What Parliament agreed concerning the EU and Northern Ireland

This week the Commons passed unanimously an important motion to sort out the issues with the EU concerning Northern Ireland. Noting that this got very little attention in the media, I need to set out here what was agreed. I assume the BBC ignored it because it did not offer them the usual opportunity to interview a lot of Remain MPs willing to slag off the UK and put the EU case. To the BBC many pro Brexit MPs speaking for the majority view are non persons unless they can be damaged by a story.

The motion stated:

“That this House
supports the primary aims of the Northern Ireland Protocol of the EU Withdrawal Agreement, which are to uphold the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement in all its dimensions and to respect the integrity of the EU and UK internal markets;
recognises that new infrastructure and controls at the border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic must be avoided to maintain the peace in Northern Ireland and to encourage stability and trade;
notes that the volume of trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland far exceeds the trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland;
further notes that significant provisions of the Protocol remain subject to grace periods and have not yet been applied to trade from Great Britain to Northern Ireland and that there is no evidence that this has presented any significant risk to the EU internal market;
regards flexibility in the application of the Protocol as being in the mutual interests of the EU and UK, given the unique constitutional and political circumstances of Northern Ireland;
regrets EU threats of legal action;
notes the EU and UK have made a mutual commitment to adopt measures with a view to avoiding controls at the ports and airports of Northern Ireland to the extent possible;
is conscious of the need to avoid separating the Unionist community from the rest of the UK, consistent with the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement;
and also recognises that Article 13(8) of the Protocol provides for potentially superior arrangements to those currently in place.”

So Parliament agrees with the majority in the country at last over this issue, agrees that there is no need to bring in over the top measures the EU wants which have not yet been brought in, and recommends alternative arrangements to the current EU style Protocol. The government Ministers who replied to the debate welcomed the views of those of us who drafted and backed the motion, and the Opposition parties allowed it go through without too many pro EU complaints.

To some of you the wording will be too soft, but the significance is the wording was accepted by all. More importantly the actions that follow are also clear. The grace periods on further excessive EU intervention in NI trade should be permanent as there is no need for the powers and inspections they threaten. The EU and UK should look for an alternative to the Protocol. Parliament sees that the current EU version is alienating the Loyalist community in NI and is therefore contrary to the Belfast peace Agreement. The UK proposal of mutual enforcement and continuing checks as needed away from the border makes sense. Imposing a disproportionate number of checks at NI ports on GB/NI trade makes no sense and is illegal under the Agreement,

The government was committed to protecting the integrity of the UK internal market, and has reaffirmed its commitment in accepting this motion. If there is no early success in EU/UK talks along these lines then it is clear the UK has to take unilateral action, as it is legally entitled to do as set out in the debate. The EU should stop belaying and obfuscating and see that it has at last united the UK Parliament against its view and actions.

196 Comments

  1. Peter
    July 18, 2021

    ‘So Parliament agrees with the majority in the country at last over this issue, agrees that there is no need to bring in over the top measures the EU wants which have not yet been brought in…’

    Well, given the ‘over the top measures’ already in place, I would hope so. Sausages, seed potatoes, over the top inspections at ports – these issues are bad enough already.

    I think many will consider this motion wordy and ‘soft’.

    1. Denis Cooper
      July 18, 2021

      December 8 2019, Boris Johnson told Sophy Ridge:

      https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/find-you-courage-bbc-clip-of-johnson-promising-seamless-trade-between-gb-and-ni-goes-viral-274034/

      “There is no question of there being checks on goods going NI to GB or GB to NI”

      March 3 2021, Boris Johnson told Sir Jeffrey Donaldson, Column 246 here:

      https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-03-03/debates/FEFD58B1-9E44-4ECC-A14D-B7AB29E7A325/OralAnswersToQuestions

      “The position of Northern Ireland within the UK internal market is rock solid and guaranteed. We are making sure that we underscore that with some temporary operational easings in order to protect the market in some areas, such as food supplies, pending further discussions with the EU. As I have said to the right hon. Gentleman and his colleagues, we leave nothing off the table to ensure that we get this right.”

      Today, six leading supermarkets in NI tell a different story:

      https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2021/0718/1235790-brexit/

      “The supermarkets said that unless a solution is found, from October retailers will face increased cost and complexity when moving goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.

      They added that the increased checks, additional paperwork and need for export health certificates on products of animal origin could force many retailers to move supply chains from Britain to the EU.”

      Of course when Boris Johnson said “we leave nothing off the table” that could have been just another lie.

      1. a-tracy
        July 19, 2021

        Why are the shelves empty now though Denis? They are still in the EU single market in Northern Ireland, they are still able to import from the UK? Which suppliers in GB are having problems sending goods into Northern Ireland at the moment?

        1. Denis Cooper
          July 19, 2021

          https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2021/0718/1235790-brexit/

          “Six of the UK’s leading retailers, representing over 75% of the region’s grocery market, have written to Brexit minister David Frost and European Commission Vice President MaroĆĄ Ć efčovič, calling for urgent action over trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.”

          1. a-tracy
            July 21, 2021

            I read that Denis but it doesn’t explain why shelves are empty now, presently when we have an extension? Something is fishy here. We’ve had nine months now to get a processing plant set up in Northern Ireland, this plant can then export sandwiches and chilled meat into the UK and the EU opening back up that market, most of the animals are grown in N Ireland and surely it is better that sandwiches are made in Northern Ireland for Irish use and the supermarkets could then send their sandwiches into Ireland and gain back market share that the UK has lost because of Boris poor deal for the UK and excellent no restrictions to trade into the UK from the EU.

            We should be more concerned that our manufacturers can’t send their products into the EU with a UK base in Northern Ireland that is still in the single market then the UK keeps that market open from our own base in the single market. Why keep batting our heads against a brick wall? Make it work to the UK’s advantage.

    2. Peter
      July 18, 2021

      ‘To some of you the wording will be too soft, but the significance is the wording was accepted by all. ’

      Maybe, but there are a lot of words and plenty of wriggle room for equivocators and gainsayers.

      So I don’t see that the motion achieves a great deal.

      1. Richard
        July 19, 2021

        No doubt the corrupt and incompetent Wasters of Whitehall will have something to say about this motion. The motion although supported by all, is definitely too long and beats about the bush rather than straight talk of what is required of Bell End Boris and David Frost. The government cannot continue to allow these corrupt and incompetent Wasters of Whitehall to have the final say on everything. Bell End Boris must put them firmly in their place once and for all and keep them away from any meetings or negotiations, none can be trusted.

    3. Hope
      July 18, 2021

      Johnson admitted to the select committee there were mistakes made including allowing the EU a say to how inspections were carried out in N.Ireland. Why would anyone let a foreign body a say in how we transport goods across our own country!! Then claim to have taken back control, sovereignty etc when he knows what he said to be utterly untrue? Johnson capitulated to EU demands. He signed up to it. A choice he exercised and your mob voted for it! Now you all cry and whinge when the horrors come home to roost.

      40 horrors of the WA and NIP highlighted long ago very widely by the Spectator and other publications. Also expert views given by Martin Howe QC who you sat by at the Bruge Group meeting. This is not the EU, that was expected. It was your party and govt that has created this mess. You now try to deflect the horrors which have come to fruition, but were known a very long time ago.

      2hours 38 mins before Johnson’s flip flop capitulation today. Will this record time be broken for his next capitulation?

      1. Richard
        July 19, 2021

        The mistakes were made by firstly allowing the corrupt and incompetent Wasters of Whitehall dictating everything, including being the negotiators. The second mistake was allowing Barnier to dictate what will and will not happen, never mind he was under orders from Merkel, that is not negotiating, that is dictating. Yet these corrupt and incompetents showed their true colours by allowing him to get away with it. Johnson had the ideal opportunity when he suspended the talks to snooker the Eu, he should have stuck to his word instead of grovelling back and giving them the advantage yet again. Even selling out our fishing industry just so as to allow the EU to agree a deal. He should have told them to get stuffed and walked away. We would not be in this situation if it had not been for Bell End Boris.

  2. Richard1
    July 18, 2021

    Sounds sensible. The key point is the EU approach is a breach of both the Protocol and the GFA. The govt should explain this patiently, being clear and firm whilst trying to avoid sinking to the use of the EU’s language of threats and ultimata.

    If agreement isn’t possible unilateral action must be taken. The EU will then retaliate – but the UK should turn the other cheek and not do the same, despite the loud calls there will be for it. We know that trade protectionism is throwing rocks in your own harbour. Leave that sort of behaviour to the EU.

    1. Hazlet
      July 18, 2021

      Unilateral action like the striking down of the terms of the Treayy of Limerick 1692 which later heralded in the Penal Laws all happened within fivs years when the English changed its mind. So D’ya think only the Irish read history and we here looking for a deal with Bidens America or OZ or for that matter NZ – so grow up.

      Then supposing we still think we can act unilaterally about anything we like then what about Gibraltar and the Treaty of Utrecht 1713.. do you think the Spanish are going to stand by if there is a free for all. Idiot

      1. Peter2
        July 18, 2021

        Going back centuries looking for context Hazlet makes you look desperate.
        PS
        What is it with you lefties that makes you have to resort to personal abuse?
        Is your argument so weak?

      2. Richard1
        July 18, 2021

        Yes that was very coherently argued. Do try again.

    2. Margaretbj
      July 18, 2021

      Plus 1

  3. DOM
    July 18, 2021

    The NIP is to those who understand the warped and extreme nature of British politics that took hold under May and has morphed into something far more sinister under Johnson it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that we appear to have arrived at this juncture in which the territorial integrity of the UK is sacrificed on the altar of political expediency

    I have no doubt that if those who oppose the UK ie (that is the entire Labour party and their extremist supporters, some Tory MPs with their psychological deficiencies and the SNP who embraced extremism and Anglophobia decades ago) backed this motion you can bet your bottom dollar that this horrid PM will have once again dipped into the taxpayer coffers to buy Parliamentary support to get this motion through. On that basis the term ‘motion’ perfectly describes this piece of Parliamentary puff

    Suffice to say NI will not exist in 20 years. time. The English voter wedded to the free-lunch politics of the Tory-Labour shysters will at some point elect the utterly vile Labour party who will simply hand over NI to the EU on a platter.

    The voter is to blame for all of this nonsense. Their inability to see that both parties no longer exist in the way the voter think they do is killing our nation and indeed its sanctity

  4. Carrie J
    July 18, 2021

    Utterly untrue. There was no vote, only a few angry backbenchers sounding off. Why do you misrepresent proceedings in our Parliament?

    Reply The motion passed unopposed. If the government disagreed it would have voted it down.

    1. Garry
      July 18, 2021

      So there was no vote. Parliament passed nothing, unanmously or otherwise. Please apologise, and correct your misstatement

  5. Len Peel
    July 18, 2021

    The EU has said NO to mutual enforcement, that’s why we have the Peotocol (which you voted for). Why can’t you understand the EU has sovereignty?

    1. steve
      July 18, 2021

      Len Peel

      “Why can’t you understand the EU has sovereignty? ”

      The EU does not have any sovereignty, it is not a sovereign country. In fact it isn’t a country at all.

      1. MiC
        July 18, 2021

        No, the European Union is an unprecedented entity composed of sovereign countries by consent.

        It is absolutely not an empire therefore, and nor is it what might yet be called a federation.

        It is, however, a Legal Persona – like a country is – and can be represented as such where necessary.

        1. Peter2
          July 18, 2021

          It is certainly not a country MiC

          1. glen cullen
            July 18, 2021

            but it almost is

          2. MiC
            July 19, 2021

            I never claimed that it was.

            But it is recognised by good people for what it self-evidently is.

            That is the most civilised, enlightened, peaceful, voluntary association of nations that this blighted globe has ever seen.

            As such it has a high standing.

          3. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            Yes you did MiC you claimed it was a country.
            You said:-
            “It is however a legal persona like a country is, and can be represented as such where necessary”

        2. NickC
          July 19, 2021

          EU member states are not sovereign, Martin. Remember Declaration 17 which states that EU law has “primacy” over the the laws of its members?

          1. MiC
            July 19, 2021

            They are, and the fact that the UK has left by the mere sending of a letter proves that.

          2. Peter2
            July 20, 2021

            Yet a long 4 years later after that letter we are still struggling to wrest ourselves from their grasp.

    2. GilesB
      July 18, 2021

      They don’t have sovereignty in Northern Ireland.

      Sovereignty, though its meanings have varied across history, has a core meaning, supreme authority within a territory. It is a modern notion of political authority. Historical variants can be understood along three dimensions — the holder of sovereignty, the absoluteness of sovereignty, and the internal and external dimensions of sovereignty. The state is the political institution in which sovereignty is embodied.

      They have the Northern Ireland protocol which agrees that the EU will help protect the U.K. single market, the U.K. will help protect the EU single market. That is not sovereignty. The Queen in Parliament is Sovereign in Northern Ireland.

      Actually the EU doesn’t have sovereignty anywhere. Sovereignty is a power held by a state over its territory. And the EU, and its acolytes, are forever denying that the EU is a state or has any ambitions to become a state.

    3. Denis Cooper
      July 18, 2021

      Thanks for that.

    4. Lets Buy British
      July 18, 2021

      The EU doesn’t have sovereignty nor the sole authority to insist on a course of action. There are two parties to this abominable Protocol. The UK has the right to take unilateral action to mitigate and frustrate the EU’s malign interference within the UK, the right to prevent the EU taking action against the terms of the GFA, redirection of trade to the EU ( Rep of Ireland ) and societal changes ( disenfranchisement of Unionists and the breakout of hostilities ).
      Unfortunately our benign and benevolent Govt has adopted a reasonable approach through the means of negotiation but they must now realise that the EU does not want to negotiate and only has evil intentions. However ordinary people are seeing and feeling the effects more immediately and want the UK govt to stamp its authority on the resultant issues much more quickly ( unfortunately this gives the appearance of the UK govt being slow and uncaring ).
      There is a perfectly acceptable digital solution, without physical borders, for trade that was acceptable to the HMRC departments of both the UK and ROI but rejected by the EU ( and possibly RoI ) for political purposes. It’s not just the EU thats been disingenuous but the politicians in the RoI too.
      It is now time for the UK govt to pull the levers available to it and lessen the impact on NI communities and businesses. If the EU remain intransigent then repudiate the Protocol and threaten to pull out of the trade agreement ( or give 12 months notice ) and put them on standby that no EU fishing vessels will have access to UK waters including those vessels with a British flag but majority owned by foreigners.
      It’s time to act before NI is lost to the UK or the relationship is severely damaged in which case only the EU and RoI will be the winners.

    5. Jamie Would-Wood
      July 18, 2021

      If you click your heels together and say, “In a decade or two we may have a ability to elect a labour rejoiner government.” It may come true… Stay positive, no matter how utterly impossible. 😁

    6. Mike Wilson
      July 18, 2021

      @Len Peel

      Why can’t you understand the EU has sovereignty?

      Sovereignty over whom?

      1. Harvey
        July 18, 2021

        It’s not about sovereignty really it’s about clout. Atbthis time The EU 27 has massive clout over the UK

        Of course when we get these new trade deals going – well then – who knows

  6. MiC
    July 18, 2021

    “Got very little attention in the media”

    Yes, people trying to make a profit out of selling newspapers understand that most normal people are not as vehemently and obsessively fixated on the European Union as are the brextremist politicians and their dwindling number of anger-addicted dupes.

    Especially when this nonsense is a load of trumped-up hysteria about some utterly trivial aspect of moving non-essential sausages about.

    1. Micky Taking
      July 18, 2021

      But I can understand the EU being concerned by billions of sausages infiltrating their way into the dietary habits of the ‘union’ via middle of the night juggernaut loads quietly making their way across the Irish border, and hence into untracked shiploads to the French or Spanish coast, or possibly even past Gibraltar. Steps must be taken to avoid undermining and risk of union collapse.

      1. Micky Taking
        July 18, 2021

        Is my sarcasm too much?

        1. Peter2
          July 18, 2021

          It is excellent Mickey.
          Keep it up.
          PS
          I’ve heard there is a secret ingredient in these sausages which makes people dislike the EU.
          Could it be true?

    2. Peter2
      July 18, 2021

      I’m guessing you don’t agree MiC
      Rather early to be so very angry on this fine summer Sunday.

      1. bill brown
        July 19, 2021

        Peter 2

        Your contributions are getting increasingly weaker

        1. Peter2
          July 19, 2021

          Sorry bill.
          We can’t all be as brilliant as you.
          PS
          Sorry to be pedantic bill, but the correct English is “increasingly weak”
          Glad to be of help.

    3. dixie
      July 18, 2021

      But it is important that the electorate stay aware and educated on the intent and actions of the EU with respect to the UK and our sovereignty.

      We wouldn’t want the country to be slid back in by EUphilic zeolots now would we.

    4. NickC
      July 18, 2021

      Martin, You don’t get to decide whether I should, or should not, be angry about anything.

      1. MiC
        July 18, 2021

        No, Im quite content to leave that to those who so evidently do.

        1. Peter2
          July 18, 2021

          I just read your posts MiC
          It is quite obvious how angry you always are.

        2. NickC
          July 19, 2021

          No, Martin, I decide for myself. Sometimes anger is appropriate. And I get to decide that too, not you. In any case given the hilariously over-the-top reactions of Remains to Brexit (to the point of breaking the UK constitution, and gloating when old Brexit voters die off) you should be careful where you throw your stones.

    5. Micky Taking
      July 19, 2021

      ‘most normal people are not as vehemently and obsessively fixated on the European Union’.
      Where does that put you?

  7. Fedupsoutherner
    July 18, 2021

    About time but let’s wait and see what actually happens. Can we expect threats from the EU?

    1. Newmania
      July 18, 2021

      You can expect action if the UK reneges on the agreement it signed , threats have been going on for some time .
      Europe’s retaliatory tariffs for Trump’s steel and aluminium duties may give us some idea .They battered targeted American exports like bourbon whiskey, jeans, orange juice, tobacco, peanut butter, yachts and Harley-Davidson motorbikes. More was coming but Biden has got a re-set .
      Of course a trade war with the UK is much easier for the EU to fight but I guess they will aim their fire with the same precision. Someone is going to get hurt

      Reply Try reading the NIP and the Withdrawal Act which give us clear legal grounds to sort this out unilaterally

      1. NickC
        July 19, 2021

        Newmania, Your gloating is misplaced. The harder the EU makes it to trade with the EU, the less trade we’ll do.

        1. MiC
          July 19, 2021

          Whereas “they” will hardly be affected.

          1. dixie
            July 20, 2021

            Except for critical components for their vaccine it seems …

    2. steve
      July 18, 2021

      FuS

      “Can we expect threats from the EU?”

      Yes, and you can also expect Johnson to comply with those threats.

    3. Jamie Would-Wood
      July 18, 2021

      Oh god yeah. It’s how they function. They are unique in the history of the world, as they are the only organisation, (not single person), that has narcissistic personality disorder.

      1. steve
        July 18, 2021

        JW-W

        The narcissistic disorder in the EU stems from the ungrateful French who always insist on controlling the commission, and is a Gaullist / Napoleonic legacy.

        1. glen cullen
          July 18, 2021

          You don’t have to go much further than our first application to the EEC, the Indochina war / Vietnam war and the Iraq / Iran war to understand the French legacy

        2. MiC
          July 19, 2021

          I see now.

          Did a Frenchman once take your girlfriend from you?

        3. dixie
          July 20, 2021

          @Steve – As you suggest that legacy goes back at least 300 years to June 1815 when British soldiers shed their blood defending Brussels, alongside Prussian, Dutch and Belgian comrades against the French at Chateau de Goumont, La Haye Saint and Papelotte.
          That alliance had the goal of freeing our comrades from the yoke of French imperialism.
          Funny how the French establishment finds it self at the centre of so much turmoil so often, can’t be accidental can it?

  8. J Bush
    July 18, 2021

    This situation now is directly due to those Parliamentarians who refused to respect and uphold the 2016 referendum result. If they had respected it, there would have been none of this ‘belaying and obfuscating’ from the EU interfering in UK Parliamentary time still occurring, 6 months after we formally left!

    It would be better for the UK as a whole to discard this half in half out ‘deal’, which was not even on the ballot paper, and go to WTO rules.

    1. Everhopeful
      July 18, 2021

      Agree entirely. But suspect they want to leave open a crack in the door for rejoining at some point?
      +1

      1. Ian Wragg
        July 18, 2021

        More than crack in the door, more like door wide open. With the majority of MPs nd civil Serpents being remain, it’s only matter of time.

        1. Everhopeful
          July 18, 2021

          Ok.
          Yes 
door flung open with “Welcome Back” mat on the floor.
          Sadly.

    2. Peter
      July 18, 2021

      ‘It would be better for the UK as a whole to discard this half in half out ‘deal’, which was not even on the ballot paper, and go to WTO rules.’

      Agreed but Johnson will not do that.

      He will try to buy time with tough words from Lord Frost – but run away from tough questions from MPs like Sammy Wilson in Parliament.

      Johnson is good at running away. It’s a trick previous PMs never really made use of.

      1. Micky Taking
        July 19, 2021

        Johnson is good at running away……I knew there must be a reason …..its wind in the hair.

    3. Andy
      July 18, 2021

      You Brexitists signed us up to a legally binding international treaty – the withdrawal agreement. The bit you are moaning about, the Northern Ireland Protocol, was negotiated entirely by Brexitists Frost and Johnson.

      Your deal is crap. And you blame everybody else for it. Not only are you incompetent, you also lack the guts to admit your own culpability.

      1. Jamie Would-Wood
        July 18, 2021

        International treaties are a concept. Legally binding by what law? There is no world organisation enforcing magical laws that apply to all… You are either too ignorant to know that, or too stupid to grasp it. One thing I bet you will grasp though is: We left. We’ll never rejoin. Come to the winners side and vote Conservative. 😄

      2. jerry
        July 18, 2021

        @Andy; “Your deal is crap. And [Brexiteers] blame everybody else for it. Not only are you incompetent, you also lack the guts to admit your own culpability.”

        Indeed, although the UK negotiations were not helped by the attitude of some europhile fanatics who until the ‘midnight hour’ (and even then…) refused to accept the democratic wish of the majority, and as such you now blame everybody else for the mess. Not only are you incompetent, you also lack the guts to admit your own culpability for the mess!

        Best not to throw stones when living in a glasshouse yourself…

      3. NickC
        July 18, 2021

        No, Andy, we “Brexitists” did not sign up to the WA, the NIP, nor even the T&CA. We voted to Leave the EU. No, ifs, no buts, no maybes, no caveats. It was the Remain establishment who gave us BINO. And, surprise, surprise, all the bits still controlled by the EU are rubbish.

        1. Garry
          July 18, 2021

          Well, the WA, NIP and the TCA were all negotiated, agreed and made into law by Boris Johnson and David (unelected bureaucrat) Frost, and hailed as wild successes by all Conservative MPs (in the case of the WA and NIP) and almost all Conservative MPs (in the case of the TCA). You think that is the Remain establishment? I don’t think so

          1. glen cullen
            July 18, 2021

            Apart from a small handful, I believe that the whole of parliament, both houses and the mandarins of the civil service are the remain establishment

        2. glen cullen
          July 18, 2021

          Spot On

      4. Peter2
        July 18, 2021

        andy
        Plainly you haven’t read or understood Sir John’s post and previous posts on this subject.

      5. agricola
        July 18, 2021

        Your legally binding agreement contains the means within it to negate aspects that prove unworkable for either side. The EU have already, briefly resorted to Art 16 when they screwed up their vaccine ordering and verification. They quickly backed off when they realised the fault lay within their own administration or lack of it. Art 16 is there should HMG decide that the intransigence of the EU was impinging on the smooth running of internal UK trade or undermining the GFA. I feel HMG have let this run too long, allowing you to feed on the nonsense of regurgitated international treaties by lapping the bits that you erroniously think suite your rant.

        1. Lets Buy British
          July 18, 2021

          Spot on

    4. Original Richard
      July 18, 2021

      J Bush : “This situation now is directly due to those Parliamentarians who refused to respect and uphold the 2016 referendum result.”

      I agree completely and we should not forget that the current leader of the Opposition was a leading member of this Parliamentary group.

      1. MiC
        July 18, 2021

        Like, did he negotiate the WA and the NIP, then?

    5. jerry
      July 18, 2021

      @J Bush; “This situation now is directly due to those Parliamentarians who refused to respect and uphold the 2016 referendum result. “

      Prey, what result was that, oh yes, a ‘simple’ binary vote to leave the EU, by what ever course the elected govt and Parliament chose, the NIP became part of that democratic process.

      Those who didn’t like the way Brexit was being done, should have done as myself and others suggested, demand a second referendum to ask HOW Brexit should be done [1], I would have voted for a WTO exit but I suspect that would not have been either the govts advice nor the majorities wish – hence why many on the undemocratic hard right scoffed at the idea, they only seem to like democracy when they are winning!

      [1] even post 2019 GE, during the pandemic, lockdown, simply make all ballots postal, after all if postal ballots are good enough to be the legally mandated requirement for trade unions….

      1. MiC
        July 19, 2021

        According to the teeth-grinders that would have been “treason”, Jerry.

      2. NickC
        July 19, 2021

        Jerry, The route of exiting the EU was not defined on the ballot paper of the Referendum, but the outcome was.

        1. MiC
          July 19, 2021

          And you have it.

          Rubbish, isn’t it?

      3. a-tracy
        July 19, 2021

        The 2019 manifesto clarified Boris’ guarantees. Three words, “Get Brexit Done,” are largely responsible for the Conservative Party’s emphatic victory in the U.K.’s 2019 election. The Conservatives’ clarity of message on Brexit contrasted starkly with Labour, who after years of internal disagreement over Brexit, eventually came out in support of holding a second Brexit referendum if elected, with remaining in the E.U. being one option.’ quote from Time ‘“Take Back Control”
        Boris Johnson’s guarantee:

        We will get Brexit done in January and unleash the potential of our whole country.

        Extra funding for the NHS, with 50,000 more nurses and 50 million more GP surgery appointments a year.

        20,000 more police and tougher sentencing for criminals.

        An Australian-style points-based system to control immigration.

        Millions more invested every week in science, schools, apprenticeships and infrastructure while controlling debt.

        Reaching Net Zero by 2050 with investment in clean energy solutions and green infrastructure to reduce carbon emissions and pollution.

        We will not raise the rate of income tax, VAT or National Insurance.

        “The Conservatives say the UK will be outside the EU single market, and any form of customs union. But until we know the terms of a new relationship with the EU, it will be hard to argue that Brexit has really been done.
        + + +
        This policy would apply to the whole of the UK.”! Boris also said: “It is fair to say you’re getting Brexit done because you are coming out of the EU and you’re coming out of the legal order of the EU,” the prime minister told the BBC.

        “You are really taking back control of all the things – money, border, rules – you are doing all that.”

    6. formula57
      July 18, 2021

      + 1

      The Evil Empire is even now devising new obstacles to trade (its CBAM levies) so any trade treaty is of doubtful worth.

      1. MiC
        July 19, 2021

        Some “empire” that a country can leave by the mere sending of a letter, as this one did, eh?

        1. a-tracy
          July 21, 2021

          Martin, vehicles are tracked, drivers mobiles are tracked the UK can prove that deliveries are only for Northern Ireland from the UK and not onward shipped in to the EU, it is provocative, firms have audits, imported goods would require onward sales paperwork to sell into Southern Ireland from Northern Ireland Businesses, there is something wrong with all this posturing over a minor trade.

          The UK should fight back opening processing plants in Northern Ireland (does M&S really have no production facility in Northern Ireland? Or Southern Ireland) we need to open a market of the banned UK produce (that is banned in the whole EU presently) and get it manufactured in Northern Ireland for Irish sale and sale into the EU if that region of the UK is still in the single market then why aren’t the British taking full advantage of that? I wouldn’t want to buy 2 day old Transported M&S prawn sandwiches anyway if I were in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland trade and regional profitability then also gets a boost as the UK can freely import the chilled meat already processed within the United Kingdom.

    7. steve
      July 18, 2021

      J Bush

      “This situation now is directly due to those Parliamentarians who refused to respect and uphold the 2016 referendum result. ”

      Yep, and in particular May and her republican sympathising successor.

  9. Mark B
    July 18, 2021

    Good morning.

    If there is no early success in EU/UK talks along these lines then it is clear the UK has to take unilateral action . . .

    The track record of ALL previous governments from late 1990 until the present day has been woeful, to put it politely. I expect, certainly with the current incumbent at Number 10, no better.

    The EU knows that the UK Government, and especially the PM, is all talk and, the UK Parliament is as weak and pathetic. You people cannot get us out of Lockdown / House Arrest despite the threat to the NHS, the original reason, has long since passed.

    If change is to be brought about, I fear it will come from those who have the most to lose and their methods will not be nice.

    1. NickC
      July 18, 2021

      Mark B, Unfortunately the “important motion” is just so much waffle. The EU empire will take no notice. Why should it? The EU has us over a barrel, just where it wanted us. Yet another example of the UK establishment thinking the EU is reasonable and a friend. Actually I’ve stopped believing the UK establishment is merely gaffe-prone – our continued subjection to the EU is deliberate.

      1. steve
        July 18, 2021

        Nick C

        “Actually I’ve stopped believing the UK establishment is merely gaffe-prone – our continued subjection to the EU is deliberate.”

        To be expected. Research May & Johnson – you’ll find their recent ancestry, ideology and religious affilliation very much at odds with any notion of British sovereignty. One has French family ties, the other Belgian. The latter coming out as a practising catholic AFTER his election and AFTER selling NI down the river.

        Expect Johnson -DePfeffel to visit his boss in the Vatican, just like Blair did.

        1. MiC
          July 19, 2021

          So what of IDS and JRM along with the rest, then?

      2. MiC
        July 19, 2021

        It is the simple facts of geography and recent economic history which have the UK over a barrel, as you rightly say it is.

        There’s not much that you can do to change those, however hard you wish, or whatever rubbish the right wing media propagate.

        The European Union is simply the present entity treating with those facts.

    2. Enrico
      July 18, 2021

      Well said.100% correct.There’s nothing else to discuss .

    3. DavidJ
      July 18, 2021

      Indeed Mark.

  10. Everhopeful
    July 18, 2021

    Meanwhile it is reported that Johnson has cancelled his “Freedom Day” speech.
    The Health Sec has “tested positive”for the latest plague 
oh
.DESPITE being double jabbed
well there’s a thing! And him protesting that he doesn’t feel too bad. OK
get back to work then.
    And poor old Johnson might get “pinged”and quarantined despite having had the lurgi AND being double jabbed!
    Presumably the last hammer blow in destroying the hospitality industry? Which was probably the intention all along.
    This all seems a very tortuous route to devastation.
    A govt. that enjoys torturing its subjects?

    1. Iago
      July 18, 2021

      double jabbed – with what?

      1. Everhopeful
        July 18, 2021

        Oh goodness!
        Well
certainly not a truth drug.
        Ah..but you might mean
saline maybe?

  11. George Brooks.
    July 18, 2021

    Right from July 2016 the EU has consistently under estimated the desire in this country to leave the EU. They also fail to understand that their implementation of the protocol is expanding and hardening the view that it was absolutely right to cut ourselves free from those unelected little dictators. They are still taking their soundings from a reducing number of Remainers in the ”Westminster Bubble”.

    Nothing wrong in parliament being polite but I have my doubts the those thick skinned bureaucrats in Brussels fully understand what is coming down the track towards them. We have to go through this phase before we can sort this mess out, which I am certain we will.

  12. Nig l
    July 18, 2021

    Thank you. You were right. Nothing in this that is new and as ever zero actions and timescales and certainly will carry zero weight with either Brussels or the ECJ. Once again I will huff and I will puff and blow your house down.

    The government didn’t oppose it because they knew it tied them to nothing so no point in having an unnecessary fight with senior backbenchers.

    Please update us monthly on progress directly linked to this motion.

    In other news we wish the Health Secretary well. How did he catch it if he has been following the rules that we are all being battered with? Obviously hasn’t been so more double standards. Both the country and the media are now united that your policy is a shambles driven by political cowardice. Informed analysis on the variant in France, which by the way is already here, exposes the governments con.

  13. Blake
    July 18, 2021

    Whatever parliament agrees, especially in its near downtime, will not in anyway best the International Treaty already agreed and signed. If Sainsbury’s has a problem with getting goods to market because of delays at Belfast Larne then they should consider sending through Dublin where the contentious stuff can be inspected by EU officials then the truckloads can be sealed before sending north over the border, so no need to bother anyone in Belfast or Larne and the people get their sausages. UK and the EU have an international agreement and if there is any further divergence from this then all I can say is we can expect little further movement on Equivalence in any other areas. I need hardly remind all that other prospective trade partners are also looking on and as far as I can see they are not at all impressed.

  14. Garret
    July 18, 2021

    There is a good reason it got little mention in the media because even media now regards it as another example of foot stamping rage by the ERG wing types who are never going to be happy until they drag this country to the point of ruin to prove some delusionary ideological point

    1. Peter2
      July 18, 2021

      Hysterical nonsense garret.
      Stop copy and pasting from the Guardian and calm yourself.

  15. BJC
    July 18, 2021

    “…….and also recognises that Article 13(8) of the Protocol provides for potentially superior arrangements to those currently in place.”

    This principle underlines everything else and is a timely reminder to the House that the government aren’t seeking anything from the EU that Parliament hasn’t already endorsed. Hopefully, all your hard work will put rocket boosters under Lord Frost’s endless circular negotiations!

    Clearly, the “superior arrangements” you speak of should be the electronic tracking already applied to goods from the rest of the world. Out of interest, can’t we quietly implement this, anyway? Operating it as a (temporary) dual customs system to prove its efficacy would lay the ground for removal of routine physical checks between GB/NI and offers the potential to shift the border back to its rightful place. Evidence of this nature would surely be a very effective way to disempower the EU and, if necessary, sway the naysayers in Parliament if the EU won’t back down and Art16 needs to be invoked?

  16. Alan Jutson
    July 18, 2021

    So we now have the majority of UK Mp’s recognising that the UK should not have any internal trade borders within its structure, amazing it has taken this long.
    But the EU does not agree because we supposedly signed up (the majority of the UK Mp’s) for something different, at least that is their claim.
    So I really do hope that this time, and after yet more negotiations and delay with the EU, we have the balls to stand firm if they continue to disagree, and we take unilateral action ourselves.

    Thanks for all of your efforts JR and to those of like mind who are trying to grasp the nettle, and resolve this farcical situation.

  17. bill brown
    July 18, 2021

    Sir JR,

    It is nice to see that you are now finally giving the on-going negotiations a chance to finda more permanent solution , instead of political posturing tahat seems to be the case from both sides that really bring no progress to the Protcol.

    1. Peter2
      July 18, 2021

      I’m surprised you took that conclusion from today’s post by Sir John
      But I admire your current optimistic attitude bill

  18. agricola
    July 18, 2021

    It is unlikely that the EU will settle for the practical and common sense approach because they have no intention in making Brexit a sensible amicable arrangement. It was never in their plan which was set out by Barnier in the German Press when the referendum result was announced in 2016. We must ignore their threats and act in whatever way aligns with the conclusions of the Commons. This probably means invoking Art 16 and thereby preserving the tenets of the GFA.

    1. Old Salt
      July 18, 2021

      Agreed

    2. Lets Buy British
      July 18, 2021

      Spot on again

  19. steve
    July 18, 2021

    JR

    You’re right, it is too soft.

    It’s time to stop dancing with the EU.

    I suggest EU quisling and Repubican sympathiser, Boris Johnson, should be offered a choice of being charged with treason, or undergoing a sovereignty awareness course. Though it is doubtful that being half – Belgian and a catholic he would ever defend British Sovereignty.

    Or he could just resign now and disappear in disgrace as the worst PM this country has ever had……which he will eventually do anyway just before there’s revolt in NI thus leaving his flithy mess for someone else to clear up.

    1. Peter
      July 18, 2021

      Steve,

      You have a real hang up about Belgian Catholics. The great Hercule Poirot was a Belgian Catholic. He was a man of honour though and his little grey cells put him ahead of the current Prime Minister.

      Poirot also had a completely different attitude to his personal appearance – an over fussy dandy, compared to someone who always looks as though they have been dragged through a hedge.

  20. turboterrier
    July 18, 2021

    Sadly Sir John no matter what is said or not as the case maybe but all this grief over NI is judged by one thing only.
    The perception on how the country sees the problems. All the time it is perceived that double talk and lack of firm decisions and actions are not working the majority of the people have had enough. The EU treats us with total disdain, stop the talking and start playing hard ball and invoke the elements that we walk away, pay them no money and get on with our destiny whatever that might happen to be.

  21. Narrow Shoulders
    July 18, 2021

    Is it binding? How many MPs voted?

    Was this an early day motion or did it have real traction?

    What are the next steps?

    Reply No it was not an EDM. It was a full debated Commons motion.

    1. hefner
      July 18, 2021

      Sorry to insist: where does Parliament go from there with this full debated Commons motion. I think this was the gist of NS’s question. Without an explanation, this motion is likely to have the same importance than most motions, EDM or not, when passed: the NI Minister may choose not to take any action after 40 days, or the thing will not even appear in the dustbin of history.

      reply Watch this space. I expect the govt to follow up

      1. Hope
        July 18, 2021

        Hef,

        Brandon Lewis stated previously the WA and NIP were here to stay. Gove the same. Even after the EU blocking life saving vaccines!! I fail to see the point for this motion other than to deflect blame. It was clear what the horrors were. Dennis above points out what Johnson said even though he knew what he was saying to be untrue.

      2. steve
        July 18, 2021

        Hefner

        “this motion is likely to have the same importance than most motions”

        But probably less importance than a bowel motion.

    2. Hope
      July 18, 2021

      reply to reply: In other words hot air to deflect blame and garner support.

  22. lifelogic
    July 18, 2021

    Indeed, but will this government? They are getting almost everything else wrong after all.

    1. lifelogic
      July 18, 2021

      Thing he has wrong for example ( in the Telegraph today):- Narrow and unbalanced Sage leaves the Government bind
      Steve Barker & Roger Kappl and

      Freedom-loving Boris can’t stop flirting with authoritarianism – and it’s all our fault by Daniel Hannan.

  23. Denis Cooper
    July 18, 2021

    For those who are sufficiently interested, this will happen tomorrow afternoon:

    https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/69/european-scrutiny-committee/news/156615/frost-to-be-quizzed-on-ni-protocol-future-and-brexit-divorce-bill/

    “Frost to be quizzed on NI Protocol future and Brexit divorce bill”

    https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/11928db9-9c05-4dfd-ba10-fde66a6954f0

    In my view the second item has always been a relatively unimportant distraction.

    1. Peter
      July 18, 2021

      Denis Cooper,

      PM and senior cabinet ministers are self isolating. So whatever happens tomorrow can be avoided until the Summer recess.

      Can kicked down the road.

      1. steve
        July 18, 2021

        Peter

        ” PM and senior cabinet ministers are self isolating. So whatever happens tomorrow can be avoided until the Summer recess. Can kicked down the road. ”

        Yes, that’s another of Johnson’s tactics. + he pulls a sicky and treats himself to a week off work.

      2. Denis Cooper
        July 19, 2021

        Initially to Wednesday.

  24. William Long
    July 18, 2021

    I agree that on the face of it, the passing of this motion sounds a satisfactory result, but I am sure the reason the Government let it through was that it does not require it to take any action, and it does not mean there is the remotest chance that the EU will take any notice.

  25. The Prangwizard
    July 18, 2021

    So the Protocol stays now and the wish of many – I saw IDS’s speech wishing its removal – abandoed. No action to be taken.

    Just more talking authorised. Plenty of scope still for ‘Boris’ to continue taking the knee to the EU. His betrayal plan is still in place.

    1. glen cullen
      July 18, 2021

      The EU don’t wish to change the protocal – but more importantly our own government don’t wish to change the protocal

  26. Denis Cooper
    July 18, 2021

    Looking for something else I came across this from September 2019, which is of tangential relevance:

    https://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2019/09/19/the-eu-and-empires/#comment-1056676

    It’s about the “Operation Yellowhammer” leak, and in condemnation of Theresa May it points out:

    “But after she had spent three years telling all and sundry that ‘no deal is better than a bad deal’, surely she would have made sure that by the time she handed the reins over to Boris Johnson all the necessary preparations for a no deal exit were well advanced?

    I am no fan of Boris Johnson, far from it, but how can it be right for a politician to say one thing but do another, and then stay silent while her successor is pilloried for the dire situation she bequeathed to him?”

    I now ask: have Boris Johnson and Lord Frost done any better in preparing for abrogation of the protocol?

  27. turboterrier
    July 18, 2021

    O/T
    On the BBC Marr show you have the European Environmental Agency blaming all the flooding in Europe on climate change, spouting all the plans to advert it.
    Not one word if the climate changes everything changes pro rata. More severe weather will put the power transmission networks at risk, turbines and solar may not be able to operate, water pumping , sewerage pumps it’s the whole gambit of civilised life.
    No matter what we do the climate will change and it is how we manage the change. An all electric dependent transport system will hinder the recovery and emergency services.
    Heed the gypsies warning as with most problems it has two sides as it does not matter where you live.
    .

    1. Original Richard
      July 18, 2021

      Turboterrier : “More severe weather will put the power transmission networks at risk, turbines and solar may not be able to operate, water pumping , sewerage pumps it’s the whole gambit of civilised life.”

      Yes, it is obvious that In emergencies where power supplies have been disrupted electric vehicles and electric equipment cannot cope. So for these situations ices will be needed.

      It will be found to be far harder to clear blocked motorways when hundreds of vehicles are trapped overnight through snow or flooding and all the vehicles have dead batteries each taking hours to re-charge.

  28. Julian Flood
    July 18, 2021

    The EU has a system for monitoring imported goods in transit which have elected to pay VAT at destination rather than port of entry. It does not need a hard border except at the point of entry. It should not be beyond a cooperative EU to adapt the system to maintain the integrity of its internal market
    Unless, of course, it is just being difficult.

    I

    1. glen cullen
      July 18, 2021

      As a sovereign independent nation we should be asking while the EU is involved in our tax system
the EU receives many goods from China without dictating the Chinese tax arrangements

    2. Garry
      July 18, 2021

      You voted to leave the EU. Now you want the EU to behave as if the UK has not left the EU. Clearly, even now, you Brexiters have no clue what you voted for

    3. Grey Friar
      July 18, 2021

      I know, it is amazing – the EU is treating the UK as if the UK is not a member of the EU! Can you think of any reason for this?

      1. Peter2
        July 18, 2021

        Be nice to be treated like many other non EU nations rather than singled out for special treatment.
        South Korea, USA, China, Australia, Japan etc

        1. Andy
          July 18, 2021

          You are being treated like all of those other countries – all of which face border challenges when dealing with the EU. In fact the EU has treated you Brexitists MORE favourably than any of the countries you mention by granting special status to Northern Ireland. There is no special status for Quebec or Idaho.

          The reality is that none of you Brexitists understood what a border was. You were obsessed with borders for people – particularly for people who don’t actually originate from Europe – but you didn’t ever figure out that a border is also actually for goods and services.

          What you are whinging about now is the border you voted for. Perhaps your vote was a bit dumb?

          1. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            Wrong as usual Andy.
            The countries I listed are treated differently to the UK that is why I listed them.
            They successfully sell billions of pounds worth of goods into Europe without any real problems or restrictions.
            Notice any shortages of their products in the UK?
            Notice any EU border guards checking goods situated inside these nations?
            Notice any demands by the EU for these nations to follow EU rules regulations directives and laws?
            Your eyes are closed.
            You have no practical trading experience.
            And it shows.

  29. agricola
    July 18, 2021

    More important today is the questionable Test & Trace programme. Relevant when vaccinations were low, but is it now, when a high percentage of the UK population are double dosed. Currently only the very vulnerable who have refused vaccination are at risk. I ask the question, of the roughly 4000 in hospital, how many have been double vaccinated and how many are refusenicks.

    From the experience of neighbours that have been double vaccinated and subsequently contracted Covid, the symptoms equate with the Common Cold , and do not last long. We do not bring the country to an economic halt when colds and flu hit us so why is a double vaccinated UK over reacting. Covid is going to be with us for many many years. The vaccination was not designed to eliminate Covid, just to protect us from its worst effects.

    The T&T regime is now under question when people realise its implications and wipe the App from their phones. We also have Boris and Rishi applying common sense and finding ways around it. Let us have a realistic evaluation of T&T, and when the elderly , vulnerable and those that elect to have it, require a booster jab. The economy cannot for ever remain in the waiting room.

    1. Alan Jutson
      July 18, 2021

      agricola

      Agreed, many I know now do not even turn the test and trace on any more.

      I would suggest that if you are double jabbed and pinged all you should have to do is isolate until you take a lateral flow test at home, if that proves positive then immediately take a PCR test, and if that proves positive then isolate for the full term.

      We have too many people having to isolate and losing money, losing business simply on a ping.
      Not everyone is fortunate enough to have a salaried job with a guaranteed income.

    2. Richard II
      July 18, 2021

      Very much agree with the need for common sense and realism that you call for, Agricola. The Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust covers most of SJR’s constituency. It gives as its most recent figure: ‘There were 6 patients in hospital with coronavirus on 13 July 2021’.The Royal Berkshire hospital says it has ‘813 inpatient beds, together with 204-day beds and spaces’ (Wikipedia). So the hospital can accommodate over 1,000 patients, and last Tuesday, it had six people with coronavirus.

      For goodness sake let’s get things in proportion.

    3. Fedupsoutherner
      July 18, 2021

      Apparently the Astrazenica jab does not give great protection from the South African variant now in our midst. I’m sure we all wanted to hear that good news. I do wonder if life will ever be what it was again.

  30. John Miller
    July 18, 2021

    Thank God some sense at last.

  31. Nig l
    July 18, 2021

    So magically more cabinet ministers are involved in a testing pilot when to my knowledge hundreds of thousands of ordinary people have had no such luck. Just like communist Russia. Party members got all the goodies whilst the rest of the population suffered.

    1. glen cullen
      July 18, 2021

      Correct – We’re all equal but some are more equal

    2. Sakara Gold
      July 18, 2021

      George Orwell – Animal Farm – “All animals are equal, except some are more equal than others”

      In what may be the most rapid government U-turn in history, Johnson and Sunak have announced that they will, in tact, be self-isolating.

      One feels for Javid, accepting Johnson’s poisoned chalice and thrown into the deep end, double-jabbed and catches the latest vaccine resistant variant…..strewth!

  32. formula57
    July 18, 2021

    We have been let down very badly by the political class and the May the quisling government in particular. The view that should have guided us and can guide us now is “our border, their problem”.

    Otherwise, your proper remarks about the BBC offer a challenge to its highly privileged funding arrangements. Surely those should be ended now?

    1. MiC
      July 18, 2021

      Nah, the country has been let down very badly by people like you.

      We would not have this excuse-for-a-government without you.

      1. Peter2
        July 18, 2021

        “people like you”
        The common statement by people who discriminate against others.
        This is what I was told when I was on a diversity training course.
        Which was very good BTW.

        1. Peter2
          July 19, 2021

          Keep digging MiC

      2. steve
        July 18, 2021

        MiC

        Bang out of order Martin. I think you would be happier living elsewhere.

        1. Fedupsoutherner
          July 18, 2021

          Steve, what you really mean is you wish he was living elsewhere with ‘people like him’.

          1. steve
            July 18, 2021

            FuS

            Yes I was just trying to be polite about it.

          2. MiC
            July 19, 2021

            No, most people are not like the extremist minority amongst the further minority of seventeen million, who are preposterously over-represented here and elsewhere on the internet.

            THAT is whom I meant.

        2. Micky Taking
          July 19, 2021

          ‘Taxi’ for Martin…..’Which Airport?’
          ‘Beijing?’

          1. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            Your inability to

          2. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            to…write a post without insulting people is what is becoming preposterous MiC
            First you insult formula57 and then in a sort of climb down you manage to call everyone on here extremists.

    2. DavidJ
      July 18, 2021

      +1

  33. Sir Joe Soap
    July 18, 2021

    This false border won’t last.

    NI will either become part of Ireland and the EU by poll, in which case the problem is no longer the UK Parliament’s or
    the border will be shifted back to where it should be and NI returned to the UK VAT and customs regime.

  34. NickC
    July 18, 2021

    The border is not between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland; it is between the UK and the Republic of Ireland (Eire on their Euro coins).

  35. James Wallace-Dunlop
    July 18, 2021

    Positive steps. May i suggest Two extra points

    A) The protocol provides for action in the event of trade distortion. There has already been such distortion

    B) the protocol provides for 4 yearly democratic consent (or otherwise) by NI. The U.K. government should abandon its (non protocol mandated) choice of a Stormont vote, and make the consent mechanism a referendum:. And set the first for 2022. That will give the Eu an incentive to be sensible

    The issue here is not so much what is needed, as how to make it easy for the rest of the world to see that the EU approach violates the GFA and is prepared to sacrifice peace and consent in an attempt to force the U.K. to adopt Eu rules

  36. glen cullen
    July 18, 2021

    That motion is all well and good however how does it match up to the EU position as described and recorded in the joint committee meeting minutes 3rd June 2021 
.their position is clear – ”There is no alternative to the Protocol”

    https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/20210603_unilateral_jc_statement_002_final.pdf

    1. Lets Buy British
      July 18, 2021

      The EU would say that. They are blinkered to suit their own purposes. There is a perfectly reasonable digital border option which the EU won’t consider because they are at war with the UK. The HMRC departments of the UK and RoI have agreed that it is eminently possible to adopt a digital strategy but the EU have rejected it because of their twisted and evil intent to do down the UK born out of hate, jealousy and fear that the UK will accelerate economically leaving them in the dust

      1. glen cullen
        July 18, 2021

        I fully agree with your comments and find the HoCs ‘motion’ pathetic….best send them another letter approach

  37. Everhopeful
    July 18, 2021

    After Brexit it was pointed out to the government by customs experts that there were viable technical alternatives to the imposition of a visible hard border between NI and The Republic and the imposition of visible customs checks at that border. It is entirely feasible technically for the border to be invisible and still maintain the integrity of the single market. These options were not accepted by the EU 
.they want the border to be a problem in order to punish the U.K. for leaving!!
    No other country would agree to internal border checks being imposed on it by a foreign power.
    This was designed to keep us in the EU or as close as possible for some future rejoining.

    1. Len Peel
      July 18, 2021

      There are no such technological alternatives. If there were, they’d exist sonewhere in the world. But they don’t exist. Just another Brexit fantasy. Just another Brexit dream that collapses when it comes into contact with reality

      1. Peter2
        July 18, 2021

        Complete twaddle Len
        Go to major container ports around the world (I have) and watch as tens of thousands of tons of goods are unloaded off huge ships in one day.
        They are then checked and allowed into the host country.
        The EU is sliding back into protectionism.

        1. Garry
          July 19, 2021

          “They are then checked 
”. Thanks for confirming Len’s point

          1. MiC
            July 19, 2021

            “Click, bang, oh no, my foot AGAIN!” yells Peter.

          2. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            Electronically by the manifests provided by the exporter
            Done by computers.
            Have you heard of them Garry?
            Or do you think armies of men open and unload every container?
            Hilarious.

          3. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            Click bang oh my foot goes MiC yet again on his 30th post of the day, displaying he is blissfully unaware how goods are actually”checked” at ports of entry
            throughout the world when goods arrive.
            People who import and export for living would be laughing at the inanities you and a few other lefties come out with on here.

        2. hefner
          July 19, 2021

          As you say P2, which is just the proof that the recent news about UK bands and musicians having problems to work in the EU (problems that were already apparent in January but have been moved near the top of the news in July to excite ‘some’ people) are just twaddle. Apart from the now required work visas all the rest is straightforward and is a ‘blizzard of paperwork’ only for people who wake up in the morning saying ‘What a beautiful new day to hate the EU’. What do you think?

          1. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            You still waffling on heffy?
            Some of you remainers are making a big issue about the difficulties UK artists are faced with in terms of managing an European tour.
            Like the Musicians Union for example.
            You need to decide what side you are on.

          2. hefner
            July 19, 2021

            P2, just pointing out that if containers can easily go through checks thanks to electronic manifests, I would guess musicians and their gear could do the same. That’s all.

          3. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            Indeed they could heffy.
            Please try to persuade your friends in the EU of that obvious solution.
            Because currently they are refusing to budge from their current obdurate position.

          4. hefner
            July 19, 2021

            P2, 17/07 in Sir John’s ‘The NI Protocol’: ‘Reports by the Musicians Union say that the EU is imposing new bureaucratic hurdles on the UK that make impossible for tours to take place’.
            P2, 19/07 ‘Some of you remainers 
 Like the Musicians Union for example’.

            So which is which, the MU as complaining about EU or the EU as remainers?

          5. hefner
            July 19, 2021

            
 or the MU as remainers 
 it was a bit late to address the inconsistencies in P2’s thinking.

          6. Peter2
            July 20, 2021

            I’m commenting on your own inconsistency heffy not the the Musicians Union.
            There are many other trade bodies criticising the way the EU are treating this issue and the EU’s refusal to modify their current rules.
            You need to decide as a remainer if this criticism of the EU by these organisations is deserved.
            But I presume you will default to blaming Boris and or Brexit.

      2. Everhopeful
        July 18, 2021

        I don’t think that any have been implemented yet but see what Lars Karlsson has to say about it.

    2. Andy
      July 18, 2021

      Customs experts nearly all pointed out the exact opposite. The friction free border you demand really doesn’t exist anywhere outside the EU. And you left the EU.

      Reply We are merely seeking friction free trade GB to NI which is a UK matter which the EU should not seek to preventb

      1. MiC
        July 19, 2021

        Then your party’s government should not have negotiated the NIP, which expressly prevents that, should it John?

        Maybe the whole UK’s staying in the SM and CU would have saved all this nonsense?

        And yes, you’d have had to admit then that there was no point whatsoever in Leaving then, and that the whole thing was a con.

        And you would have been spot-on.

  38. Everhopeful
    July 18, 2021

    OMG 
the peasants are jolly cross
if not revolting.
    Better get a positive test and hole up in the country mansion for the duration.
    They might be fooled ( again)!

  39. acorn
    July 18, 2021

    I have at last discovered why the phrase “Take BACK Control” was used rather than simply “Take Control” in the Brexit campaign. “The sado-populist prime minister Author Alastair Campbell”, New European (google ” “).

    As for the Northern Ireland debate; it was basically irrelevant; like most debates nowadays as far as Downing Street is concerned. As witnessed by Boris sending the Paymaster General to wind up the debate.

    1. hefner
      July 18, 2021

      acorn, thanks for pointing the article. It can be read (no paywall) at
      theneweuropean.co.uk ‘Boris Johnson: The sado-populist Prime Minister’.

      An interesting take on the present situation.

      1. Peter2
        July 18, 2021

        You rate Alister Campbwll now Hef?

        1. hefner
          July 18, 2021

          P2, don’t you think it is a good thing to read from different perspectives? How many books on Johnson have you read? Tom Bower’s? Andrew Gimson’s? Sonia Purnell’s? Do not be shy, show us the breadth of your readings.

          1. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            You especially like articles written by the Prime Minister’s enemies don’t you heff.
            First Adonis and now Campbell.
            Where is the “different perspective” you talk about?

          2. hefner
            July 19, 2021

            Gimson, an enemy of the PM, the guy often writes for ConservativeHome. Pull another one, will you. You clearly do not know what you are talking about.
            Have you seen Gimson’s (previously of the Daily Telegraph, now of the Spectator) portrait in CH of Munira Mirza (21/05/2020)?

          3. Peter2
            July 19, 2021

            More personal attacks heffy
            You just can’t help yourself can you?
            I repeat you support and a market two articles for us to read about our PM by two people immplacibly opposed politically to him
            And added to that they both have a great dislike of him.
            Thanks for Glimson.
            Have you got more unbiased journalists to give us?

  40. turboterrier
    July 18, 2021

    Here we go again another climb down over self isolation.
    Where in hells teeth are we going to get responsible leadership?
    The wheels are coming off, itcannot carry on like this for much longer, what signals this man and hos cohorts sending out to the country let alone the world.

    1. No Longer Anonymous
      July 18, 2021

      Indeed. It should have been “We’re cancelling track and trace for the double jabbed and no isolation for those testing negative.” Instead Boris jumped the wrong way.

      We are now in lockdown and masks forever.

      The old normal is never coming back.

  41. DavidJ
    July 18, 2021

    My understanding is that the sovereignty of NI as part of the UK has been compromised if not removed altogether. That alone is both reason and necessity for the NI protocol to be binned. Let the EUrocrats jump up and down if they wish but no compromise must be entertained.

    1. DOM
      July 18, 2021

      Absolutely and this attack on our nation has happened under both rancid, dirty parties that now infect our every waking moment with their mendacious presence and subtle erosion of voice and identity

      For the captured, imprisoned Tories, it’s party before EVERYTHING ELSE. For Labour, it’s Socialism to the death

      1. glen cullen
        July 18, 2021

        I’d suggest that for the tories read ‘green-eu marxists’ and for labour read ‘elite eu socialists’

    2. Garry
      July 18, 2021

      You don’t understand that EXACTLY this deal is the oven ready one the British people voted for at the last General Election. I dont know why, but they did. It is time the UK did what it agreed to do. The silly debate last Thursday doesnt change what the UK is committed to

  42. X-Tory
    July 18, 2021

    The whole debate can be read here: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-07-15/debates/65E91ED8-A873-4858-836F-DDB48C5C97AA/NorthernIrelandProtocol

    What disgusts me most if the statement by the minister (Penny Mordaunt) who stated: “We agreed to apply EU law and to control the movement of goods within our own country without any democratic say beyond a vote in four years’ time …. No other country has agreed to such a thing.” She explains this extraordinary (literally) concession with the weasel words: “all in the interests of peace. ” Well yes, anyone can achieve ‘peace’ through complete surrender! But since when was that the way we did things in Britain? No – this is peace through treachery, through appeasement and through national betrayal. That is NOT the sort of ‘peace’ I want or that is worth having. Our country has been betrayed by this government. This is NOT what Brexiteers voted for.

    1. glen cullen
      July 18, 2021

      hear hear

  43. Mike Wilson
    July 18, 2021

    When Mr. Redwood says it was passed unanimously, did anyone abstain?

    Reply In order to find out if someone abstains there needs to be two people opposing the motion to force a vote. Both the government and the Opposition supported the motion hence no vote.

    1. Garry
      July 19, 2021

      There was no vote. So obviously it was NOT passed unanimously

      Yes it was. If you disagree with it passing you ask for a division to hav3 a vote.

  44. jon livesey
    July 18, 2021

    “… significant provisions of the Protocol remain subject to grace periods ….. and that there is no evidence that this has presented any significant risk to the EU internal market”

    Now that is genuinely funny, and a very good point. It is time we emphasized to the EU and to their creatures in the Press that the supposed dangers to the Single Market simply have not materialised, even by the EU’s own account.

    That makes the victimization of NI a completely gratuitous piece of nastiness on the part of the EU.

  45. mancunius
    July 19, 2021

    I doubt very much that EU will pay any attention to a motion passed in Parliament. They are only interested in what the government can manage to get through Parliament (or as in recent years, get *past* Parliament). And the HoC has a curious way of forgetting what it has already decided. I recall during one of the May government Brexit debates, Jacob Rees-Mogg proposing a motion that NI would ‘never be a part of any customs union outside the UK’ – and the motion was carried. So what happened to that ‘parliamentary decision’, when the NI Protocol – passed by the HoC – made NI precisely that – part of the EU Customs Union?

Comments are closed.