COP 30

What is the point of COP 30? The US does not believe in man made climate change as a threat and is pursuing growth through producing more cheap okl and gas to give it a big competitive advantage against the EU and UK with their dear energy. China has been expanding its CO 2 output in the ten years since the Paris Treaty Agreement for others to get it down, whilst building  a dominant position in renewables, batteries and battery cars to sell to others as well as for home consumption. Other leading  CO 2 emitters including Russia, Iran, India, Indonesia are still expanding their CO 2 output.

It is stupid for the UK and other parts of Europe to cut its CO 2 output by closing down industry, only to import the goods instead. This increases world CO 2 output with all the extra transport.

The Climate Change advocates want to cut air travel, air conditioning and meat eating as all these add to CO 2. A COP Conference in Brazil will increase all of these are many people fly out to air conditioned hotels with grand dinners. Doing all this on a government expense account is unwise. People hate hypocrisy and waste. This Conference looks like both on stilts.

The UK cannot spare more money for the usual whip round the richer countries to give to the poorer. The UK should not promise to hit tougher targets as it is already signed up to targets that are too high.

97 Comments

  1. Lifelogic
    November 2, 2025

    It is stupid for the UK and other parts of Europe to cut their CO 2 output as:-

    1. CO2 is harmless, indeed net beneficial, gas (vital plant tree and crop food) and even a doubling of atmospheric CO2 would, at worst, cause only trivial warming (all other things being the same) and for the UK a little warming would be good too.

    2. Merely exporting the jobs and CO2 will on average increase CO2 anyway.

    3. Any anyway to reduce CO2 worldwide would require world cooperation which clearly highly unlikely to happen with China, Russia, USA, North Korea, Latin America…

    So three reasons, all true and any single one alone blows the deluded Miliband’s agenda out of the water. (wrong comment on Conservatives deleted. Next time I will delete the whole post as that is quicker Ed)

    A fourth reason is most of the things they push do not really save any or very much CO2 anyway. Things like renewables, EV cars, public transport, heat pumps, cycling, walking…

    1. Lifelogic
      November 2, 2025

      Or burning imported wood at Drax!

      1. Lifelogic
        November 2, 2025

        Plus most of the thinks pushed EVs. public transport, walking, renewables, heat pumps, burning wood at Drax… do not even save any (or any significant CO2) anyway. EVs increase it on average as does burning wood instead of coal at Drax.

        1. Ian B
          November 2, 2025

          @Lifelogic – breathing plays a big part as well. Massive population growth from stupidity enhances CO2 output as well.

          You could ask is that why the Assisted Dying Bill is a big part of Parliaments agenda

    2. Ian Wragg
      November 2, 2025

      I have a feeling this may be the last hurrah for the climate change idiots. Momentum is gathering in Europe and Australia against the damage being foisted on the people by the UN and WEF. The odious Liar and Gates are rowing back on their commitment to this charade, if only to be on the right side of history when it collapses.
      People are starting to feel the pain from complying with this nonesense and we are one power cut away from civil disturbance.

      1. Narrow Shoulders
        November 2, 2025

        When even Bill Gates comes out in favour of people over doctrine you know that the message is diluting.

  2. Ian B
    November 2, 2025

    Sir John
    It gives all the appearance of being an extension to the Socialist WEF, their almost religious doctrines aspiring to the ‘Great Reset’

    Then you have to ask we here in the UK have we so many people engaged in ‘ponsing’ around on these nothings when the Nation is going broke, society is being destroyed from the top. Just a little effort in controlling expenditure in the UK its self would be nice, COP and the WEF do the opposite, they are destroyers not builders conceived by those that have never done a days productive work in their life.

  3. Lifelogic
    November 2, 2025

    Two Tier Kier and his police urge us “not to speculate at this stage”.

    Speculate:- the forming of a theory or conjecture without the full facts.

    The public will speculate as much as they wish too Sir Kier. The police should get the facts out asap not order people not to speculate. Good speculators are very often spot on – though not always. The absence or hiding of information by the authorities as we see with many violent attack, stabbbbiings and with the data on the net harm Covid Vaccines (and the multi million sick joke inquiry) is often a very useful indication of the truth.

    1. Lifelogic
      November 2, 2025

      We do not want “the thought and prayers” from our truly dire government ministers – we want preventive, deterrent action from them to police the borders and to deter (especially violent) crime!

    2. Lynn Atkinson
      November 2, 2025

      You can roll up public transport. It’s too dangerous to use.

      Let’s hope that this time the government, which in another I turn is allowing the families of ‘palestinian’ students to come to Britain, has COPPED it.

      1. Lifelogic
        November 2, 2025

        Well fairly safe in crash injury terms but perhaps less so for mugging and knifings. 29,643 killed or seriously injured in road accidents PA UK.

        1. Lynn Atkinson
          November 2, 2025

          Nobody is worrying about crashes. If you are a good driver, and I am, you have reduced chances of being involved in motor accidents too.

          1. Lifelogic
            November 2, 2025

            I have had three (write off) crashes over my 40 odd years of driving, two rear shunts and one from a car speeding out of a side road into my nearside I was fortunately in largish cars each time. Non were my fault but in non could I have done anything to avoid them. I was fine in all three other than a bit of whiplash but had I been on a bike or motor bike could very easily have been killed.

            Not much you can do if a truck careers into your rear when stationary in a queue however careful you are!

          2. Lynn Atkinson
            November 2, 2025

            Well I got my first car 58 years ago. Funnily enough I was in traffic on the M4 and saw a truck coming too fast. I pulled onto the hard standing (I always have space in front of me.) The truck hit the car that had been in front of me. The driver was angry … with me!
            I have suffered a few scratches. Anticipation you know, is everything, while driving and navigating politics.

          3. Lifelogic
            November 3, 2025

            Has the hard shoulder gone now with so called “smart” motorways!

      2. Berkshire Alan.
        November 2, 2025

        Lynn

        “It’s too dangerous to use” Not exactly, but it certainly is a factor, especially at night or when travelling alone.
        More train personal on board would help, but that would make it even more expensive than it already is.
        Crowded trains with people coughing and sneezing all over the place does not exactly encourage you either, given windows are not now openable and the Filters (if they exist) in the air-conditioning just help to re-circulate the germs.
        Buses are uncomfortable, but at least have small opening windows.
        The problem with public transport is the Journey you have to make to get to them, and their car parks are expensive which also adds to the overall cost.

      3. Peter Parsons
        November 3, 2025

        Based on per capita death rates, you’re about 3x more likely to die in your own private car than you are to be murdered in any location.

    3. Peter
      November 2, 2025

      LL,

      Yes I thought ‘cops’ were now going to quickly release descriptions of crime suspects.

      Hence speculation. I suspect media have already been given instructions on what to report.

      1. Lifelogic
        November 2, 2025

        Well we have not been given much info so far but this lack of info. usually indicates rather alot!

        They have not even indicated as yet that they were Welsh Choir Boys as yet (or perhaps East Anglian ones).

    4. Bloke
      November 2, 2025

      Speculation is thinking ahead for assessment.
      Anyone who doesn’t risks falling off a cliff.

      1. Lifelogic
        November 2, 2025

        +1

    5. graham1946
      November 2, 2025

      It is not speculation to think that we never had a serious knife crime problem prior to the open borders policy. Certain cultures abroad (and increasingly here) use knives as weapons and for killing animals for food as we well know and allow. We reap what we sow.

  4. Kenneth
    November 2, 2025

    It’s only the BBC and the our civil service who take this this seriously.

    1. Donna
      November 2, 2025

      No, so do Red Ed, Two-Tier and Charles Windsor …. along with a significant number of “our” MPs and members of the House of Frauds.

      The Establishment is infested with Eco nutters.

      1. Kenneth
        November 2, 2025

        I cannot believe Ed Milliband takes this seriously either.

        Look at how many air miles he and his Department for Energy Security & Net Zero have clocked up.

        It seems they don’t believe in this nonsense either.

        1. Donna
          November 2, 2025

          Believing it and taking it seriously are not the same things. I doubt if they believe the nonsense either …. but they are taking it seriously because it is the means by which they intend to create a One World Government of Global Socialism, ruled by an unelected, unaccountable “Elite” … The Prize Pigs of Orwell’s Animal Farm.

          1. Sharon
            November 2, 2025

            And, Donna, the best way to get people to comply with further restrictions, as during the lockdown years, is fear!

            I’m listening to GB News and earlier, Talk Radio… and each reporter who has spoken says the people they’ve spoken to are very frightened!

            Let criminals run amok, crime increases until you reach this week where there has been a long list of stabbings!

        2. Lifelogic
          November 2, 2025

          Indeed is he a potty deluded zealot or a “do as I say not as I do liar and hypocrite? Motivated perhaps by versted interest groups, a disire to wreck the economy or what?

      2. glen cullen
        November 2, 2025

        Correct

  5. Christine
    November 2, 2025

    We have a group of people who live in a parallel universe to the rest of us. The ‘do as I say, not as I do’ brigade live a comfortable existence funded by the sweat, hard work and sacrifice of the rest of us. They preach utter nonsense whilst awarding themselves accolades and titles. This is The Emperor’s New Clothes, and in my opinion, it won’t end well for them. A day of reckoning is fast approaching as people have had enough.

    1. Wanderer
      November 2, 2025

      @Christine. +1.

      Only I guess at this COP, we will have the PM or Milliband strutting around giving away our money and making promises harmful to our interests all to get a few moments in the spotlight. Fat lot of good it does their political prospects at home (they and the Tories are, after all, polling less than the Greens now).

      Most of the other politicians there will think how gullible, foolish and possibly corrupt our leaders are, selling out their citizens to cosy up to the green blob and the lucrative opportunities it provides for post-parliamentary employment.

    2. Berkshire Alan.
      November 2, 2025

      Christine
      +1

    3. Mickey Taking
      November 2, 2025

      We could do with stock punishment for us all to jeer, celebrate and throw rotten veg at them.
      Nothing of the kind will happen of course.

  6. Sakara Gold
    November 2, 2025

    The UK has cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 50% between 1990 and 2022 – while growing the economy by 79%

    Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-first-major-economy-to-halve-emissions

    This compares to a pathetic 23% reduction in France and no change at all in the USA between 1990 and 2021. With renewables now accounting for more than 50% of the UK’s (and the world’s) electricity – up from just 7% in 2010 – the UK is the global leader on cleaner energy.

    The fact is that the UK is making significant progress towards net zero. The long-term trend shows that UK is rapidly driving down emissions. The government must put a stop to the great gas rip-off, use the regulator to reduce the huge profits made by the privatised energy industry and complete the transition to make renewables the backbone of our energy system to lower our bills for good

    UK CO2 emissions fell 3.6% in 2024 alone as coal use dropped to it’s lowest since 1666, when the figures were skewed by the Great Fire of London

    Reply This model will result in black outs, ultra expensive energy, mass factory closures and dependence on imports for most manufactures.

    1. IAN WRAGG
      November 2, 2025

      SG
      This has been achieved by offshoring the majority of uk industry. We have merely transferred the emissions to China etc.
      Our electricity grid is teetering on the brink of collapse due to the unsane policies of Milibrain and Co.
      You fail to mention the fact that US per capita has doubled in the time frame you quote and now Europe is only half as rich from almost parity 20 years ago.

      1. IanT
        November 2, 2025

        Yes Ian – it’s Net Zero accounting fraud. We just generated our “consumed” carbon elsewhere – the manufacture of EVs ss a prime example. Starmer is now proposing to align us with EU carbon import tarifs to ‘account’ for this. So we will pay extra for our imported goods and still claim to be on the side of the righteous. Typical double-think.

    2. Wanderer
      November 2, 2025

      @SG. How far has world greenhouse gas production fallen in that same time period? A net zero UK achieves net nothing.

    3. Old Albion
      November 2, 2025

      The UK contributes 0.04% of global Co2 (400 PPM) Next to nothing, as i repeatedly try to tell the net zero nutters.

      Reply The UK contributes 0.8% of total annual world CO 2, China 33%

      1. Old Albion
        November 2, 2025

        I have no idea where you have seen that figure for the UK
        8000 PPM ??? I don’t think so.

      2. Old Albion
        November 2, 2025

        I stand corrected Sir JR. 0.04% is the proportion of Co2 in the Earths atmosphere (400 PPM)
        The UK does indeed contribute 0.8% of that. (3.2PPM) way less than I had been led to believe.
        Thanks for highlighting this.

        1. KB
          November 3, 2025

          Old Albion: better but you are still not getting it fully.
          Most of that 400ppm was already there. It is natural. It is only the increase from 280 to 400ppm (actually about 427ppm by now) that can be blamed on man-made emissions. So we are not responsible for even 3.2ppm.

    4. Narrow Shoulders
      November 2, 2025

      Offshoring customer service Jobs didn’t work. Offshore carbon production has been very sufmccesful unless you lost your job

    5. Lynn Atkinson
      November 2, 2025

      So we have to endure blackouts and cold, either voluntarily by not being able to afford switching the Aga on or as we are currently experiencing, blackouts every night, on the say so of the Globalists who AT THE SAME TIME wage war in Ukraine exploding all sorts of weapons which emit enormous amounts of CO2.

      In addition we will be lectured by the Government that to even consider the death penalty for those who attack civilians is out of the question while they partake in the bombing and effective murder of the Ukrainian press-ganged civilian forces (by continuing to fund this disastrous, unwinable war).

      All the skill of the political class is geared on presenting disasters as wins. You will see that signing up to more COP madness will be described as a monumental step towards peace and prosperity (see Mr Gold above) and begging for a cease fire is presented as ‘wanting to stop the killing’ rather than needing time for Germany to become the armed powerhouse it was 100 years ago, so it can subdue Russia and the rest of us.

    6. Original Richard
      November 2, 2025

      SG: “This compares to a pathetic 23% reduction in France….

      France’s CO2 emissions are lower than the UK. They’re emission reduction is lower than the UK because whilst we were generating most of our electricity using coal and gas, they had already moved to 70% nuclear. Not that CO2 is a problem anyway. It is the gas of life and more CO2 in the atmosphere greens the planet and more food is grown. There is no historical, empirical or even theoretical evidence that CO2 controls the planet’s temperature. The IPCC’s radiative greenhouse gas warming theory is false. Water vapour is a far more prevalent greenhouse gas (between 10 and 100 times more than CO2) and a more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2 absorbing far more of the planet’s emitted IR radiation. But the climate cult (yet) doesn’t think we should curb atmospheric water vapour!

      1. Original Richard
        November 2, 2025

        Their not they’re.

    7. Mark
      November 3, 2025

      France achieved the bulk of its emissions reductions before 1990 through their nuclear programme. It has lower per capita emissions than the UK even today.

  7. James1
    November 2, 2025

    I believe many people feel that the CO2 nonsense is on a par with borrowing money to give it away in foreign aid. Not to help with disaster recovery, but simply giving it away for absurd purposes, i.e. the goal being not where money should be spent but where money could be spent.

    1. Lynn Atkinson
      November 2, 2025

      Should be illegal.

  8. Donna
    November 2, 2025

    The point of COP 30 is the same as all the previous COPs: to deliver UN Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
    The UN requires the de-industrialisation of western democracies; reduced living standards for “the peasants” and the transfer of wealth from “the undeserving west” to the deserving in Asia and Africa. UN representatives have spelled it out for us very nicely:

    “Ottmar Edenhofer, lead author of the IPCC’s fourth summary report released in 2007 candidly expressed the priority. Speaking in 2010, he advised, “One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. Instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth.”

    And “as U.N. climate chief Christina Figueres pointedly remarked, the true aim of the U.N.’s 2014 Paris climate conference was “to change the [capitalist] economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”

    They are enforcing global Socialism, dressed up as Climate Policy.
    https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/05/24/global-warming-is-not-about-the-science-un-admits-climate-change-policy-is-about-how-we-redistribute-the-worlds-wealth/

  9. Will
    November 2, 2025

    Instead of wasting obscene amounts of taxpayer money on the utterly pointless virtue signalling nonsense that is COP, it would make a refreshing change to see our government actually act in the interests of the country they allegedly control. How about actively supporting UK energy resources instead of putting them out of business? How about supporting UK industry instead of taxing and pricing it out of existence? How about looking after their own citizens instead of actively encouraging replacement by( people from abroad ed)?

  10. Brian Tomkinson
    November 2, 2025

    Man-made climate change and net zero are scams designed to control and impoverish the majority for the benefit of a globalist minority and their political puppets.

    1. Donna
      November 2, 2025

      Correct.

  11. Donna
    November 2, 2025

    So, a terrorist incident on a train – at least 10 injured, 9 apparently in a life threatening condition. etc ed

    Reply I will comment when we are allowed more information. We are urged not to speculate, so I will be patient.

  12. Harry MacMillon
    November 2, 2025

    It is stupid for the UK and other parts of Europe to cut its CO 2 output by closing down industry, only to import the goods instead.

    It is beyond stupid – it has become treasonous.

    Based on what the world outside of the UK and Europe ae doing it would be so easy to say that there is no logic to all of this unnecessary destruction of our societies in the west.
    OK, so we totally destroy our industry and get used to eating bugs, will the tiny mount of co2 saved do anything for the planet?
    Obviously not – this is all about commercial suicide!

    1. Sharon
      November 2, 2025

      If CO2 is so harmful, why then do farmers spray it into their green houses? To encourage better growth, of course!

      1. Harry MacMillon
        November 2, 2025

        CO2 is what makes the world so green and allows us to feed the world – except of course where things are mismanaged

  13. Sakara Gold
    November 2, 2025

    Why does the BBC have to broadcast religious claptrap on Sunday mornings? These days less than 2% of the population attend a CofE church. Their most recent male Archbishop had to resign because he was implicated in the latest child abuse scandal. And was then replaced with a woman

    Last week some spam came through the door inviting us to contribute £5 to an appeal to “save” 500 churches which have no congregation. When the Church of England has £billions and £billions invested and could easily pay for the upkeep themselves.

    Meanwhile, apparently their retired clergy are living in penury in rented accommodation

    1. Narrow Shoulders
      November 2, 2025

      The UK has a Christian civil law basis and moral compass.

      If we completely abandon this something will fill the void.

      I’d rather persist than abandon our heritage. Hymns on Sundays, Carols at Christmas and the occasional bible reading are small prices to pay.

      But yes religious leaders are to be treated with caution

      1. Original Richard
        November 2, 2025

        NS :

        Agreed. Those currently in charge of our country seem to wish our becoming a multicultural/multifaith country like Yugoslavia or Northern Ireland or, worse still, an Islamic country with sharia Law, through immigration.

      2. glen cullen
        November 2, 2025

        Halloween was almost non existent this year ….well many of our high street shops aren’t sympathetic to christian views

    2. Mickey Taking
      November 2, 2025

      Amazing. Is that really you Mr Gold? A sensible submission unlike so many previously.

    3. IAN WRAGG
      November 2, 2025

      SG. Never mind, shortly you’ll be forced to pay a tythe to your local Mosque. I believe it runs at 10% of your earnungs/pension. This will be automatically deducted so no need to worry.
      You think I’m joking, wait until your grandkids are confronted with this.

    4. Lifelogic
      November 2, 2025

      Well the BBC broadcasts climate alarmist religious claptrap every single day of the week? This together with their other pro EU, lefty, woke, pro-DEI anti-white male, anti-landlord, anti car and anti business agendas.

  14. Rod Evans
    November 2, 2025

    The most telling fact about how pointless the COP jamborees are is this.
    If you graph the growth in CO2 from the point of the first meeting to the current 432 PPM you will see a continuous line of uninterrupted growth not a flicker of any change in the direction of CO2 rising level in the atmosphere.
    For those concerned about CO2 growth that would inform them the actions of the COP meetings are worthless. Even the much talked about Paris Climate Accord in 2015 has made zero difference in CO2 growth.
    For those scientifically minded maybe a look at Henry’s law which defines the balance between gas in solution in the atmosphere and in the oceans. The ocean holds over sixty times more CO2 than the atmosphere in balance with Henry’s laws on partial pressure. The additions we make via via fossil fuel use are only 3% of the annual CO2 released into the atmosphere the bulk comes from natural processes in the oceans and on land.
    One final point CO2 is good for the environment and good for all living things on Earth there is not a single negative feature associated with CO2. Record harvests and massive additional green growth is something we should be celebrating.
    Ban all COP meetings of at least make them not government funded. Those who wish to go can do so on their own dime and own time.

  15. Dave Andrews
    November 2, 2025

    Maybe there’s a man-made climate change crisis, or maybe there isn’t.
    Let’s give it the benefit of doubt and halt all imports from China, to reduce the CO2 impact of transportation. Let’s also end the import of people from warm countries to our country where winter warmth depends on the burning of fossil fuels. That could be our contribution to the cause.
    Perhaps our politicians in COP30 can advocate that.

  16. Bloke
    November 2, 2025

    The current government is addicted to doing wrong things. It needs an antidote like Reform.

  17. Sakara Gold
    November 2, 2025

    Sir William Rees-Mogg must be bored now that he is no longer an MP. He has started a YouTube channel, where he speaks to the nation from a different room each time in his Somerset mansion. Usually a library

    Moggy has about 40,000 subscribers and judging from the comments, many regard his YouTube channel as a comedy show, especially in California and Queensland, Australia

    Somebody tell him how to spell “medieval” – you would expect an ex-Etonian and alumnus of Trinity College, Oxford to know that

    1. Lynn Atkinson
      November 2, 2025

      Sir William Rees-Mogg is deceased. He never was an MP. He was a newspaper editor and a stalwart defender of an independent Britain.

  18. Sakara Gold
    November 2, 2025

    My apologies for the typo. Of course, I ment to refer to Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg and not the late Lord William Rees-Mogg, former editor of The Times

    1. Donna
      November 2, 2025

      Don’t worry Sakara …. we’re all well used to your inaccuracies.

    2. Rod Evans
      November 2, 2025

      That’s a pity, I thought for a moment you had achieved a first and moved onto another level of communication with the dead. Hey Ho, one day eh? Note of caution, when it comes to removing spelling flaws in someone’s output remember to remove the flawed paragraph from thine own output…. 🙂

    3. Lifelogic
      November 2, 2025

      I am sure both William and Jacob both knew/know how to spell medieval. Both are/were good & sound chaps only occasionally driven away from rational reason by their religion.

  19. Original Richard
    November 2, 2025

    All very good points, Sir John. That these COP jamborees are held yearly, with our moral superiors flying in on their private jets, and this time staying in very expensive hotels in the Amazon forest accessed by a newly built 4 lane highway, ignoring the CO2 emissions from China and ignoring the only low CO2 emitting source of energy which is affordable and reliable, nuclear, is clear evidence that they themselves do not believe that there is a climate crisis caused by anthropogenic emissions of CO2. Neither of course does the UN itself who only rate ‘climate action’ as #13 on their list of sustainable goals.

    1. Berkshire Alan.
      November 2, 2025

      +1

    2. Original Richard
      November 2, 2025

      PS : I think Prince William will eventually regret attending COP30, a political jamboree, where the delegates are attempting to enforce Net Zero on his country to cause impoverishment, rationing and control through electrification using the false theory that anthropogenic emissions of CO2 will cause an existential climate breakdown/catastrophe/crisis. A theory that only exists as a model and is designed to frighten the population and then make them feel guilty for even living.

  20. Original Richard
    November 2, 2025

    Bill Gates, has written to the COP30 delegates that the doomsday view of climate change, namely that in a few decades cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilisation, is wrong and we should concentrate instead on different efforts that will have more impact on the human condition. This fits with the UN listing ‘climate action’ as only #13 in its list of sustainable goals, despite what the UN Sec Gen utters, and the fact that Table 12 in Chapter 12 of the UN IPCC’s latest AR6 Working Group 1 (“The Science”) report shows no signals for climate change (precipitation, droughts, storms) other than some mild warming. The mild warming being 0.14 degrees C per decade according to the UAH satellite data. Bill Gates hasn’t yet admitted that rising levels of CO2 is not the prime reason for the planet warming, but at least it’s a step forward. Climate history over the last 500m years, since the start of the Cambrian explosion, shows there to be no correlation between CO2 and temperature except for the last 500,000 years when both CO2 and temperature have been exceptionally low and here the Vostok Antarctic ice core data clearly shows CO2 following temperature. Happer & Wijngaarden have shown, using the IPCC’s own radiative greenhouse gas warming theory that adding further CO2 to the atmosphere adds little, if any, additional warming because a phenomenon known as saturation. A view endorsed by |The Royal Society. And Shula & Ott have used the data from 3 experiments to provide a compelling case that the IPCC’s radiative theory is invalid because of thermalisation. See the Tom Nelson YouTube podcasts for both.

    1. glen cullen
      November 2, 2025

      But you can’t stop the free jolly, a political showcase, a chance to declare a worldwide tax and restriction on plebs ….they can’t lose face, they can’t say its all been a waste of money; a scam

  21. Narrow Shoulders
    November 2, 2025

    “It is stupid”

    And here we have the message of today, tomorrow and the future.

    Climate, refugees, higher taxes, government borrowing, cutting defence, DEI being prioritised over merit, freebies.

    Western governments need to beware.

  22. Sakara Gold
    November 2, 2025

    Julius Caesar launched two invasions of Britain in 55 and 54 BC, to stop British support for the Gauls and to enhance his reputation, but the invasions did not result in a full conquest

    Caesar found the British weather to be dank and disruptive, noting that after an initial period of fair weather for his first invasion in 55 BC, fierce storms, high tides and continuous rain made it “impossible to maintain the troops in tents” and wreaked havoc on his ships

    He did, however introduce the Roman snail to the British, which the Romans regarded as a delicacy. Unfortunately, they escaped into the British countryside and now the infernal molluscs are wreaking havoc among Mrs Gold’s orchid collection.

    Last night the lady was distraught and I spent much of the evening in the greenhouse with a torch, collecting the snails (which are now a protected species) before releasing them in an open space half a mile away, where the local hedgehogs could enjoy them

    1. Lynn Atkinson
      November 2, 2025

      Julius Caesar abandoned his first invasion of our island as the Gauls kicked up and he had to return to the continent to subdue them.
      His problem always was supply lines and Scotland proved a nation too far.
      Is it snails or slugs eating your orchids? Usually it’s slugs that are the problem.

    2. IAN WRAGG
      November 2, 2025

      SG. You should apply for reparations from the government in Rome.

      1. glen cullen
        November 2, 2025

        ha ha

    3. Original Richard
      November 2, 2025

      SG :

      I’m sure Caesar did find British weather, compared to Roman, “dank and disruptive”. But it appears it was warm enough to grow vines up by Hadrian’s Wall by 122 AD. Or did the Romans’ CO2 emissions cause global warming? BTW, it is thought that the reason Hannibal was able to cross the Alps in 218BC was because there was no snow, or very little, in the Alps ar the time.

  23. IanT
    November 2, 2025

    The Huntingdon Police say they are “working at pace”. Well I often ‘pace’ slowlyaround,
    so I’d suggest they just get on with it and try working “quickly”

    1. glen cullen
      November 2, 2025

      Don’t worry our government & police have declare the incident as a None-Terrorist event ……I’d be in terror if I was on that train …..so its back to a terror thats some 100 years ahead of us, something they can tax today and will never be measured

  24. Roy Grainger
    November 2, 2025

    COP30 gives Starmer yet another opportunity to do what he likes best – leave the UK and get his photo taken with other world leaders, in Brazil this time. He has spent an inordinate amount of time out of the country since he came to power, can’t blame him really given the absolute shambles he is making of things here.

    1. Ian B
      November 2, 2025

      @Roy Grainger – unfortunately for him, World Leaders will not be there. Although as he stated, his preferred bunch for telling him what to do next the Socialist WEF Cabal. The ‘Great Reset’ is still in motion and he wont let a little thing like the UK economy to cause that to falter

    2. Ukret123
      November 2, 2025

      He’s off to COP 30 to Cop Out of the Reeves PR unlawful rental disaster and will pledge more billions of our Taxes to our detriment. Total madness for us but dressed up as Christmas has come early for our foreign competitors and fake credit and expensive virtue signalling for him and the high priest of Net Zero Miliband.
      God help us!
      Have we borrowed enough yet to pay the ridiculous billions Labour promised the last year?

  25. Alison Barnes
    November 2, 2025

    But we have spared money though for a road to nowhere to be cut through the Amazon rainforest in the cause of reducing climate change!

  26. Ian B
    November 2, 2025

    There is a surprise, “The UK’s national debt is growing at the fastest rate of any rich country as a prolonged borrowing binge threatens to push the country into a “doom loop”.

    Debt has close to tripled from 2005 to 2025, analysis by Oxford Economics shows, outpacing increases in any other advanced economy.

    A failure by successive governments to live within their means has left the UK with a £2.9tn mountain of debt, which is almost as large as the entire economy and costs over £100bn a year in interest payments.”

    The Uni-party this Century set out to destroy the UK and its People and you could say they are doing a good job of that aim… Thank you Blair, Brown, Cameron, Johnson, Sunak and Starmer destroyers of the first order, WEF Socialist to the core.

    1. Ian B
      November 2, 2025

      “Jagjit Chadha, a professor of economics at Cambridge University, said the UK’s uniquely sharp rise in debt levels over the last two decades was a sign that the political system had failed.”

      Is anyone surprised? Most of us don’t need or want reminding, but there is always hope that some numpty somewhere will have a day of dawning get the message, see common sense and put the economy first instead of always taking money from the economy and wondering why it falters

  27. Ian B
    November 2, 2025

    COP 30 in Brazil is the next AWOL for 2TK, along with Prince William government officials, diplomats, business leaders, and Quangos are also anticipated to be there.
    The hot air and burning of fossil fuels is beyond belief. If a single one of them was honest, wouldn’t they just boot up Zoom/Teams?
    Unfortunately a taxpayer funded free holiday in the sun trumps all. Just bettered by personal ego and self esteem.

  28. glen cullen
    November 2, 2025

    The UK’s International Climate Finance (ICF) initiative is a program of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to help developing countries tackle climate change and poverty. It involves a commitment of £11.6 billion between 2021-2026
    Did someone mention Labours budget blackhole

  29. Peter D Gardner
    November 3, 2025

    “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting”. ”
    Sun Tzu, The Art of War.

  30. Peter D Gardner
    November 3, 2025

    The Epica Dome C Antarctic ice core covering 8 inter-glacial cycles of 100,000 years each shows that CO2 lags temperature during warming periods. Therefore rising CO2 can not be the cause of rising temperatures.

    1. Peter D Gardner
      November 3, 2025

      For reference, the last glacial maximum was only 20,000 years ago so we still have a lot more warming to come for a very long time yet.

  31. Mark
    November 3, 2025

    Almost unnoticed last week, the government claimed to have complied with a court order issued in March to produce a climate plan that is consistent with the targets stipulated in the 6th Carbon Budget, after its earlier effort was rejected through judicial review. The need for the plan to be feasible and affordable was an optional extra that was not covered.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/carbon-budget-and-growth-delivery-plan-2025

    I suspect it will prove to be a little read work of fiction that simply satisfies the court edict.

Comments are closed.