Calamity Clegg is Euro Clegg

Readers of this site know that I have always thought Clegg would win, and never thought it made much difference whether he or Huhne did. They both believe in massive transfers of power to the EU, and both want to deny us the promised referendum on the constitutional treaty.

Mr Clegg should be given no honeymoon, as his leadership begins by denying the referendum his party promised in the last election. He and his party misled the public, and he cannot claim to be a new honest face when his first important deed will be to instruct Lib Dem MPs to vote against our referendum amendment to the European Treaty Bill. His silly rejoinder that he wants an In-Out referendum just increases people’s cycnicism about politics, as Labour has clearly ruled such a vote out, and never promsied one of those in the first place. We should expect rebels of conscience on the Labour side over a Treaty referendum, but they are not in the same embarrassing position over an In-Out vote.

Mr Clegg’s very poor margin of victory will mean he has to get on with Mr Huhne, and will doutbless tack a little more to the "left" or bigger state side of the argument, as that is clearly what his party membership wants. Mr Clegg has no decisive mandate for change, and will need to be careful. Lib Dems turn nasty if they do not win by-elections. Mr Clegg will have to watch his back if the third party squeeze continues.

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Posted December 19, 2007 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    He touted his liberalism -and in the next breath lauded the EU. We call that chutzpah round here…

  2. Posted December 19, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    What odds that if their poor polls don't turn round Huhne will get a 3rd chance?

  3. Ian Edney
    Posted December 19, 2007 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    Clegg is a good egg and will soon be PM

  4. Jonathan Robson
    Posted December 20, 2007 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    I think the Liberal Party should change their name – do these people know what liberal actually means. In my book most conservatives are more liberal.

    "liberal

    a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets "

    Doesn't sound like the LibDems does it?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • About John Redwood

    John Redwood has been the Member of Parliament for Wokingham since 1987. First attending Kent College, Canterbury, he graduated from Magdalen College, and has a DPhil from All Souls, Oxford. A businessman by background, he has been a director of NM Rothschild merchant bank and chairman of a quoted industrial PLC.
  • John’s Books

  • Email Alerts

    You can sign up to receive John's blog posts by e-mail by entering your e-mail address in the box below.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    The e-mail service is powered by Google's FeedBurner service. Your information is not shared.

  • Map of Visitors

    Locations of visitors to this page