The UK needs to back digital investment

The main reason the US has been and is growing at twice the rate of the EU and the UK is its leadership in the digital revolution. The US has produced all the dominant western companies in software, mobile phones and pads, search, on line shopping, cloud storage, social media and complex chip production. The EU and UK just have to use these US services, and allow the US corporations to set up this side of the Atlantic to serve the customers.

Out of the EU the UK now has a bit less onerous regulatory regime than the EU for innovatory digital business, and has a growing cluster of smaller digital success stories which we need to build on. So I was dismayed to read recently that some in the UK government see the wish for large corporations to invest in many more large data centres in the UK as bad news. They apparently are arguing that these centres would require too much electricity and water which they do not want to supply so we should say No.

This is the ultimate madness. Far from saving the planet it just means we would need to link to overseas centres where the extra energy and water would still be used. If the government was serious about renewable power being able to answer all our problems they would get on and provide it by commissioning far more they have to date. If they were more realistic and worried about costs and reliability they will get on and put in some additional new efficient gas fired power stations alongside replacement nuclear for our soon to close stations and more wind and sun powered plant. Controlling migration properly would also help, reducing the number of extra people that will need power as well the extra business demand.

We are short of water which is also silly in a country with plenty of rainfall. New reservoirs are urgently needed for existing growing demand let alone for the new data centres. Just get on with it.

More data centre investment can drive more growth in energy and water supply. That is the way you grow a modern economy. Why stay limping along in the EU slow lane when we can join the new data super highway to prosperity?

27 Comments

  1. Mark B
    February 25, 2026

    Good morning.

    Why create anything when all that will happen is that the government will tax it all from you.

    I Dubai the level of Corporation Tax is 8% as opposed to our 19-25%. If you have transferable skills, why work here ?

    What is being created here is a welfare dependent society. A society that, will be further managed via your carbon credit score. The EU and the UK do not want a modern functioning society. They want control.

    Reply
    1. Peter
      February 25, 2026

      Many ‘smaller digital success stories’ get bought out by a larger American company.

      Otherwise, the creators move the business abroad anyway. This also applies to other types of business and has been a pattern over many years.

      At least other European countries are more protective of their industries and don’t allow foreign buyouts. We prefer Selling England by The Pound.

      Reply
    2. Ashley
      February 25, 2026

      Seems so but the welfare society is a doom loop that cannot survive, as ever more rich and hard working leave, the tax take declines and ever more claimants arrive often people working in the black market and in crime while claiming benefits too and that often criminal too!

      Reply
    3. Lifelogic
      February 25, 2026

      7% of energy bills announces the energy regulator or just move to the USA and get 70% of them! Far more and better paid jobs there too and rather lower taxes..

      Lots of ‘The government is opening lots of community NHS diagnostic centres” adverts is there some election coming? Is it legal to use tax payers money for such slightly disguised political adverts?

      But London especially the transport system is littered with adverts for “The Mayor of London…” all done at public expense or transport users expense.

      Not the actions of decent, nice and intelligent leaders! How are the action against the rape gang and those who turned a blind eye to it going?

      Reply
  2. Wanderer
    February 25, 2026

    Why? We have lousy politicians nowadays. Corruption (financial, moral, intellectual) amongst our elites and the complicit blob is endemic. The system will not produce better outcomes for ordinary people.

    On our side of the Atlantic, the environmemtalist dogmas are entrenched so deindustrialisation is accelerating. In the US, corporatism has a stranglehold. They may lead in AI, but it doesn’t help most people. Like us, their growth rate of real medium income has dropped sharply over the past 25 years (it’s about a quarter of what it was).

    Their system isn’t serving the needs of the majority well, and nor is our system. Tweaking AI rules here won’t change things for us. The malaise is so much deeper.

    Reply
  3. Ian Wragg
    February 25, 2026

    I’m not sure Data Centres are a good idea. Apart from the power and water they need, it’s likely they could soin be obsolete. As things progress they tend to miniaturies making large factory scale buildings unnecessary.
    If they are built they would probably have their own SMEs for power, supplied from overseas because our government won’t give the go ahead for our own SMRs. Once again destroying manufacturing at the altar of Net Stupid.
    We now appear to be giving Gibraltar to the Spanish as 2TK seeks to divert us if any overseas territories before being evicted from Westminster. Please, please let us be rid of these scoundrels.

    Reply We would not be communicating on this website without data centres.

    Reply
    1. iain gill
      February 25, 2026

      space needed for a given compute and storage capacity in data centres is shrinking massively over time. but the demand is also going up. as is the requirement for resilience which requires duplication. as is the demand for low latency which requires capacity closer to the end users. as is the demand for security and regulatory compliance, which often means trusted geography and jurisdictions.

      Reply
  4. dixie
    February 25, 2026

    So how do your reverse the flight of capital from the city and encourage the institutional investors to do as you request?
    What practical steps are there?
    There are some routes for the individual to directly support innovation such as VCT/EIS but it’s really the large players that will make the difference.

    Reply
  5. Sakara Gold
    February 25, 2026

    It’s clearly in Britain’s interests to support the digital AI revolution; the datacentres are a necessary evil but must be built here

    The datacentres in particular will require vast amounts of juice; in America, where they have the same issues, Trump has refused authorisation for onshore solar/wind datacentre projects – he has demanded new coal and CCGT plant, alleging without evidence that they are more reliable, if much more expensive

    The problem of datacentre cooling would seem to be impossible to solve; datacentres need vast amounts of clean cooling water. Unfortunately, there are almost no sources of clean river water here, everything is contaminated with sewage and the costs of cleaning it up mean that datacentre operators will build their plant in France or elsewhere in the EU. Or, if Musk has his way, they will be located in low-earth orbit.

    We already have the dearest electricity in Europe thanks to our reliance on LNG gas-fired CCGT plant – building more will just make the situation worse. The recent successful AR7 renewables auction included a number of cheap onshore solar and wind projects, which will include battery storage facilities. The datacentres could be built close to these.

    Reply
  6. Peter Parsons
    February 25, 2026

    Have you not heard of companies like ARM and ASML?

    Reply Yes, Have you not seen the relative size of 7 UIS giants compared to the UK/EU companies?

    Reply
  7. iain gill
    February 25, 2026

    ah my specialist subject…

    intellectual property protection is far stronger in the USA, this is a massive problem here

    UK innovation does succeed but the founders always sell before it gets massive here, we should look at why

    use of cheap imported tax subsidised ( foreign Ed) workers, encouraged by state treaties and social engineering, is far bigger proportion of the IT workforce in UK and Europe. this limits quality, innovation, and IP protection.

    UK is still building new buildings with copper telco connections, everything should be optical fibre by default now.

    many of our telco exchanges are full, and there is no place to expand them physically.

    data protection regime and the whole ICO organisation are incompetent here.

    FCA regime and organisation are incompetent here.

    UK business is infested with class based prejudice, in the US it is a million times more meritocratic.

    nobody will study computer science here because they can see all the jobs are being given to Indian imports.

    so its not all power and water…

    Reply Where are they putting in copper? Where I live we have fibre optic from BT’s competitors.

    Reply
    1. iain gill
      February 25, 2026

      plenty of new builds, both residential and commercial, being installed with copper cables in the ground to them and no optical fibre, I walk past them every day.

      which considering most of the cost of laying optical fibre is in digging up the ground a sensible approach would be every single time new cable is laid they should be putting optical fibre in.

      we still have over capacity of optical fibre back haul between telco exchanges, which is accidental as its still a result of over investment during the dot com bubble. but between exchanges and end users we still rely on copper way too much. and many of the exchanges are physically full, limiting room for options.

      in many places we have the BT half way house of optical fibre from exchange out to one box per neighbourhood, where it converts to copper for the last mile to end users. this is poor because those boxes look rubbish, take space, and are vulnerable to getting damaged in road accident or vandalism etc. this is a pretty crap solution which should never have been allowed.

      many places in the country where optical fibre is officially available to end users, if another 10% of people started taking them up on that offer they simply dont have the space in the exchanges or under the ground currently. so its only a valid option if small numbers take them up. and then in many cases they would have to dig the ground up and lay new cable anyways. I know my house officially has optical fibre available, but I also know they would have to dig the ground up for a few streets to actually deliver it, including my very expensively laid driveway.

      etc

      Reply
  8. Jim
    February 25, 2026

    Not so sure about data centres, are they really the money makers. Data centres are usually dumped in places where land, energy and water are cheap. It costs next to nothing to carry the money making data in and out. So lay a load of concrete, install rows of servers, hire a few technicians and turn out the lights. I am not at all sure the dim wits who run government can make a net profit out of this.

    While at it, the noble Lords might consider why data centres need so much water. The small numbers of technicians don’t wash their hands and use the loo that much. No, what happens is that water is a cheap way to dump heat from all that electricity poured into the data centre. Costed as industrial water use such a use is perfectly legal.

    The real reason the USA is ahead of the UK and Europe is finance post WW2. Ably assisted by Parliaments here and in France and Germany. You might ask why they didn’t ride the computer and semiconductor booms. The real reason is size and serious money, we don’t have either. Way back a great Parliamentary committee decided that three computers would satisfy the UK’s needs so not much investment needed. Never made a right decision since.

    Data centres are the start of the 4th wave of technology change, the parking of the wasteful energy consuming component of high tech on former industrial nations.

    Reply
  9. Ian B
    February 25, 2026

    Good morning Lord Redwood

    “The UK needs to back digital investment”, I read that differently probably, hopefully to how you intended it to be read. The inference being is that Government should get involved and interfere. The opposite is what is needed, no Government involvement. The right track for Government is to ensure a path is cleared and framework in place to permit the best of the best to reach it potential.

    Government, Parliament even half believing only they have the knowledge and the wherewithal to ‘achieve’ is proven time and time again to be false, creating a false hope in very lame minds.

    Half the problems the UK suffers wouldn’t be there if Parliament and Government hadn’t tried to put their own personal spin and direction on things to achieve a ‘look-at-me’ moment.

    Reply
    1. iain gill
      February 25, 2026

      correct layers and layers of state manipulation, often pulling in different directions, costs a lot, is counter productive, and makes the country inefficient. the state should concentrate on protecting the borders, defence, and a minimal safety net for those in need. you could more than half the size of the state and only good would happen.

      Reply
  10. Ian B
    February 25, 2026

    Take Parliaments desire for NetZero, its evolved into a personal ‘ego trip’. The infinite ‘free’ energy. Homes that are warm & cosy with no energy requirement. Transport free of petro-carbons. Parliament thought that only they could achieve though diktats, laws and banning. How dim-witted are they? You cant flick a switch and say we have decreed so it is done. That’s just personal ego and self esteem drunk on power.

    The NetZero dream needs vast amount of money as yet an undreamed of amount of money. Parliament has demonstrated it has no concept of where money comes from how it is earned. To achieve this personal NetZero dream the first action was the knee-jerk dimwitted ‘I am the power, the lord’ action of cancelling all the UK’s known means to finance tomorrow. They killed their offspring, got deluded by power, for what? A cost burden increasing by the day, and the constant funding of other Nations for their own tomorrow. Every action by Parliament and its Government was to import, therefore post the UK’s main resource ‘money’ to foreign climes for it never to return. Parliament and its Government at every-turn because they know best precluded the opportunity for Great British ingenuity and ward work to participate.

    Parliament, Government needs to get off its personal ego trip come back down to earth and recognise they are not the ‘doers’, they are the drain on society

    Reply
  11. Peter Gardner
    February 25, 2026

    “This is the ultimate madness.”
    No, it’s communism, levelling everyone down to loin cloths, clubs and spears – except for the Party leaders and officials who will have luxury apartments in exclusive immigrant free enclosed suburbs, private jets, designer suits and glasses courtesy of their financial friends, armoured luxury cars and body guards.

    Reply
    1. Ian B
      February 25, 2026

      @Peter Gardner +1 the Politburo, how did we get to this?

      Reply
  12. Peter Gardner
    February 25, 2026

    What we really need is a way for voters to get rid of Starmer’s Gang without waiting for the Gang to deign to submit to voters in 2029 or, if they can manage to delay a general election as I am sure they are planning, some time later.

    Reply
  13. Harry MacMillion
    February 25, 2026

    We are short of water which is also silly in a country with plenty of rainfall.

    That’s disinformation of the worst kind from HMG and water companies.
    We suffer from mismanagement of our water industry just as we suffer the same with our road network and our energy supply.
    Incompetence is just too vague a description – HMG has been in violation of the basic requirement to keep us safe as regards food, energy, water and streets free of violence – and they have failed miserably!

    Water companies are very keen, as are HMG to impose water meters – they provide a sweet fairy tale about why, but they deliberately do not mention that water meters are a requirement of net-0 – a part of the control mechanism. HMG and water companies want smart meters, in addition to net-0 requirements to use less resources, so that they can cut off our supply at a whim, to educate us against over-use, or when we’ve been politically incorrect.

    All of this expensive nonsense should be halted and HMG/Utilities made to do their day job.

    Reply
  14. Ian B
    February 25, 2026

    These USA Companies mentioned rely on UK ingenuity and education. The main block of those now running AI which is correctly called Large Language Models, is Google & Microsoft their AI was spawned from consuming the UK Company ‘Deep Mind’, who’s founders are now the CEO’s and those that run these 2 large dominant AI outfits. And running them out of London. The London connection is becoming a problem as each day passes as the UK Parliament, its Government and its MPs are fighting the very exitance and future of innovation and enterprise in the UK

    The UK Parliament even with a wealth of evidence to the contrary haven’t yet understood, they cant do things, real things, that need a hands on approach. They can’t even manage themselves, they are too busy fighting the people and democracy. The NHS their big dream 75years on is stall an abject failure.

    Parliament needs to back of the EU rules based mindset, reinvent Britishness of exposing everyone to the opportunity to be and achieve the best they can. But that wont mean a thing to the UK Parliament its members are to busy fighting political egotistical battles that have nothing to do with anything other than their personal ego. Its the Surfs, the People that are taking the brunt of their ineptitude

    Reply
  15. Lynn Atkinson
    February 25, 2026

    We are way behind the curve.

    The biggest problem is that the latest genetically British genius did NOT come home to Britain but went to our successor nation, the USA for all the reasons that you cite. This is the first time Britain has not benefitted directly from the genius of our own people.

    He launches Starships the size of tower blocks and will build the new data centres in space powered by the sun. That will make earthbound data centres obsolete on cost ground.
    We can’t catch up. We have to hitch our wagon to Musk’s Starship.

    The second point is that we don’t need more houses or reservoirs, we need REMIGRATION.

    The MOD must be held responsible for the crimes committed by the 19,000 Afghans they have brought to the U.K. I do not believe for one second that 19,000 Afghans ‘helped’ British troops in Afghanistan. The ‘data leak’ of their names was also very fortuitous for those engineering the annihilation of the British nation.

    It is OBVIOUS that British troops must NEVER be deployed abroad again. It has cost more British lives (ruined, traumatised as well as k1lled) than Afghani lives.

    Anyway the MUST ALL GO BACK.

    Reply
  16. Rod Evans
    February 25, 2026

    There is a discussion to be had before we get to this more AI is a good thing and we must engage with it.
    The discussion we should be having is what is the function of this ever increasing AI/data availability? What is to be used for that will bring advantage to people living their lives and bringing up their families?
    Some might suggest AI will bring forth improvement in decision making. If that happens fine but ultimately better decision making is only an advantage if the decision is going to be beneficial.
    I would argue we know enough about what is wrong and what is bad to be making decisions today to improve peoples lives. Sadly we do not enact the decisions needed to bring forth improvement. Just as we need more reservoirs for obvious reasons during warm spells, they do not get built because some activist group protecting the lesser spotted fritillary, or their fellow activists in the great crested newt protection society decide no place for reservoirs around here or indeed anywhere as far as they are concerned.
    That brings me back to the question. What is the benefit of AI if we don’t intend to implement its findings?
    Why bother? Should we be sorting out other more pressing social issues first?

    Reply
  17. Ian B
    February 25, 2026

    Today we read a privately run freight yard has shut down. Some will blame just Reeves, but the bigger picture it is Parliament, its their Government they chose it, no one else, they hold her and the team she works with to account.

    Business rates were increased in a Parliament approved budget from £22m to £65m. So the company walked away. Now the Taxpayer is finding £15m to keep the yard in a holding pattern.

    Stupidity, deliberate, privatisation by the back door?

    As with elsewhere no money for the Country or the State is gained, money lost and the means to recover loss is actually lost as well. The UK Parliament knows they cant run things that achieve and they have yet to learn that repeating the same mistakes produces the same results

    Reply
  18. Ian B
    February 25, 2026

    An election, the party set to displace Labour

    “Illegal migrants would be granted an amnesty under plans drawn up by the Green Party.
    Internal documents seen by the Daily Mail state that “immigration is not a criminal offence under any circumstances”.
    “Migrants would be allowed to stay in Britain even if they had made failed asylum claims and immigration “detention would be abolished if Zack Polanksi’s party wins the next election.”

    Reply
  19. glen cullen
    February 25, 2026

    Digital investment must be led by industry and the markets …..and not the taxpayer nor government (EVs etc)

    Reply Of course. I am talking about govt needing to grant the permits and organise enough power, not paying for a data centre!

    Reply
  20. Atlas
    February 25, 2026

    To be brief:
    Folk should not be worried by the present excitement over AI. Similar claims were made over 40 years ago. Time has shown that we can develop a “super-fast Parrot”, but not one that really can think for itself. The present AI systems can mine open source data on the web, but they do not understand the meaning of the data. The “super-fast Parrot” was called an IKBS (Intelligent Knowledge Based System) back in the 80s – all it can do is regurgitate what it has been taught, little else.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Peter Gardner Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.