The government of England

When I took the unfairness of UK devolution to David Cameron as Prime Minister he agreed something needed to be done. The original idea of EVEN, English votes for English needs, was watered down by William Hague and called English votes for English laws. I always assumed choosing EVEL not EVEN as the shorthand was deliberate to portray a good cause in a not so good light. Instead of England emerging with the right to initiate our own laws in devolved areas of activity, and to veto any move by the Union Parliament to override English decisions on devolved matters, we only kept the right to a veto.

I always argued that English devolution could best be done at Westminster, with a Grand Committee of all English MPs elected to the Commons debating and deciding on English laws where they were needed for devolved matters like Health and Education, and supervising the English budgets. I saw no need for a separate and expensive English Parliament to mirror the Scottish one, though some in England wrote to me requesting one.

This week-end I call on the government to preserve our right of veto, not to strike it down. Surely on this week-end of all week=ends, when English people are united and purposeful behind our football team and proud of their achievement so far, we do not deserve negative treatment. I urge the government to adopt EVEN, a very modest proposal to give to England some of the devolved power the Scottish Parliament enjoys. I would welcome your views.

220 Comments

  1. Garland
    July 10, 2021

    This is dangerous nonsense. The UK Parliament is 85% English. There has NEVER been an occasion where Scots, Welsh or NI MPs have blocked English MPs from getting what they want – they couldn’t, the Scots, Welsh and NI are a small minority. All you are doing with this false claim is whipping up anger among English people to make them think – wrongly – that they are currently disadvantaged. But I suppose this what the Conservative Party has become – a nasty inward-looking English nationalist party, first blaming the EU for stopping you getting your own way, now blaming the Scots, the Welsh, and NI. Truly sad to see what the party of MacMillan and Thatcher has become.

    1. lifelogic
      July 10, 2021

      Just one MP can block things sometimes. 15% is plenty.

      1. lifelogic
        July 10, 2021

        Good piece by Charles Moore today:- People are starting to confront the painful choices that Net Zero involves. Why are we expected to abandon gas boilers, when the expensive alternative will not reduce emissions?

        He is right heat pumps are very expensive, less effective & convenient than gas and save little or usually no net CO2. Changing you old car for an electric one (this causing a new one to be built) will almost always increase CO2 emissions. He notes that electricity prices are already about 40% above what they would be without the government’s green crap market Kwasi Kwarteng
        All this is politically suicide too. So why exactly is this the bonkers agenda – Boris, Sunak, Kwasi Kwarteng & Carrie?

        1. NotA#
          July 10, 2021

          @lifelogic and of course the grandstanding of ditching of everything that works and importing a lot of new rubbish from China will save the world, save the planet. Xi Jinping will thank Boris, as in the same way he will thank Boris for handing over the strategic semiconductor plant in Wales.

          Control the market you control the price and the consumer.

          1. Lifelogic
            July 10, 2021

            What about the semiconductor plants in Taiwan? All very worrying indeed.

        2. rose
          July 11, 2021

          Bim Afolami write first (in Conservative Home) about the sucidal nature of the Government’s energy policy.

    2. lifelogic
      July 10, 2021

      Just 25 MPs switching votes in the vote for the speaker would have saved us from suffering John Bercow and all the dithering, incompetence and blatant dishonesty we suffered post the Brexit vote could perhaps have been avoided (this after Cameron abandoned the bridge like a petulant child).

      1. Alan Jutson
        July 10, 2021

        Lifelogic

        Indeed, Bercow was supported by Labour because he was Labour himself in reality, the fact that he came out to admit it a few weeks ago proves it really.
        Clearly he hoodwinked the voters of Buckingham, as well as the Conservative Party

      2. steve
        July 10, 2021

        LL

        “Cameron abandoned the bridge like a petulant child”

        I’d have said Cameron was more flatulent than petluant in his exit following the referendum result.

        Never the less Johnson will do likewise when he has caused revolt in NI, or allowed the Scottish National Socialist Workers Party to rip the UK apart, though more in the style of slobbishly leaving a mess for someone else to deal with than running like a petulant child, I suspect.

    3. Everhopeful
      July 10, 2021

      Good Lord!
      If only they had.

    4. Robert McDonald
      July 10, 2021

      That misses the point. If even one Welsh, Irish, Scottish MP votes against a law that only affects England then they are acting aggressively to challenge the wishes of the English voter, that is only going to exacerbate any conflict. And there will always be one.

      1. lifelogic
        July 10, 2021

        +1

    5. steve
      July 10, 2021

      Garland

      Be assured English Nationalists don’t accord Johnson and his government any legitimacy whatsoever, and they certainly won’t be voting for them at the next General Election.

      John Redwood MP is not whipping up anyone’s anger, Johnson and his predecessor Theresa May did that already with their treason.

      Sir Redwood is simply inviting views & discussion from the people on a daily basis, 365 days a year at his own expense, and in this way offers direct access to an MP by everyone to have their opinions acknowleged, regardless of political ideology.

      Can you name any MP who provides such facility as this ?

      Please give the man some credit rather than accuse him of agitation, and perhaps recognise that he does not reside in an ivory tower, unlike the rest of them.

      1. ChrisS
        July 10, 2021

        Hear ! Hear !

      2. a-tracy
        July 10, 2021

        Well said Steve

      3. Ian Wragg
        July 10, 2021

        Well said, we have more than enough whingeing trolls on here.
        Sir John provides an excellent platform for us to air our views.
        I suspect many in government read the comments to gauge public opinion.

      4. lifelogic
        July 10, 2021

        Imdeed.

      5. Jim Whitehead
        July 10, 2021

        Steve, +1. Hear, Hear!

      6. Peter2
        July 10, 2021

        Very well said Steve

        1. Jacqui
          July 10, 2021

          Well said.Steve

        2. John Hatfield
          July 10, 2021

          And from me.

      7. Fedupsoutherner
        July 10, 2021

        Great post Steve.

      8. MiC
        July 12, 2021

        “…the Scots have their bagpipes, the Welsh have their leek
        but the English have nothing, of which one might speak…”

        As the Irish sing.

    6. BW
      July 10, 2021

      What nonsense. England is the only country on the European continent not to have its own Parliament. There are no English MP, in the Scottish or Welsh Parliament. Devolution was the worst decision in generations. It has given rise to nationalist and all the hatred nationalist will always bring with them.

      1. lifelogic
        July 10, 2021

        +1 , Blair did huge harm (& not just his counterproductive wars) all largely thanks to Major’s idiotic ERM fiasco & his failure to even apologise or resign post white Wednesday. Then again one might blame Thatcher’s bonkers decision to appoint Major (without even a maths O level) as Chancellor. Bit then without the ERM fiasco we might never have achieved Brexit (or rather never almost have achieved Brexit).

      2. John
        July 10, 2021

        There are no English MPs in the the current parliament, they are all British and have a vested interest in not giving ENGLAND any voice whatsoever. There would be no extra expence if we got rid of hundreds of unecessary British MPs, Ministers and Quangos.

        1. JoolsB
          July 10, 2021

          +1

        2. steve
          July 10, 2021

          John

          “There are no English MPs in the the current parliament, they are all British ”

          There is a PM who’s half – Belgian and is a catholic…….and will therefore always side with European and catholic countries.

          Hence the sell – out of NI ?

          Maybe the Falklands next.

      3. Old Salt
        July 10, 2021

        BW-
        As I see it devolution is the cause of all the ongoing unsatisfactory situation regarding what was the United Kingdom. Past followers of the EU in high office being responsible but in reality it is the voters for voting them in in the first place. The EU embarks on a divide and rule or conquer with little or no opposition. Then we have the Global Migration policy eagerly signed up to also the HRA/ECHR, NIP – no border down the Irish sea – all against the popular vote. This is not democracy as described. More like BRINO not taking back control.

        We do not have a housing crisis we have an immigration crisis for at least the last decade despite promises. It is difficult to get around here as it is without all the extra tens of thousands of new houses and additional new towns planned on farmland with little or no additional infrastructure. Where is all the additional infrastructure and ongoing supply and support coming from? Less food producing acres more concrete adding to more flooding. All adding to more international c02 food miles as we are not self sufficient relying on other countries as we are increasingly so for energy etc. Electricity powered everything madness. Just where does it all end? Where are the jobs for all the new occupiers or are they all on social, working from home and not actually doing anything much manually productive? Just about most every ‘Western’ item recently bought is found to be ‘Made in China’. We as a country has become a more consumptive than a productive country which basically needs to be reversed if we are to balance the books.

    7. NickC
      July 10, 2021

      Garland, How is an English parliament for England so “dangerous”, and “false”, and “nasty”, and “inward-looking”, but a Scottish parliament isn’t?

      1. lifelogic
        July 10, 2021

        The Scottish one surely is largely is “dangerous”, “false”, “nasty” and “inward-looking” under Sturgeon and the SNP.

    8. Roy Grainger
      July 10, 2021

      Nonsense. Allowing the SNP MPs in Westmister to vote on English education policy (for example) is totally unjustified and gives the socialists more votes in England than they should have.

      1. Jacqui
        July 10, 2021

        Roy Grainger
        I agree. We are angry about this be used the Government are taking the English for granted. Michael Gove apparently said the Barnet formula would remain indefinitely even if Scotland and Wales gained independence! Why would still pay the Barnet formula from our taxes when they don’t want to be part off the Union. I think the riot would be worse than the poll tax! SNP MPs have said they will deliberately vote down English laws as payback for no referendum. We have for years not been allowed to out on form we are English and had to put British but They could be Scottish, Welsh and Irish. So unfair and the Government think we should accept this it makes me very angry.
        Sir John Redwood is the only MP I heard in Parliament that stands up for England. At the moment I feel I have no party to vote for because none of them have English or British values anymore. English. MPs can’t vote on the laws that belong only to the devolved nations so why should SNP, Welsh and NI MPs be able to vote on English laws. England is always left out and ignored. Fed up told woke and white privileged nonsense, children will be taken out of school if it continues.

        1. S. Scullion
          July 12, 2021

          I could not agree more, wise words.

    9. a-tracy
      July 10, 2021

      Garland – Sunday trading that Scotland enjoys already – “SNP stop rest of country have freedom Scotland has.” MPs were denied the opportunity to debate the 11th-hour compromise, after Speaker John Bercow declined to provide Commons time.”

    10. Iain Moore
      July 10, 2021

      Gordon Brown marshalled Scottish elected MPs to support Blair’s imposition of the tuition fees on English students, it wouldn’t have got through without those votes.

      The last act by Gordon Brown as Chancellor was to slash the capital spending budget of the English NHS by one third , he did not correspondingly cut the budget given to Scotland.

      Garland here you have the consequences of having a mercenary cohort of MPs in the Commons who can vote stuff on other people that won’t have an effect on their own constituents, the West Lothian Question. It also shows that these MPs can not be denied jobs at the highest level in the British state , again inflict stuff on other people that won’t effect their own , a structure more closely related to colonialism than democracy.

      We also have the case of Emma Block, an English student studying in Scotland, who took the Scottish Government to court for their discrimination of financially penalising English students (EU students got their university courses free). She lost her case , but what was remarkable was that no English elected MP fought her corner, there was no groundswell of outrage in the Commons for this injustice, no they were silent, the problem being they see themselves as British MP’s, not English, so the English people do not have a collective identity in Parliament that fights our corner, with the result we get a raw deal from Parliament in pretty much everything.

      This is why we need an English Parliament.

    11. JoolsB
      July 10, 2021

      Garland,
      With respect you are totally wrong. Thanks to the votes of MPs elected outside of England, tuition fees and foundation hospitals were only able to be introduced in England. Without their interference, they would never have got through. The bill for extended Sunday trading also failed thanks to the SNP voting against because although already enjoying extended Sunday trading in Scotland, they didn’t want the competition from across the border.
      You’re kind of missing the point, even if their voting had not made one jot of difference, it’s an insult to the English that they get to vote on our business in the first place. But you’re not alone. It seems 533 UK MPs squatting in English seats don’t have a problem with it either.

    12. Paul Marks
      July 10, 2021

      What if the English MPs are divided, as they always are, then that 15% may force on England laws that the English people do not want.

      1. a-tracy
        July 12, 2021

        Paul, as they did on tuition fees in England – Between 1997 and 2015, Labour had the great majority of MPs in Scotland and more Welsh MPs than the other parties.
        This meant that a Labour Government could whip its Scottish and Welsh MPs to vote for legislation only affecting England, even when a majority of English MPs were against it.

        This happened in 2003. There was a major rebellion of Labour MPs against their Government’s proposals for foundation hospitals. English MPs voted by a majority of 1 against the proposal but Labour Scottish and Welsh MPs saw the legislation through.

        The same happened when the Labour Government wanted to raise tuition fees to ÂŁ3000 a year. This proposal was passed with the help of 46 Scottish Labour MPs, 5 SNP MPs and 10 Scottish Lib Dems even though the Scottish Government had decided against tuition fees in Scotland.

        We English electors need to know the name of every English MP that votes against EVEN/EVEL and check if ours did so.

  2. agricola
    July 10, 2021

    It is not as complex as some would have us believe. For Westminster there is UK business and English business. I don’t know the ratio but suspect UK business predominates.

    The simple solution is for the Speaker to invite all devolved members to retire while English business is dealt with. With a little organisation and scheduling the devolved members could get on with constituency business. There is no need for it to be any more complex.

    1. Alan Jutson
      July 10, 2021

      Agricola
      The most simple, cost effective, and sensible solution, so sure as eggs are eggs it will not happen, because politicians always like complex, expensive and confusing solutions to anything.

      1. Micky Taking
        July 10, 2021

        and the sound of their own voice in the chamber.

      2. Jim Whitehead
        July 10, 2021

        AJ, +1, It’s a pity but it’s true. Elected and unelected apparatchiks copper plate whatever comes before them because ‘it’s in our interest’.
        Bureaucratic bindweed.

        1. Alan Jutson
          July 10, 2021

          Jim

          You only have to look at the Northern Ireland Fiasco for confirmation of complication, when the simple solution was staring them in the face.
          We still have the simple solution in our hands, but Boris does not seem to have the courage to announce it.

    2. Roy Grainger
      July 10, 2021

      The SNP wouldn’t “retire”, it is in their interest to cause as much trouble as possible to alienate English voters and MPs to further their independence campaign. They vote on Covid restrictions which affect only England for example.

      1. lifelogic
        July 10, 2021

        +1

    3. a-tracy
      July 12, 2021

      agricola, yes but then how do they defend the expensive talking shops MSP’s and all their on-costs away in Scotland, that’s why nothing will change its double money spent up there and in Wales.

  3. Malone
    July 10, 2021

    Yet more politics of grievance. You whine about English MPs not being able to initiate laws. Give me one example of English MPs wanting something and Cameron, May or Johnson not giving you it because the Scots block it. One example. You haven’t got one because there isn’t one

    Reply The key point is to have a system of English devolution that works if party A has a majority in England but not for the UK as a whole at Westminster.

    1. lifelogic
      July 10, 2021

      To reply – exactly and it would also be good if the devolved parliaments just occasionally worked for what was best for their people and the UK as a whole, rather than turn everything in to a political battle or tool for independence.

      1. Alan Jutson
        July 10, 2021

        +1

      2. turboterrier
        July 10, 2021

        LL
        Totally correct.

    2. Peter Parsons
      July 10, 2021

      How about having a voting system where party A has a majority only if a majority vote for it? If it’s good enough for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, it should be good enough for England too.

      1. hefner
        July 10, 2021

        Somewhat related to your point, see commonslibrary.parliament.uk ‘General Election 2019: Marginality’

      2. Peter2
        July 10, 2021

        In for example Italy, people vote for a party because they like its policies and then post election find due to coalition negotiations that all the policies they voted for are dropped.

    3. hefner
      July 10, 2021

      Reply to reply (below Malone): Give us a proportional voting system first so that we get out of the CP/Labour/(LibDem) vice tools and allow other parties, whether Reform or Green or new ones, to be properly represented.
      You may even benefit from such a ‘liberation’ being able to show your true colours.

      1. forthurst
        July 10, 2021

        The Tory party gives its adherents a sense of self-worth especially for those of a modest background. Don’t expect serious constitutional reform when there is still a supply of sticking plaster.

    4. a-tracy
      July 14, 2021

      Malone, we’ve given you two above, Student tuition fees and maintenance/grant repayments for English Students ONLY. +stopping England having freer trading rules on Sundays that Scotland enjoys and voted for themselves. Let them carry on, it will be easy to land this punch on the English Labour and Lib Dem and Green Party at the next election, they didn’t stand up for England and voted our rights away on devolved matters.

  4. Andy
    July 10, 2021

    We have a government of England. Conservative MPs – elected almost exclusively in England – have a veto over what happens in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. For example, the Tory pensioners – elected by a minority – can impose their will over Brexit on the people of Scotland and Northern Ireland. People there did not want it, they do not want it – and they overwhelmingly reject it. The English pensioners imposed it anyway.

    I suspect a majority of young people are deeply disturbed by the Tory pensioners decision to put young people’s lives at risk by letting Covid rip try through unvaccinated young people. Some young people will die, many will suffer from Long Covid. Not something they want – something imposed on them by the pensioners. Elected by a minority.

    What Conservatives object to is not getting their own way. This is why they attack devolved administrations, the media, the judiciary, experts – and why they want to reduce the franchise and change constituency boundaries so fewer people vote for other parties.

    The majority do not vote for the Conservative party. We need to change the system so it is recognised that they are a minority.

    Reply Brexit was a decision of the people of the UK by referendum

    1. Everhopeful
      July 10, 2021

      Andy.
      Your transparent socialist/Marxist tactic of divide and rule is an extremely cruel one, especially when applied to different generations.
      The harm it has caused is incalculable.
      However, rest assured that our present government backs you up in all your aspirations.
      The English united would be their worst nightmare come true.

      “Speaking for England”
even that has gone!

      1. Micky Taking
        July 10, 2021

        cruel? or just ignorant!

      2. Roy Grainger
        July 10, 2021

        I’m not sure he’s a Marxist, just an entitled middle-class middle-aged bad loser.

        1. J Bush
          July 10, 2021

          I suspect he is neither middle aged, a Businessman, or middle class (though he may be a ‘Tarquin’), but nonetheless a youngster, with an axe to grind because everything he wants hasn’t been handed to him on a platter. The reason I say this is because of his abject ignorance about so much of the Real World of Business he claims to be in.

          If he was what he claims to be, he would have been a child, possibly in teen years during the Winter of Discontent. He would have witnessed his parents working and doing without luxuries, so they could afford the mortgage to keep the roof over their heads, during a period when inflation was 15%+. However, he displays an exceptional ignorance about this era. This is further confirmed by his naive assumption the older generation didn’t work for what they have achieved after a lifetime of work.

          1. steve
            July 10, 2021

            J Bush

            “but nonetheless a youngster, with an axe to grind because everything he wants hasn’t been handed to him on a platter. ”

            In a nutshell, J Bush +1

    2. NickC
      July 10, 2021

      Andy, All of the southern (border) constituencies of Scotland are Conservative. But the SNP – elected by a minority – imposes its will on them. So will the south of Scotland as well as the Shetlands secede if Scotland votes for independence, in order to remain in the UK? And if an independent parliament is good enough for Scotland, it’s good enough for England too. Oh, and don’t forget you gloated about the veto that the EU had over the UK, and you maintained that might, and size, should win.

      1. SM
        July 10, 2021

        +1

    3. NickC
      July 10, 2021

      Andy, You’re completely out of touch with your lockdown and vaccine fanaticism. Especially for the “young” (by your definition under 50, but that’s actually the young and the middle-aged). The untargeted national lockdowns have damaged the young far more than the old. And the serious vaccine side effects are – for the young – currently in the same ball park as the consequences of covid19, despite known under-reporting of the side effects.

    4. hefner
      July 10, 2021

      Andy, you might want to read Alabrese et al., ‘Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined’, 2019, Eur. J. Political Economy, 56, 132-150.
      And inews.co.uk 23/06/2021, T. Saunders, ‘How did my area voted on Brexit?’

    5. rose
      July 10, 2021

      Furthermore, the majority of the Unionists in N Ireland voted to leave the EU, and more Scots voted to leave the EU than voted for the SNP.

      1. glen cullen
        July 10, 2021

        You never hear that in the media….nor in their parliament

    6. MiC
      July 10, 2021

      Leaving the European Union in any normal modern democracy would be constitutional change, because all twenty-seven have membership written into their constitutions.

      There is no such country, where constitutional change can be brought about by

      a) a mere majority of those who voted of a few percent, especially when it only amounted to 26% of the people in total, and those tax-liable whom it most affected were denied a vote at all, along with many nationals living abroad.

      b) no majority at all amongst the constituent nations of the country.

      1. G Wheatley
        July 10, 2021

        You just CANNOT leave it alone, can you Martin in Cardiff?
        Every.
        Single.
        Opportunity.
        You.
        Get.

        Give it a rest FFS.

      2. Peter2
        July 10, 2021

        Hilarious MiC
        Just hilarious

    7. steve
      July 10, 2021

      Andy

      “What Conservatives object to is not getting their own way. This is why they attack devolved administrations ”

      And what you and your remain work-shy snowflake friends object to is not getting your own way. This is why you attack ‘brexiteers’ , innocent pensioners, anyone else who has worked hard for what they have, or indeed anyone honourable enough to stand and fight for this country. And aldso why you incessantly moan about a democratic referendum in which your ideology was out-voted fair and square.

      To acquaint you with facts –

      ‘YOUR’ Johnson and his government do not attack devolved administrations, if anything they frequently appease one, and have sold another down the river.

    8. Fedupsoutherner
      July 10, 2021

      Andy, the last time I looked at my children’s birth certificates they were not old enough to be pensioners but they voted for Brexit. You really do say some silly unfounded things for a supposed grown up.

  5. Peter
    July 10, 2021

    While the idea has merit it might have been better not to have devolved parliaments in the other nations in the first place. However, it would be too difficult to undo that now.

    Northern Ireland with its history of gerrymandering and crooked elections might need special monitoring but demographics are addressing some of those issues anyway.

    1. lifelogic
      July 10, 2021

      Indeed Blair’s devolution was a disaster he surely did it as he foolishly though it would help Labour in elections. What a fool, he should have asked me. I would have told him the more power you give Scotland then the more power they will endlessly demand and Labour would be done fore. Who in England wants to be ruled by Labour/SNP – not very many!

      1. steve
        July 10, 2021

        LL

        “Indeed Blair’s devolution was a disaster he surely did it as he foolishly though it would help Labour in elections.”

        More the fact he did it [devolution] because he’s not English and harbours a deep grudge against England.

  6. David Peddy
    July 10, 2021

    Totally agree

  7. Andy
    July 10, 2021

    I have taken to watching David Frost every time he attends an evidence session. It is box office stuff in a comedy way.

    Yesterday Frost was absolutely eviscerated, completely humiliated, in Stormont when an assembly member pointed out his epic Brexit failure.

    Mr Frost looks increasingly lost as the absolute uselessness of his ‘deal’ is repeatedly exposed.

    One wonderful thing about Brexit – which I hadn’t appreciated before – is watching how angry Brexitists get about it. It is very funny watching them watching their pathetic project crash and burn. Most satisfying.

    Reply You are watching continuing anger that Northern Ireland has not left the EU as instructed by voters thanks to EU actions which go beyond the Agreement

    1. Malone
      July 10, 2021

      This reply is false. The Eu simply wants the Agreement to be implemented. The Agreement requires customs checks between GB and NI. You must know this, Mr Redwood. You voted for it, in Parlaiment (January 2020)

      Reply I voted for UK sovereignty as Cl 38 made clear

      1. hefner
        July 10, 2021

        Reply to reply: clause 38 has three points, the second one is:
        ‘Its sovereignty subsists NOTWITHSTANDING’ and follow points a to d.

        So Sir John how exactly do you interpret these points a to d?

        Reply As Bill Cash and I explained at the time notwithstanding means we are sovereign and can organise NI/GB trade as w wish

        1. Len Peel
          July 10, 2021

          So you and Cash think every Treaty the UK agrees means whatever the UK subsequently chooses to want it to mean, whatever its terms? Riiiggghhtt 
.

          Reply No, they mean what was agreed and recorded and are renounced or arbitrated according to their wording anÂŁD that of the implementing UK Statute.

          1. Len Peel
            July 10, 2021

            The UK statute is 100% irrelevant to arbitration and interpretation of the Withdrawal Agreement. How can you possibly misunderstand this so badly? Who gives you legal advice?

      2. Malone
        July 10, 2021

        Can you explain? Do you think the Uk can sign an international Treaty and then change it without consulting the other party? Do you really think that? (if so, presumably you accept every other country has the right to re-write its Treaties with the UK as suits it) . No one would bother to sign a treaty is this were true

        1. Dave Andrews
          July 10, 2021

          You mean like Italy? Signed up to the Maastricht Treaty limiting debt to GDP ratio at 60%?
          Were the other countries in the EU asked whether they agreed to Italy’s borrowing, or is it the case that the Commission considers the treaties all at their discretion?
          EU Commission sovereign, member countries suzerain.

        2. dixie
          July 10, 2021

          If only you EU fanatics held the EU and other EU countries to the same criteria as you hold the UK there might be some progress.
          But you hypocrites never, ever did which is why we left.

    2. lifelogic
      July 10, 2021

      The blame for the duff deal lies mainly with Cameron, May, Bercow, Benn, Grieve 
l and the treachery of many remaoner MPs.

      1. Andy
        July 10, 2021

        Your Brexit is such a huge success you have an entire list of people to blame for it.

        1. a-tracy
          July 10, 2021

          Andy, yet we are being told we have hundreds of new jobs being created some saying that we are struggling to fill them. A tightening of benefits and the tug away of furlough should sort some of that out. Wage rates are rising, people are having to train again.

          HGV company spokespeople are saying we had 100,000 EU drivers in the UK that are missing (what 100,000 individuals each day or 100,000 journeys – over what period? Why does no one ever clarify) we are told they aren’t coming anymore so that’s 100,000 new HGV British drivers that need training at a minimum wage of around ÂŁ25,000 pa basic and some people were claiming on twitter they were paying ÂŁ50,000 pa and couldn’t fill the vacancy (which I don’t believe for one minute). 40,000 British HGV drivers are waiting for tests in a backlog – get on with it, let’s rope in the Army training teams.

          Frost needs to get tough and we need quid pro quo – no EU musician passports until we get them. And any other things that they are stopping. Can we have a list please John of all the allowances we’ve made that the EU haven’t followed through on.

          1. MiC
            July 11, 2021

            Great – so you propose to deny us music in our own country as well as a vast raft of rights in twenty-seven others.

            Wretched brexit puritans just are like the others, it seems.

          2. a-tracy
            July 11, 2021

            MiC, do you agree with the EU then to deny their audiences the music of British musicians when EU musicians can perform freely in the UK with musician passports from day 1? What is wrong with wanting equality and equivalence Martin? How does that make me wretched, I believe it is the EU that are being wretched and people like you that support them.

          3. G.Wheatley
            July 11, 2021

            a-tracey, indeed.
            Wasn’t it one Joseph Goebbels who said (auf Deutsch obviously…) “Accuse the other party of that which you are guilty” ? MiC is very good at that.

        2. Peter2
          July 10, 2021

          Like your “off to the gulags” list andy and MiC list of people he wants executed.

          1. MiC
            July 11, 2021

            I don’t want anyone executed – I’m resolutely against the death penalty.

            However, the treatment of those who sabotage war efforts is an indication of how seriously those who undermine the struggle against a mortal adversary is historically taken.

            You would encourage those who are doing just that for covid19 on the other hand.

          2. Peter2
            July 11, 2021

            Yes you did MiC
            With your sly words of a recent post.
            We knew what you were calling for.

            I thought you extreme lefties didn’t support capital punishment.
            OK for people you disagree with it seems.
            Just like happened with all the other dreadful experiments with state socialism.

      2. Peter
        July 10, 2021

        Lifelogic,

        The instigator of the deal might be these people – May in particular – but you get to a stage where you have to handle the consequences, rather than look backwards woefully.

        Lord Frost talks tough but he is not the one taking the final decision.

        Boris Johnson just runs away when taken to task by Sammy Wilson of the DUP in the House of Commons.

        Johnson cannot keep running forever though.

        1. Denis Cooper
          July 10, 2021

          Ultimately it must be down to the Tory – “Conservative and Unionist” – MPs to force Boris Johnson to sort out the stupid destructive mess that he created and they approved.

          And there is only one way to do that, which is for the UK government to withdrew its consent to be bound by the protocol. Not to try to drag its feet and wriggle out of its obligations under the treaty, but to openly denounce it.

          So far there are no signs that a sufficient number care enough about Northern Ireland and its place in the United Kingdom to do anything about it, they prefer to continue with Boris Johnson’s lie that by some miracle he managed to extract a great deal from the EU where Theresa May had failed.

          I asked whether there is a group of Tory MPs who take a particular interest in defending the Union:

          https://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2021/07/01/open-letter-to-mrs-merkel/#comment-1240665

          but there was no reply.

          1. Peter
            July 10, 2021

            ‘Ultimately it must be down to the Tory – “Conservative and Unionist” – MPs to force Boris Johnson to sort out the stupid destructive mess that he created and they approved.’

            Agreed. Johnson signed up. Then he lied or inadvertently misspoke depending on your viewpoint about borders in The Irish Sea. You cannot keep referencing May’s negotiations and you cannot keep running away from questions on the issue and hope Lord Frost will reassure people.

            If the EU organisation want to use a bad deal to punish Britain then you have to recognise this and confront it.

            If MPs don’t force Johnson, then the electorate need to do so.

    3. Nig l
      July 10, 2021

      Plus of course you watched it objectively. Just the thought of your morning croissants tasting stale because of Brexit does give my morning laugh.

    4. steve
      July 10, 2021

      Andy

      “One wonderful thing about Brexit – which I hadn’t appreciated before – is watching how angry Brexitists get about it. It is very funny watching them watching their pathetic project crash and burn. Most satisfying.”

      …..in private, of course.

      Mind history does’nt repeat itself Andy.

    5. steve
      July 10, 2021

      JR

      “continuing anger that Northern Ireland has not left the EU as instructed by voters thanks to EU actions which go beyond the Agreement”

      No, JR. This has more to do with Boris Johnson’s cowardice than the EU.

      1. rose
        July 10, 2021

        You couldn’t possibly call the PM’s struggle with the Traitors’ Parliament and their friends across both waters, cowardice.

        1. anon
          July 10, 2021

          The 2019 United Kingdom general election was held on Thursday, 12 December 2019. It resulted in the Conservative Party receiving a landslide majority of 80 seats.

          On 24 December 2020, the UK and the EU reached agreement on a Trade and Cooperation Agreement (the TCA) setting out their future relationship. The UK Parliament passed the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020 in one day on 30 December 2020. The TCA has been provisionally applied by both parties from 1 January 2021.

          Helluva struggle!

    6. Garland
      July 10, 2021

      I agree, Andy! Frost looked in turn terrified and embarassed. I suppose it was something new for him to be asked “If this Protocol is so terrible and needs changing, why did you negiotiate it, and greet it as a major triumph, in the first place?”. A good question to which he had no answer. Maybe MPs in Westminster could start asking the same sort of questions

      1. Richard1
        July 10, 2021

        Because at the time mrs may had agreed the backstop and parliament had passed the surrender act.

    7. Richard1
      July 10, 2021

      The reason NI is in the mess it is with Brexit is the WA was agreed at a time when the U.K. was bound by previous incompetent negotiation and continuity remain shenanigans in parliament to the backstop and the surrender act. It’s much better than the mrs may backstop, but it’s still unsatisfactory. But as the EUs behaviour is a breach of both the WA and the GFA it will get sorted out sooner or later, and Lord Frost – who takes a tough line – is exactly the sort of person we need for that.

      Did you notice some recent Brexit good news? The U.K. remains the fintech capital of europe. The U.K. continues to attract more venture funding than any other European country. It looks like the U.K. will be the standout major European economy in 2021 and 2022. There has been no exodus of City workers. We have 5.5m EU citizens – probably more – who’ve decided they prefer to live and work in the U.K., outside the EU. (you said they’d all go).

      No of course you didn’t.

      1. Andy
        July 10, 2021

        I don’t care about your non-news.

        Your Brexit is a disaster.

        The only person you are fooling is you.

        1. NickC
          July 10, 2021

          Oooh, you don’t care Andy? Really? You seem to care a lot. Actually you could burst a blood vessel at this rate of not caring.

          And in fact it is a “disaster” everywhere we do not have Brexit. BINO is a disaster. So that makes ongoing EU control a disaster. Which is what we’ve been telling you for 5 years. Only just woken up?

          1. Micky Taking
            July 10, 2021

            That expression ‘grumpy old man’ fits him perfectly. Does he not realise his kids generation think middle-age or 50s whiners have one foot in the grave?

        2. Richard1
          July 10, 2021

          It’s going to be so funny watching your rage and frustration as it becomes increasingly clear to everybody what utter tosh project fear was.

          1. Peter2
            July 10, 2021

            Richard
            Your original post was very good.
            Only bettered by your response to the childish young andy

        3. Fedupsoutherner
          July 10, 2021

          Andy. Why do you keep going on about it if you don’t care? It’s funny how much it has got to you.

      2. Sharon
        July 10, 2021

        Richard1

        +1

    8. acorn
      July 10, 2021

      Perhaps JR you could list the occasions when EU actions have gone beyond the Agreement. We data miners on both sides of the Channel can’t find any that were not allowed for in the text of Boris’s Northern Ireland Protocol in Boris’s Withdrawal Agreement.

      Other than that, the obvious solution is a re-united Ireland within the EU and the Euro currency. Northern Ireland residents can keep their savings deposits in Pounds until they want to trade them for Euro. Northern Ireland, that was, pays taxes in Euro.

      Next, and independent Scotland resurrecting the Pound Scots; and, preferably membership of the EEA agreed prior to independence. Scottish bank deposits remain in Pounds Sterling until they want to trade them for Pounds Scots. Scottish government spends and taxes only in Pound Scots, which will eventually find its market exchange rate.

      England’s elected dictatorship form of government, will continue to reprise 18th Century elitism and the governed will keep voting for it Ad infinitum.

      Reply The EU is failing to observe the need for our UK internal market to work smoothly, and to not disrupt the Good Friday Agreement

      1. Dave Andrews
        July 10, 2021

        A re-united Ireland? The only time Ireland was ever united was when it was all part of the UK. Before then, it was a collection of feuding tribes.
        I agree with your aspiration though. I would welcome a united Ireland, together with England, Scotland and Wales, all one British Isles. Not in the EU though.

        1. Old Salt
          July 10, 2021

          Dave –
          I couldn’t agree more. It could possibly have been so had Ireland not been made to vote again the right way!

      2. acorn
        July 10, 2021

        JR, the EU couldn’t give a toss about the UK internal market, the UK is now a “third country” like all the other non EU members the EU has agreements with. Any disruption to the Good Friday agreement is solely due to Boris not implementing his own protocol as signed sealed and delivered, as a Treaty, with the EU.

    9. MiC
      July 10, 2021

      Errrm, the voters of NI instructed the Government absolutely NOT to take them out of the Euroepan Union.

      1. Peter2
        July 10, 2021

        Errmm…We voted as the UK
        There was no instruction.
        Just a result.

      2. a-tracy
        July 11, 2021

        MiC, the voters of NI have got what they wanted then Martin, they have NOT been taken out of the European Union that is what is causing the trouble, they can’t have both on incoming trade, however, their freedoms are to have both free access to the Eu and the Uk outbound trade and with freedom of movement. The desire is to make things so awkward that Northern Ireland rejoins Southern Ireland the long term plan of reunification that Blair and the EU began and Boris walked right into it.

  8. turboterrier
    July 10, 2021

    The situation as exists is a bit of a Catch 22. The members of the devolved areas of the country can and do cause mayhem when it comes to voting in debates that only concern the English population. The classic, voting to close shops and supermarkets early on Sunday. No impact on their constituents but the opportunity to boast that they were bring the English to account.
    That is the weakness in parliament since the devolving of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland their elected members have no interest at all in the debate and what laws are required for the betterment of the English people, it is often used as a tool to show that they are actually doing something to justify their very existance in the house. One party in particular always drags down the level of debate by using it to belittle the rest of the house. EVEN is not a lot to ask for considering what is being and will be forced upon us in the future. It is long overdue that English MPs have the power and right to determine the best path of the English electorate.
    Not wishing to add to the national debt I am sure it is not above the bounds of the members to have a system within Westminster that negates the need for a separate English parliament.

  9. turboterrier
    July 10, 2021

    The first debate you could be having is about the CPS no longer prosecuting illegal migrants. When the hit our South Coast beaches that is an English problem. That’s undermining the HS plans. The CPS must be looking to reduce their work load. Oooooh bless.

  10. Garry Y
    July 10, 2021

    I am amazed that a Conservative administration is abolishing EVEL (which is a poor substitute for EVEN or an English parliament). The democratic deficit in the UK is shameful. The majority of MPs, Lords and MSM actively avoid using the term England when policies are announced or debated. Instead they insist on formulations of “the country” and imply that policies are UK wide. Naively by refusing a civic and political identity for England, which they fear will undermine the Union, they will lead to its demise.

  11. Javelin
    July 10, 2021

    The fear of an English Parliament is that it would drive devolution further across the UK.

    However the argument needs to be made that a UK Parliament needs to be set up and not an English Parliament. The English Parliament would be a side effect of setting a UK Parliament up.

  12. Nig l
    July 10, 2021

    Cue the inevitable beak up for the U.K. and this would decrease our global influence and turn us justifiably into ‘little’ England not forgetting the unjustified connection between racism and the cross of St George.

    You have hung out a theoretical position inviting views including mine that will not be sufficiently informed to make value judgment. Practical costs and benefits would be a start. What actual difference would it mean for the person on the Clapham omnibus? I suspect zero/not a lot.

    I would prefer ‘you’ to actually stop the BS and actually take action, not hot air, to sort out things that we know will benefit us, protect the City from the Agreements sell out, real jobs, tax etc are at stake. Repeal the EC bureaucracy that we are told is costing us.

    English votes for English only matters, no surprise it surfaces on a day of rampant English nationalism and fervour. Not good when cool objective thinking is needed.

    1. dixie
      July 10, 2021

      Why protect a City that does not protect the UK? The City makes it’s profits fleecing pensioners, savers and the investors on the “Clapham Omnibus” while giving away our commerce and industries for a paltry commission while ignoring the far higher costs to the country as a whole.

      I have worked in the City and been it’s victim so I would welcome a cool objective analysis of just how useful the City is to the rest of the UK and the omnibus users – the true returns and the true costs.

      1. Mitchel
        July 10, 2021

        In a word “compradors”.

        Lenin was absolutely right about international capital.It was “fine” when the British Empire was the centre of such things dishing it out,but now we are on the receiving end of it.

        1. dixie
          July 10, 2021

          @Mitchel, perhaps or maybe they are so blinded by greed they simply do not care.
          Empires come and go but “we”, the plebs, didn’t benefit from the Empire, the plebs never do.

      2. Nig l
        July 10, 2021

        I guess the word victim results in the emotive subjective language.

        1. dixie
          July 10, 2021

          @Nigl
          how else to describe being the victim of premeditated law-breaking by officers of the court who were protected by their own “professional” bodies

  13. SM
    July 10, 2021

    I am genuinely baffled by the refusal of successive UK governments to entertain the notion of equal treatment for England within Parliament, and have obviously missed any explanation or defence of their stance. Perhaps you, Sir John, or one of the rational contributors to this site could enlighten me?

    1. Iain Moore
      July 10, 2021

      The British establishment are at war with the English people, England is the golden goose that supports them all, and they resent it, and are fearful of it. Fearful that the English might reassert themselves pushing their noses out of the trough , so they pursue a policy of divide and rule, and don’t allow the English any sense of identity, unless it is diverted to some frippery like football.

      Divide and rule is after all a well tried and trusted British establishment policy , they tried it in Fiji between indigenous islanders and South Asians , left the country in a bit of a mess, but let’s not worry about that. Did it in Malaya, so the country descended into race riots between the Bumiputrans, Chinese and South Asians but no matter. Did it again in Ceylon, and so what if Sri Lanka descended into civil war? Did it again in East Africa , and that didn’t work out too well. And now the policy of divide and rule is coming home , and we get to enjoy the British establishment’s ethnic manipulation.

  14. J Bush
    July 10, 2021

    The devolved assemblies are the legacy of the EU’s desire to carve up the UK and remove England as a country off the global map, by dissecting it into regions. Blair had his own agenda when he allowed and created the Scottish, Welsh and N. Ireland assemblies, leaving the people of England to disappear into the metaphorical ether, only to be used as a cash cow. This continues today. This in a nutshell is the problem that exists today.

    I am appalled at the way these devolved assemblies receive more English taxpayers money than those who have to pay for it. This has not changed since the supposedly temporary levelling up Barnett Formula was introduced in the 1970’s.

    The time is long overdue for politicians to recognize England and its people have the right to expect and receive the same rights as those who live in the devolved areas. Indeed I am now of the opinion, the financial decisions of these assemblies should be subjected to close scrutiny and agreement across the board. That means if Sturgeon and Co funding plans want, for example, continued free prescriptions and further education, it must only be approved by the UK Parliament, purely on the basis the same benefits are affordable across the of the UK.

    Only when this is acknowledged and followed through, will the politicians recognize the rights of the English to be treated with the same rights across the board as the rest of the UK.

    1. Sharon
      July 10, 2021

      J Bush
      +1

    2. J Bush
      July 10, 2021

      IMO the reason this has occurred is because for decades most of Parliament were content to just be lazy EU ‘rubber stampers’. Picking up a huge pay cheque, benefits and gold plated pension, whilst not doing the job they are suppose to do. Which is to work in the UK’s best interest and be accountable.

      England, which has the largest population and funds their largesse, were fed up being ignored and treated as nothing more than a cash cow, voted out.

      How dare they! They must be punished and therein lies the problem.

      I challenge any remainiac politician to prove me wrong and go on record stating the English will have exactly the same rights as the devolved assemblies?

    3. Pauline Baxter
      July 10, 2021

      J. Bush. Totally agree there.
      Devolution was an evil policy and part of Blair’s obsession with the EU project.
      I wish devolution could be ‘annulled’ ‘repealed’ removed or wound back, whatever it would take.
      Failing that I suspect Sir John’s Diary today is the best we can do.

  15. Micky Taking
    July 10, 2021

    So what unifying purpose does the Union serve? The clamour for decisions to be made in the respective countries indicates dissatisfaction with Westminster, itself problematic when Scottish, Welsh, and N.Irish MPs debate and vote on English matters.
    Time to begin separation.

  16. Everhopeful
    July 10, 2021

    It is a left wing affectation to hate the English. I have heard the most terrible things said about the English ( specifically) by those who enjoy incredible privilege.
    Is it because of our history of conquest? We have been ruled over by those who hate us, Romans and Normans and then duplicitously led into the servitude of our old European enemies. Or because our royal succession, in a move worthy of the EU, was subverted, when they deposed James 2?
    Seems a bit rich to me that in a time of politically correct lunacy the English tribe is the only one that can not only be ignored but positively discriminated against. Since the 18th century our customs and homelands have been relentlessly destroyed. And it continues.
    Lingering terror of our true potential maybe?

    1. hefner
      July 10, 2021

      Romans and Normans? what about Angles, Saxons, Vikings, Danes, Huguenots, Dutch, 
 ?

      What a pile of piffle and what type of ‘pure’ English person do you think you are? And what is your true potential, mate? Sitting in front of the telly shouting ‘England England’.

      1. a-tracy
        July 10, 2021

        You know Hefner that is a very strange comment I know lots of Turkish people and 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants that are very proud of now being English and will shouting on Sunday with the rest of us, in fact a lot of them are more willing to vocalise their love of this country. What’s worse to me is people like you.

      2. NickC
        July 10, 2021

        What an excrescence of anti-English bile you put forth, Hefner. DNA research indicates that the majority of modern natives of the British isles have between about 70% and 90% of the original DNA of the post ice age settlers in these islands. That’s not “pure” (who is?) but it’s a lot closer than the anti-English shout about in front of their tellies as they gullibly absorb the anti-English piffle of the BBC and the rest of the MSM.

        1. Pauline Baxter
          July 10, 2021

          Well done NickC

        2. MiC
          July 10, 2021

          Yes, the English are basically the same as the Celts.

          Especially those in Elmet, now mainly W. Yorks.

        3. Fedupsoutherner
          July 10, 2021

          Well said A Tracy and Nick C. How many nations are totally pure anyway and who gives a stuff as long as they have a love of whatever nationality they’ve adopted or been born into. It’s people like you Hefner we don’t need.

      3. Old Albion
        July 10, 2021

        hefner, are you as rude and insulting about the Scots who also have a mixed heritage. Or do you reserve your hate for the English.

      4. steve
        July 10, 2021

        Hefner

        “……what type of ‘pure’ English person do you think you are? ”

        That varies, since we English still have a so-called class based society, despite what socialists would tell you.

        But we are all the ‘Island Race’.

      5. Everhopeful
        July 10, 2021

        Dear me!
        I have looked and looked but can’t find the word “pure” in what I wrote.
        I was merely asking why the left hate the English.
        Maybe you could answer that question?
        Watch your blood pressure M8!

        1. hefner
          July 10, 2021

          EH, Sorry , not ‘pure’ English but ‘English tribe’. And I guess without my comment none of your supporters would have noticed your vocabulary.
          Very interesting experience, indeed.

          And I do not dislike anybody except people who go on for years calling up at regular intervals the ghost of rampant nationalism to divert people’s attention from the continuous failings of the Government.

          1. Everhopeful
            July 10, 2021

            Again. I did not say that you dislike anyone.
            I just asked if you know why the left hate the English.
            Actually 
I have remembered. It is because ( it is said) the English chose to go and get slaughtered in the trenches for King and country in 1914 rather than submit to communism. How they have been repaid!
            Is that too simplistic an answer?
            I wonder what they will choose this time!

          2. a-tracy
            July 10, 2021

            Hefner, so you hate all the Scots, all the Irish and all the Welsh and all the French after all they have been rioting regularly against their government!

  17. steve
    July 10, 2021

    Surely a better strategy would be a PR operation to spell out to the Scottish populace that independence would mean losing it within five minutes, because they have no currency and they’d have to join the Euro – assuming the EU would have them. HM Dockyards and HMRC would also be lost. Additionally there will be no access to English airspace or territorial sea areas.

    And of course the money from English taxpayers stops.

    The Scottish people need to be clear that no good will come of voting to be led by racist crackpots.

    Alternatively why not just bring back the treason laws.

    1. Micky Taking
      July 10, 2021

      I’d prefer some of our ‘spokespersons’ went public saying England needs the Scottish to help our economy.
      Certain to raise the Indyref vote significantly !

    2. Pauline Baxter
      July 10, 2021

      steve. +1
      I’m sure there are other things the Scots would lose as well as those you list.
      Plus, I’ve never seen the SNP distinguish between the call for Independence and the call for rejoining EU.
      Surely those are two quite separate ideas/policies.

  18. Bryan Harris
    July 10, 2021

    EVEN might be a solution – but I’d rather we did not have peacock thrones in Scotland or Wales. They are disruptive.

    I’d prefer to see these parliaments lose their power as they have shown themselves incapable and anti-Britain.

    It is time the UK parliament ruled over the whole of the UK – by all means lets have debating chambers, but when England has to subsidise the Scot’s then not only should England have the final word, it should be supreme

    1. Pauline Baxter
      July 10, 2021

      Bryan Harris. Precisely. What a good idea. Let those ‘Parliaments’ LOSE THEIR POWER.
      There you are Sir John. That’s the way to go. Divest them, bit by bit, of their powers until they are Debating Chambers, simply offering advice to the Westminster Government. (Bit like the quangos really.)

  19. formula57
    July 10, 2021

    Equality and fairness means England must have its own Parliament or the devolved parliaments should be scrapped.

    If the Prime Minister is unwilling to recognize England, will be please cease draping Downing Street and himself in the St George’s flag?

    (The Euro football competition the Prime Minister glories in presents a new source of resentment since the SNP will never forgive England for winning should we do so.)

    1. Fedupsoutherner
      July 10, 2021

      Formula. Yes, I always remember my first month living in Scotland and the world cup rugby was on. All I heard from the Scots was the phrase “Anyone but England”. That’s when I realised I was not among friends.

  20. Old Albion
    July 10, 2021

    Sir John used to be a proponent of English Devolution. It seems he has backtracked.
    Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland have their own governments deciding on their own policies. England has nothing. This is the true democratic defecit.
    650 MP’s sitting in Westminster decide both UK reserved decisions and purely English decisions. How can it be fair within a Democracy that a Scottish MP can vote against free prescriptions (for example) within England. Yet his home country Gov. votes for them in Scotland.
    I have previously suggested, Westminster should remove all non English constituency MP’s and become the parliament for England. Scrap the House of Lords and turn it into a UK parliament for reserved matters only.
    Not only would this balance Devolution but would make some financial savings by reducing the amount of MP’s and retiring over 800 Peers.
    Of course all this is too radical for our inward looking governing class. However there is an alternative way. Support Scottish independence (I do) Eventually the UK will dissolve to it’s constituent parts and England will be free.

    1. JoolsB
      July 10, 2021

      Agree 101% Old Albion except John has never supported equality for England, ie. an English Parliament. He only supports the wearing of two hats by 533 self serving UK MPs squatting in English seats who have already let England down so badly by not uttering one word of protest when his Government discriminates against England. They have always and will always put their beloved union before England.

      1. a-tracy
        July 11, 2021

        joolsB let the current group of Tories finally stick another nail in their future. The SNP surprised the Labour Party by taking all their seats. The English people are getting riled and fed up now, Providing the free lunch then being asked to leave the room while everyone else eats it. If the polls aren’t telling the politicians that then they need to get some new questions asked and ask different focus groups.

  21. hefner
    July 10, 2021

    As Arrigo Sacchi (Italian coach whose team lost on penalties in the 1994 World Cup) said: ‘Football is the most important of the least important things in life’.

  22. The Prangwizard
    July 10, 2021

    Why should England and the people of England be treated differently from every other nation in the world? It is an arrogance held by Unionists who think they can provide for us better than we could provide for ourselves. They are not English yet claim to speak for us in the argument. It is a form of colonialism and must be ended.

    1. Everhopeful
      July 10, 2021

      +1

  23. turboterrier
    July 10, 2021

    Steve
    Now that is what you call a strategy.
    To quote Paul Daniel’s “You are going to like this. Not a lot “

  24. Dave Andrews
    July 10, 2021

    UK votes for UK needs please. I’m glad not to be in Wales, Scotland or NI, with an extra tier of useless government. If more devolution is needed, then devolve it to the local councils. How about local councils keeping all the business rates they collect, rather than sending half of it to central government? That would give them more incentive to develop business and enterprise, rather than the incentive to expand sink estates so as to claim more benefit.

  25. Mark B
    July 10, 2021

    Good morning.

    . . . a very modest proposal to give to England some of the devolved power the Scottish Parliament enjoys. I would welcome your views.

    I have expressed my views enough times here already, and look at where we are. What little crumbs you MP’s, the majority owing their jobs to the English electorate, you give, may now be taken away. I have therefore come to the conclusion that, they only way forward is to support the Nationalist Parties and hope that, by they gaining their independence, I may gain mine.

    So bring on Indy’ Ref’ 2.0

    1. Micky Taking
      July 10, 2021

      +1

    2. rose
      July 10, 2021

      This is the wrong way round. Whenever I watch the proceedings in the Scottish and Welsh Assemblies, I am reminded of parochial corruption, of jumped up town councillors with very little to do. The Blair Devolution was wrongly conceived as it tried to reproduce Westminster Government at regional level, and the result was a an embarrassing farce. It should have given power to local government, not imposed a quasi national assembly between it and Westminster.

    3. Fedupsoutherner
      July 10, 2021

      I second that Mark B. It can’t come soon enough.

  26. ChrisS
    July 10, 2021

    I am pleased to see our host returning to this subject, although, sadly, there is no sign of the “Speaking for England” header – yet.

    Like all governments since Blair, this one is running scared of the Scottish Nationalists. Why ?
    I don’t believe the canny Scots will vote for Independence. They know at heart that their economy is a basket case and Sturgeon and Co have no answer to their huge deficit, Currency or Border issues. Sturgeon knows full well that she has no chance of rejoining the EU unless she can reduce the deficit to below 3% of GDP : at least ÂŁ7bn a year. Osbourne’s austerity decade ? They haven’t seen anything yet.

    Boris should call Sturgeon’s bluff by giving her a second referendum sooner rather than later.

    Instead, we have Gove suggesting that the modest little measure of EVEL is upsetting the SNP and should be abolished and the hated and expensive Barnett Formula continues to divert English taxpayer’s money to meet the deficits of the three devolved provinces to the tune of more than ÂŁ38bn a year ! English taxpayers should be made aware that the English deficit is less than half of our contribution to the Overseas Aid budget.

    There are criticisms that making an English Parliament consist of English MPs sitting at Westminster would create “second class MPs” of those from the devolved provinces. That is nonsense. They are already “second Class MPs” because they are getting full pay for only doing half of the job, with a whole extra layer of MEPs, MSs and MLAs to take care of much of their constituency matters. Nor do they have responsibility for any of the devolved matters.

    Reply I did not campaign in the last election on the Speak for England pledge.

    1. steve
      July 10, 2021

      Chris S

      “I don’t believe the canny Scots will vote for Independence. ”

      ….so give the vote to us and we can do it for them.

      1. Fedupsoutherner
        July 10, 2021

        Oh yes Steve. Please.

    2. ChrisS
      July 10, 2021

      I am aware of that, but if you still support the idea of an English Grand Committee, why do you not openly continue to “Speak for England ?”

  27. ukretired123
    July 10, 2021

    In a perfect world everyone would be happy but we live with historic legacies proven to be practical ways of give and take despite the Roman legal legacy of challenging.
    The more recent experiments of devolution have proven to be wasteful, divisive and useful to our enemies. United we stand was how how David versus Goliath the Britain of my youth inherited.
    It seems today our National confidence is being undermined by woke-folk and other useless idiots.
    Sir John is rightly a proud Englishman as I am too and I find it depressing so many in different areas complain as if they lived in a Third-World country where life hangs by a thread daily.

  28. BJC
    July 10, 2021

    I believe EVEN is a fudge that would probably cause more long-term problems than it solves. The issue for me is that the hybrid UK Parliament has foolishly devolved too many crucial powers, without oversight, including constitutional matters. Retaining constitutional powers was the key principle of devolution as it was the mechanism to balance the power, i.e. decisions taken by one devolved assembly couldn’t unduly affect the other countries. It’s this evolving imbalance that’s now failing England.

    At a GE we vote for a mandate to be implemented by a UK government, i.e. for the entire country. For some unknown reason, the devolved assemblies are now elevated to the same authority level as the UK government/above Parliament, ignore the majority decisions of the UK electorate, prioritise and implement their own unaffordable regional mandates, then expect UK taxpayers to fund them, e.g. “free” prescriptions, tuition, subsidised NHS (i.e. use of England’s services). In theory, regional MPs should be exercising more power and authority than their assemblies, negotiating funding, etc, upfront to prioritise and co-ordinate local (assembly) compliance with nationally mandated policies.

    In summary, the entire governance structure should always be required to deliver the decisions of the majority of the electorate. Yes, deliver the results with specific local policies (healthy for the country, as generates varied solutions), but the overall objectives as voted for by the electorate shouldn’t be changed, otherwise we can’t claim to be a democracy and the failure is entirely the responsibility of the UK Government..

  29. agricola
    July 10, 2021

    I realise you have written on Test and Trace but that is not the same as the shambles surrounding our holiday and international travel since the Shapps announcement. Bare in mind that some 60,000 will attend Wembley on Sunday with no requirement fo tests hours before you enter, hours after you exit or a few days after you exit. Nor is there a requirement to have been double jabbed as far as I am aware. Never mind the thousands in public and private gatherings

    Then we come to holiday makers. They can fly to Spain having been double jabbed but prior to return must obtain a negative test result. Then on return must have two more negative tests. Only politicians and civil servants could dream up such a bucket of worms. Holiday makers own little NI Protocol, ensuring they have a stressful and expensive time, and the whole industry staggers to get itself off the ground.

    Common sense suggests that returning holidaymakers should get themselves tested at a free test centre, but only if they detect any symptoms. What is the genetic code that qualifies so many ministers for the pissup in a brewery club. Do they ever sit down and consider the insane consequences of their announcements.

    1. Christine
      July 10, 2021

      The Government doesn’t want the little people to go on holiday. Foreign holidays will be reserved for the rich. Just wait for the climate change proposals to kick in. The EU is bringing in a climate change fuel tax on commercial airlines but private jets are exempt. Expect Boris to follow suit. This pandemic has allowed politicians to bring in changes that would never have been approved in normal times. Why people vote for the current main parties is beyond me.

  30. rose
    July 10, 2021

    I am in agreement wit you: EVEN it should be, not the loaded EVEL. I am shocked to learn it was a deliberate alteration.

    And while we are about it, why are we not dispensing with the Brussels tax, VAT? We only had to pay it in the first place because certain continental countries wouldn’t pay their other taxes. 80% of what was gathered went to the Commission and the rest in administration. So what is the point of it now? It is a tax on the poor which they don’t necessarily realize they are paying, therefore does not serve the purpose of giving them a conscious stake in government spending as voters. If it were dispensed with, building and repairs would benefit; the whole economy would benefit; investment here would increase; and the poor would benefit most.

    1. rose
      July 10, 2021

      And of course small business would benefit hugely from not having to do all that admin. and keep itself below a certain level of economic activity. This has been demoralising for honest people.

    2. Old Albion
      July 10, 2021

      Sir John has often stated he supports the removal of some VAT. Unfortunately he seems to be alone.
      In fairness to the current Gov. Covid has caused an enormous drain on (dis)UK finances and hopes of any form of tax cut may well be some way off.

      1. glen cullen
        July 10, 2021

        Disagree – if indeed ”Covid has caused an enormous drain on UK finances”
        Then we’d cancel HS2……we must’ve loads of money

        1. Everhopeful
          July 10, 2021

          Hot little printing presses!

    3. glen cullen
      July 10, 2021

      Our first alteration of VAT away from EU alignment (level playing field) will be the first step in ‘brexit’, I’ve yet to see a single benefit of leaving apart from giving the French free fishing rights for 8 years, cutting off NI from the UK and still paying the EU ÂŁ40bn….oh there all EU benefits

      1. a-tracy
        July 11, 2021

        Glen, they’ve cut the UK off from Northern Ireland they’ve not cut Northern Ireland off from the UK, they still have free trade outbound, common travel, voting rights, but they’re still in the EU too which is what they wanted, they were told they couldn’t have both so it’s either a border between the mainland and them or on the Island and then they lose their EU passports and EU trade.

        HS2 isn’t a long term project about moving people and goods within the UK its about an integrated European network that EU trains can run on so that freight can go past GO no stops to Scotland and Ireland using England as a free land bridge.

  31. XY
    July 10, 2021

    I agree that while thingsa re as they are, EVEN is better.

    However, my preference would be to reverse devolution. And yes, I realise that’s an uphill task but “the longest journey starts with but a single step” and all that. The question would then be: what are the steps?

  32. Elizabeth Spooner
    July 10, 2021

    I agree there should be proper democratic representation for English MPs over laws for England. Scotland and Wales are over-represented with both too many Westminster MPs plus their own parliaments. This has been brought into sharp focus by the implementation of Pandemic laws and restrictions which is going to be shown to be even more nonsensical as they are relaxed. Scots and Welsh MPs show a complete lack of integrity in voting on purely English affairs.
    Although a separate chamber would be more expensive it would be best to have the 4 nations all having the same own parliaments rather than England having a different system.

  33. Christine
    July 10, 2021

    I wouldn’t want the expense of an English parliament. There are so many tiers of governance now it is ridiculous and a total waste of money. We have so many officials lining their own pockets and our services don’t increase but our bills do. I’d rather cull the whole lot and remove mayors, police commissioners, the Lords, and the myriad of quangos.

    Why our government keeps giving more money and power to the devolved parliaments is beyond me. Why should the English taxpayer subsidise countries that seem to hate us giving them more perks than the rest of us?

    I do agree that only English MPs should have a vote on English matters. As English MPs have more work to do they should be paid more.

    1. Peter
      July 10, 2021

      Christine,

      Agreed. More political patronage and jobs for the chumocracy.

      Letting only existing English MPs debate and vote on English matters would address these issues though

  34. glen cullen
    July 10, 2021

    Government of England…I wish
    We still haven’t full Government of the UK – We’re still in the EU by Protocal and Trade & Cooperation Agreement

  35. NotA#
    July 10, 2021

    Sir John, I agree with you.

    We are always promised less government not more.

    The neglect of devolution was to not complete it. I have said this before on your site Yorkshire has a greater population than Scotland, and wales and NI for that matter. As with most English counties they are in a better position and more capable of serving their electorates than the monolithic HoC.

    in Scotland there are some 35 counties all more capable of serving local needs than the Edinburgh administration.

    The point being is that central government is for coordination internally not dictating on size fits all policies. Central government is to look after the UK affairs externally. All internal management should default to a minimum of county level. Then should, as will happen, if there is a need to pool to get things it can simply be bumped up a notch. Some small populations in Scotland might if they desire find a Edinburgh domestically has a purpose, but is is not a one size fits all situation – most Scottish counties can do a better job at a local level than either London or Edinburgh. Its not the Scots requiring devolution from the UK its their assembly that is looking for a job. Just as in the UK under EU rule the HoC started to interfere in local matters as externally they had no purpose.

    1. NotA#
      July 10, 2021

      As a starting point the Barnett Formula should be awarded to all Counties in the UK on the same reasoning and same purpose. But seeing the whole of the UK as one, and redistributing what is taxpayer money on the basis of need equally is what creates a fair and equal society. If the Counties then want to pool/pass up to their administration centers that should be their choice.

      The current well meaning project is abused and manipulated beyond it purpose. Just as was highlighted this week with the Covid Fund for Business – everything suggests it doesn’t arrive at its target.

      Will the Boris cabal bother with equality and fairness? No, its all about their ego, grandstanding and being WOKE with a virtue message

      We need a real Conservative Government

    2. forthurst
      July 10, 2021

      There is far too much decision making by Westminster which used to belong at the county or local level and should devolve again. Health and Education are areas where the Westminster wrecking ball has been highly active and has led to us falling well behind our continental neighbours in provision and choice in the public sector.

  36. NotA#
    July 10, 2021

    I am still amused that we have a UK Health Minister that has no authority outside of England, similar we have other equally paid ministers that are NOT able to function as UK Ministers – that is how daft is that.

    1. NotA#
      July 10, 2021

      @NotA# … that is how daft the system is.

  37. DavidJ
    July 10, 2021

    I would prefer to see Blair’s devolution reversed. We don’t need 4 governments for the UK. The EU, with the assistance of Boris, have already messed up Northern Ireland. No doubt they have their hopes pinned on a fully devolved Scotland which they can annex and use to cause us more problems. This was the United Kingdom which should be restored and defended against all comers.

    eu, wit the

  38. Everhopeful
    July 10, 2021

    Swords to ploughshares.
    Covid visors to food trays.
    Whoever đŸ€” was in charge of PPE procurement bought TOO MANY.
    And cheap at the price
how many £billions was it?

    1. glen cullen
      July 10, 2021

      We should surrender our marks under an amnesty, and hand them into the NHS procurement bins for reuse in the NHS

      1. glen cullen
        July 10, 2021

        masks

        1. Everhopeful
          July 10, 2021

          Lol!
          Oh yes.
          I believe people have been posting them to number 10?

    2. a-tracy
      July 11, 2021

      Everhopeful, the NHS got what they asked for, the government responded to the NHS Directors requests and If what the NHS asked for was purchased and wasted then shouldn’t the NHS procurement be shown up for demanding too much from taxpayers and wasting resources in the wrong areas. The MPs and government was responding quickly to what they thought were experts in their field.

  39. NotA#
    July 10, 2021

    One reasonable way out of English Laws for England, is for there to be one Parliament and one government for the whole of the UK.

    As it stands some in the UK government/cabinet only have authority in England, they do not serve Scotland, Wales or NI or have any authoritative position in these devolved regions. Either those positions in the UK government should not exist as part of the ‘UK Government’ or alternatively those appointed by other administrations should report to the UK Minister and be part of serving the UK as a whole.

    You can’t have a partial United Kingdom.

  40. NotA#
    July 10, 2021

    When you think of our leader’s perception of how Government should work we are continually faced with knowing that basic thought and capabilities are lacking.
    If the MsM is to be believed, if a handful of millionaires’ that for a change do what they are paid to do at Wembley Stadium, the Government could announce an additional Bank Holiday.
    Yet 455 service men lost their lives in a war Afghanistan, those they leave behind get little or nothing. They in part lost their lives from being undermanned and poorly equipped for the task set by successive Governments, more intent on ‘grandstanding’ than doing a job properly.
    So in this Governments terms well healed millionaires’ must be celebrated, squaddies just be forgotten.
    To Government, keep demonstrating that you are serious about your version and drive for this ‘them and us’ equality and divide, and you will send us into the clutches of the looney left once more.

  41. Ed M
    July 10, 2021

    We got to make argument that Scotland is either comoletely part of UK or it is completely independent. The situation we are in is absurd. If we lived back in time of William Wallace, I’d support full independence. But this 2021. Not Braveheart.

  42. Ed M
    July 10, 2021

    If Nichola Sturgeon wants to help Scotland do it as a Tory MP or as a Liberal or Tory MP inside Westminster. I just find her whole SNP thing absurd / a fantasy. Maybe I’m wrong.

  43. JoolsB
    July 10, 2021

    “I always argued that English devolution could best be done at Westminster, with a Grand Committee of all English MPs elected to the Commons debating and deciding on English laws where they were needed for devolved matters like Health and Education, and supervising the English budgets. I saw no need for a separate and expensive English Parliament to mirror the Scottish one, though some in England wrote to me requesting one.”

    Would this be the same ‘English’MPs who have stood by and done and said absolutely nothing for the last twenty years whilst their constituents, our young, the sick, the elderly, have been constantly discriminated against both financially and constitutionally on a daily basis because not one of them has stood up for them.

    John, stop treating us as fools. An English Parliament if anything would save money, not be more expensive. For a start the building is there, the H of C, we could get rid of 800 has beens and cronies in the Lords and turn that into a Senate and as for 650 self serving UK MPs in the UK Parliament, 550 of them could be given their P45s leaving the remaining 100 for reserve matters in the senate. Then we could replace them with much needed dedicated English MPs who are willing to stand up for England and put it first for a change instead of last unlike the current bunch of incumbents who can’t even mention it’s name, let alone stand up for it. Isn’t that the real reason none of them want an English Parliament.

    And just why should England settle for less than the other nations of the UK enjoy, especially as we are the ones paying the bill.

    1. Mark B
      July 12, 2021

      +1

      I read elsewhere that you are coming round to the same view that I have. And that is, we will get no joy whist Scotland remains in the UK.

  44. Martin
    July 10, 2021

    Perhaps you fear an English Parliament because it would be embarassing for Whitehall if the Scots, Welsh & NI devolved institutions were joined an English parliament in opposing whatever Westminster was up to?

    1. Martin
      July 10, 2021

      “joined an English” should read “joined by an English “

  45. John McDonald
    July 10, 2021

    If it is UK democracy to have an NI, Welsh and Scottish Parliament then there is no alternative but to have an English Parliament with only MP’s elected by English Constancies sitting therein (Of course the MP’s themselves need not be pure English 🙂 )
    But this is strongly linked with just having a UK parliament for Federal and International Government
    Move the English Parliament to the Centre of England. Must be some fine old building to use. The existing house of commons and the Lords could be knocked into one for an elected Higher House to run the UK and be a check on the country Parliaments. There is not justification for an unelected House of Lords in a democracy.
    A lord/lady could be elected to any of the Parliaments if she or he chose to run for election. We would actually make a saving in the number of persons in “Government” if we no longer have MEP’s and the Lords.

  46. jon livesey
    July 10, 2021

    Every discussion here turns into attempts to reopen Brexit. What ought to be obvious retort to that is that Brexit is a done deal and cannot be undone. The less obvious answer is that Brexit can be as “done” as we like, but that does not prevent the EU continuing to try to undo it.

    The motives for the EU to continue to undo Brexit are obvious. Germany wants physical control over its export markets. Inside the EU they have achieved that via the euro, which removed monetary sovereignty from Germany’s European trading partners, meaning that Germany controls their fiscal and economic policies as well as their German imports.

    The fly in the ointment is the UK, which by leaving the EU not only impacted the EU politically but removed a significant chunk of the European market, plus an even bigger chunk of its financial and even military strength, from German control.

    If you want a simple explanation of German revanchism, we are Germany’s Taiwan. Germany – which now includes the rest of the eurozone – is the giant economy, like China, but the UK is where the high tech action is, and the UK’s financial independence enables it to act as the portal for anglo-saxon influences which contradict the corporatism that Germany has chosen for is model.

    We can expect this attempted subversion of UK sovereignty to continue for ever – what has Germany to lose, after all? – or we can make a conscious decision to put as much new blue water between us and Europe to make it clear that we are no longer Europe’s neighbour and that Europe is no longer our default counter-party. It’s our decision and it won’t be decided until we stop trying to be honest partners. You cannot be an honest partner with hostile crooks.

    1. Old Salt
      July 10, 2021

      jon
      +1

  47. JoolsB
    July 10, 2021

    John, here’s an idea. Why don’t you propose we English are asked if we want a parliament, you know, in the same way every other nation in this so called union has been asked more than once. What are 650 self serving UK MPs afraid of I wonder.

    1. Mark B
      July 11, 2021

      They’re afraid we would, just like BREXIT, give them the ‘wrong’ answer.

      Our only hope is the SNP. Ulster has been sold out and the Welsh know better.

  48. G Wheatley
    July 10, 2021

    Contrived acronyms abound Sir John, and I think we’ve all had our fill of those these last 15 months, courtesy of Johnson’s Junta, S.A.G.E. (…you see what they did there ?!) SPI-B and SPI-M.
    We also have the VERY contrived R.E.A.C.T. group too now.

    Enough! Save for two more perhaps :-
    C.L.O.T. (Corona Longevity Organising Team)
    P.R.A.T.S. (Pandemic Resurgence and Transmission System).

    Perhaps your readers have other, better suggestions for those two groups?

    1. DOM
      July 10, 2021

      MARX and that’s not an anagram but it does inspire and infuse all that this government and its PM does.

      A PM who takes advice from people who embrace such a vulgar and despicable ideology does a huge disservice to the status of the PM of the UK

      We are lost to the left and you thank the clueless, naive British voter for staying loyal to the two main parties that have stained our nation since 1990

  49. Ian Stafford
    July 10, 2021

    Westminster is the English Parliament: It acquired some extra members through the two Acts of Union. That is to say all the character and history of the English Parliament was retained. It can be called the British Parliament as a recognition that it is the national government of the whole kingdom, but any attempt to create a federal government means creating a large regional council in England which will not have the accumulated characteristics of the historic English Parliament. The national Parliament would become simply a council for defence and foreign relations. The change would be far more than simply creating the new regional council in England. [If anything we need less devolution. The present pandemic has shown the need for a central PHE policy. It has shown Sturgeon how to demonstrate she can be different from the national government but this has created so many anomalies.] I am content with EVIL but EVEN would be preferable to a separate body. At least I assume that separate English committees for dealing with matters that are otherwise regionally devolved elsewhere applies only to the HoC. The HoL should be less concerned with a similar procedure to keep a semblance of a national Parliament..

  50. mancunius
    July 11, 2021

    Of course English Votes for English Needs should be maintained within Parliament. Yet sooner or later the issue of English devolution will come to a head: we are a federal state where the largest country has no direct representation, exacerbated by strong metropolitan London bias, and MPs do not particularly have the English concerns of their English constituencies at heart. In a national English parliament situated in the North, say, or the Midlands, the federal structure of the UK could be more fairly maintained, and a reformed and mainly elected upper chamber could concentrate on keeping the balance of fairness, rather than pursuing unelected party politics, as its members do now.
    By the way, as the debates over Brexit made clear, we should also institute in both Houses of Parliament the same nationality rules as for those elected to the Australian parliament – no MP or peer should be allowed to sit who has the additional nationality of any foreign state (or has in the past been employed by the EC). Singleminded national loyalty is an essential in an elected representative. (I am always curious when some MP or journalist pours scorn on such an idea of national loyalty and advocates ceding sovereignty. Inevitably it emerges that they are moved by some undeclared foreign interest or financial concern in doing so. )

  51. Dr Alain J.E.Wolf
    July 11, 2021

    I would agree with any measure intended to limit the deleterious consequences of devolution as it is set up. The current system leads to what can be perceived as untenable divergences between the four nations. At a time when the U.K. most needs to be united, the outcome has been more unwarranted calls for independence than ever before and more spurious attempts at introducing it through the back door on the basis of sanitary security.
    The unfairness of devolution is exemplified by the fact that whilst Scotland and Wales are largely receivers of English tax-payers’ money, they frequently manage to enjoy benefits of which the English population is deprived, e.g. pensioners in Wales get bus passes at the age of 60 whilst their English counterparts have to wait until the retirement age of 66.
    Such divergences in such a small nation as ours would be inconceivable in other countries where they would be perceived rightly as discriminatory. English votes for English needs should certainly be maintained in what is already a system that seems to discriminate against the English.

  52. James Matthews
    July 11, 2021

    Very relieved to see this post. I hope our host will make his points forcefully to both Government and the UK Parliament. I also hope that he will get real support from the members of his party who represent English constituencies. If not, it will reinforce my view that Scottish independence is should be supported by the the English electorate as their best (and now only) chance of regaining equal representation in their homeland.

  53. Edwardm
    July 13, 2021

    I fail to understand why the government is removing the English veto on English matters, and why we don’t have EVEL or EVEN.
    It will only be OK if, in return, all devolved matters of the Welsh and Scottish parliaments are now voted on by the UK parliament.

Comments are closed.