Ed Balls shows he is more politician than Cabinet Minister

Ed Balls came to the House for a debate on Education and Health with a soundbite in mind. He intended to share it with Parliament, the media and anyone else still listening. It praised the government and ran down the Conservatives in a predictable and foolish way.

The soundbite was that Labour wants educational excellence for all, the Conservatives for the few.

Like so much from this government, the soundbite was too clever by half. It seeks to mislead people about Conservative policy, and confuse them in a favourable way about Labour policy. He did little to explain how his policy would work in practise, and why we should believe standards will make a great leap forward on his watch. There was little detail on how the large number of students who do not do well at GCSE and leave school at 16 would suddenly be transformed by another two years of school or College.

The truth is both the Labour and Conservative parties want to extend educational opportunity to all, and both strive to make public sector education better for the many who will rely on tax financed schooling. The Conservatives do not wish to limit excellence to the few.

The truth is also that under either a Labour or Conservative government there will be students who do not achieve the excellence that Ministers and teachers would like. Labour’s aspiration is not very different from the Conservative one, and Labour’s results are disappointing judged by the grand claim of their Schools Secretary. Conservatives are more honest in admitting that not everyone will be able to achieve academic excellence or vocational excellence, whatever policy is adopted. We are a long way from that happy outcome today, yet the Secretary of State showed no humility before the scale of the task, or even any recognition of how many pupils find school a disappointment that does not work for them.

The debate should have been about the detail. Given that all main parties want the best for all children, the debate should be about whether new diplomas replacing A levels and the current raft of vocational qualifications will make such a difference to real achievement as the goverbment asserts. The debate should be about how courses and curricula can be made more relevant – whilst maintaining or raising standards – to engage more students willingly in learning. The debate should be about whether compulsion to 18 will work where compulsion to 16 does not work for all too many at the moment. I am not proposing a lowering of the school leaving age but a recognition of the reality that some 14-16 years olds do not value school as it is today, and more work to engage the 14-16 year olds before compelling the 16-18 year olds to stay.

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

4 Comments

  1. Cliff
    Posted November 13, 2007 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Is Ed Balls short for Education Balls up?

    We need to take politicians out of education and trust the professionals.

    We teach children from a very young age to pass tests, this in my opinion is wrong. These tests are on very narrow subjects. We should be teaching a wider curriculum in order to make lessons interesting and stimulating. Children will take in information they find interesting and information that is presented in a lively entertaining way.

    It seems the government move the goalposts every year or so with education, they need to stop now, well actually after they have implemented real Conservative educational reforms based on Grammar, technical and secondary modern schools. Just because the idea is old, it does not mean it is wrong.

  2. Letters From A Tory
    Posted November 14, 2007 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    Excellence for everyone, Ed?

    Maybe someone should remind him that universities and employers are refusing to accept his new 14-19 diplomas on the basis that they are pathetic qualifications?
    http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com

  3. judy from the north
    Posted November 14, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    i am so glad someone saw how awful Ed Balls was in the debate yesterday it was an old style politics.He never gave ministers chance to debate it was bash the tories the whole time until the speaker told him to get on with it.Am i alone in thinking he is Auther Scargill in disguise

  4. Neil Craig
    Posted November 14, 2007 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    I suppose the alternate to that soundbite would be to say that Labour promise to make every student above average & the Tories only a minority.

    Reply: Ten years into a Labour government and still half of all the people are on below average earnings!

  • About John Redwood


    John Redwood won a free place at Kent College, Canterbury, and graduated from Magdalen College Oxford. He is a Distinguished fellow of All Souls, Oxford. A businessman by background, he has set up an investment management business, was both executive and non executive chairman of a quoted industrial PLC, and chaired a manufacturing company with factories in Birmingham, Chicago, India and China. He is the MP for Wokingham, first elected in 1987.

  • John’s Books

  • Email Alerts

    You can sign up to receive John's blog posts by e-mail by entering your e-mail address in the box below.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    The e-mail service is powered by Google's FeedBurner service. Your information is not shared.

  • Map of Visitors

    Locations of visitors to this page