The continuing damage of higher taxes

The farmers were back in Westminster yesterday, angrier than ever. The family farm tax will drive some out of business and split up farms on the death of the farmer. Just when we need more home grown food the government taxes farms to extinction, with high NI and subsidies for not growing food also doing damage. The mean IHT charge will not raise much money but will pull down some family farms. The PM made a mess of responding to worries about farmers mental health and more possible suicides.

Meanwhile predictably the higher National Insurance duly pushed unemployment  up,now well  up on the inherited level in the summer of 2034.  Conservatives took unemployment down from 7.6% to 4.1 % over14 years, Labour put it up to 5.1% in a year and a half.

The high taxes on energy and energy use are busy closing refineries, petro chem  plants, ceramics works, a fibreglass factory  and many others.

Big wage awards mean public sector pay now goes up far faster than private sector. The squeezed private sector has to lay higher taxes to lay the bigger state wage bills and ballooning benefit bills. No wonder there is no growth, fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

115 Comments

  1. Stephen Sharp
    December 18, 2025

    You write about ‘ballooning benefit bills’ as if an injection of demand into the economy is not welcome. People on benefit tend to have a higher propensity to spend than those with more than one house.

    Reply Taxing energy/ carbon and family farms is destroying businesses and closing factories, undermining our ability to earn a living. We cannot all live on benefits.

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      How can you have ‘demand’ with no money?
      All that does is remove assets from the economy.
      I bet you work in the Treasury. I see your ‘logic’ all over Reeves budgets and in the ferrying of a penniless aliens into the country.
      Truly you are more terrifying than everything else.

      Reply
      1. IanT
        December 18, 2025

        I agree Lynn, a very twisted logic.

        Reply
      2. Sam
        December 18, 2025

        Magic Money Tree economic theory writ large.
        Thank you Lynn and Ian for calling it out.

        Reply
    2. Lifelogic
      December 18, 2025

      Indeed we cannot all on live on benefits or paid by the state sector or from gold plated state sector pensions. Starmer even has his own act of parliament to give him special tax advantages over other pensions for mere plebs! Pensions they have used their own earning to fun unlike Sir Two Tier!

      Reply
      1. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        “Teachers will be given training to spot the signs of misogyny and tackle it in the classroom as part of the government’s long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls within the next decade.”
        Reported by the BBC.

        So will this misogyny include forcing girls as young as 10 to wear head covering at many schools?

        Just how will misogyny be defined. If I say women on average tend to be shorter than men, less good a sports, less likely to study physics, computer science or further maths is it misogyny or women are more likely to study English or languages, spend more on clothes, shoes and makeup, live longer… Indeed if you measure almost anything you will fine a gender differences on average!

        Will they also cover misandry such as in RAF pilot recruitment or courts absurdly equating the wages of bin men (nearly all men) with dinner ladies (nearly all ladies) as if they were comparable jobs!

        Reply
        1. iain gill
          December 18, 2025

          young working class white boys are not the problem.

          Pakistani heritage people who routinely cover up gang rape, and never report each other to the authorities… on the other hand

          Reply
      2. Lynn Atkinson
        December 18, 2025

        Just been revealed that Somalis sent $1.7 billion ‘home’ to Somalia in 2023. And that was out of benefits.
        What are we all doing? When a country with an average IQ of 70 outwits us we need to stop and think!

        Reply
    3. PeteB
      December 18, 2025

      Stephen – those ballooning benefit costs can only ultimately be funded by private sector activity. Grow the state sector and you bleed the private sector dry. Jacob Rees-Mogg did a good YouTube brief this week explaining the issue.
      One point from JR-M that I hadn’t known: Every single Labour Government has increased unemployment during their term in office. What more evidence do you need of socialist incompetence?

      Reply
      1. Stephen Sharp
        December 18, 2025

        You don’t think tax breaks are a form of benefit?

        Reply
        1. iain gill
          December 18, 2025

          If I earn 100 quid and I get to keep 60 of it instead of 50, as the state taxes it at 40% instead of 50%, then its still money I earned. When it gets taxed again when I spend it. Taxed again when I die. There is not much of what I earn that I actually get to keep and use myself.
          When everything the state takes gets at least 30 % wasted on admin costs which add no value to society…

          Reply
        2. Mickey Taking
          December 18, 2025

          No!! the tax taken from income is only justified for Defence and Law and Order. Everything else needs debate to justify.

          Reply
        3. PeteB
          December 18, 2025

          Tax breaks = not taking money off people. I’d hardly describe that as a benefit. Like asking you to be grateful the thief didn’t take your wallet.

          Reply
        4. PeteB
          December 18, 2025

          As an aside, I’d scrap Inheritance Tax, which may be what you are referring to with farmers getting tax breaks. Inheritance Tax doesn’t raise significant money, is avoided by the very wealthy and is a second tax on people for saving/investing their earnings.

          Reply
          1. glen cullen
            December 18, 2025

            Scraping inheritance tax would also alleviate the pain & heartache of ‘probate’

        5. Ian B
          December 18, 2025

          @Stephen Sharp – agreed, one man’s tax break is another man’s additional tax payment

          Reply
        6. Donna
          December 18, 2025

          No. The Government helping itself to slightly less of your money in order to influence your behaviour in a way it approves, isn’t a benefit. It’s manipulation.

          Reply
        7. Lynn Atkinson
          December 18, 2025

          NO!

          Reply
      2. Ian B
        December 18, 2025

        @Mickey Taking & @ PeteB

        tax taken from income is only justified for Defence and Law and Order – agreed

        Tax breaks = not taking money off people. I’d hardly describe that as a benefit. – then the shortfall created by a tax break surely means someone else has to pay more.

        Isn’t the problem that the tax system is overly complicated, used to bend minds, so unfair? The result being is the wrong people get trapped so have to be subsidised out of the system, then in doing so it traps someone else that is not the intended target, so on and so on, so it gets administratively complex and becomes a fight to only attack those that for political reason were the intended target. It could be reasoned it is and expensive administration mess because of political religious ideology

        Reply
        1. Ian B
          December 18, 2025

          Personally I believe everyone should pay tax and no tax breaks. Everyone enjoys the Defence, Law and Order, infrastructure, education etc that taxes provide so paying for it would simply be honest and a fair way for all to contribute to the society we belong to. Everyone gets the opportunity to benefit and earn because of that tax spend. What shouldn’t be going on is the diatribe of political religious ideology being used as punishment taxes to bend minds. Get rid of the latter and I would guess as Steve Wozniak once calculated a straight forward simple tax of 6% is all that is needed.

          Reply
    4. Donna
      December 18, 2025

      Destroying manufacturing and private business, including farming, in order to give unearned money to welfare claimants (including a great many foreign ones) is not going to “put more money into the economy.”

      In the real world you have to earn money (ie business) before you spend it (welfare).

      Reply
    5. Sir Joe Soap
      December 18, 2025

      Perhaps you should look to countries with successful economies to learn a thing or two about real life? Can you see this idea of paying people from tax not to work and importing people going down well in the US? Switzerland? If it worked so well to boost their economies, I’m pretty sure they’d have twigged it. Instead, you’re relying on ideas tried in the USSR and east bloc.

      Reply
    6. Berkshire Alan.
      December 18, 2025

      SS
      “People on Benefits tend to have a higher propensity to spend than those with more than one house”.

      Yes you are probably right, that is why they are on Benefits, they have little or no savings, so your solution is what exactly, should we all get Benefits and then we could all spend more ?
      But who finances the Benefits in this dream World ?

      Reply
      1. a-tracy
        December 18, 2025

        Well said Alan, saved me the same answer.
        Deter business set up encourage living on the State because you get to spend more of other people’s money, great advert for Labour.

        Reply
    7. Lifelogic
      December 18, 2025

      “You write about ‘ballooning benefit bills’ as if an injection of demand into the economy is not welcome”.

      So where do these benefits come from but taxes on people this removing money from the economy!
      It also lower the incentives to work and increases the incentives to live off benefits. Plus you also have all the costs of collection and distribution. Furthermore the incentives to leave the country.

      So how exactly do you think this doom loop agenda will provide a sustainable injection of demand?

      Reply
      1. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        Rolls-Royce is looking at moving its £1.6 trillion jet engine project and 40,000 of Britain’s top jobs to America or Germany – as Theresa May’s Con Socialists & now Labour’s insane Net Zero policies are making its UK business unviable. They are not the only ones nearly all business is dependent on cheap reliable energy in order to complete also plus not too much taxation on transfers of wages to employees plus affordable accommodation for employees too.

        Reply
        1. Lynn Atkinson
          December 18, 2025

          It has to. The development it was undertaking is based on intellectual property owned by the Americans and Trump pulled the plug on Starmer.
          So RR has to give up or undertake the work in the USA.

          Reply
    8. Narrow Shoulders
      December 18, 2025

      The money multiplier requires the money to be earned through production not handed out.

      Helicopter money, as proved by Covid giveaways, ends in rampant inflation.

      Reply
      1. Mickey Taking
        December 18, 2025

        and crime – fraud being the most likely.

        Reply
      2. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        You end up with a riders being larger than the workers they all leach off. Sustainable it can never be for long!

        Reply
    9. Nick
      December 18, 2025

      Stephen Sharp’s ingenious argument has convinced me that what Britain needs is more theft. I now see how wicked it is to just own stuff when the national interest demands that others spend it for me.

      Laws against burglary and robbery must be repealed immediately, and our hard-working, disgracefully misunderstood thieves released from prison so they can get the economy motoring again.

      Reply
      1. Mickey Taking
        December 18, 2025

        Yes all buying and selling, even bartering, should be done ‘down the pub’ ….oh! Starmer is presiding over the daily closing of them.

        Reply
      2. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        The smashed factory window fallacy or dig holes then fill them in again lunacy – let’s all smash windows thus creating work for the window repair man and his family to buy food, pay rent…

        Except the window owners then have less to spend or invest on new staff, new machinery, food and rents for their families, taxes for governments. Plus this spending makes people better off and is not just replacing one window with another this wasting people’s money time and efforts with zero gain what so ever.

        Reply
      3. Lynn Atkinson
        December 18, 2025

        😂🤣 I had a boundary dispute some time ago. My neighbour built his driveway on my land. My barrister, his junior and solicitor visited the site and he said ’if there were no documents how would you prove this was your land?’
        I told him that if there were no documents I would not bother with this piece of land at all, I would lay claim to a few blocks in SW1, because the Duke of Westminster would have no means of proving it was his land.
        You get tired of dealing with morons by the time you reach your eighth decade!

        Reply
    10. k
      December 18, 2025

      It’s not worth working. So the tax burden is falling on fewer and fewer and poorer shoulders. This is an economic death spiral.

      Reply
      1. Ian B
        December 18, 2025

        @k – Parliaments ‘plan’ in action

        Reply
      2. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        Higher tax rates lower take take leads to even higher rates and even less tax take – the great Reeves doom loop lunacy to kill growth!

        Reply
    11. Jam Tomorrow
      December 18, 2025

      Comedian Andrew Lawrence has just released a sketch where he’s a bricklayer appealing to unemployed people to donate money to him so he can buy presents for his kids.

      If only this were a joke.

      The brick layer is having his earnings stolen so that the unemployed can boost the economy. I can assure you. If the brick layer could keep more of his money then the economy really would be boosted.

      Reply
    12. Robert Mcdonald
      December 18, 2025

      People on benefits only spend the taxes raised from “people with bigger houses” on their own personal comfort / entertainment. People with bigger houses invest what’s left after living expenses, including taxes, on investment .. I.e. JOBS for people willing to work.

      Reply
  2. iain gill
    December 18, 2025

    meanwhile we have people in London living in social housing where the market price of their individual house is more than 2 million quid, these people really have won the state lottery.

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      Better still, they don’t have to pay any additional fees!

      Reply
      1. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        They can often even pass the cheap rent benefit onto resident children and with no IHT! The family next door in a similar house may be working hard to pay a large mortgage, taxes are circa 50% and often have a far lower disposable income than the people in the council house be they working or on benefits! Their taxes being used to give the neighbours a far higher standard of living than themselves and in a similar house!

        Reply
        1. iain gill
          December 18, 2025

          I know a single mother with 3 kids, one of the kids is disabled. The amount of money and perks she gets is amazing. This free, that free, allowed queue jumping here, queue jumping there.

          It is madness.

          Reply
          1. Narrow Shoulders
            December 18, 2025

            Free TV licence on it’s way

          2. Lifelogic
            December 18, 2025

            What is also common is a “couple” with or without children – who have two flats/houses both paid for by benefits no incentive to give one up as all fully paid for by others. Were they having to pay for these themselves they could only afford to live in the one! But why give it up if it is free. Perhaps you working children or similar stay there some of the time and perhaps give you a bit of cash in hand too.

    2. iain gill
      December 18, 2025

      except of course that social housing allocation is not random like a lottery, it would be interesting to know the backgrounds of such residents, what their relationship with councillors is, etc.

      Reply
      1. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        Indeed! Corruption in allocation is often rife!

        Reply
        1. iain gill
          December 18, 2025

          same in NHS queue jumping.

          the national religion is very corrupt.

          Reply
          1. iain gill
            December 18, 2025

            same as allocation of the best state schools, corruption is routine

          2. Lynn Atkinson
            December 18, 2025

            Thank your lucky stars if you can’t get into an NHS facility!

      2. Wanderer
        December 18, 2025

        @Ian Gill. My workmate got to be 2nd on the list for a social housing property, as a technically homeless single dad with a 12 year old son. He was then bumped to 6th on the list. He phoned the council and was told this was because there had been a “migrant emergency”, with an influx of migrants to the local authority area. He missed out on the property.

        Reply
        1. glen cullen
          December 18, 2025

          Soon they’ll be removing people from social housing to make way for ‘migrants’

          Reply
    3. Lifelogic
      December 18, 2025

      Indeed and very likely never to move out as paying such low rents and even these quite likely being paid for by other tax payers, many with their own large mortgages, via benefits! As they will not own the house they will not pay the new mansion mugging taxes either!

      Reply
      1. Lifelogic
        December 18, 2025

        The IHT tax grab is not just on farms but on all small businesses it is hugely harmful. The government grabs the 20% but this destroys businesses, jobs, productivity going forwards or the business folds.

        A growth, growth, growth rain-dance from Reeves yet every policy she pushed is anti-growth. Plus the insanity of net zero rip off energy, the renters rights bill, the worker rights bill… total insanity.

        So silly Kemi wants to ban Doctors from striking which would be hugely counterproductive. Almost everyone seems to be against the doctors currently but if you do the maths they often end up with circa £150k of debt to qualify over 5-6 years plus interest of 7% on this. The maths using junior doctors pay rates mean they actually often get no pay after tax, NI, commuting costs, exam fees, stethoscopes etc. and other deductions beyond what they need jist to repay this student debt until they get to about age 32. Literally zero pay nothing for food, rent, council tax until age 32! Yet it seems it is fine from Bankers, Lawyers, HR consultants, compliance people, insurance people to earn three times doctors pay often after only the three or four years at uni or even non!

        Reply
        1. Enigma
          December 18, 2025

          I frequently read on here how easy lawyers have it. Let me explain our reality. My son completed a degree in philosophy (3 years) followed by a law conversion degree (1 year). He then needed to find a job to gain some experience because guess what – no one wants to employ anyone who hasn’t had experience 🤷🏼‍♀️ and training contracts are very difficult to obtain if you do not have the right contacts. After 4 years working as a paralegal on low pay and applying for many training contracts – a lengthy procedure which in most cases wasn’t even acknowledged – he finally secured one. A training contract lasts 3 years. The first year he spent at university on a grant of £10000. Two further years are spent working at a modest salary. It will have taken him 7 years to qualify. He lives in London because that is where the opportunities are but it also means high living costs as you have explained Lifelogic. So his experience is not unlike that of a doctor. He barely gets by and has depended on our financial support. He will be 30 by the time he finally qualifies and will need to find a job.

          Reply
          1. Narrow Shoulders
            December 18, 2025

            Is he any good?

          2. Lifelogic
            December 18, 2025

            I agree it can be. But some lawyers and bankers in London do start on over £100K after only three or four years with a good degree from a top university. Doctors start on about £35K and with perhaps £150K of student debt plus interest at 7% on top (so circa £10K of just interest. The debt and interest do not come into any benefit calculations so they can rarely get help with rent, council tax and similar. They even have to pay for their own exams £500 at time and some medical gear which can gets stolen every so often too.

            Many would be financially far better off with no student debt and having worked from the age of 16 on minimum wage! You might get to 40 as a doctor before you are better off. How are these people ever going to have children or buy a house?

        2. iain gill
          December 18, 2025

          Kemi is wrong.

          Much of what the doctors say is correct. Replacing doctors with PA’s etc is a bad mistake. Big bottlenecks in training for local doctors is a bad mistake. Importing foreign docs instead of training our own is a mistake. She should have taken a pop at the crap way the NHS is organised and run, not the docs. Their pay is a small part of their grievance.

          Reply
          1. Lifelogic
            December 18, 2025

            Indeed plus Doctors will just leave if pushed much further. Most can only do it as they often do have some family wealth.

        3. Enigma
          December 18, 2025

          Lifelogic where do you get your information from? You cannot practice law until you have completed a training contract! The business secretary was caught out calling himself a lawyer when he hadn’t completed his contract! As for starting on £100k dream on! My son has good degrees from top universities and yes Narrow Shoulders he is very good! It doesn’t make it any easier and he still has all the costs you list Lifelogic. How will he ever afford to save for a deposit on a house? DEI also raises it’s ugly head.

          Reply
  3. Mick
    December 18, 2025

    What Starmer the harmer is trying to do is the total collapse of the farming industry along with everything else the liebour party touches so we are dependent on overseas imports, then there’s the little question of the liebour parties drip drip dripping us back into the dreaded EU by the back door and ignoring the 17 million voters who voted out of the organisation of pig trough eaters , surely there’s got to be a way of getting this bunch of rabble out of power before 2029 or we are doomed and the country I’ve lived in for over 70 years is gone forever

    Reply
    1. Berkshire Alan.
      December 18, 2025

      Mick
      I viewed some of the Select Committee meeting that Starmer attended ref Farmers IHT.
      Alistair Carmichael put it to him that elderly Farmers were in a no win situation, firstly with the 7 year gifting rule, and those who were presently terminally ill are thinking of committing suicide before next April to escape the new grab for IHT, he asked Starmer if he was he aware of that situation.
      Starmer said he had been advised, but he was simply changing the rules not actually targeting anyone in particular.
      This Prime Minister and his advisors clearly do not have a clue or a concern about what they are doing financially, and I would suggest, between them they do not have a compassionate bone in their bodies.
      IHT under the current and proposed new rules, will eventually kill off all privately owned business, future savings, and investment, because “What is the point” when the Government demand almost everything with this generational tax above what is now a very, very low level.

      Reply
      1. Berkshire Alan.
        December 18, 2025

        Just for clarification, a very low level means when it starts to come into force, not the rate, which at 40% is very high after years of fiscal drag..

        Reply
      2. Ian B
        December 18, 2025

        @Berkshire Alan – advisors, read the Resolution Foundation under Torsten Bell this was their thinking their religion. Its the old socialist mantra that ownership is ‘theft’ and the direction to be taken was everyone works for the State and gets pocket money for essentials. The expectation goes further that it gives those that steal power control over everyone including those that disagree.

        Reply
    2. Ian B
      December 18, 2025

      @Mick – the plan, but you weren’t supposed to notice until its to late. Although it is now unstoppable, the tyranny of a traitorous Parliament

      Reply
    3. Bloke
      December 18, 2025

      Sir Keir” is misleading and unworthy of the title.
      A knighthood represents the highest level of honour for significant, long-term contributions to society, recognizing individuals for inspirational achievements in any field.
      Starmer’s field is anti-farming. His errant ways damage the lives of farmers and the important role farmers perform in feeding the nation. He is more like a muck spreader force-growing these islands’ excessive population and dumping hardship on taxpayers who are unwilling and unable to pay for his incompetence.

      Reply
    4. Donna
      December 18, 2025

      Agreed. They want us totally dependent so we have no choice but to be absorbed by the EU.

      Reply
      1. Lynn Atkinson
        December 18, 2025

        The EU is now on an aspirator. Been on the Liverpool Pathway for a while. I’m ironing the shroud.

        Reply
  4. Mark B
    December 18, 2025

    Good morning.

    All going to plan.

    Reply
    1. Peter Wood
      December 18, 2025

      Yes, I agree. No more clear evidence of this socialist, dogma driven PM and government than Starmer’s dismissive answers to the committee challenges on possible farmer suicides; handing the EU £500 million – no problem, saving essential home farming – – no…

      Reply
  5. Lifelogic
    December 18, 2025

    If you invest say £10 million in the UK and do well getting a gross return of say 10% PA (perhaps circa 5% above inflation) the combined effect of all the many UK taxes plus IHT on death is likely your take 90% of your wealth off you over 21 years or so. Without tax it would grow to about £80 million with UK taxes you will be lucky to have the £10 million still intact (plus inflation will have reduced its value to less than half in reality).

    Investment in the UK or bringing money to the UK does not look very attractive! Nor very often does working in the UK.

    Reply
    1. Lifelogic
      December 18, 2025

      Working hard in the UK after tax, NI, rent or mort., council tax, living costs, commuting… often leaves you nothing at all left for savings or fun or even for children!

      Reply
    2. Ian B
      December 18, 2025

      @Lifelogic – common sense doesn’t aid the desire to become a basket case beholden to the unelected unaccountable technocrats that still wield the power while remaining isolated and unscathed of the outcome

      Reply
    3. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      You are absolutely mad! The return is 4%.

      Reply
  6. Sakara Gold
    December 18, 2025

    The war criminal Putin is desperately discombobulated by the support of NATO countries for Ukraine and their resolute rejection of territorial and other usual maximalist demands encapsulated in Wittkopf’s 28 point “Peace Plan” He spent yesterday making his usual angry, impotent threats.

    Putin is enraged by Ukraine’s refusal to capitulate and recent statements by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte:-

    “NATO’s increased defence spending commitments respond to long-standing US concerns about burden sharing. New members Sweden and Finland have already increased their defence spending to 5%. Putin has, strategically, already lost the war”

    Yesterday the US Senate overwhelmingly passed the bipartisan fiscal 2026 National Defence Authorization Act, which among other measures (including an $8bn increase in military spending) allocated $800m over two years for military support to Ukraine. It also authorizes the Baltic Security Initiative. which will provide $175 million to support Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia’s defence. Apparently, Trump has said he will sign it.

    Putin is KGB and a professional liar. The Russian summer offensive has failed, with horrific WW1 casualty levels. When the ground freezes, it will be Ukraine’s turn.

    Reply
    1. Mickey Taking
      December 18, 2025

      yep …tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands forced Russian troops ( a motley of reasons to be forced to fight) will find themselves abandoned to the fate of being picked off mercilessly by Ukrainain weapons.
      Essentially a Russian winter with little or no support.

      Reply
    2. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      You know Witkoff is a Russian Speaker?
      Your assumptions are so wide of the mark that I suggest you stick to selling EVs. Your claims are more accurate in that subject.

      Reply
    3. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      Hope you have seen the video of Johnson urging British people to sign up and go to fight Russia!
      I really needed the laugh. He signs off with a salute which would have had my RN Dad transfixed.
      Benny Hill incarnate but without the wit!

      Reply
      1. Mickey Taking
        December 18, 2025

        I can hear the S.Major shouting in Johnson’s ear ‘get your bleedin’ hair cut’.

        Reply
  7. Sakara Gold
    December 18, 2025

    Much guff in the right wing press this week, blaming the closure of the UK’s last ammonia production company (in Billingham) CF Fertilisers UK Ltd, on net zero.

    CF Fertilisers UK made the proposal to shut their ammonia plant due to a forecast in 2023 that producing ammonia at Billingham will not be cost-competitive for the long-term compared to importing cheaper American ammonia. Primarily due to projected high “natural” gas prices in the UK relative to other regions and the impact of carbon costs.

    Additionally, shutdowns in recent years of CF’s industrial customers’ UK operations – which had consumed significant ammonia volumes – have created a supply-demand imbalance for ammonia production at the Billingham Complex.

    The company believes that ample global availability of ammonia for import, including from CF Industries’ North American production network, will enable more cost-competitive and efficient production. Sales of ammonium nitrate fertilizer and nitric acid for its U.K. agriculture and chemicals customers will be supplied from it’s American plant moving forward.

    So just like Cadbury’s chocolate, they have closed the British factory to concentrate production in America. Nothing to do with net zero whatsoever. Just the high price of “natural” gas here

    Reply That is everything to do with NZ. See our carbon price and emissions trading, oil and gas taxes and new drilling bans compared to US exploitation of home gas.

    Reply
    1. Donna
      December 18, 2025

      The Net Zero Insanity is causing the high price of gas.

      Reply
      1. Lynn Atkinson
        December 18, 2025

        Gas is actually at a very low price, but the price charged to U.K. consumers is very very high indeed.

        Reply
      2. glen cullen
        December 18, 2025

        CORRECT

        Reply
  8. Donna
    December 18, 2025

    This level of economic damage can only be achieved in such a short time if it is deliberate.

    Two-Tier and the Blair/Brown Establishment are deliberately crashing the economy.

    Reply
  9. Sakara Gold
    December 18, 2025

    Without a doubt, the People’s Bank of China is the leading single entity that is driving up the gold price to record highs.

    In the third quarter of 2025, the PBoC’s gold purchases (reported and unreported) accounted for 118 tonnes, up 39% MoM and 55% YoY. Chinese monetary gold reserves stand at ~5,400 tonnes in Q3

    As other central banks aggressively load up on gold and help move the price to new all-time highs, global gold reserves are rising to the detriment of the dollar. Total central banks’ monetary gold reserves now account for 40,225 tonnes, 50% of which is owned by countries outside the West

    As the developed nations continue to print fiat to pay the interest on their humungous national debts, gold (and now silver) will continue to be bought by countries on the other side of the trade. The de-dollarisation of the world economy continues apace.

    Reeves & the BoE have failed to buy a single ounce of gold this year. Again.

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      So wrong.
      The EU, by stealing the Russian deposits has killed the Eurozone and undermined the whole Bretton Woods settlement.
      Go and deadhead your orchids.

      Reply
      1. Mickey Taking
        December 18, 2025

        never knew you could get them with heads that might need dead-heading!
        So I looked it up and understand it to be more like pruning than removing spent flowers.
        We learn something every day, or hope to.

        Reply
  10. Dave Andrews
    December 18, 2025

    Well done Labour voters, and in the 2024 election second place went to the party that left office with nothing working except the cross-channel taxi service.
    If they hadn’t voted Labour, would they have voted Lib-Dem instead, giving us a government that wanted to sell the country out even more to the EU?
    When will the people of the UK wake up and vote for men and women with a credible plan for good government and prosperity?

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      That was not an option. We had Hobson’s Choice.

      Reply
      1. Sir Joe Soap
        December 18, 2025

        Reform stood but had little support here or elsewhere

        Reply
  11. Colin
    December 18, 2025

    OT Doesn’t the Erasmus scheme remind you of Chagos? The UK hands over some of the best universities in the world to EU students and pays the EU for doing so!

    Reply
    1. glen cullen
      December 18, 2025

      You mean ”it wasn’t in their manifesto”

      Reply
  12. Narrow Shoulders
    December 18, 2025

    Labour government’s are like Ashes tours. Full of hope at the start followed by the rapid realisation that the approach is all wrong and the participants are not up to the job.

    Doomed ultimately to fail over a flawed philosophy which becomes more and more discredited by experience and events.

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      At least the6 always bring home the ashes – everything they touch, in fact, turns to Ashes!

      Reply
  13. Ian B
    December 18, 2025

    As we all know it has been parliaments and its governments policy for some time now that we should be an import only country, particularly imports from the EU who have been the main beneficiaries to these policies.

    The only regret that the UK Parliament has that it didn’t completely stop the move from the people for it to be democratic and take responsibility for what happens within the UK. The UK’s parliament still remains the EU’s parish council and nothing more, an order taker from what only they see as a higher authority.

    Reply
  14. IanT
    December 18, 2025

    I got up feeling cheerful this morning. I then read your comments Sir John and fully agreed with them. Howevrr, the prospect of another (nearly) four years of these people (and the accumulating damage they are doing) has quite taken the shine off my morning.

    Note to self. Go down the shed, forget about them, do something useful and look forward to seeing the Grandchildren next week.

    Reply
    1. Mickey Taking
      December 18, 2025

      brilliant…great for the mental health.

      Reply
  15. Stred
    December 18, 2025

    The move against hard working family farmers, forcing agricultural land sales to be used for solar and wind generation is in accwith the UN Agenda 30 and WEF policies. The aim is to remove property rights to the corporate ‘stakeholders’ which carry out this ‘Reset’. The present king gave lectures at the WEF supporting this. The PM has said that he prefers Woking with his friends at Davos.
    The Dutch PM, before he was moved to Nato, tried to close Dutch farms and build new cities, as UN Agenda, but was thwarted.
    The Renters Rights act has forced many small landlords to sell up and corporations are buying at a discount. This investment was not to be for the small investor. The same goes for small businesses such as pubs and restaurants.

    Reply
  16. Stred
    December 18, 2025

    accordance with
    working – not Woking.
    Phone changes after typing.

    Reply
  17. Ian B
    December 18, 2025

    From the media – “Britain’s £8bn bill to rejoin student exchange scheme. Starmer accused of paying ‘whatever the EU wants’ to be part of Erasmus ”

    And what will Parliament do to stop this wreaking of the Country? Nothing, they are so desperate to hand responsibility and the thought of democracy away they will also get on bended knee

    Reply
    1. Ian B
      December 18, 2025

      Lord Frost, the UK’s former Brexit negotiator, told The Telegraph: “The Government has done what it always does – make a concession up front and sort out the consequences later.
      “They pay an inflated amount to get back into Erasmus for one year, they won’t then want to leave again, so they will end up paying whatever the EU wants for the next seven years. The truth is, of course, they just want to be liked by the EU and don’t care what price they have to pay.”

      UK Fish , UK Farming, UK Defence, UK Industry, the means to earn and pay, all gone. A UK Parliament in all its glory

      Reply
      1. Lynn Atkinson
        December 18, 2025

        They will be paying with their own blood soon. We are all already bled white.

        Reply
  18. Harry MacMillion
    December 18, 2025

    All of which shows how right Thatcherite polices were/are and how destructive socialist policies are.

    OK, so we’ve known for a long time that ‘LABOUR ISN’T WORKING / HAS NEVER WORKED’ – and that’s just their normal day to day inept thinking, but link that with WEF demands and the impact of NET-0 and the crumbling economy becomes a disaster zone.
    That’s where we are, just on the precipice.

    This government has no intention of making anything better, despite their alleged concerns about economic growth. They have deliberately and willingly set us on a course of national suicide.

    Reply
  19. iain gill
    December 18, 2025

    the whole way the UK is setup is anti business, anti people who want to look after themselves.

    we have destroyed the UK IT sector by allowing massed import of (overseas workers? ed) to undercut the locals, driven the quality down, and so we can only sell services at commodity prices. the UK should have stayed with premium pricing and higher quality local workers. same is true of other sectors too. commodity pricing is a bad place to be when your power costs, tax costs, etc are the worst in the world.

    manufacturing has been decimated by the most expensive anti pollution rules on the planet, and the same driving the most expensive power. so we import from China & India instead, where they pollute more than we ever did, and pushed up net world pollution but destroyed jobs here.

    I have a current account with one of the big UK banks. My transfer limit is 20,000 a day. 20,000 a day may as well be toy town money when you are trying to juggle hundreds of thousands. Despite my pleas the bank is not interested in revising this. And yet I am supposed to stay here and pay the massive tax bill for the worst services in the developed world.

    And my family get robbed and threatened regularly. The country is overrun with people who hate us.

    The whole country is a joke.

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      One of my small tenants went to my bank with my invoice and tried to pay her rent in cash (she sells cards). They refused to take the payment.
      I went to collect the cash myself, I don’t know whether the bank will accept my attempt to deposit the money.
      How can we operate without banks? We will be forced to be our own bank and trade in cash exclusively.

      Reply
  20. Rod Evans
    December 18, 2025

    The Labour government attack on farming and farmers is nothing to do with raaising taxation. The money it will raise is less than the cost of travel for Labour MPs using their private jet privilege to watch Ladies football matches in foreign lands.
    The reason Labour hate the country communities which is where the farms are is because they hate those with independent means, those who are not yet completely dependent on state decision and funding.
    It is simply an example of class contempt which Labour remain wedded to despite it being so last century.
    The shires is also where the majority of Tories reside and vote so Labour see hitting the countryside as hitting the Tories.
    The truth is, the countryside is where abject poverty also lives, hidden from media attention spread thinly across vast areas where the media rarely visit. Those are the actual victims of Labour’s malicious policies.
    The ongoing Labour destruction of our economic wellbeing knows no limits. The Chancellor will not be satisfied until she is forced to call in the IMF claiming, it is all the Tories fault as she finds another fictitious financial black hole, or indeed decided creating her own is so much more fun….

    Reply
  21. a-tracy
    December 18, 2025

    John, I appreciate only the farmers are protesting. Representatives of small business organisations FSB, FPB, IoD, CoC, are doing an abysmal job at the moment (in fact, I’m thinking of ending my subscription because they’re getting paid for nothing). Have you seen any of them on tv news about the iht changes to all family businesses not just farms.

    They could have been fairer and said if the farm is passed on inside a family business structure no change to inheritance tax but inheritance tax is due if it passes outside the family as thats when they realise the £s value from the farm.

    Reply
  22. William Long
    December 18, 2025

    Another horror is business rates: the impression given at the election was of understanding the pressures they caused, with the prospect of mitigation, and now, the reality is precisely the opposite.

    Reply
    1. Lynn Atkinson
      December 18, 2025

      Actually Cameron delayed the revaluation (moons ago) so business in the poor north has been subsidising the southern High Streets with business rates paid completely out of kilter with the valuations.
      The only reason there is any attention being paid to business rates is because the South are getting an idea of how put upon the North is.

      Reply
  23. Keith from Leeds
    December 18, 2025

    The new IHT rules are unfair to Farmers, on whom we depend for food, unfair to businesspeople who want to pass on the family firm, and unfair to everyone in the UK who works hard and has modest success.
    IHT is a tax on our assets, which were already purchased with our after-tax income. So it is a tax on top of taxes.
    This Labour Government is doing what Labour always does, making the UK and the people poorer, putting up unemployment, squandering money right, left and centre, and damaging the productive part of the economy.
    Then spending money it does not have to increase welfare payments, instead of spending on our armed forces, where it is desperately needed. This Government is a shambles from top to bottom!

    Reply
  24. glen cullen
    December 18, 2025

    I’d welcome the scraping of the entire inheritence tax, its just wrong

    Reply
    1. iain gill
      December 18, 2025

      yes I was talking to an Australian friend, there is no inheritance tax in Australia…

      Reply
  25. Chris S
    December 18, 2025

    I have been unable to post a contribution today. Is there a problem ?

    Reply
  26. glen cullen
    December 18, 2025

    497 ‘unknows’ invaded the UK yesterday 17th Dec 2025

    Reply
  27. Ian B
    December 18, 2025

    Another day, another betrayal. Today is the day that Spian/EU get control Gibraltar’s border. Now if UK citizen flys into Gibraltar’s airport they have o go through the Spanish/EU border control to get into Gibraltar. So to move from one part of the UK to another you are under EU control and doing so with their permission

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Dave Andrews Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.