The EU is grossly over represented at the G7

If the U.K. thought it should send both the Prime Minister and the Speaker to represent it at the G7 the other states would object that Ā the U.K. was over represented. If the mighty USA sent both the President and the Majority Ā leader of the Senate that too would have seemed silly or unfair. Yet if you look Ā at the photos of the meeting of the G7 you see nine people present. Sure enough the EU had sent not one but two Presidents, the President of the Council and the President of Ā the Commission.

This absurdity famously spilled over into a row between these same two Presidents in recent negotiations between the EU and Turkey. The President of the Council who I think is technically the senior bagged the one large official chair for the EU rep, only for there to be very public complaints from the President of the Commission. The EU needs to get its act together and decide in each meeting or negotiation which of its 5 Presidents leads the delegation and sits in the one chair they should be awarded like the countries present.

There is at the G7 a more serious and worrying issue. The EU has five of the nine seats, sending three member state Heads and two Presidents. On an issue like vaccines which is a crucial issue at this summit the EU has run the policy for its member states, so on that issue just one EU rep should engage with four independent countries. If these intimate gatherings of a few leaders of powerful countries are to be valuable they should not be slowed down by the EU giving five versions of what they will do on vaccines.

On Ā issues where member states have some powers but have to work under the legal and policy framework of the EU as in green matters and economic policy it would be helpful if they settled in advance who was in the lead and who could speak for them. There will inevitably be much groupthink and common policy between all 5 so it does not need all 5 present and talking to represent that one viewpoint. Decisions of the Ā G7are usually by consensus, not vote, but having a majority of the voices could distort the debate and give the EU view an unjustified numerical advantage over the US or U.K. view.

254 Comments

  1. Lifelogic
    June 12, 2021

    Indeed and this is particularly of concern when EU policies are, in general, so profoundly misguided.

    So Boris has gone completely mad, another insane months delay to unlocking causing huge economic damage for no advantage and he wants to build back better, with more idiotic green wash and green crap and more ā€œfeminineā€ to it seems.

    Does anyone want to build back worse? So how many builders and construction workers are female, surely less than 10% and far, far less than that on the front line. It seems woman are not that keen on building jobs at all currently.

    1. Lifelogic
      June 12, 2021

      I see that we are nearly at a 60/40 split female to male ratio for undergraduates now 3 women for every 2 men. Though in stem subjects it is more like 24% women and rather less that that if you define STEM rather more rationally and tightly. Many men seem to have worked out that University Degrees (outside a few subjects) is a rather expensive con trick. Women on the other hand often work part time and take career break so far less likely to repay their student loans. So the loan system is also anti-male in its effect.

      So why does Boris really want us to build back in a more “feminine” way? If you want millions of high wage, high skilled jobs it does not seem the right way to go.

      1. Lifelogic
        June 12, 2021

        Also 75.8% of teachers in the UK are women it seems.

        1. a-tracy
          June 12, 2021

          Lifelogic, did your wife obtain a degree? Do you have daughters?

          1. Lifelogic
            June 12, 2021

            Yes in English and Italian, one son and two daughters.

          2. a-tracy
            June 12, 2021

            Lifelogic, what does your wife and daughter think of your comments about women taking degree and obtaining loans being anti-male and not good value for money for the government? Or is it any woman other than your wife and daughter.

            You remind me of my mother, when at 16 she told me that college was wasted on a girl and I could earn Ā£3000 by the time Iā€™d be coming out of college with no guarantee of a job! Oh and sheā€™d found me a job because she couldnā€™t afford the bus fare anyway.

            Iā€™d like to add Iā€™ve spent a lifetime doing courses at my own expense to make up for this decision and an education is never wasted on a woman, our most important job in life is to bring up healthy, happy, children who hopefully are full of ambition and verve.

          3. a-tracy
            June 12, 2021

            Oh, also when I ran my previous comment to you past my husband he reminded me that it is only one of my important jobs the other is to keep him happy, turns out I get full marks for that one too lol.

          4. Lifelogic
            June 13, 2021

            @ A-Tracy – I did not say education was wasted on women at all please read it again. I merely pointed out that on average women pay back far less of their student loans due to more women choosing to work part time, with slightly lower pay and taking more career breaks. Also that we now have 3+women for every 2 men at university and the relatively low proportion of women reading Stem subjects.

            These are merely statistical facts. You are reading things into it that I did not say and do not think.

          5. a-tracy
            June 13, 2021

            Lifelogic, you might find more women forced into degrees by the public sector that value degrees highly. Women are quite sensible and work out that working for the public sector especially in jobs that can go part-time, flexitime without the performance targets and sales levels of private sector jobs or to choose lower hours and long holidays to match their childrenā€™s timetable like teaching are the way to go because trying to get a job to match education hours at that high a pay rate per hour plus a fantastic pension is very difficult in jobs without guaranteed income from a passive client voice that has no say in what you offer them.

        2. hefner
          June 12, 2021

          A UN world survey of teaching at different levels shows that the UK is not so different from other European countries (data.worldbank.org search for Primary Education, Secondary Education, Tertiary Education).

      2. Peter
        June 12, 2021

        Lifelogic,

        Two posts.

        ā€˜Green crap and university degrees.

        Thatā€™s all your bases covered I think.

      3. rose
        June 12, 2021

        It sounded to me as if he was sending it all up. Someone has to. Though he was serious about the 12 years of education for girls.

      4. John C.
        June 12, 2021

        I don’t think he meant anything by it. He was just rambling and trying to say woke things. Pitiful for a Conservative Prime Minister.

        1. a-tracy
          June 12, 2021

          Boris trying to be liked and everyoneā€™s best buddy isnā€™t working.

    2. DavidJ
      June 12, 2021

      Agreed LL. We should not allow these globalist jollies to have influence on our government; indeed we would be better off if Boris didn’t attend. We have enough problems with him being subservient to the Green Crappery, Wokery and other propaganda. We need government and PM to base decisions on reality.

      1. Mitchel
        June 12, 2021

        A far more important meeting took place at the end of May when Yang Jiechi was in Moscow for four days of talks with the Russians about further deepening their strategic relationship.Yang is the politburo member for foreign affairs and one of the most important-if not the most important member-after President Xi.

        No razzamatazz,no comments officially or unofficially from either side other than “The Sino-Russian relationship is at it’s highest level in history”which I’m sure is absolutely true.

    3. beresford
      June 12, 2021

      I’ve just read that Boris and other ‘democratic countries’ have committed to ensuring that a ‘global pandemic’ can never happen again. Any thoughts on how they might do that? The megalomania of these people knows no bounds. The extra-terrestrials we have been hearing about had better scarper in case ‘vaccinating the world’ proves too modest an objective.

      1. Mark
        June 12, 2021

        Perhaps they have plans to ensure the closure of the Wuhan research lab?

    4. Dr Jones
      June 13, 2021

      Just look at the G7 photos (the ones not staged-managed). To the world elite, there are no pandemic restrictions. One rule for them…

  2. Garland
    June 12, 2021

    Yes, the EU is very powerful. Yes, countries in the EU magnify their power through membership. Yes, the world listens to the EU, where it wouldn’t listen to a single European country on its own. Are you finally waking up how much self-harm Brexit has done to the UK?

    Reply All nonsense. EU membership takes power away from member states who lose their own voice in vote in world fora

    1. MiC
      June 12, 2021

      Indeed, Garland, and let’s have a look at how many presidents the UK has – all unelected:

      President of the Law Commission.
      President of the Supreme Court.
      Lord President Of The Council (Rees Mogg)
      President of the Board of Trade.
      President of the Queens Bench Division…
      …and so on.

      Reply None of them shadow the PM and try to speak for our country with Heads of government from other countries

      1. MiC
        June 12, 2021

        The European Union’s representatives primarily only speak for its institutions which they represent, not for any of its countries’ national business.

        Of course, they will express solidarity on behalf of all with any member e.g. the Republic of Ireland, over any particular difficulty that might affect it.

        1. Micky Taking
          June 13, 2021

          solidarity? – -you know you mean ganging up, in other words bullying!

      2. a-tracy
        June 12, 2021

        MiC were these presidents all at the G7 meeting? Where was their picture with the other unelected leaders if they were?

    2. Garland
      June 12, 2021

      So you write a post complaining about the extra power states in the the EU enjoy. Then you reply to me saying that states in the EU lose their power. I really think your anger has deprived you of the power of rational thought.

      Reply They do not have extra power but less power and then clutter up international talks with their own internal squabbles

      1. Garret
        June 12, 2021

        What power – even UK parliamentarians have no power – extra power? less power? All bunkum

    3. Shirley M
      June 12, 2021

      Too powerful! It can force it’s idiotic decisions upon it’s members with impunity. Just look at the vaccine fiasco. It would have been extremely difficult to have made a worse job of it!

      1. MFD
        June 12, 2021

        I totally agree with you Shirley

    4. David Brown
      June 12, 2021

      Totally agree with you Garland

      1. Peter2
        June 12, 2021

        Do you really think the world doesn’t listen to Germany and France?

    5. Cliff. Wokingham
      June 12, 2021

      Garland
      When I see EU leaders parading in front of cameras, I always thing of a PTA or Boy Scout Committee.
      They come across as a desparate group with sharp elbows who want to join the big boys.

      1. Cliff. Wokingham
        June 12, 2021

        Think not thing.

    6. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      “Influence” is a weak man’s substitute for control, Garland.

      1. MiC
        June 12, 2021

        And now the UK has neither influence nor control over any aspect of the European Union.

        The converse is patently not the case, however.

        Congratulations.

        You have exactly for what you voted.

        1. John Hatfield
          June 12, 2021

          Didn’t vote for that Martin.
          Remember what it said on the ballot sheet? Leave. That’s what we voted for.

        2. Peter2
          June 12, 2021

          Influence….one vote in 28
          Ridiculous as usual MiC

        3. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          Martin, We have wrested control of Great Britain from the EU’s sticky mitts – which is (partly) what we voted for. The EU empire still controls Northern Ireland. Which we voted against. But which you wanted. You prefer mere “influence”. You got it. It’s bad isn’t it? Own it.

        4. Gordon Bennett
          June 12, 2021

          So….. had we remained in the EU, we would have been one voice in 27 of which we had not much say anyway… which is why we left. Duh !

      2. Pieter
        June 12, 2021

        So NickC where do you thing Uk’s strength lies today?

        seriously – in the face of the US, China, the EU, where is UK?

    7. nota#
      June 12, 2021

      @Garland – Absolute nonsense, the only problem is the EU has to punish the UK to assert its unelected unaccountable rule, other wise others will follow. The EU has dishonoured the trade deal with the UK from the get go- the EU can export to the UK but they have created artificial barriers and refuse to talk about UK trade with the EU as laid out in their own rules and laws for those leaving the block.

      1. hefner
        June 12, 2021

        nota# unfortunately I guess you were/are misinformed.
        When the UK left the EU on 31 January 2020 there were 11 months of supposedly intense discussions about trade led by Lord (David) Frost. A quasi day-to-day diary of these discussions over four years and a half is available from M.Barnierā€™s ā€˜La Grande Illusionā€™. It is obviously written by the guy leading the other side, but it is not really difficult to see within its 500+ pages how unprepared the UK was just after the June 2016 results, how the hardly won 2017 GE impeded proper preparations given that the various factions of the CUP were trying to influence the usual culprits (tabloids, Telegraph) and feeding the public different stories (including Sir Johnā€™s little if not lies but certainly very biased views) and some positioning themselves for the PMā€™s position. Then after July 2019 and the 2019 general election contrary to what a number of contributors here appear to think, it was the UK that was to propose what it wanted given the very reasonable and well known (since at least the EU Lisbon Treaty, voted 2007, enforced 2009) limits of the EU.
        The British delegation, as Brits have done again and again over centuries, thought the other side could not be ā€˜seriousā€™ and tried ā€˜to divide and ruleā€™. Unfortunately, the calibre of the top British people (Davis, Raab, Barclay, Frost) was far below what they think of themselves. They were taken at their own pitiful game by EU people, maybe not more clever but certainly much better prepared than the UK negotiators were, when Johnson decided that the end of the transitional period at 31 December 2020 would not be moved any further (not that there was much support on the EU27 part for a further extension, but it had been offered). So Johnson and Frost hurried up (without reading or at least understanding or possibly thinking that whatever was signed could be changed ā€¦ because ā€˜We Are Britishā€™) to sign the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement on 24 December 2020.

        If the UK wants to further diminish its standing in the world, the Government and its ā€˜supportersā€™ (maybe half of them being Reform Party supporters, as seems to be the case reading this blog) just have to go on with their present behaviour, suicidal in terms of international collaboration.

        And for the ridiculous on this blog who not long ago was enjoying the idea of the Republic of Ireland siding with the UK, what planet are you from? In 2020, the GDP per person in the RoI is $84k, the UK one $40k. (countryeconomy.com ā€˜Country comparison Ireland vs United Kingdomā€™). Why do you think the Irish would want a diminution of their standard of living?

        The less than absolutely polite contributors on this blog who call others ā€˜old fogeysā€™ or the like might have a point: the uninformed talking to the misinformed and the deliberately mistaken?

        1. Peter2
          June 14, 2021

          A rather pompous post from you as usual heffy
          Only you can be right.
          You should arrange a night out with Andy, MiC and Jerry

      2. MFD
        June 12, 2021

        The eu can export all it likes but I will not buy from them. Not one penny

  3. Mark B
    June 12, 2021

    Good morning.

    I had a look at the G7 website and noted that it includes guests. I also noted the, “Build Back Better” slogan was included in its main page guff. Clearly they are ALL on message šŸ˜‰

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Indeed, Mark B, any politician that trots out the slogan “build back better” is one who worships the spirit of the age – the god that demands the sacrifice of my warm home, my gas boiler, my car, and my foreign holiday. Or else – catastrophe! The Christian God is dead; and in its place our leaders have no more idea than to revert to the primitivism of an Earth god.

  4. Lifelogic
    June 12, 2021

    In your Politeia pamphlet you say:- “Let us accept that they
    will for the foreseeable future make cutting CO2 a central policy
    requirement.”

    Probably a reasonable assumption given the misguided fools with zero grasp of science or economics we are government by (hence the extra month of lock down). But the reality is there is no real climate emergency at all and even more clearly the “solutions” proposed (EVs, wind, PV, electric storage, tidal, wave, heat pumps, hydrogen, battery cars, public transport, bikes…) will make no, trivial or often even negative differences to world wide CO2 and other greenhouse gasses – let alone to climate.

    Your pamphlet link:-
    https://www.politeia.co.uk/wp-content/Politeia%20Documents/2021/June/John%20Redwood%20-%20Going%20Green%20-%20How%20Should%20UK%20Policy%20Proceed.pdf?_t=1623077740&mc_cid=281f7c613b&mc_eid=UNIQID

    1. GilesB
      June 12, 2021

      I do not accept that.

      I will vote to change that policy. So will the majority of people when they start paying the enormous unnecessary costs, and have absurd changes foisted on them.

      A new political party will form if all of the existing parties swallow this guff.

      1. Dennis
        June 12, 2021

        ‘A new political party will form if all of the existing parties swallow this guff.’

        Breaths must not not be held.

      2. Lifelogic
        June 12, 2021

        I hope the Tories will (rather like the Home Sec.) just be hot air at COP then no real action on this as the net zero policy is insane. But it would be good if Ms Patel actually did something more than hot air for a change.

      3. dixie
        June 13, 2021

        It looks like in 2023 there will be 7 new constituencies in the south east of which 2 are on the Isle of White. So there appears amply opportunities for new parties to establish themselves.
        Two years for hopefuls to start making themselves known, to get established.
        I am in a proposed new constituency and await such developments with interest … but not bated breath.

    2. DavidJ
      June 12, 2021

      +1

    3. Mark
      June 12, 2021

      Thanks for the link. I read the paper, which relies on the CCC’s Sixth Carbon Budget report as the underlying scenario. Having looked at that report in some depth, it is plain that there are a lot of assumptions about technologies that do not exist, and hidden assumptions about sharply lower economic welfare, as well as technically infeasible proposals that ignore the need for dispatchable backup and storage on a vast scale.

      Having looked at the potential for renewables in many different settings, I have found that they result in much higher costs. But once you start trying to go beyond about a 60% share of supply, the problems and consequent costs start escalating rapidly, and the problems of inadequate supply during periods of Dunkelflaute, and unusable surpluses at other times, with storage being far to expensive to bridge from one to the other across seasons or between years become insurmountable without full backup. The CCC projections are pure fantasy.

  5. Malone
    June 12, 2021

    “That big boy over there, he’s got lots of friends, and nice toys, it’s not fair, I want them too”. It would be funny listening to you Brexiters sobbing about how weak Britain is now – except I’m British too and I have to live with the consequences of your decision to put Britian in the slow lane, with no influence

    1. Lifelogic
      June 12, 2021

      Britain is clearly far stronger now with power restored to Westminster from the anti-democratic EU.

      A shame Boris has become a daft, climate alarmist tax borrow and piss down the drain socialist who wants to build back in a more “feminine” way through.

    2. MiC
      June 12, 2021

      Aye…

    3. Gordon Bennett
      June 12, 2021

      The EU is either a country (in which case it sends one President) or it is an association of different countries, in which case each of those countries sends a President, and if truly democratic then differing ideas should be offered.

      At present it is doing both and behaving like one country and loose association of countries, which is cheating which ever way you look at it. Do you want to be a cheat ?

      1. NigelE
        June 12, 2021

        Having their cake and ā€¦ etc?

    4. Sea_Warrior
      June 12, 2021

      Is the EU one of the P5?

    5. agricola
      June 12, 2021

      Malone, Canada, USA, UK, Japan are all there because they are sovereign countries. The rest being part of the EU are not. Name a subject and they all have different views. One of them isn’t even economically viable. They can all be seen to say one thing and do the opposite. The EU is the ineffective sheepdog only capable of attempted control of the lame sheep.

      The danger to the UK is following the green crap religion, not leaving the sclerotic EU.

      Who wants influence, almost always a product of overwhelming military might. The requirement for the UK is commercial success for every citizens benefit. There is much basic work that needs attention in the UK. Perhaps unintentionally your first sentence epitomises the EU.

    6. beresford
      June 12, 2021

      I’d be happy if the ‘big boy over there’ didn’t keep threatening us unless we give him our pocket money and let him examine the contents of our lunchbox.

      1. Grey Friar
        June 12, 2021

        O dear. The real world is tough. Big boys get their own way. You should have thought that through before voting for Brexit.

        1. a-tracy
          June 12, 2021

          Grey, so in your new world order of wokeness do you think it fair and just that ā€˜big boysā€™ bully others and especially those that were ā€˜voting for Brexitā€™ as you claim. I thought the whole purpose of this new woke lifestyle is supposed to treat everyone equally and not discriminate against minorities. Iā€™m offended now is there a court perhaps that we could go to as a victim of bullying šŸ˜‚.

    7. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Malone, I see the Remain mot du jour is “influence”. What do you want “influence” for? To be able to steer the rest of the EU to the UK way of thinking? And how did that go when we were in the EU, eh? Only being able to “influence” proves weakness. At least now, we can control what happens within our own borders. Except of course in Northern Ireland. Which rather proves my point.

    8. Dennis
      June 12, 2021

      If you have a single impacted toothache the extraction of that one tooth is good but if the dentist takes out all your teeth it’s a disaster. The Remainers say that Brexit is a disaster. There is nothing wrong with Brexit only how it has been handled.

    9. John C.
      June 12, 2021

      Yes, you do have to live with the decision. So do so.

  6. formula57
    June 12, 2021

    Surely the German Chancellor can represent them all? A much greener solution too.

    (Is use of the descriptive term “Evil Empire” still ok please? I should be reluctant to relinquish such as it is so apt.)

  7. Shirley M
    June 12, 2021

    I was also wondering why the EU president was present, as well as state representatives. The EU want their cake and eat it by allowing the representatives of individual countries AND the EU. Surely they should choose one, or the other. Likewise with Embassies.

    Who decides which countries (or organisations) attend these meetings and partakes in the consensus? I would like to know who makes these decisions.

    1. Lifelogic
      June 12, 2021

      The SNP plan to open ’embassies’ across the world it seems:-
      SNP ministers are attempting to boost foreign presence with new “embassies” across several countries.

      Taxpayers money to burn it seems.

      1. Mark
        June 12, 2021

        I wonder if their “diplomats” will be given status under the Vienna convention, or whether they will be treated like a business. Which countries are going to establish embassies in Edinburgh, and which buildings is Sturgeon eyeing up for them? Has she costed her diplomatic protection squad? And many more similar questions.

    2. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Shirley, Exactly so. Either the EU, or various European countries, not both.

      1. MiC
        June 12, 2021

        Like, what you or John think might affect this?

        Thanks for the hoot.

    3. Blandell
      June 12, 2021

      Boris as leader of the host country agreed to this formation – nobody else

    4. Pieter
      June 12, 2021

      This time Boris decided.. he is the host

  8. turboterrier
    June 12, 2021

    The EU should it even be there? It’s not a country. If it is allowed there should only be one President. As usual the EU side is top heavy. Not good for the rest of us.

    1. Lifelogic
      June 12, 2021

      Itā€™s not a country – well not quite yet.

    2. MiC
      June 12, 2021

      The European Union is unique.

      There has never been anything like it in human history on this planet.

      Yes, it makes people think, and rightly so.

      1. NickC
        June 12, 2021

        No, the EU is not unique, Martin. Walther Funk (Reich Minister for Economic Affairs, 1938 – 1945) came up with the same idea in about 1942.

        And Napoleon before him – ““I wished to found a European system, a European Code of Laws, a European judiciary: there would be but one people in Europe” declared Napoleon nearly 200 years before the EU.

        1. Mitchel
          June 12, 2021

          Napoleon also wanted to make Tsar Alexander I “his mistress”;that didn’t end well either.
          Every globalist (inevitably) comes up against Russia….and loses.

          Looking forward to Biden v Putin?

        2. SM
          June 12, 2021

          Plus the Holy Roman Empire, plus its derivative the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and so on.

      2. None of the Above
        June 12, 2021

        The USSR.

      3. Peter2
        June 12, 2021

        Nonsense again MiC
        History has many examples of failed empires that have tried to turn individual nations into one uniform blob.
        The EU is just a more modern example.

      4. Micky Taking
        June 13, 2021

        it makes people think ‘another attempt to build a dictatorship running the lives of sheep’.

    3. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Turbo, Remains had the luxury of portraying the EU as one state, or merely a group of friendly “independent” states, to suit their whim. Someone should have told them we saw through their subterfuge.

  9. Sea_Warrior
    June 12, 2021

    There’s a lot wrong with the G7. It’s meetings are too expensive. And the idea of inviting guest countries is dumb. But my biggest concern right now is that our PM is intent in delivering a policy agenda that Labour and the Lib Dems might have delivered had they won in 2019. It’s time that the 1922 gave him a stiff talking to. I’ll not vote Conservative again until Fred Scuttle has been driven into retirement.

    1. Lifelogic
      June 12, 2021

      Fred who?

      1. Sea_Warrior
        June 12, 2021

        One of Benny Hill’s characters. You can find some clips on YouTube. Take and look and then tell me he isn’t our PM.

        1. Lifelogic
          June 12, 2021

          Yes I see the similarity. Benny Hill was also quite popular.

    2. Ian Wragg
      June 12, 2021

      It’s time Boris found his spine. The doom mongering of SAGE not wanting to relinquish their control.
      They will never get zero civid without destroying the country. Maybe thats the plan.

    3. Christine
      June 12, 2021

      It amazes me that anyone votes for any of the current main political parties. Boris has lost the plot and the opposition is even worse. As soon as he started using the phrase Build Back Better I knew he was a NWO plant. Voters need to wake up and oust these charlatans before our economy is ruined.

      1. Lester
        June 12, 2021

        Christine

        I fear that itā€™s already too late?

      2. steve
        June 12, 2021

        Christine

        “Voters need to wake up and oust these charlatans before our economy is ruined.”

        You state that the opposition is even worse, however what Johnson intends for everyone in this country has become personal. For some it’s immigration, for others it’s BRINO, for me it’s the thinly veiled surrender of NI to the cowardly RoI and the threat to petrol supply.

        Everyone has a reason these days to hold Johnson and his party in utter contempt.

        Personally I don’t see much difference between Labour and Tory……except the fact that Mr Starmer appears straight talking whereas Johnson is an act, and I cringe at Johnson’s oratory especially when he uses the word ‘to’……which he exresses as ‘ter’. The pronunciation gives away this common con merchant.

        I shall be voting for the opposition. It’ll be worth it as far as I’m concerned just to see Johnson’s lot well and truly punished for the way they’ve betrayed this country. And until now I’ve been a conservative voter all my life.

    4. DavidJ
      June 12, 2021

      +1

    5. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Sea Warrior, Forgive me for being sceptical of your threat, but the Conservative party makes the calculation that sometime and reluctant Tory voters can always be brought on back side because dislike of the hard left exceeds dislike of the Tories.

      Labour make the same calculation, of course, in reverse. This time, though, Labour came a cropper over their policy of overturning our Leave vote at the Referendum. So something is stirring. Perhaps that’s why, having given us BINO, Boris Johnson is now governing with Jeremy Corbyn’s policies.

      1. The Prangwizard
        June 12, 2021

        The Tory leadership and establishment know they can get away with pretty much anything. None of their MPs in particular who claim to disagree or oppose have enough gumption to make any real trouble, and voters just vote without realising how they are being deceived.

      2. steve
        June 12, 2021

        Nick C

        “the Conservative party makes the calculation that sometime and reluctant Tory voters can always be brought on back side because dislike of the hard left exceeds dislike of the Tories.”

        Nick, that is a gross miscalculation by the tories.

        1. NickC
          June 13, 2021

          I hope so, Steve.

  10. steve
    June 12, 2021

    Ah yes the chair incident.

    Anti-EU as I am, I don’t think I’d have tolerated Ms Der Leyen being treated that way. I was brought up to give up my seat to a lady.

    I think the uncivilised slob should have been extracted from the chair by his ear and made to give it up for Ms Der Leyen.

    1. Everhopeful
      June 12, 2021

      Eeeeeek!
      I know men who have been half lynched for less by the ungrateful recipient of a polite gesture.
      ā€œWimmenā€ donā€™t like it you know!
      Let them get on with it.

      1. NickC
        June 13, 2021

        Indeed, Steve would not get a degree in Woke.

  11. Peter
    June 12, 2021

    The EU organisation are unlikely to to forego an ā€˜unjustified numerical advantageā€™, though drawing attention to it may possibly discomfort it.

    Anyway, it is only Western Europe and North America that are represented. The faster growing BRICS do not take part. They may have very different views on vaccines and certainly on green issues too.

    Meanwhile it is an opportunity for Boris Johnson to voice meaningless slogans like ā€˜Build Back Betterā€™.

    I wonder how the dance around the Northern Ireland Protocol will continue ?

    1. Everhopeful
      June 12, 2021

      I wonder who BJ thinks is impressed with such nonsense?
      Do they truly believe that having made such a mess of everything they have the capacity to create an improved world?
      Ohā€¦maybe just for themselves? But how far down the pecking order will that apply?
      Useful idiots cast aside first!

  12. Andy
    June 12, 2021

    It surely doesnā€™t matter because, apparently, the EU is going to collapse in 5 years. A Brexitist told me. Lolz.

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      And a Remain told me that there would be 55,000 extra penpushers at HMRC by now.

      1. MiC
        June 12, 2021

        Well, we’re short of 30,000 lorry drivers, apparently.

        They seem to have returned to eastern Europe for some reason.

        1. Peter2
          June 12, 2021

          Great job opportunities for UK citizens eh MiC.

        2. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          Martin, Remain told us there would be 800,000 jobs lost as a direct result of leaving the EU. So the 30,000 lorry drivers can easily be found in the ranks of that 800,000. Lolz . . . .

        3. a-tracy
          June 12, 2021

          MiC seems like a good opportunity for UK rail freight for long distance trunking as all the greenies want then.

        4. Micky Taking
          June 13, 2021

          well we are not buying – so the drivers can go home to be unemployed.

  13. agricola
    June 12, 2021

    The G7 are France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Japan, the UK and USA . Russia once was , but was excluded after the invasion and annexation of Crimea. It is suposedly a collection of the Worlds most advanced economies, but on that criteria alone many smaller but more competent economies should be present. How about Monaco for instant. A perfect example of how the seriously very wealthy and the not so wealthy cohabit in harmony. On no criteria should the EU be present. It isn’t a state, I would not even describe it as a commonwealth. It is a collection of bickering countries that cannot a agree on what they are or where they are heading, because they are all driven by national self interest. They don’t even qualify as part of the Anglosphere. I see them, like Russia, China, Palastine, Iran,and Burma as one of the problem areas of the World. All problems for different reasons.

    They the G7 get together, they preach, pay homage to a false religion within which they have even invented a new satan, CO2. They do nothing big about mans capacity for creating detritous, destroying wildlife or polluting the planet. They talk top down, science and engineering free solutions that only impact on mans basic freedoms. Then on Monday they will jet back to their lairs, to for instance, importing vast quantities of gas into Germany from Russia without batting an eyelid. It might ensure Germany’s continued economic dominance, while we think we can electrify everything while lacking electricity for current needs nor the infrastructure for our sparky future. In this area we are a king naked and oblivious.

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Agricola, The EU is an empire. Kim Jong-Un is a king. Modern political correctness cannot disguise either.

      1. agricola
        June 12, 2021

        If the EU is an empire, it is dying before its creation. It is merely an idea split 27 ways, whose application is equally divided. Best go back to a clean sheet of A4.

    2. Mitchel
      June 12, 2021

      The G7 is just the USA and it’s vassals and tributaries(a number of whom are still under US occupation-for their own good,of course!).See also “international community.”

  14. Nig l
    June 12, 2021

    Itā€™s a fact of political life. You are closer than anyone watching the Tories morph into Social Democrats without complaint as far as I can see so your natural home is with many of the parties in Europe.

    And in reply to,Jerry yesterday who didnā€™t read my blog closer enough. If I am quarantining for 10 days that means I have no social interaction at all so why do I need two tests when after 10 days the incubation period is over?

    Indeed having to go out and get the tests puts people at more risk than if I had stayed indoors. We now see out infection rates are higher than many parts of Portugal so I will be safer over there!

    Itā€™s bureaucracy boleaux.

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Nig1, The ONS all death graph shows three peaks over the last 18 months. The mean time of infection to death for covid19 is approximately 4 weeks. In every case the peaks come significantly less than 4 weeks after the untargeted national lockdowns. Or, to put it another way, subtracting the 4 weeks from the dates of the peaks results in the peak of infection occurring well before the lockdown start date. So none of the three lockdowns have worked.

      1. hefner
        June 12, 2021

        Or in other words the authorities were three times too slow to call the lockdowns. Isnā€™t that a conclusion that can be drawn from your comment?

        1. Jun
          June 12, 2021

          Same peaks observed in Sweden with no lockdowns.

        2. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          No, Hefner, because disguised within your claim that “the authorities were three times too slow” is the implicit assumption that lockdowns work (as in: ‘if only we’d had earlier lockdowns things would have been better’). That’s circular reasoning because you cannot start with the assumption that lockdowns work. In fact the real life evidence shows that the reduction in deaths began despite the untargeted national lockdown.

          1. hefner
            June 13, 2021

            NickC, so do I have to understand that you think that a flare-up in infections just disappears after a while without any need for any measures? Interesting. If it is the case, could you provide me a list of countries that went for your approach and subsequently did not have an increase or resurgence of infections. Thanks in advance.

    2. None of the Above
      June 12, 2021

      A family member was pinged by track & trace and advised to take a test. She tested negative but was still told to isolate. What is the point of having the test?

      1. Lester
        June 12, 2021

        None of the Above

        The first thing that I did was delete the Track and Trace app and refused to be tested ā€¦ sorted!

  15. Everhopeful
    June 12, 2021

    I heard that the oh so clever organisers/politicians of the G7 didnā€™t even think to warn Biden that his limo would not squeeze down Cornish Lanes. Oh my! Even the Great Leader didnā€™t think of it?
    Why in any case are they skulking behind vast security? Why donā€™t they have the guts to stand by their policies and face the public?

    1. hefner
      June 12, 2021

      EH, Do you want the PM to be slapped the way E.Macron was?

      1. Lord Bob
        June 12, 2021

        Yes, repeatedly until he sees sense on a number of issues.

        1. Everhopeful
          June 12, 2021

          +1

      2. Lester
        June 12, 2021

        Hefner

        YES

      3. Everhopeful
        June 12, 2021

        +1
        Perish the thought!šŸ˜‚

      4. steve
        June 12, 2021

        hefner

        “Do you want the PM to be slapped the way E.Macron was?”

        Yes, and then some.

  16. None of the above
    June 12, 2021

    An EU representative should not be there at all as it is not a nation state. Any Attendee from a State that is an EU member can easily brief his or her EU Presidents at a late date. If those EU Presidents have any orders or instructions for their subordinate, they can brief him or her before they attend.

  17. No Longer Anonymous
    June 12, 2021

    We can save Freedom Day by telling those few who are yet to be double-jabbed to wear N95 masks (perhaps the Govt could provide them free) and/or self isolation.

    Anyway.

    Back to the boycott.

    1. Gordon Bennett
      June 12, 2021

      Boris has declared that taking the knee is non political.

      How can he justify NOT him taking the knee now ? And seeing as he is about to cancel Freedom Day, taking the knee in a mask ?

      He has also said that a Catholic marriage is superior to an Anglican one.

      All of this in one week !!!

  18. Everhopeful
    June 12, 2021

    Apparently the NHS has been instructed by our lovely government to now report figures for ā€œpositiveā€ tests and people who are actually ill ā€¦.separately!
    Wellā€¦wellā€¦.why so interested in accuracy at this late date?
    Took their time didnā€™t they?

    1. Everhopeful
      June 12, 2021

      Wonder if that is an attempt to make it look as if the govtā€™s policies ( as ordered from from on high) worked?
      All ready for the next ā€œpandemicā€.
      The Global War Against Microbes!

  19. Sharon
    June 12, 2021

    ā€œBuild back more feminine ā€œ why?

    Ask most women if they want thisā€¦ most women would either prefer not to work to enable them to bring up their children or work part time which is a good balance of time and child rearing.

    What are all the men going to do if more women take the jobs- not many choose to be house husbands?

    And the EU is not a countryā€¦ itā€™s a ā€˜trading blocā€™ remember.

    Also, G7 get together, I thought that having diplomatic immunity in Cornwall meant that Covid is off limitsā€¦seems Covid didnā€™t get the email for that one.

    And for the record, Malone, Britain isnā€™t weak now, but our leaders do need to step up to the mark with regards to our best interestsā€¦.and stand up to the EU who are a hostile body.

    1. Narrow Shoulders
      June 12, 2021

      Sharon I would prefer to stay at home and home make while my wife goes out to work.

      I earn more (longevity rather than discrimination) so that option falls to my wife. A fact I regret daily

  20. Newmania
    June 12, 2021

    Illogical …but so is the G7. Its supposed to be the worlds richest ” advanced”, nations, which in effect means powerful Western Countries plus Japan, no China India Russia etc. Of the assembled economic might, the UK accounts for 6%c., the US 44%c. the EU 33% c. . It would make zero difference if we had an entire chorus line of tap dancers in tails there.
    Anyhoo, it is now clear that the UK`s ill considered fawning over Donald Trump has fatally alienated main stream America, leaving us with no ally in our increasingly bitter dispute with the EU .The visceral animosity, formerly known as the,” Easiest negotiation ever “,currently concerns the UK` unwillingness to implement the deal on Ireland it has just agreed. Excellent.
    The UK chose Brexit, then hard Brexit, and then to have a border in the Irish Sea. It signed an agreement , took the gains, ( the deal … you will recall much crowing over ) but dislikes the consequences.
    I need hardly say that this is everyone else’s fault. In the words of E. Costello ” I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused “

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      No, Newmania, it never was the “easiest negotiation ever”. Liam Fox observed – since the UK and EU started off with identical regulations – that it “should” be the easiest negotiation. Of course it wasn’t because of the hostility and intransigence of the EU which could not bear the thought of a successful UK. As ever, the EU’s position is short-sighted – it will make us turn away from the EU even more. Who in the UK would trust the EU now?

      1. steve
        June 12, 2021

        Nick C

        “Who in the UK would trust the EU now?”

        Not many that’s for sure, also buying British in the supermarkets is very poular now.

    2. Lester
      June 12, 2021

      Newmania

      I failed to notice any fawning over Donald Trump, I got the impression that they were very hostile towards him, Johnson couldnā€™t wait to welcome Biden, the breath of fresh air!

  21. David Brown
    June 12, 2021

    I am in total support of the EU and anti Brexit
    For me itā€™s good to see the EU becoming more powerful on the World stage.
    Interesting to read their could be a trade war between the EU and UK over NI
    If the USA join the EU in sanctions the UK Gov will be in a very difficult position.
    Oven ready deal was the phrase used I wonder if the Gov actually thought they could ride over the EU once the deal had been signed?
    I think this G7 summit is the start for the EU on the world stage and countries will see the EU as the voice for all Europe
    This will be more so when Scotland becomes independent and returns to the EU family
    I take a 10 year forward looking approach and in my opinion the EU will be very powerful and a super power in its own right
    Itā€™s good to see the US starting to recognise the EU as an equal.

    Reply. dream on. Biden is out to put them on his agenda

    1. None of the Above
      June 12, 2021

      Off you go then. Have a good journey and I hope you will be very happy in your new Home.

    2. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      David Brown, People who support a foreign power over their own country are traitors.

      1. David Brown
        June 12, 2021

        Put me in the tower
        Along with millions of others

        1. Lester
          June 12, 2021

          David Brown

          There was a referendum which your side lost, how about being grown up and accepting the result?

          Itā€™s called DEMOCRACY !

          1. MiC
            June 13, 2021

            He, like I do, does accept the result.

            We just think that it’s rubbish, and accept John’s kind invitation to express our views and to pass on our knowledge where they might be apposite.

            Then there’s this thing called freedom of expression, and democracy too.

            Millions of people want a different relationship with the European Union from the one that you do, and we’ll work to see if we can get it.

            OK?

        2. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          That’s put a big smile on my face, David Brown.

    3. David Brown
      June 12, 2021

      Your reply has put a big smile on my face
      I will smile even more when whatā€™s left of the UK joins the EEA in the future under a different GOV
      However as you suggest for now I will bask in the glory of dreaming on

      1. steve
        June 12, 2021

        David Brown

        Enjoy it while you can, because if history repeats itself you and your kind are in big trouble.

    4. Martyn G
      June 12, 2021

      The ICAO sets international air travel rules at a global level, which are then handed down the line to be implemented at regional and then national level.
      ICAO officially designates the the European Union as a Regional Integration Organisation (RIO). Although the EU has an official representative to the ICAO, and has observer status only, as adherence to the founding Chicago Convention is open only to states. So far as ICAO is concerned, the EU is not a State.

  22. Nig l
    June 12, 2021

    And in other news Brino is confirmed once again as we sell out fishing allowing the EU to plunder our stocks.

  23. Sir Joe Soap
    June 12, 2021

    Well as hosts we had the opportunity to point out the over-representation and correct it. Why not invite the fastest growing countries rather than the large sluggish ones? They’re clearly the ones getting things right. Israel, on vaccines. Singapore, on trade. Australia and NZ, on working on Chinese influence and as islands insulating themselves against pandemics.

  24. Roy Grainger
    June 12, 2021

    Boris is having so much fun on holiday in Cornwall heā€™s had to tell the newspapers heā€™s cancelled unlocking – no time to waste telling Parliament about it. Why do you lot put up with that ?

    1. Everhopeful
      June 12, 2021

      Sweet talk and promises.
      An ardent but faithless lover who can charm the birds out of the trees.
      The same charm wins elections and poll ratings but the promises are always empty.
      The tories like winning!

  25. Bryan Harris
    June 12, 2021

    AS the EU is not a recognized country surely only the heads of states from G7 countries should have attended — but this is how the EU are – so immature they want to make sure they are recognized and sitting with the big boys. The host should have made things clear.

    What concerns me more about the G7 meeting, more than the theatrics of the EU, is what is being agreed in closed meetings, in the corridor and even along the beach, as well as at the big table:


    – the start of global taxation;
    – more irrational green ideas and regulations;
    – agreement on CV passports;
    – ways to extend lockdowns and mask regulations, etc etc…..

    What else will Boris sign off on to make our lives even more miserable?

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Yes, Bryan Harris, that list greatly concerns me too. We shall have to think of ways of resisting all of them, not just politically, but by refusing to do what we’re told. There are two problems with idiotic laws: they’re idiotic; and they bring all law into disrepute.

    2. Lester
      June 12, 2021

      Bryan Harris

      Thereā€™s a telling what Johnson has up his sleeve, but it sure doesnā€™t involve Parliament!

      The worst PM ever ..governing by Diktat

      1. Lester
        June 12, 2021

        No telling!

  26. Bryan Harris
    June 12, 2021

    AS the EU is not a recognized country surely only the heads of states from G7 countries should have attended — but this is how the EU are – so immature they want to make sure they are recognized and sitting with the big boys. The host should have made things clear.

    What concerns me more about the G7 meeting, more than the theatrics of the EU, is what is being agreed in closed meetings, in the corridor and even along the beach, as well as at the big table:


    – the start of global taxation;
    – more irrational green ideas and regulations;
    – agreement on CV passports;
    – ways to extend lockdowns and mask regulations, etc etc…..

    What else will Boris sign off on to make our lives even more miserable?
    But what about the PM’s opening address – “In an absolutely BIZARRE opening address to the G7 summit Prime Minister Boris Johnson has said that we need the world to be ‘more gender neutral, feminine and green’. “

  27. Narrow Shoulders
    June 12, 2021

    France, Germany and Italy’s (and still to a large extent the UK’s )economic and domestic policies are dictated at EU level. There is no reason why even one representative of the EU should be there. The EU is not a country. I do not see NAFTA or ASEAN or UN representation.

    The EU punches above its weight at these junkers. Is it because it is white?

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      The EU punching above its weight, Narrow? No, the EU just likes punching smaller nations. And Remains cannot see anything uncivilised about that.

      1. Narrow Shoulders
        June 12, 2021

        The fact it is there when NAFTA and ASEAN are not suggest it is punching above its weight Nick.

        But yes it does excel at subjugation of the easily cowed.

  28. Alan Jutson
    June 12, 2021

    Will be interesting to see how the Current internal EU spat will turn out, that EU law is superior to that of any of its single nations members, so why are individual EU nations present at all ?
    Think this separate argument has a way to run as yet.

    Surely whoever hosts any meeting is in charge of the invites, yes ?

    1. glen cullen
      June 12, 2021

      Aren’t the EU the host !

    2. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Alan, Declaration 17 (Lisbon treaty) states that EU law has primacy. EU sub-states, and Remains such as Andy and Martin on here, are fully signed up to that. Which, when they claim that the 27 are “independent”, merely demonstrates that they don’t know how the EU empire works.

      1. Alan Jutson
        June 12, 2021

        NickC

        Indeed it does, but now the EU is talking about taking individual Nation EU members to Court to absolutely prove that fact, because some Nations are getting restless, and starting to become difficult.

        Also recently suggested by Germany that all veto’s will be stopped, in the interests of solidarity.

        Interesting times ahead.

    3. forthurst
      June 12, 2021

      Easy mistake to make; its actually a meeting of the G7 ( and Charles Michel, he of the ultra sharp elbows) not Boris Johnson’s nostalgically self-indulgent beach party.

  29. a-tracy
    June 12, 2021

    I took a glance at the free online Daily Express today and apparently you ā€˜blew you topā€™ John about this issue šŸ˜‚. Donā€™t question the EU machinations the Express journalists donā€™t like it, apparently you are expressing anger with this calm little tweet ā€œThe EU at the G7 can be represented by Germany, France and Italy, three voicesā€. I always like to read left wing group newspapers.

    Martin and other remainers tell us on here on a daily basis that the EU isnā€™t a Country. That is has little say over sovereign issues, yet it is over represented in a group that it doesnā€™t belong to, not just with one head like Biden to represent the whole of the USA but with two heads to join the other three EU member Countries, if the EU Commissions seeks to take a Presidential role then surely there is no need for Merkel, Draghi or Macron to attend. Seeing all five at the brilliantly arranged photo opportunity to show how united they are is like taking a look at Medusa.

    This is now a group of nine, lets hope itā€™s not majority vote as usual in matters the EU want to push through.
    ā€œGroup of Seven – The Group of Seven is an inter-governmental political forum consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. The heads of government of the member states, as well as the representatives of the European Union, meet at the annual G7 Summit. As of 2018, the G7 represents 58% of the global net wealth, more than 46% of the global gross domestic product based on nominal values, and more than 32% of the global GDP based on purchasing power parity. The seven countries involved are also the largest IMF-advanced economies in the world.ā€ Wikipedia.

  30. majorfrustration
    June 12, 2021

    The EU just likes to feel important

    1. Grey Friar
      June 12, 2021

      No, it is important. There’s the US, China and the EU. And every country which exists in the shadow of the big three. Sorry to bring news of the real world to you

      1. NickC
        June 12, 2021

        I thought you told us we shouldn’t talk about the EU because, being out, it was no longer important to us? Dear me, do make up your mind.

      2. a-tracy
        June 12, 2021

        Grey make your mind up if the EU ā€˜is importantā€™ as there is ā€œthe US, China and the EUā€ then why are Germany, France and Italy there if theyā€™ve handed over to the EU?

        To see Boris sucking up to these people who are behaving discriminatory against the UK and heā€™s doing nothing about levelling up the playing field they are playing on is sickening.

        1. Peter2
          June 12, 2021

          The EU isn’t a nation GF

      3. Lester
        June 12, 2021

        Grey Friar

        A slightly sinister presence !

  31. Everhopeful
    June 12, 2021

    Front page of Express.
    Lead story.
    šŸŒŸ

  32. BJC
    June 12, 2021

    It’s all about the seduction of power. They’ve gatecrashed the party because they’re basically insecure and the knowledge they gain feeds their lust for power. The prime aim for the EU is, in fact, to establish the initial benign “in”, from where they can slowly ingratiate themselves and exercise their more hostile influences. So, the benign G7/EU meeting in the margins of the 24 March 2014 summit, has evolved to where Ms von der Leyen can usurp Ms Merkel at this years summit (photos).

    We have our own example with NI, now feeling the hostile effects of allowing the EU to park their tanks on UK soil, handing them the “in” to interfere in UK-wide policy and controlling the narrative. The fault is all ours, because we consistently and willingly hand this untrustworthy, malevolent force the weapons to damage us. Why?

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Indeed, why, BJC? Why does Johnson allow the EU to park its tanks on UK soil? I suspect we’ll never know the truth. But one thing we do know is that he will keep up the bluster until he thinks we’re no longer paying attention. A bit like Patel forever threatening crack downs on illegal immigrants but actually doing nothing. Remains insisting we mustn’t look at what the EU is doing is part of that process of manipulation.

  33. rose
    June 12, 2021

    I would go further and say the EU should not be represented at a group of nations making national decisions and commitments, just as the EU should not be represented at the Court of St James masquerading as a nation. Other trading blocs are not represented and quite right too. Even FATGA is not represented – yet.

    1. glen cullen
      June 12, 2021

      Spot On

  34. NickC
    June 12, 2021

    The President of the EU Commission was there to make sure the President of the EU Council behaved himself politically. Just like the Commissars in the USSR.

  35. Andy
    June 12, 2021

    The EU has been invited to the G7 for years. A union of 27 of the worldā€™s wealthiest countries is a major player on the world stage – economically, diplomatically, politically. It deserves a strong voice alongside great powers like the US and Japan.

    The question now is why should Little England still be a part of the G7? Little England is now an irrelevant little backwater where the tinpot dictator – appointed by a minority – has negligible support in swathes or the country.

    In any case such is their awesome power, all of the other G7 members can still legally sell sausages throughout their own countries. Maybe one day the rest of Canada will erect an internal border with Quebec in sympathy with the Brexitists. Or perhaps the US will put a border around Minnesota – ghastly place. But, frankly, I donā€™t expect they will ever be quite that dim.

    I am exceptionally proud to be a European. And whilst the Brexitists can temporarily steal my legal rights they will never remove my identity. And the reasons the Brexitists are so scared as they know the vast majority of younger people think like me.

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      It is true, Andy, the EU’s awesome power means it does prevent us from selling sausages within our own country. You are proud of that? Really? It figures, such is your blind hatred of your own country. Yet the nastier the EU is, and the more Remains such as you unthinkingly crow about the EU’s power over us, the less likely we are to rejoin.

      1. David Brown
        June 12, 2021

        Iā€™m a remain and believe in close alliance with the EU
        I donā€™t want the UK to rejoin the EU
        I want the UK permanently locked into the EEA and to like Switzerland
        Then there is no article 50 for leaving
        This idea is already starting to circulate and I feel a future lab lib and Scots pact can make this happen

        1. Lester
          June 12, 2021

          David Brown

          Arenā€™t you concerned about the Democratic implications of your master plan?

          Donā€™t referenda carry any weight, the majority voted to leave, doesnā€™t that concern you, how would you feel if remain had won and leavers were frantically trying to undermine the result ?

          Whatā€™s sauce for the goose!

      2. Andy
        June 12, 2021

        You are funny. The EU is simply demanding that you Brexitists implement the deal that YOU negotiated, that YOU signed into law, that YOU fought an election on and that YOU had nearly every Tory MP vote for. We were told by all the Brexitists that the Withdrawal Agreement was ā€˜oven readyā€™ – we were told both it and the trade agreement were ā€˜great dealsā€™.

        And yet now you whine that the EU is being ā€˜nastyā€™ for demanding you stick to the terms of the great deal you agreed. How awful of the EU.

        1. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          Andy, The 2019 general election offered us a choice of rejoin or BINO. You may think that’s funny, but I don’t. Nor is it funny for Northern Ireland to remain in the EU’s single market, which is your preference. The only vote I had on this issue was at the Referendum, and Leave won. I have not voted on it since.

          Bear in mind that the EU has pledged to respect the integrity of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Of course no one expects the EU to honour that pledge. Not even you.

      3. Blandell
        June 12, 2021

        You’ll never be allowed to rejoin – not for a thousand years – too much trouble

        In the meantime you’ll be allowed to sell sausages or you won’t be allowed sell sausages – depends – so better behave

        1. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          Really, another 1000 year Reich?

    2. Peter2
      June 12, 2021

      So European now andy.
      Thought you were telling us you are a citizen of the EU?

      1. NickC
        June 13, 2021

        Good point, Peter.

  36. glen cullen
    June 12, 2021

    Like the NI protocol Boris knew and accepted the terms of the group dynamic before attending the G7 ā€“ he does have history of agreeing to everything EU

    With ambassadors everywhere, attendance at UN and the G7 is the EU a fully fletched country in its own right

  37. bill brown
    June 12, 2021

    Sir JR,

    The world is facing significant problems, like climate change, Covid, economic disequlibrium and many more significant challenges, that the G7 have to deal with and you talk about the over-represntation of the EU.

    What a waste of time, can’t you come up with something improtant?

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Bill Brown, There is no significant problem with the global climate.

  38. ukretired123
    June 12, 2021

    Is this the G7 or G27?
    At the Eden Project Queen’s photo-shoot a few EU spares were spotted looking like unwelcome guests on the fringes pretending to be friends when in fact they looked like silly sausages surplus to requirements.

    1. glen cullen
      June 12, 2021

      I asked my friend in Hong Kong what he thought of the G7ā€¦he said ā€˜whats that, is it a drink like 7upā€™
      The rest of the world are unconcerned about western power politics and PR summits

  39. Know-Dice
    June 12, 2021

    The question should be why are France, Germany & Italy there? They have all sold their souls to the EU super state project.
    Also, why are they disturbing the peace of a small Cornish village? With a great big aircraft carrier moored just off the coast have your cosy chats on that. Not to mention the policing cost… These people really know how to waste money…

  40. ChrisS
    June 12, 2021

    I do not see why the EU should be represented at all. The three largest member States of the EU are already at the table as genuine members of the G7 and that should be enough.
    After all, the EU is most definitely NOT a State.

    One so-called EU President could be invited, but only as an observer, that would be a fair representation.
    That person should not be accorded the same status as Scott Morrison, Moon Jae-in, Cyril Ramaphosa and Narendra Modi who are all elected leaders of Democratic Countries. Neither EU Presidents are elected in the true democratic sense of the word.

    1. ChrisS
      June 12, 2021

      PS : Biden likes to blow his tenuous Irish ancestry out of all proportion so one could say that Ireland is also represented at the G7.

      1. nota#
        June 12, 2021

        @ChrisS, it would appear from the BBC Sussex is the birthplace of the Biden’s that crossed the Atlantic to Maryland, and are said to be Joe Biden’s direct descendance. When you need to get elected in the US saying you are from English stock is a ‘so-what’ moment, say you are Irish and you secure 10% of the vote

        ref: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-57394351

    2. Andy
      June 12, 2021

      But then neither the British prime minister nor the American president are ā€˜electedā€™ in the true democratic sense of the word either. But Brexitists seem to struggle with this concept.

      1. SM
        June 12, 2021

        But the UK’s Prime Minister is not the UK’s Head of State, Andy. You know, a Head of State like President Macron, the chap who got his face slapped and who is facing violent riots in Paris over his proposed reforms to working hours and pensions.

      2. NickC
        June 12, 2021

        Andy, Both the PotUS and the UK PM are democratically elected, but the president of the EU Commission is not.

      3. Micky Taking
        June 13, 2021

        Just like you seem to struggle with the idea of majority wins in a vote!

  41. Original Richard
    June 12, 2021

    I think it is a good idea to have EU nation states represented at the G7 and thus for the UK to be able to converse with and influence each of the elected representatives of these states rather than be simply faced with an unelected EU bureaucrat with their own axe to grind.

    1. Sea_Warrior
      June 12, 2021

      So that the G7 then becomes bigger than the G20?

  42. acorn
    June 12, 2021

    Did you mean the Northern Ireland Protocol supporters are over represented at the G7? Biden has issued a diplomatic Demarche, the EU says patience is wearing thin. Extending again, to 2022, the time without full import checks is putting the wind up WTO members. The UKā€™s special treatment of EU imports for an extended indeterminate period, is against WTO rules, which require countries to treat their trading partners equally. Alas, the ERG 62’s obsessional stalking of the EU is probably the only way they can keep the holy grail of a “no-deal” Brexit simmering.

    1. Denis Cooper
      June 12, 2021

      “WTO rules, which require countries to treat their trading partners equally.”

      Wrong, as you have almost certainly been told before.

      https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/tfa-nov14_e.htm#art7

      “4 Risk Management

      4.1 Each Member shall, to the extent possible, adopt or maintain a risk management system for customs control.

      4.2 Each Member shall design and apply risk management in a manner as to avoid arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination, or a disguised restriction on international trade.

      4.3 Each Member shall concentrate customs control and, to the extent possible other relevant border controls, on high-risk consignments and expedite the release of low-risk consignments. A Member also may select, on a random basis, consignments for such controls as part of its risk management.

      4.4 Each Member shall base risk management on an assessment of risk through appropriate selectivity criteria. Such selectivity criteria may include, inter alia, the Harmonized System code, nature and description of the goods, country of origin, country from which the goods were shipped, value of the goods, compliance record of traders, and type of means of transport.”

      NB, selectivity criteria may include “… country of origin, country from which the goods were shipped … ”

      NOT, you must all trading partners the same.

      1. Denis Cooper
        June 12, 2021

        Yes, here we are once before, in March 2019, and although we discussed it then you still refuse to take it in:

        https://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2019/03/19/maybe-you-cannot-keep-asking-the-same-question-in-parliament/#comment-1005135

        That was over two years ago, and I see that my reply concluded:

        “Youā€™ve been told this before, and more than once, but even so you still try on the same old nonsense.”

        1. acorn
          June 12, 2021

          Denis, you continue to display your naivety in these trade matters. And, as you have recently reappeared on this site, after you went off in a huff when JR blackballed some of your comments; can I suggest you research “risk management experience in WTO dispute settlement”. Let me know if you need me to explain anything.

          1. Denis Cooper
            June 12, 2021

            In the meantime you could answer the point, which you failed to do on previous occasions.

          2. Denis Cooper
            June 12, 2021

            And are you sure that you wish to refer me to a book published in 2001:

            https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/2242_4.html

            to refute provisions of a treaty which came into force in February 2017?

          3. NickC
            June 12, 2021

            You’ve been rumbled, Acorn, stop digging.

    2. a-tracy
      June 12, 2021

      Acorn, why do you think the people here support the UK giving special treatment to EU imports?

      1. acorn
        June 12, 2021

        Because “the people here” keep buying loads of EU stuff and holidaying on EU beaches.
        BTW, have you noticed in your Parish that, like mine, “leave” voters don’t want to talk about Brexit anymore? Which is the exact opposite of UK mostly Conservative voting expats retired to France and Spain.

        1. Peter2
          June 12, 2021

          We have accepted we have left the EU acorn
          Unlike you.

        2. a-tracy
          June 12, 2021

          No, Iā€™ve not noticed, I had a conversation just now outside with a man about Brexit. Iā€™m in the North West are you?

        3. Cora
          June 12, 2021

          I have noticed that too. All Brexit voters change the subject when you ask how well it is going

          1. Peter2
            June 14, 2021

            6 month out, after over 40 years in the EU and you really think it is time to make a proper long term view of how well it is going Cora?

        4. a-tracy
          June 12, 2021

          Also acorn, how do you know what the people ā€˜hereā€™ buy with their money? Iā€™ve not been into Europe for a couple of years. Every time I hear of a product that we are having problems with the EU trading I stop buying EU produce and find British alternatives to support the local traders and I recommend that course of action to others. Luckily Aldi and Lidl have got on board and 75% of the veg and food products they sell are now UK made. Shame it is only the German supermarkets that have cottoned on, but I also heard Waitrose and the Co-op have started to label more and sell more British goods. Iā€™ve a feeling Anchor and Country Life are going to have a good year and British made sausages with British bred meat, letā€™s wait and see.

        5. NickC
          June 12, 2021

          Except that Leave voters on here have been told by Remain voters on here to stop talking about the EU, Acorn. Which we ignore, of course. I’ll happily talk about Leave any day. And one day I hope we’ll get it.

  43. Mark Thomas
    June 12, 2021

    Sir John,
    All this talk of the G7 and yet I’ve heard almost nothing of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. It’s as though it never happened.
    At least at the G7 we were treated to the spectacle of old Joe wandering around lost in the outdoor dining area of a cafe, much to the amusement of the customers. While wearing a suit and noticeably large white sneakers.

    1. Mitchel
      June 12, 2021

      The media is only permitted to tell negative stories about Russia-and when it can’t find them it has to make them up!

      I’m not joking.Ask the Ministry of Information.

  44. nota#
    June 12, 2021

    The EU is grossly over represented at the G7

    It comes back to the situation is the EU a Country or a Trading Block. If it is a Country then why are Germany and France there. If it is a Trading Block then why isnā€™t NAFTA, Mercosur, AFTA etc there. The other trading blocks account for more of the World Trade than the EU, yet are excluded.

    This was a gang of Merkel, Macron, YSL and Michel with one aim to get the UK back under their control and maintain their undemocratic power as a protectionist block.

    The Channel Islands, The Isle of Mann were and are still not in the EU, yet the UK could always trade with them with out an outside power defining how they should be ruled.

    In part Boris has made the personal mistake of believing the as the PM of the UK he was also PM of the Channel Islands.

    We voted leave – not BRINO.

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Exactly true, Nota.

  45. nota#
    June 12, 2021

    One big irony that has come out of this get together, from Biden a World tax. He has forgotten his roots and the start of US independence – no tax without representation.

    As he will remember (or maybe not) the last time a tax was imposed in the US by others it caused a war.

  46. John McDonald
    June 12, 2021

    Agree – The EU is not a country but it likes to think so. EU out, Russia and China in. Even if they do not think like the WEST and the Biden America . We may not be comfortable but there is a G9 like it or not.

    1. Pieter
      June 12, 2021

      Agreed the EU is not a country but rather a collection of the richest wealthiest twenty seven countries in europe bound together for reasons of the four freedoms – wow!

      1. NickC
        June 13, 2021

        Pieter, So the EU empire is “richest wealthiest 27 countries in Europe”? And the biggest market on the planet. And one of the big boys. And will punish puny Britain. And your Dad is bigger than my Dad, no doubt? How old are you, 12?

  47. X-Tory
    June 12, 2021

    I’ve never understood why the EU has *any* representative at the G7. It is clled the G7, after all, and is for the leaders of the most important democratic sovereign nations to meet. There is no reprentative of NATO, or the UN, or the OECD, or any other organisation, and neither should there be an EU representative (let alone two!). But the real fault lies with Boris Johnson. He is the host. Who he invites is up to him. So why did he invite the EU? He should simply have omitted them from the invitation list. But once again, he didn’t have the guts. The man is a disgrace to Britain.

    Then again, it is clear that Boris has been completely emasculated. Hence his embarrassing nonsense about a more feminine policy. It is clear that he is now simply the puppet of the unelected Lady Carrie Macbeth.

    1. nota#
      June 12, 2021

      @X-Tory – Agreed

      for the leaders of the most important democratic sovereign nations to meet Then Boris sits the un-elected un-accountable at the top table. Or maybe that’s the new World Order if your mates and chums in your club suggest you should rule and not the people that is the new democracy. May be that’s what’s in store for the UK

  48. Denis Cooper
    June 12, 2021

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57453004

    “The disagreement between the UK and the EU is over the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol, a measure in the Brexit deal which prevents checks on trade across the Irish border.

    Some checks are taking place on British goods entering Northern Ireland, causing disruption to food supplies.

    A Downing Street spokesman said: “Currently as implemented, the protocol is having a damaging impact on the people of Northern Ireland.

    “We need to find urgent and innovative solutions.””

    How many times have I heard that, during the tenures of both Theresa May and Boris Johnson?

    But whenever a rational alternative solution is proposed it is either simply ignored or it is outright rejected.

    Why is that? Is it to do with the carefully cultivated delusion that we need a special trade deal with the EU?

    1. NickC
      June 12, 2021

      Keep going, Denis, eventually it must penetrate their thick skulls.

    2. mancunius
      June 12, 2021

      That, plus the other carefully cultivated delusion that the Belfast Agreement somehow abolishes the political and economic border between the UK and the RoI and leads the way to handing over UK citizens to the tender mercies of the RoI. It does no such thing, though you could be forgiven for thinking that history-ignorant Westminster MPs have only contempt for Northern Ireland’s UK loyalists. They spit on the very word. Yet loyalism means a patriotic adherence to and support of the UK: something many MPs would do well to emulate!

      1. Peader
        June 12, 2021

        First of all let’s get one thing straight the Unionists in NI for fifty years after the foundation of the NI state was founded had a chance to deal with the nationalist people there in a decent and fair manner – but they didn’t. So now it seems according to mancunius it’s ok to keep nationalist irish people to the yoke of unionists domination but not ok for unionist people to live with an irish majority. Well the word is that demographics is takeing over and it us only a matter of a short while. Then after Scotland gets independence there will be no more UK there will be no more GB either all of the treaties signed in centuries back will be null and void – so you see where i’m coming from ‘ eejit

        1. NickC
          June 13, 2021

          There’s no independence within the EU either, Peader.

        2. Micky Taking
          June 13, 2021

          Thats all fine with me, how about you?

  49. X-Tory
    June 12, 2021

    Sir John, given your concern for Britain’s fishing industry I am astonished that you have had nothing to say about the latest sell-out of our fishermen. While the latest fishing deal does give British fishermen a very small increase in their permitted catch, it also allows EU fishermen an UNLIMITED amount of non-quota species. How on earth can this plundering of the seas around our coast be sustainable or good for the long-term of these species? Clearly it isn’t, which is why the UK-EU TCA stipulates that the UK will impose limits on the catch allowed of these species. But instead Boris the Betrayer has FAILED to do so. There is not even going to be any assessment of the health of the fish stocks.

    YOUR government claims that the decision not to place quotas this year is due to ā€œthe unique situation this yearā€. Perhaps yu could tell us precisely WHAT is “unique” about this year? The only thing I can think of is Covid, but clearly this is not relevant to the amount of fish that is caught, so it can’t be that. So what, precisely, is it that means that quotas cannot, or should not, be imposed?

    Reply I opposed the fishing agreement, have urged them to ban ultra large vessels and oppose this decision.

    1. Derek
      June 13, 2021

      SJ, has the Bill now passed through the HoC, unopposed by the majority?
      As our elected representatives, MPs should be made to explain their voting decisions lest we lose more democracy in this country.
      Over the past decades we have seen too many self-serving MPs consistently go against the wishes of their electorate, who were eventually removed via the Ballot Box. But look at the damage they did before they were thrown out.
      And there lies the problem, we really only have our democracy for one day in every five years. And that is not good enough.

  50. Lar
    June 12, 2021

    “The EU is grossly represented at the G7” more than that it is like these huge multi corporations that are so big and powerful that they have to be broken up by law – same should happen to the EU it should be broken up disbanded scattered because we say so and it doesn’t suit us.

  51. Derek
    June 12, 2021

    Since when was the EU inducted into G7? Why not admit China too? They are both managed by neo-marxists?

    1. Pieter
      June 12, 2021

      The G7 is not a club it can be anything – it can be a figment – it can be make it up as you go along

      1. NickC
        June 13, 2021

        What you mean like Remain?

  52. jon livesey
    June 12, 2021

    This is a typical example of a dialog of the deaf. The fans of the EU will actually *define* power as EU membership, despite the fact that legally and by Treaty, the EU members have surrendered power to the EU.

    We have been here before. In the heyday of Soviet communism we regularly heard that Soviet citizens had more power than we did because the State acted on their behalf, and that they had more rights because they had a written Constitution.

    And back then, just as today, people with a certain cast of character obsessively defended these ideas, and even interpreted the abuses of the Soviet Union as necessary corrections to those who did not understand how privileged they were to be Soviet.

    This isn’t a debate about systems. It is a debate between people who can live their own lives, and those who have to have authority figures to tell them what to think and what to do, and how straight their bannanas ought to be.

  53. The Prangwizard
    June 12, 2021

    In my view what is grossly unacceptable is the military oppression of our waters, airspace and land by US forces. I oppose the demonstration of their killing power on our land. Their armed paramilitary forces are not wanted.

    Do you think US behaviours are those of a trusting friend Sir John?

  54. Original Richard
    June 12, 2021

    If the G7 say they can plan to prevent future pandemics then either there is something about the Covid-19 pandemic which they are not telling us or else they’re all believing they’re King Canute.

  55. Alastair Findlay
    June 12, 2021

    Where the EU has primacy, it would make sense as JR suggests, for it to attend these jollies as the member states have relinquished their control. There should, as for other members, be one representative. This would emphasis to the EU member states that they have no individual voice on the world stage on that matter.
    Similar considerations would apply at other international fora, eg the United Nations, particularly when there is a High Representative for the EU foreign policy and continuing talk about EU control over some armed forces.
    I doubt this will be acceptable to the EU member states, so other nations/ members will need to take the lead. The UK, perhaps?

  56. jon livesey
    June 12, 2021

    A lot of people take their news at face value, and I suppose those people think that Biden, Johnson and the EU are in Cornwall to fight something out. In reality, international meetings are choreographed well in advance and the public appearances simply confirm what was decided weeks before.

    What we see today is a very much over-telegraphed bit of comedy in which Biden “leans on” Johnson. Now think about that. Johnson is going to risk being humiliated at his own Summit? Biden is going to tell Johnson what to do and being told to buzz off? No-one holds an international meeting for the pleasure of experiencing a domestic political disaster.

    All that will happen here is that Biden will return to Washington assuring his base that he told off “the Brits”, but everyone knows that the NI situation has to change, and not in the direction the EU would prefer, and Macron will go on trolling the UK while seeking the protection of a close British alliance – it’s an election year.

    NI is shaping up as a mini-Brexit. The EU shows up with all guns blazing, and three months later we will see that the situation has been quietly adjusted in favour of the UK. To paraphrase Reagan, you can win anything you want as long as you let the other guy fly pretty flags for his voters.

  57. Original Richard
    June 12, 2021

    The G7 are not discussing the most important issue, which is not CAGW as evidenced by the fact that the planet has been steadily warming since the last glacial maximum 22,000 years ago and hence well before any man made CO2 entered the atmosphere.

    They should be discussing how to curb population growth and massive flows of migration.

    Or are these issues not considered a problem for them as after all Mrs May did sign the UK up to the UN Global Compact for Migration without any vote in Parliament, let alone a referendum.

  58. Pieter
    June 12, 2021

    This time Boris decided.. he is the host

  59. Garret
    June 12, 2021

    My point about writing is to get my message through to the principal but if it gets lost like being suddenly deleted.. ah well I understand.. happens in other countries J have lived in as well. But am surprised about censorship in Britain

  60. Paul Cuthbertson
    June 12, 2021

    Once again state the obvious on this site which does not comply with the Establishment narrative and it does not get published.

  61. Treacle
    June 12, 2021

    Macron today told Boris Johnson that Northern Ireland is not part of the UK. That is truly staggering.

    1. Micky Taking
      June 13, 2021

      Did you mean truly ignorant?

    2. MiC
      June 13, 2021

      Well since the DUP themselves – of all people – have been wailing and screeching that the brilliantly-negotiated NIP has resulted in exactly this, what is wrong with Macron’s observation?

      Who is to argue with the “experts”?

  62. XY
    June 13, 2021

    That was my take on it also – the EU should not be there, they are merely a trade bloc.

    France and Germany are over-represented since they have their own Head of State and two EU presidents.

    It is more akin to the USA sending its president, the leader of one of its Houses and the leaders of its two largest States, say California and Texas.

    I really wish the other countries would stop inviting appointed EU officials to meetings for countries and stop giving them the right to have “ambassadors” – certainly not with full diplomatic status.

  63. Cat Daddy
    June 14, 2021

    The President of the European Commission has attended since he was first invited to the third G7 summit in 1977, Roy Jenkins was the then-President.[2] Since 1981 the President has attended all sessions of the G7.[3] The EU is currently represented by the Commission President and the President of the European Council.[2] The latter used to be the rotating chair of the council of EU state leaders, with irregular attendance since 1982.[4] The Council Presidency sometimes coincided with one of the G8 members, in which case that leader attended with their national and European mandate.[2] Since 2009, the President of the European Council is a permanent position, who always attends the summits. As the EU is a member, what the Presidents endorse at the G8 is politically binding on them.[2]

Comments are closed.