drys. That is as prevalent today as it has ever been. The chief mistake the Wets always make is that they do not understand struggle as they have never been put through it. What the most unfortunate amongst us need is opportunities and they will forego an immaterial and irrelevant increase in welfare for the opportunity of getting out of that difficulty and having a future like everyone else. That cascades up to the middle class too.
The Wets do not understand that people are forward-looking and it is imperative the Government is providing a strong legal and economic framework where people are safe and the financial opportunities are present. That means taking on the anti growth coalition, the Labour Party and saying no the supranational organisations which conflict with those frameworks. In short the Conservative Party needs to dry out, get tougher and be uncompromising for the British people. Then the country benefits and so does the Conservative Party.
September 1, 2024
Sums up perfectly what I want the new leader of the Conservative party procure the delivery of. The only element which I would add is the development of software to make it easy to augment representative democracy with direct democracy in order to provide voters with similar powers to those which, for example, the Swiss have – the use of the technology could be governed by Conservative party membership rules and avoid the need for legislation.
September 1, 2024
Well Sir John, here we are two years on from when you wrote that article.
In that two years the only thing that has changed is the colour of the rosette worn by ‘the government’
The policies are no different to what the international movement demand from each and every administration. The demand is, compliance with the world domination policy via UN treaty and via UN agencies enacting internationalism across the world. The people sat discussing good ideas in parliament or wherever are wasting their time and our financial support for them. I say that, because they can make no change from the direction of travel set in place by those controlling them.
Can you name just one positive step towards any of the freedoms you mentioned two years ago that has been taken by the last government? Just one.
September 1, 2024
Far too much emphasis on the economic and financial, which I suspect is deliberate. No reference to an extremist political ideology that is maliciously tearing apart and intended to tear apart our country. This is the contemporary Tory party, head in sand, head up arse, endorse Labour’s agenda while appearing not to and focus firmly on career and bank balance.
The question is simple. Who will now represent those that the woke political establishment openly despise? Scum, like me. The lowest of the low. The lowest caste in the now new, remodeled British society.
Labour died in 1979. The Tories died in 1991. Both today are deceitful, anti-British and utterly repugnant. Voting for these two deeply untrustworthy entities have caused irrecoverable damage.
September 1, 2024
and what of the nasty, deceitful, fraudulent fantasy land of the LibDems?
Most recognise what it is so will never lend meaningful votes in a GE, much as heaps of money being thrown to repeat the lies are falling on deaf ears.
September 1, 2024
We need a Gov. that puts the heritage population first, not immigrants. We won’t get that with Two-Tier Kier.
Did you see? murders at Carnival, two. Murders by Southport protesters Nil. Yet who is in prison ??
September 1, 2024
I know some people top of the class when in school then university but afterwards never worked a day just couldn’t make it in the grown-ups world and I believe there are a plenty of them out there, add to that the ten per cent on benefits who are not in good health plus the idlers – It is not so simple as the Telegraph 2022 made out – first of all we live in a complex society supported by economic well being all somehow managed af the top by industrialists academics and the government – but if the political pendulum keeps swinging left and then right to such extremes every few years? then we are a hiding to nowhere.
September 1, 2024
If only the pendulum would swing right. I’m still waiting.
September 1, 2024
In your old article you say ‘we need to say NO’.
Of course, but saying it nicely, which has been the stance, is ignored.
Opposition must be strong, persistant detemined and loud. It never is, never has been. You were always afraid to upset anyone.
That is how others realise it’s easy for them to carry on and get their way.
September 1, 2024
John
The Conservative Party were not listening then, to either you or any of us out here in the real World, and they are not now, hence the the massive abstention of voting at the last election.
Reform are now the only true political Party with the old Conservative values.
September 1, 2024
Conservatives could have accomplished much of the improvements proposed while in office, but failed.
The Reform Party stood on a better platform and would have enacted most of the good things, but too few voted for them, thinking they couldnât win.
It was those people who thought they couldnât win who caused them to lose, and lost themselves by not voting for better, or not voting at all.
September 1, 2024
I wish even one of the Conservative leadership candidates was putting the Conservative case so clearly.
September 1, 2024
I do worry that were there the amalgamation now spoken of it might be a Tory trick to defuse Reform.
Not that I have much faith in any of them but almost immediate surrender to the tories would shake said faith even more.
And anywayâŠ.WHY? Why would they do that? UnlessâŠâŠ?
September 1, 2024
Sir John, you are describing the majority view.
Politicians who support the majority view will start winning again. The rest need to recognise that the minority loses.
Labour are backing the minority which is why their tenure is built on shaky foundations.
September 1, 2024
Globalist loving socialists have done all of this – the chaos now running through our society is destructive and too well planned.
Somehow the idea that all decisions have to be made for the world – Not the people of the world, means perverted resolutions that do not work. We were quite happy as nation states, apart from the wars created by imperialist America and its war machine.
Any alien coming to Earth, looking around at the irrational activities going on, would certainly declare that as a species occupying a valuable planet we had truly gone insane.
Yes there are pockets of sanity still, and some good people are fighting back against the insane, but the globalists now have a strangle hold on us. Week by week the laws become more oppressive and dangerous. Riots no longer bother anybody in charge as they will just add to the chaos and degeneration. Besides, they have the riot police stacked against us. What do we have?
September 1, 2024
What about an end to mass immigration (legal and illegal), Net Zero and multiculturalism?
I donât see any of these policies coming from the Con/Lab/Lib Dem/Green Uniparty.
September 1, 2024
PS :
In my lifetime I have seen the disappearance of the English virtues of equality under the law and equality of treatment by institutions whatever oneâs beliefs coupled with the disappearance of the âsticks and stonesâ meme.
And the rise throughout the Anglosphere of control by governments, organisations, regulators and establishments who clearly despise their western populations and wish to destroy their wealth and freedoms by submitting to mass immigration and multiculturalism and the economy destroying CAGW/Net Zero lie.
I donât see any of the Con/Lab/Lib Dem/Green Uniparty wanting to end this, and neither the Democratic Party (another oxymoron like DESNZ) in the USA.
September 1, 2024
DEI, foreign wars, overloaded health service dependent on foreign staff, open borders, mediocre GDP per capita (PPP), banksterism, rent-seeking, failure to protect British successful businesses from foreign predation, too much power in hands of know-nothing Arts graduates, failure to prioritise science and technology whilst blathering about AI, inadequate dispatchable power generation, attempting to change technology by statute
September 1, 2024
It would be nice to look back and say that things turned out much better than I predicted back in 2022 but unfortunately, it was all too clear what would happen. Welcome to September 2024….
(IanT – from October 7, 2022) “…Whatever you think of L&K Iâd suggest that anyone who owns anything (a pension and property for instance) supports them, because however much you might dislike them now, you would certainly hate Starmer and Reeves a great deal more. The printing presses (QE) are now permanently broken and higher taxes and wealth confiscation will be the only route open to Labour to fund itâs Socialist policies”
September 1, 2024
I agree with you, just a shame that the Conservatives are not in power to get on with that vision.
Very pleased to hear and meet you last Friday, I look forward to your daily emails.
September 1, 2024
The Conservative Party desperately needs a leader who can articulate these principles of conservatism and attack the declinist statist Labour and Lib Dem parties, keener to virtue-signal than to enhance our lives and prosperity.
September 1, 2024
The big question is why do so many people despise conservative values, why do they oppose policies that promote them? Is it envy? Is there some malign intention? is it a belief that socialism that levels downwards is a higher moral belief? How to persuade them to change their minds? Pointing out the failures of the alternatives to conservatism, alternatives they support, has failed to persuade them. The problem for democracy is that persuasion and demonstration has failed to win the case for democracy. Many people still adhere to the Marxist-Leninist socialist ideals of the 1920s despite the fact that in every case of practical implementation they have lead to murderous tyranny. Perhaps their motivation really does just boil down to hatred. Certainly socialism is a hateful doctrine. It is the doctrine of Starmer’s Labour Party.
September 1, 2024
PS. I have emigrated to Australia and despite the lunacies that occur here I look at the UK with incredulity that it is has still not resolved the issue of socialism as it was in the 1920s.
September 1, 2024
Yes that’s a good summary of what being a Conservative should entail. It’s unfortunate the Party leaders didn’t trouble themselves to follow it.
Regrettably in 2005 the Conservative Party again chose Macmillan instead of Butler. The results have been equally disastrous.
September 2, 2024
Absolutely true
September 2, 2024
We should be allowed to keep more of the money we earn and save. We should also be the people to say where our money goes to charity. For myself, I prefer animal welfare and have always given to many different types who work on these issues. Why should someone else say what charity I give to? It is my money. There will always be plenty of people who give to child/age welfare and this gets much government funding. Animal welfare gets nothing from government so those of us who do care need to conserve as much of our money as possible to help out. I also give to human charities so I am not an animal nutcase but just pointing out that certain charities get none of my money from government which I am not in agreement with. We also have given a certain contribution to the EU when we were in it (I think we still do) so I would like to have had that scrapped as I never voted to join the Common Market which turned out to be the EU. It is my money and I want it to go where I say.