Mr Burnham’s big idea is to spend more in the public sector to promote growth. Unfortunately for him there is no extra tax revenue spare, so he needs to put up taxes or borrow more to spend more.
If he raises taxes he will hit output and investment in the private sector by more than the increase in them in the public sector. The Reeves £66 bn tax hike demonstrated that, with depressed growth and rising unemployment the result.
If he tries to borrow more, already worried markets will drive interest rates up more. This will deter private sector investment. Dear mortgages will keep housebuilding depressed. People will consume less as they pay more in credit card and mortgage interest.
In both cases Mr Burnham will get more of the wrong kind of public spending. The costs of servicing the state debt will rise more. The benefits bill will soar as more people lose jobs or are unable to find a job as the private sector slims down to pay the extra tax and interest bills.
Mr Burnham’s second big idea is to give more spending power to Mayors. If they spend in the same way as the central government was spending before granting extra tax nothing much changes. If the Mayors spend additional sums and central government carries on spending as before then there need to be tax rises to pay the extra bills. That will adversely hit UK growth.
Mr Burnham will find that genuine devolution will produce different outcomes in different places. Scotland and Wales shows devolution can produce worse outcomes by over reliance on a badly run public sector. They spend more per head than England to grow more slowly. They also often get worse public services for more cost per head.
August 1, 2026
Perhaps we should all relocate to Manchester, England’s new capital.
August 1, 2026
The whole thing is a write off.. long given up now and hopefully bonds go up to deter housebuilders until this shower are removed.. the worst ever.
August 1, 2026
sure burnham is clueless in financial terms.
but he is also clueless on cultural and what exactly are we defending terms.
even if his policies did produce wealth, which they won’t, what is the point of wealth if the people of the UK as we know them are destroyed?