The net zero enthusiasts tell us the costs of net zero will be low. They say a net cost of around 1% -2% of 2050 GDP. They decline to put an annual cash cost on the combination of investment and subsidies, wishing to net a lot of alleged gains from these true costs and express it as percentage of an enlarged GDP they forecast for 25 years time.
There are other estimates. The OBR said the investment cost will be around will be £1312 bn with a net cost of £321 bn. Mr Hammond when Chancellor thought the costs would be £50 bn a year or £1.5 tn over 30 years.
Clearly the gross costs will be huge. 30 m motor vehicles to replace with battery cars. 30 m homes to have electric heating. Thousands of industrial plants to be replaced with new electric factories. A massive expansion of electrical generation. The replacement of all gas fired power stations. A Switch to syn fuels for aviation. A switch of food production away from animal products.
This investment takes three forms. A small amount will be investment in extra capacity for growth, which we would need to do anyway. A bigger amount could be replacement of existing investment when they are worn out. Again that adds no extra cost if the replacement is as good value as the original or it adds marginal cost where the replacement is dearer or less effective. Then there is the big spend on conversion and premature replacement which is all additional cost.
There are large extra revenue costs. The state will pick up large bills for the mounting redundancies as blast furnaces and Grangemouth are closed to be followed by others. There are large subsidies to get people to buy EVs and heat pumps. Renewable generators get favourable prices and terms.
There are obvious targets to save public money on this wildly expensive command. Stop the £20 bn on carbon capture and storage. It is all extra cost. Cut the over generous subsidies to renewables, running at several billions a year. Wait for battery cars or syn fuel cars to become cheaper and better before buying them.
The £1300 bn “investment” is only part investment. Part of it is a wasteful premature replacement of perfectly good machines, vehicles and heating systems. Making them will simply add to costs and world CO 2
March 9, 2025
Good morning.
What do they care, they’re not the ones who will be paying for it !
March 9, 2025
Many are probably benefiting from it or their friends are. Either that or they are driven by totally insanity.
Mad economic vandalism on top of Ms Reeves economic vandalism and the “worker rights” economic vandalism, the housing economic vandalism and the VAT on school fees educational vandalism. Vast cost and zero benefits. The policies will not even reduce CO2 just export it at best and a bit more CO2 plant food is a net good.
March 9, 2025
British hardest hit by covid fall out five years on says the Observer despite spending more (no due to spending more you dopes.
Well far more net harm covid vaccines than most , more net harm lockdowns and on top of this net zero vandalism, 14 years of con-socialism followed by even worse from the appalling Starmer, Reeves, Lammy, Rayner and that appalling education sec.
March 9, 2025
Plus the IHT attack on farmers and small businesses.
Henry Tufnell is it seem one of three Labour MPs to have called for the Prime Minister to rethink plans to force more farms to pay 20 per cent inheritance tax on estates worth over £1million.
Just three how pathetic labour MPs are! How can farms making perhaps just 1% return on capital after tax pay 20% IHT each generation too? The businesses are being deliberately destroyed (same with landlords) Note that the normal income taxes, stamp duty, Corp Tax, Energy taxes… can easily take 80% of you assets off you over a generation anyway even before the IHT.
March 9, 2025
Lifelogic
Also add to your Tax grab list:
Unspent Pension Pot Funds also to be included for Inheritance tax in 2027.
The seven year rule for gifting.
The increase in House purchase Stamp Duty,
The £1,000 limit before tax on investment income.
You then start to wonder why anyone would bother investing for the future.
But our out of touch Chancellor says she wants people to invest in Britain, really.
March 9, 2025
Indeed far more to add to that list frozen allowances, no CGT indexation, council tax increases, minimum wage increase is in effect a tax and NI increase too.
March 9, 2025
MB
‘ What do they care, they’re not the ones who will be paying for it !’
Few in parliament are complaining about it. ‘They’ are not listening to the opposition anyway.
So it’s ‘carry on regardless’.
March 9, 2025
Nett Zero is a cats cradle of cost, misrepresented as investment, offered by a cabinet who have never run a profitable business in their committee lives, as a path to the destruction of GB Ltd. Add all the other interventions in our lives since their arrival last July and you have a certain formula for our absolute demise. There will not be any lights for the last person leaving to extinguish.
March 9, 2025
Seems so, vast costs and zero benefits. So what is driving this deluded lunacy it must surely be deliberate vandalism? As even Labour surely cannot be so stupid as to think it is a sensible thing to do unless that want to cause vast net harms can they? A policy still supported by Kemi’s Con Socialists just a tiny touch on the brakes she suggests just like the dire Sunak.
March 9, 2025
agricola:
‘Cat’s Cradle’ is a deft description of the way Labour entangles itself carelessly without sensible foresight. The term and the string process are rarely seen. Richard Attenborough as Pinkie performed it by hand in the film Brighton Rock, notable for its dark brooding atmosphere. It was broadcast on TV yesterday. You might have seen it then and linked Pinkie’s behaviour with the way Red Raw Labour operates.
March 10, 2025
Saw nothing, just a metaphor for an interlinked series of impositions that nett out at bankrupcy for the nation and its citizens. Socialism under a flag of convenience.
March 9, 2025
We all now know that this colossal expenditure will do nothing to save the planet or reduce CO2 emissions
It will enrich an already wealthy minority who will not be affected in the slightest.
Trump is shining a bright light into the murky corners of this nonesense and the perpetrators are having a meltdown.
Yesterday Nissan was assured that the onerous fines for not meeting EV sales target’s will be modified although a government spokesman says the endgame stays the same. Nissan has stopped the nightshift and no doubt soin start laying staff off.
Slowly it is dawning on the electorate just how destructive these policies are and not being promoted by other countries.
Milibrain and his cohorts are a danger to mankind and ultimately should be held to account.
Net zero is a manufactured farce designed to impoverish and destroy our country, much like untrammelled immigration said to be costing £6 billion annually.
March 9, 2025
Two-Tier is slowly waking up to the fact that if Nissan goes, so does Labour across the NE.
March 9, 2025
Net Zero is a global UN driven project.
In 1970 the global proportion of fossil fuels used for energy was 80%. Today it is still 80%.
Many trillions have been spent globally on this project.
Why does anyone expect there to be any change if the UK on its own spends another few trillions?
March 9, 2025
£trillions spent and the weathers the same !
March 9, 2025
I have a great plan spend £50k on a heat pump as it gives 2 times the heat as the electricity used to drive it. But it cost 25 times more to install and you use electricity costing 3 to 4 times as much as gas anyway. Plus the electricity will mainly come from burning gas or young coal at Drax wasting much heat at the power station. Plus you need larger tepid rads fitting and it cast far more to maintain and needs a vast investment in the electricity grid. Some houses will need 10 times as much electricity just for a few cost days of winter when demand it highest this will cost further billions.
March 9, 2025
Service life of a heat pump suggested as 20 years, same as solar panels and windmills.
March 9, 2025
Well I certainly whould not trust that. Then again as they say this hammer is just as good as new only three new heads and four shafts. Lots of bearings, fans, gas seals and will the manufacturers what to keep making the spares or whould they prefer to sell a new heat pump?
Google the picture of the storm damage to the Angelsey Solar Farm just a few month old I think it was! Still perhaps the damaged cells had repaid circa 1% of their cost in electricity (produced mainly in summer arround midday just when least wanted in the UK.
March 9, 2025
Plus the water pumps, far lager radiators, hot water tanks, electronics, tax, thermostats… so do they give a 20 guarantee? If they do I assume it well only apply if you spend £10PA+ servicing it with the approved provider!
March 10, 2025
The office I work in was renovated a couple of years ago and had heat pumps fitted. They’re so useless that when it gets even slightly cold, out come 3 or 4 fan heaters to boost the building to an acceptable temperature.
March 10, 2025
Lifelogic
I did say “suggested” !!!!
March 9, 2025
Someone on GBNews just now talking about the different views of King Charles over net zero and drill baby drill “diplomacy is what Charles does” no mate “deluded & gross hypocrisy is what Charles does on this issue” the complete reverse of “diplomacy”. I will travel as much as I like on private jets, first class, helicopters, Aston Martins… circa 5 million a year on travel then even more to heat my various palaces while you plebs. cannot even have a week in spain or afford a compulsory electric car soon!
March 9, 2025
+1 I’ve never had much time for Charles … I thought for decades that Anne would have been by far the better Monarch to replace Elizabeth II. But watching him address the WEF, supporting (leading?) the mission to destroy our economy; reduce “his subjects'” standard of living and control their every move absolutely sickened me. He is making a fortune from the occasionally useful windmills placed on the seabed around the coast, which WE are paying for.
I have no idea why anyone supports the Royals. They aren’t working in your interests.
March 9, 2025
Maybe he believe’s he’s a World King ….and the UN is his parliament
March 9, 2025
And a protector of all faiths too!
March 9, 2025
No support from him for the farmers over the government’s appalling IHT tax grab that will wreck the farming industry. But then he and his Mum were (and his is still exempt) from IHT and taxes in general so best keep your head down!
March 9, 2025
By 2050 king Charles will be living in the USA and Ed Miliband in Moscow.
March 9, 2025
There aren’t many ‘heat-pumps’ in Russia
March 9, 2025
They make even less sense when fossil fuels are about 1/4 the price as in the UK.
March 9, 2025
Lifelogic,
You are on a good little run today. However, I notice others have been posting more than you recently.
March 9, 2025
I have been rather busy with some business things plus my wife is away leaving me with the dog to care far he is rather needy!
March 9, 2025
Nobody has reacted to my letter printed in our local paper mooting that adoption of these net zero policies may have drastically cut our economic growth potential:
http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2025/02/28/labours-drive-to-close-down-uk-industry-is-going-well/#comment-1501475
Surely the burden of proof rests with those who claim that decarbonisation will not cut our economic growth.
March 9, 2025
No “may have” about it!
March 9, 2025
Perhaps in time as goes BP in the near future, so will go the nation?
March 9, 2025
Had BP rung me when they decided to go down the insane Net Zero track, then I could have explained why they should not do so and saved them about 30% of their share price. This by explaining why the laws of physics will always win out over the sick joke laws of our mad, PPE graduate politicians, and their deluded religions.
March 9, 2025
The net zero enthusiasts tell us the costs will be low …. and the net zero enthusiasts are lying. The costs will be huge, but since so many of them expect to be on the receiving end of the expenditure why should they care?
It’s “the little people” whose livelihoods, savings and household finances will be wiped out to pay for the UN’s SCAM and the Eco Nutters’ Grand Project in the UK.
It won’t make a scrap of difference to the climate because CO2 is not the main driver of climate change and whilst we reduce our insignificant contribution to global emissions by destroying our economy, China, India, the USA and others are massively increasing their emissions.
The British Establishment is basically committing the whole country to the modern equivalent of The Charge of the Light Brigade.
March 9, 2025
Find the highest projected cost for achieving ‘net zero’ then double it or even treble it. you may get close.
The answer is to abandon ‘net zero’ The UK contributes <1% of the Co2 in Earths atmosphere. A tiny amount. Reaching 'net zero' here will just export Co2 elsewhere. While China continues to produce 30% of Eaths Co2.
Co2 is an essential element of the atmosphere, not a deadly component.
March 9, 2025
The Net Zero policy supported by Mr. Milband and all the Parliamentary parties bar one isn’t simply destroying our energy security it is also destroying our national security:
How can it be safe to deindustrialise so we cannot make steel and munitions and hence military equipment?
How can it be safe to transition to expensive, chaotically intermittent and unreliable renewables and put all our energy eggs into one energy basket, electrification, when there is no plan or even an economic method to store grid-scale electricity ?
How can it be safe to electrify everything and make our grid the biggest hacking target in the world? Or in danger of a Carrington event?
How can it be safe for China, a state described by our security services as “hostile”, to supply all our energy infrastructure – wind turbines, solar panels, the metals and minerals for motors, generators, batteries and cabling?
How can it be safe for our energy infrastructure to be spread out over half the North Sea? How will our depleted armed services protect all the wind turbines and undersea cables from air and submarine drones? Or all the vast expanses of solar panels? No undersea cable or pipe is safe today, as seen with Nord Stream 2 and the recent attacks on Baltic Sea internet cabling.
How can it be safe to electrify our armed services – aircraft, ships, tanks ? How will they be re-charged on the battlefield or at sea? Or in the air? Against a hydrocarbon fuelled aggressor it would be like guns v bows and arrows.
March 9, 2025
Or invest a much lower annual figure in R & D and let the market do the work.
March 9, 2025
The sums you set out are horrific. I do not know enough about the subject to be able to comment on, or question, them, but they lead me to the conclusion that those responsible have not thought them through. If they had, they must have reached the same conclusions as you.
March 9, 2025
You mention the cost of replacing gas fired power stations with renewable alternatives. However, they will come to the end of life and need to be replaced anyway. I don’t believe there are any plans to blow them up before time.
What about the cost of going nuclear? How much will that cost as a comparison? We will have to do something, as gas is a finite resource.
March 9, 2025
SirJ is right to highlight the costs of net-zero, however I believe our government(s) still haven’t communicated the justification, reason nor evidence for the costly journey of net-zero; and the resultant cultural & infrastructural changes to our society….especially when half of the world aren’t engaged and the other half are retreating from net-zero pledges
March 9, 2025
174 criminals arrived in the UK yesterday; from the safe country of France …
March 9, 2025
They simply don’t care.
Putin doesn’t need to invade us. Just send in his proxies.
March 10, 2025
Why would Putin want to invade us? What have we got that he might want? I can understand why he invaded Ukraine – they have/had something he considered desirable ….. but us, by which I presume you mean the UK, what have we got that he would consider worth risking WW3 to seize?
March 9, 2025
I tend not to pay too much attention to my gas and electricity bill. I look at the use and the amount and pray it has not gone up too much. I also look at the VAT and standing charge element just to recognise government’s removal of my wealth.
This month I noticed the differential between electricity and gas. I heat my house using gas an in a winter month where the heating was on whenever needed gas was one third of the cost of electricity for the month. I just wish we cooked with gas and had gas lamps around the house.
Electricity is expensive. I keep hearing that renewables are cheap. It would seem not.
March 9, 2025
Highly off topic (although I suspect it is underperforming civil servants who created this net zero policy in the first place)
I look forward to your future diary entry on the sense of paying off inefficient civil servants rather than performance managing them out of employment (it’s only our money after all). Will it be like the NHS where managers were paid off and them re-engaged as consultants?
March 9, 2025
Comments are not going into review – just disappearing?
March 9, 2025
I still can’t post my comments
March 9, 2025
“The net zero enthusiasts tell us the costs of net zero will be low.”
That’s the overt costs, where we need to build in a considerable margin for their spin and lies. But what about the immediate intangible costs, comprised within the onslaught upon quality of life as we know it? And in turn the snowballing affront costs, when we ordinary plebs increasingly resent being made cold, poor, hungry, dirty, immobile, bored and controlled when the green globalist elite and their fellow travellers remain warm, wealthy, well fed, clean, mobile, stimulated and controlling?
March 9, 2025
Extracting energy from natural forces should cost a lot less than digging for raw materials and burning things.
We should be seeing price reductions in energy and not price rises.
What went wrong?
March 9, 2025
We’re paying them not to produce energy, and when they do we subsidise it ….. the whole model is wrong, what happened to capitalism, competition and free markets
March 9, 2025
Net Zero, Climate Change and Global Warming are a scam. Until we have MPs with the brains and common sense to do some simple research, this nonsense will continue until the UK is bankrupt.
The climate has always changed and always will, but it is nothing to do with CO2.
The fact that the Government and Net Zero zealots won’t state the true cost tells you that they have no intention of telling voters the truth.
Likewise, the MSM seems blind to this nonsense. Where are the editors, writers or broadcasters who will get their teeth into this nonsense and expose it for what it is?
March 9, 2025
Especially the deluded BBC MSM
March 9, 2025
Here is more sending and a huge advance to net zero – isn’t it?
‘It is noteworthy that the ban on the transfer of intelligence from the United States is sabotaged by European NATO members. In general, the EU has shed the guise of a lover of ecology and liberalism, is going to find $800 billion for the AFU somewhere, and the preparation for war with Russia is in full swing. The Wehrmacht Bundeswehr is planned for a serious expansion. The Polish Army will also be increased many times over, and Macron has generally agreed to discuss the use of nuclear weapons.
It was most likely France and Britain’s strong interests in the Odessa Region, which became the reason for the nightly strikes with “Geraniums” and missiles on the region by the Russian Armed Forces. London is trying to completely take over operational control of the Ukrainian troops, and as a fan of wars at sea, it promotes the commander of the Ukrainian Navy, supplies Kiev with the means of delivering marine landing forces and other support for operations on the water.’
March 10, 2025
Read the 100 year UK-Ukraine partnership document-it is a colonial-style agreement,just like the UK used to ‘agree’ with African chiefs in the 19th century.
March 9, 2025
Sir John, the belief (I use that word belief purposely) the control of CO2 evolution and expression by human activities is what determines global weather thus climate after thirty years of impact is about as wrong as it gets.
There is no scientific study showing CO2 controls the atmosphere or climate. There are many studies that show we are at an uncomfortably low level of atmospheric CO2 and need to increase it for the sake of a stable environmental future. The increase in CO2 that has taken place over the past fifty years standing at today’s 420 PPM has given the world a much greener environment which NASA has calculated from satellite data as being equal to twice the size of the contiguous USA states.
We must stop this insane negativity about CO2 that has been built up by the Climate Alarmists and Green activist believers.
CO2 is without doubt a net good to all species. Without it we would not exist.
March 9, 2025
Agree – https://www.weatheraction.com/
March 9, 2025
Good old Piers Corbyn, rather brighter than his brother though not without his own lefty delusions.
March 9, 2025
AND… if you remove money from the economy, how do fund a future?
In essence your MP, our MP’s, Parliament and Government have taken the fight to the people, to ensure there is no tomorrow no future for us to head towards. In practice the action of all those we have empowered and paid to act on our behalf have instead chosen to force through the conspiracy of the WEF Great Reset – so may be it is no longer just a conspiracy.
What we mustn’t loose sight of is ‘all’ our ‘competing nations’, the ones after our money, wealth, our industries etc. have not chosen the path of impoverishment as a means to destruction. They, our competitors, have not created costly malicious punishment Laws – with the creation of those the UK Parliament stands out as stuffed full of ideological terrorist. The leadership around the Globe, the same people that are affected by World pollution are at odds with the UK Parliament, they know they can only have a future, even a alternative future if they first create the funding for it.
As Sir John intimated previously, since the inception of these punitive punishment laws, any subsequent Parliament as the UK’s only legitimate ‘legislator’ could change the Law. We pay and empower MP’s to secure our future we lend them the right to create, amend and repeal the Laws in this Country.
Laws that should be applied equally, ‘above the Old Bailey sits a statue of Lady Justice’. She wears a blindfold, because justice must be blind to colour, religion or sex. It would appear our Parliament its MPs see Law as ‘Them’ and ‘Us’ and will continue the fight
March 9, 2025
I’d be most interested to know what you people think will be the cost of heating the planet to the point where humans can’t live on it – which is where all reputable climate scientists think we are heading within a couple of generations
March 9, 2025
We managed very nicely during the Roman occupation of the UK when grapes were being grown in what is now Northumberland …. and again during the Medieval Warm Period.
Your “reputable” climate $cientists base their hysterical scaremongering on the last 200 years …. and the rest is done by easily corrupted modelling (rather like the Covid SCAM).
March 9, 2025
No they don’t Lemming.
Read the last UN climate report.
Humans have survived for tens of thousands of years in areas where the temperatures are zero and where they are 40c.
PS
Can you tell us,
When we get to net zero in the UK, by how much will our effort reduce average global temperatures?
March 9, 2025
Approximately 0.003C according to IPCC modelling and assumptions. Willis Eschenbach did the full calculation (which is only a few lines of maths accessible to anyone with O level or modern A level) and wrote it up at Watts Up With That.
March 9, 2025
Under the labour & tory governments; there isn’t any clear success target nor kpi, therefore net-zero will continue forever ….the prefect scam of politicians
March 9, 2025
Reviewing the Extinction Clock predictions brings balance
https://extinctionclock.org/
Not one single climate prediction has came true
March 9, 2025
Glen, many thanks for that link.
Another good one is the “whattsupwiththat” website especially their list of failed climate predictions
March 10, 2025
Cheers for your link
March 9, 2025
+1
March 9, 2025
‘reputable’ = paid-for
March 9, 2025
Billions on the beyond parody carbon capture and storage.
Billions on the Chagos Islands, which no one can even point to on a map.
Billions on overseas climate aid which will be spent on private jets and limousine’s.
Billions on keeping illegal immigrants in four star luxury.
Billions on a forever war which our politicians want to keep going.
How far down the pecking order are the British people?
March 9, 2025
The British People are essential as they have to pay for it all!
March 9, 2025
And £266bn on Covid spending – decided just like that, without Parliament’s approval.
Value for money? if it was, the inquiry would have shown us that by now. No, it was a gravy train that ran for a couple of years, and since then it’s been the war gravy train instead. And this one is suddenly being stoked up so much, the Green Net Zero gravy train on the other track may have to be taken off into a siding! Even the long- suffering British taxpayer probably can’t afford both.
March 9, 2025
A while back, Sir JR, you mentioned that you were looking at a new format for this diary – That would be very useful because the current format doesn’t allow important documents on a similar subject to be grouped and easily found.
I would suggest a tree structure in alphabetical order, like this example:
General Comments (non-specific)
….CLIMATE CHANGE
……..NETZERO
…………15 MINUTE CITIES
………….COSTS
………… POLITICS
……..SCIENCE ARGUMENTS
….PARTY POLITICS
……..CONSERVATIVES
……..LABOUR
……..REFORM
……..PARLIAMENT
etc etc
THERE IS SO MUCH USEFUL DATA IN THE DIARY BUT IF YOU WANT CERTAIN PEOPLE TO TAKE NOTICE THEN IT HAS TO BE MADE EASY FOR THEM TO FIND LINKED ARGUMENTS
March 9, 2025
I believe Net Zero is a scam. I do not believe mankind can change climates and research tells me that man-made CO2 causes no problems for our planet.
Both Labour and previous Tory governments bewilderingly set a target to reduce our own CO2 emissions from the existing 0.8% of the Global total down to zero in a pre-set arbitrary number of years.
I want to know why it is more important to “Get there first” apart from egotistically expecting congratulatory applause from the Rest of the World!
China, the world’s most aggressive offender, emitting 33% of the global total, together with the USA and India are responsible for over 50% of the total. So while we cripple ourselves chasing Utopia, they look upon us with amazement and probably laugh at our idiocy and super-extraordinary behaviour.
March 9, 2025
Dear Mr. Redwood
I read in Guido Fawkes that not a single member of the cabinet has any real-world business experience. None of them have ever run or managed a successful private enterprise. Instead, it’s a cabinet full of career politicians, union apparatchiks and those who’ve spent their working lives in the public sector. Guido gives the numbers:
7 career politicians, 4 union workers, 7 lawyers, 2 charity workers, 2 academics, 1 accountant, 1 journalist -(Yvette Cooper – for two years in between being a career politician).
I doubt if individual cabinet members, past or present, have ever given any ‘serious’ thought as to how much this is all going to cost, the effect on the finances of British families or if it is even possible at all. They have signed us up to the climate accords and appointed the CCC quango to tell them what to do and when to do it and that is that! So far, they have taken the low-hanging fruit but it is going to get much harder and more expensive.
I doubt I will be around in 2050 but it would be oddly satisfying to hear the Prime Minister announce very proudly that the country has hit Net Zero whilst he/she surveyed the industrial and commercial wasteland all around them. Meanwhile, atmospheric CO2 levels have increased greatly worldwide – including, of course, here in the UK!
March 9, 2025
The Uniparty is a good definition that covers every party in the Commons except Reform.
They are all committed to spending incalculable sums to reduce our emissions ahead of every other country, just to make our politicians look good on the world stage, but to what end ?
We have already reduced our emissions more than any other developed country so we can easily slow down and allow the others to catch up. I would make a committment that going forward, we will reduce our percentage emissions at the same rate as the leading polluters : China, the USA, and India.
We can therefore cancel almost all of Miliband’s ludicrous policies, especially his carbon capture and storage plan, and switch the money allocated to that to building SMRs which will go along way to making us independently secure. They will also provide an export business we can make money from for UK PLC
We can also put off and ultimately abandon the switch to battery EVs, as the battery technology is not going to offer acceptable range at an affordable price for at least another decade or more.
March 9, 2025
Is part of that investment in nuclear energy?
March 9, 2025
These absurd and technically unachievable policies should be abandoned as indeed should the ill conceived Net Zero target.
March 9, 2025
What happens to civil servants if their department is closed and there are no available jobs in other departments?
What sort of contracts are there with NGOs, in particular what costs and penalties are there for discontinuing the contracts – perhaps consider setting up competitive alternatives.
March 9, 2025
Forecasting decades so far ahead is ridiculous!
As for the Trillions involved again totally uncontrollable.
The risks involved again are off the scale.
Only idiots would commit the whole country to this nonsense.
Can we seriously hold those responsible for this “Blind leading the blind” over the cliff without any Plan B to account?
March 9, 2025
Oh dear god ….Canada has just voted in a woke net-zero’ist
March 10, 2025
I doubt we will notice any difference between Carney and the previous Prime Minister who was also Woke left and completely pointless.
March 10, 2025
Just a thought: If DJT had not been threatening to put tariffs on Canada because of a quasi inexistent threat of fentanyl from Canada, Mark Carney would not have won the vote of the Liberal Party members.